RUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsRUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика2313-16832313-1705Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)7922ArticlesСтатьиResearch ArticleSex and Cognitive Style: Research Artefact or Regularity?Пол и когнитивный стиль: артефакт исследования или закономерность?BelovolE VБеловолЕлена ВладимировнаThe Department of Social and Differential PsychologyКафедра социальной и дифференциальной психологииbelovol@mail.ruPeople’s Friendship University of RussiaРоссийский университет дружбы народов15052011S5NOS5 (2011)№S5 (2011)192808092016Copyright ©; 2016, Psychology and PedagogicsCopyright ©; 2016, Психология и педагогика2016Psychology and PedagogicsПсихология и педагогикаhttps://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/7922The analysis of the results of sex differences in cognitive styles study for the past 60 years is presented in the article. The absence of the unified accepted point of view on the problem is revealed. The assumption that such inconsistent and conflicting results are partly due to the inadequate statistical methods used for these hypotheses verification is substantiated.В статье анализируются результаты исследований, проведенных за последние 60 лет в рамках изучения особенностей проявления когнитивных стилей у мужчин и женщин. Показано, что до настоящего времени не существует единого взгляда на проблему. Обосновывается предположение, что одной из причин неустойчивых и зачастую противоречивых результатов может являться применение неадекватных математических методов, используемых для доказательства соответствующих гипотез.cognitive stylefield dependence — field independenceverification of hypothesisstatistical testsparametric and distribution — free criteriarange of criterion applicationкогнитивный стильполезависимость/поленезависимостьпроверка гипотезстатистические критериипараметрические и непараметрические критерииобласть применения критерия1.Беловол Е.В. Когнитивные стили: взгляд сквозь призму анализа данных // Состояниеи проблемы измерений: материалы IX Всероссийской научно-технической конференции. — М., 2004. — С. 126—127.2.Гланц С. Медико-биологическая статистика. — М.: Практика, 1998.3.Крылов В.Ю. Методологическиеи теоретические проблемы математической психологии. — М.: Янус-К, 2000.4.Либин А.В. Дифференциальная психология. — М.: Смысл, 1999.5.Ломов Б.Ф. Методологическиеи теоретические проблемы психологии. — М.: Наука, 1984.6.Холодная М.А. Когнитивные стили. О природе индивидуального ума. — СПб.: Питер, 2004.7.Шкуратова И.П. Когнитивный стильи общение. — Ростов-н/Д.: Изд-во РПУ, 1994.8.Balistreri E., Busch-Rossnagel N.A. Field independence asa function of sex, sex-roles, and the sex-role appropriateness of the task // Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1989. — V. 68. — P. 115—121.9.Bar-Haim G., Wilkes J. A cognitive interpretation of the marginality and underrepresentation of women in science // J. of Higher education. — 1989. — V. 60(4). — P. 371—387.10.Boersma F.J., Muir W., Wolton K., Barham. Eye movements during embedded figure tasks // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1969. — V. 28. — P. 271—274.11.Blerkom Van M.I. Haptic lateralization, field dependence, and sex // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1987. — V. 64. — P. 907—914.12.Busch J.C., Watson J.A., Brinkley V., Howard N., Nelson C. Preschool Embedded Figures Test performance of young children: Age and gender differences // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1993. — V. 77. — P. 491—496.13.Bush D.F., Coward R.T. Sex differences in the solution of achromatic and chromatic embedded figures // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1974. — V. 39. — P. 1121—1122.14.Chynn E.W., Garrod A., Demick J., DeVos E. Correlations among field dependence-independence, sex, sex-role stereotype, and age of preschoolers // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1991. — V. 73. — P. 747—756.15.Elliott R. Interrelationships among measures of field dependence, ability, and personality traits //Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. — 1961. — V. 63. — P. 27—36.16.Engelbrecht P., Natzel S.G. Cultural variations in cognitive style—field dependence vs field independence. — 1997.17.Ennis C.D., Lazarus J.C. Cognitive style and gender differences in children’s motor task performance // Early Child Development and Care. — 1990. — V. 64. — P. 33—46.18.Forns-Santacana M., Amador-Campos J.A., Roig-López F. Differences in field dependence-independence cognitive style asa function of socioeconomic status, sex, and cognitive competence // Psychology in the Schools, 1993. — V. 30. — P. 176—186.19.Halpern D.F. