<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="brief-report" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">49481</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2025-22-3-614-628</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">WFEUXH</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONS OF GLOBAL SCIENCE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МИРОВАЯ НАУКА В ЛИЦАХ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Short Communication</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Back to Nature with Moscovici</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Назад к природе с Сержем Московиси</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-9541</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">6506419736</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Jesuino</surname><given-names>Jorge Correia</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жезуину</surname><given-names>Жоржи Коррейя</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Sociology, Full Professor of Social and Organizational Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор социологии, профессор, почетный профессор социальной и организационной психологии</p></bio><email>Jorge.correia.jesuino@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университетский институт Лиссабона (ISCTE-IUL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-03" publication-format="electronic"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>614</fpage><lpage>628</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-04-03"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Jesuino J.C.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Жезуину Ж.К.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Jesuino J.C.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Жезуину Ж.К.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/49481">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/49481</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The author attempts to present Serge Moscovici’s original new look into the sexgender thêmata within the context of what he called the “natural question”. As Moscovici argued, a return to nature was imperative, but hardly achievable given the lifestyles of our hubris societies. In commemoration of the centenary of his birth (1925-2014), this article aims to highlight Serge Moscovici’s contribution to elucidating what he meant by the “natural question”, i.e., the complex relations between human societies and nature, not as opposites but as historically interconnected phenomena. Serge Moscovici was one of the first authors to draw our attention to the priority of preserving nature through degrowth turn as an imperative for our own survival. According to this long-term visionary perspective, we, humans, must completely abandon our predatory lifestyles and also implement profound changes in unequal social relations, in which the “second sex” could come to assume a decisive historical role. Although the concept of ecofeminism was not invented by him, it was Moscovici who first introduced the idea of relating the condition of women under domination to the natural question, not as a meritocratic version of the war of the sexes, but rather as a radical change in the role of the family as the fundamental traditional structure of society. Serge Moscovici’s original interpretation of Sophocles’ classic Antigone is an illustration of this movement, already noticeable in our time.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Автором предпринята попытка показать оригинальный новый взгляд, предложенный Сержем Московиси по теме пола и гендера, в контексте того, что он назвал «естественным вопросом». Как утверждал Московиси, «возвращение к природе» крайне необходимо, но трудно достижимо, учитывая образ жизни наших «высокомерных» сообществ. В ознаменовании столетней годовщины со дня рождения Сержа Московиси (1925-2014) статья призвана подчеркнуть его вклад в прояснение того, что он подразумевал под «естественным вопросом», а именно - сложных взаимоотношений между человеческим обществом и природой, не как противоположностями, а как исторически взаимосвязанными явлениями. Серж Московиси был одним из первых ученых, обративших внимание на приоритет сохранения природы посредством «антироста» как необходимого условия для выживания человечества. Для этого требуется полный отказ от хищнического образа жизни, а также глубокие изменения в неравноправных социальных отношениях, в осуществлении которых женщины («второй пол») могут сыграть решающую историческую роль. Хотя не Московиси создал концепцию экофеминизма, именно он первым выдвинул идею рассмотреть положение женщин, находящихся под господством мужчин, в контексте «естественного вопроса»: не как меритократическую версию войны полов, а как необходимость радикального изменения роли семьи как основополагающей традиционной структуры общества. Предложенная Сержем Московиси оригинальная интерпретация классической трагедии Софокла «Антигона» является иллюстрацией подобного движения, уже набирающего силу в наше время.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>S. Moscovici</kwd><kwd>nature</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>society</kwd><kwd>ecology</kwd><kwd>feminism</kwd><kwd>Antigone</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>С. Московиси</kwd><kwd>природа</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>общество</kwd><kwd>экология</kwd><kwd>феминизм</kwd><kwd>Антигона</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta><fn-group/></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Adams, C.J. (Ed.). (1993). Ecofeminism and the sacred. New York: Continuum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Aristoteles. (1998). Retórica (Tradução de Manuel Teixeira Junior). Lisboa: INCM. (Original work published ca. 350 BCE).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Augagneur, F. (2023). Serge Moscovici et la nature du mouvement écologiste, une épistémologie psycho-politique. Doctorale Thèse. Philosophie. Français: Université Gustave Eiffel.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Bachelard, G. (1942). L’eau et les rêves: Essai sur l’imagination de la matière. Paris: Librairie Joaé Corti.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bachelard, G. (1943). l’air et les songes: Essai sur l’imagination de la matière. Paris: Librairie José Corti.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bachelard, G. (1948). La terre et le rêveries du repos. Paris: Librairie José Corti.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Barca, S. (2024). Workers of the Earth: Labour, ecology and reproduction in the age of climate change. London: Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13027289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Beauvoir, S. (2015). O segundo sexo: vol. 2. A experiencia vivida. Tradução de Sérgio Milliet. Lisboa: Quetzal  Editores. (Original work published in 1949).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>d’Eaubonne, F. (1974). Le féminisme ou la mort. Paris: P. Horay.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Hadot, P. (2004). Le voile d’Isis. Essais sur l’histoire de l’idée de nature. Paris: Editions Gallimard.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Hegel, G.W.F.  (1951). La Phenoménologie de l’Esprit. Tome II. Traduction de Jean Hyppolite. Paris: Aubier. (Original work published in 1806).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Heidegger, M. (1958). Introduction a la métaphysique. Traduction de Gilbert Kahn.  Paris: PUF.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Kojève, A. (1947). Introduction à la Lecture de Hegel: Leçons sur la phénoménologie de l’esprit,  professées de 1933 à 1939. Paris: Gallimard.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949). Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1994). Les androgynes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper &amp; Row.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). La Nature: Notes Cours du Collège de France. Paris: Editions du Seuil</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1968). Essai sur l’histoire humaine de la nature. Paris: Flammarion.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1969). Le marxisme et la question naturelle. L’Homme et la Société, 13, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1969.1229</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1972). La société contre nature. Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1974a). Hommes domestiques et hommes sauvages. Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1974b). Nos sociétés biuniques. Communications, 22(1), 135–150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1976). Society against Nature: The emergence of human societies. Hassocks: Harvester Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1979). Psychologie des minorités actives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1990). Questions for the twenty-first century. Theory Culture and Society,  7(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007004001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (1994). La société contre nature (édition revue et corrigée par l’auteur, postface inédite). Paris: Editions du Seuil. (Original work published in 1972).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S. (2002). Pensée stigmatique et pensée symbolique : Deux formes élémentaires de la pensée sociale. In C. Garnier (Ed.), Les formes de la pensée sociale (pp. 21–53). Paris: Presses Universitaires De France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Moscovici, S., &amp;  Lecoeur, E. (2006). Créer un nouvelle forme de vie. Multitudes. 24(1), 22–39.   https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.024.0029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Serres, M.  (1990). Le Contrat Naturel. Paris: Editions F. Bourin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Editions Montaigne.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Sontag, S. (2023). On Women. US: Picador</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Steiner, G. (1984). Antigones. New York: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Sophocles. (2003). Antigone. Translated by Reginald Gibbons &amp; Charles Segal. London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 442 BCE).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Sófocles. (2010). Antigona. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. (Original work published ca. 442 BCE)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Vickers, M. (2008).  Sophocles and Alcibiades. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315711768</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Woolf, V. (2014). A Room of One’s Own and Three Guineas. London: HarperCollins Publishers</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
