<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Public Administration</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Public Administration</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия:  Государственное и муниципальное управление</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2312-8313</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2411-1228</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">6575</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">THE IDEA OF THE “STATE” IN CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THEORY</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ИДЕЯ «ГОСУДАРСТВА» В СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ТЕОРИИ ПУБЛИЧНОГО АДМИНИСТРИРОВАНИЯ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Schultz</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шультц</surname><given-names>Дэвид</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Department of Political Science</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Кафедра политических наук</bio><email>dschultz@hamline.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Hamline University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Хэмлин</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO1 (2014)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№1 (2014)</issue-title><fpage>90</fpage><lpage>101</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-07"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2014, Шультц Д.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шультц Д.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/public-administration/article/view/6575">https://journals.rudn.ru/public-administration/article/view/6575</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">Traditional theories of the “state” in public administration theory focus on the governmental apparatus. However, over the last 40 years several forces, such as the rise of neo-liberalism, the dismantling of communist regimes, and the global economic crisis of 2008 have forced a redefinition of the state and challenge contemporary public administration theory. This paper does two things. First, it describes and examines how the rise of neo-liberalism and the fall of communism have produced a crisis in public administration theory through a redefinition of the boundaries between traditional governmental and non-governmental activities. Second, the paper will examine what impact globalization and the economic crisis of 2008 has had on public administration theory and practice. The conclusion will be that contemporary public administration theory is in need of a new theory of the state to reflect the changing political economic order that emerged after the economic crisis of 2008.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">Традиционные теории «государства» в теории государственного управления сосредотачиваются в большей степени на правительственном аппарате. Тем не менее в течение последних 40 лет несколько тенденций, таких как подъем неолиберализма, упразднение коммунистических режимов и глобальный экономический кризис 2008 года, заставили переосмыслить идею государства и бросить вызов современной теории государственного управления. В статье автор описывает и исследует, как подъем неолиберализма и падение коммунизма создали кризис в теории государственного управления через переосмысление границ между традиционными правительственными и неправительственными организациями. Кроме того, в статье проведена оценка степени влияния глобализации и экономического кризиса 2008 на теорию и практику государственного управления. Автор приходит к выводу, что современная теория государственного управления нуждается в новой теории государства, которая способна отразить изменения политическо-экономического порядка, возникшие после экономического кризиса 2008 года.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Neo-liberalism</kwd><kwd>state</kwd><kwd>globalization</kwd><kwd>communism</kwd><kwd>post-communist</kwd><kwd>global financial crisis</kwd><kwd>politics</kwd><kwd>economics</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>неолиберализм</kwd><kwd>государство</kwd><kwd>глобализация</kwd><kwd>коммунизм</kwd><kwd>посткоммунистический</kwd><kwd>мировой финансовый кризис</kwd><kwd>политика</kwd><kwd>экономика</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Åslund Anders. How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy. - Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Åslund Anders. How Capitalism was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. - NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bell Daniel. The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, with "The Resumption of History in the New Century". - Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Braudel Fernand. Civilization and Capitalism, 3 vols. - NY: Harper &amp; Row, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Cassidy John. How Markets Fail: The Logic of Economic Calamities. - NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman Thomas. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. - NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. - Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Fukuyama Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. - NY: The Free Press, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Harrison Bennett, Barry Bluestone. The Great U-Turn: Corporate Re-structuring and the Polarizing of America. - New York: Basic Books, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Keynes John Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. - NY: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Liebert Saltanat, Stephen E. Condrey, Dmitry Goncharow. Public Administration in Post-Communist Countries: Former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, and Mongolia. New York: CRC Press 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Lindblom Charles. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. - NY: Basic Books, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>O’Connor James. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. - NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Okun Arthur M. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. - Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Plant Raymond. The Neo-Liberal State. - New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Polanyi Karl. The Great Transformation. - Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Schultz David. “The Crisis of Public Administration Theory in a Post-global World”. In Don Menzel and Harvey White, eds. The State of Public Administration: Issues, Challenges, Opportunities. - Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Schultz David, Robert Maranto. The Politics of Civil Service Reform. - NY: Peter Lang Publishing, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Smith Adam. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. - NY: P.F. Collier and Son Corporation, 1937.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Spufford Peter. Power and Profit: The Merchant in Medieval Europe. - Hong Kong: Thames &amp; Hudson, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Steger Manfred. Globalism: The New Market Ideology. - Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Stiglitz Joseph E. Globalization and its Discontents. - New York: W.W. Norton, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Wallerstein Immanuel. The Capitalist World-Economy. - NY: Cambridge University Press, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Weber Max. “Bureaucracy” in Gerth, H.H. and C. Wright Mills, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. - NY: Oxford University Press, 1979. - P. 196-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Yergin Daniel, Daniel Stanislaw. The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy. - NY: The Free Press, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