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. — Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.20.Hardy R.C., Eliot J., Burlingame K. Stability over age and sex of children’s responses to embedded figures test // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1987. — V. 64. — P. 399—406.21.Holzman P.S., Gardner R.W. Leveling-sharpening and memory organization // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. — 1960. — V. 61. — P. 176—180.22.Hou G., Zhang Z., Wu X., Sen L. 1997 Gender differences in field-dependent and field independent cognitive style // Psycological Science (China), 1997. — V. 20. — P. 367—368.23.Hyde J.S., Geiringer E.R., Yen W.M. On the empirical relationship between spatial ability and sex differences in other aspects of cognitive style // Multivariate Behavioral Research. — 1975. — V. 10(3). — P. 289—309.24.Jackson D.N., Messick S., Myers C.T. Evaluation of Group and Individual Forms of Embedded-Figures Measures of Field-Independence //Educational and psychological measurement. — 1964. — V. 24. — P. 177—192.25.Kagan J. Reflection — impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. — 1966. — V. 71. — P. 123—129.26.Kagan J., Rosman B.L., Day D., Albert J., Phillips W. Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes // Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. — 1964. — V. 78 (1, Whole No. 578).27.Kloner A., Britain S. The relation between sex-role adoption and field independence in preschool children // Journal of Genetic Psychology. — 1984. — V. 145. — P. 109—116.28.Kogan N. Cognitive styles in infancy and early childhood. — Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.29.Kühnen U., Hannover B., Roeder U., Ali Shah Ashiq, Schubert B., Upmeyer A., Zakaria S. Cross-Cultural Variations in Identifying Embedded Figures: Comparisons from the United States, Germany, Russia, and Malaysia // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. — 2001. — V. 32. — P. 324—366.30.Kühnen U., Hannover B., Schubert B. The semantic-procedurial interface model of the self: the role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking // Journal of personality and social psychology. — 2001. — V. 80 (3). — P. 397—409.31.McGillian R.P., Barclay A.G. Sex differences and spatial ability factors in Witkin’s differentiation construct // Journal of Clinical Psychology. — 1974. — V. 30(4). — P. 528—532.32.Messick S. The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice // Educational Psychologist. — 1984. — V. 19(2). — P. 59—74.33.Peplin C.M., Larsen J.D. Field dependence: Experimenters’ expectancy, sex difference or no difference? // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1989. — V. 68. — P. 355—358.34.Perney V.H. Effects of race and sex on field dependence independence in children // Perceptual and Motor Skills. — 1978. — V. 42. — P. 974—980.35.Riding R. Cognitive styles and learning strategies. — London: David Fulton, 1998.36.Sherman J.A. Problems of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning // Psychological Review. — 1967. — V. 74. — P. 290—299.37.Thompson B., Melancon J.G. Measurement Characteristics of the Finding Embedded Figures Test: A Comparison Across Three Samples and Two Response Formats // Educational and Psychological Measurement. — 1990. — V. 50. — P. 333—343.38.Thompson B., Melancon J.G. Measurement Characteristics of the Group Embedded Figures Test // Educational and Psychological Measurement. — 1987. — V. 47. — P. 765—772.39.Voyer D., Voyer S., Bryden M.P. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables // Psychological Bulletin. — 1995. — V. 117. — P. 250—270.40.Wapner S. Commentary: Process and context in the conception of cognitive style // S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development (pp.). — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976. — P. 73—78.41.Witkin H.A., Dyk R.B., Faterson H.F., Goodenough D.R., Karp S.A. Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum, 1974.42.Witkin H.A., Faterson H.F., Goodenough D.R., Birnbaum J. Cognitive patterning in mildly retarded boys // Child Development. — 1966. — V. 37. — P. 301—316.43.Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R. Cognitive control: Essence and origins field dependence and field independence // Psychological Issues, Monograph 51 (Serial No. 51), 1981.44.Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R., Karp S.A. Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. — 1967. — V. 7(3). — P. 219—300.45.Witkin H.A. Cognitive styles in academic performance in teacher-student relations // In S. Messick (Eds.), Individuality in learning San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1976. — P. 38—72.46.Witkin H.A. Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press, 1978.47.Witkin H.A. Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures // Journal of Personality. — 1950. — V. 19. — P. 1—15.48.Witkin H.A. Some implications of research on cognitive style for problems of education // Archivio Di Psicologia Neurologia E Psichiatria. — 1965. — V. 26. — P. 27—54.49.Witkin H.A. Personality through perception. — N. Y.: Harper Brothers Publisherss, 1954. — P. 561.50.Witkin H.A., Asch S.E. Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields // J. of Exper. Psychology, 1948. — V. 38. — P. 762—782.51.Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R. Field dependence and interpersonal behavior // Psychological Bulletin. — 1977. — V. 84. — P. 661—687.