<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">46375</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2025-22-1-175-194</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">UPXJJA</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONALITY IN CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИЧНОСТЬ В СОВРЕМЕННОМ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОМ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Relationship of Cooperative or Competitive University Climate with the Positive Creativity in Russian Students</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Связь кооперативного и конкурентного университетского климата с позитивной креативностью российских студентов</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-2289</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Berrios Callejas</surname><given-names>Sonia A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Берриос Кальехас</surname><given-names>Соня Алехандра</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD student</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>аспирант</p></bio><email>soniaberrios@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-3275</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">7315-3399</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kodja</surname><given-names>Ekaterina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коджа</surname><given-names>Екатерина Андреевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, Invited Lecturer</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, приглашённый преподаватель</p></bio><email>katerina.kodja@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5899-9916</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5293-2730</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bultseva</surname><given-names>Maria A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бульцева</surname><given-names>Мария Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow, Centre of Sociocultural Research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, старший научный сотрудник Центра социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>mbultseva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">HSE University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая Школа Экономики»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-10-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 22, NO1 (2025)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 22, №1 (2025)</issue-title><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>194</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-10-10"><day>10</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Berrios Callejas S.A., Kodja E.A., Bultseva M.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Берриос Кальехас С.А., Коджа Е.А., Бульцева М.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Berrios Callejas S.A., Kodja E.A., Bultseva M.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Берриос Кальехас С.А., Коджа Е.А., Бульцева М.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/46375">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/46375</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Creativity is one of the key competences that educational organizations should foster in their students. Considering the valence of creative ideas and their consequences, this study examines the relationship between cooperation and competition as aspects of university climate with students’ positive creativity. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 341 Russian students (54.8% - females) using PISA’s measurement of cooperation and competition and the task from “Test of realistic problem situations,” adapted to measure positive creativity in a university context. The results showed that there is no significant relationship between cooperative climate and positive creativity, whereas a competitive climate contributes to students’ positive creativity. The discussion explores consequences of the cooperative and competitive climates in a broader perspective as well as the specific characteristics of everyday positive creativity in a social domain. Overall, the study suggests that competitive climate can lead to more pronounced positive social creativity, probably as a defensive strategy.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Креативность - одна из ключевых компетенций, которую образовательные организации должны развивать у своих студентов. Учитывая валентность креативных идей и их последствия, в данном исследовании рассмотрена взаимосвязь кооперации и конкуренции как аспектов университетского климата с позитивной креативностью студентов. Количественное кросс-секционное исследование было проведено на выборке из 341 российского студента (54,8 % - женщины) с использованием шкал кооперации и конкуренции из PISA и адаптированного задания из «Теста реалистичных проблемных ситуаций», измененного для измерения позитивной креативности в университетском контексте. Результаты показали, что кооперативный климат не имеет значимой связи с позитивной креативностью, тогда как конкурентный климат способствует ее проявлению. В обсуждении результатов рассмотрены последствия кооперативного и конкурентного университетского климата в более широком контексте, а также особенности повседневной позитивной креативности во взаимодействии. В целом исследование показывает, что конкурентный климат может вести к более выраженной позитивной социальной креативности, вероятно, как защитной стратегии.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>creativity</kwd><kwd>positive creativity</kwd><kwd>university climate</kwd><kwd>cooperation</kwd><kwd>competition</kwd><kwd>university students</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>креативность</kwd><kwd>позитивная креативность</kwd><kwd>университетский климат</kwd><kwd>кооперация</kwd><kwd>конкуренция</kwd><kwd>студенты вуза</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Данная работа выполнена в рамках Программы фундаментальных научных исследований НИУ ВШЭ.</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">This work is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University).</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta><fn-group/></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A., &amp; Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3&lt;249::AID-JOB10&gt;3.0.CO;2-%23</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Baer, J., &amp; McKool, S.S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In C.S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65–77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baer, M., Leenders, R. Th.A.J., Oldham, G.R., &amp; Vadera, A.K. (2010). Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 827–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.52814611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Baldwin, R.G. (2009). The climate for undergraduate teaching and learning in STEM fields. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2009(117), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Beghetto, R.A., &amp; Anderson, R.C. (2022). Positive creativity is principled creativity. Education Sciences, 12(3), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030184</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Benedek, M., Karstendiek, M., Ceh, S.M., Grabner, R.H., Krammer, G., Lebuda, I., Silvia, P.J., Cotter, K.N., Li, Y., Hu, W., Martskvishvili, K., &amp; Kaufman, J.C. (2021). Creativity myths: Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, 111068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Białkiewicz, A. (2020). Architectural competitions support student creativity. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(2), 157–162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Bittner, J.V., &amp; Heidemeier, H. (2013). Competitive mindsets, creativity, and the role of regulatory focus. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Bradler, C., Neckermann, S., &amp; Warnke, A.J. (2016). Incentivizing creativity: A large-scale experiment with tournaments and gifts. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 16-035/VII. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2772526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Brohmer, H., Fauler, A., Floto, C., Athenstaedt, U., Kedia, G., Eckerstorfer, L.V., &amp; Corcoran, K. (2019). Inspired to lend a hand? Attempts to elicit prosocial behavior through goal contagion. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 545. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00545</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S.P., Cron, W.L., &amp; Slocum, J.W. (1998). Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Burkšaitienė, N. (2018). How can university learning environment contribute to students’ creativity? Lithuanian students’ perspective. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Cai, H.B., Liu, Q., &amp; Xiao, G. (2005). Does competition encourage unethical behavior? The case of corporate profit hiding in China. SSRN.  Retrieved January 12, 2025, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=676183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Capraro, V., Smyth, C., Mylona, K., &amp; Niblo, G. A. (2014). Benevolent characteristics promote cooperative behaviour among humans. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102881</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Carmeli, A., Dutton, J.E., &amp; Hardin, A.E. (2015). Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68(6), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714550256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Carnevale, P.J., &amp; Probst, T.M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300–1309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Catarino, P., Vasco, P., Lopes, J., Silva, H., &amp; Morais, E. (2019). Cooperative learning on promoting creative thinking and mathematical creativity in higher education. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.3.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Choi, J., Johnson, D.W., &amp; Johnson, R. (2011). Relationships among cooperative learning experiences, social interdependence, children’s aggression, victimization, and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(4), 976–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00744.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J.J., &amp; Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Clydesdale, G. (2006). Creativity and competition: The Beatles. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1802_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>David, E.M., Kim, T.-Y., Rodgers, M., &amp; Chen, T. (2021). Helping while competing? The complex effects of competitive climates on the prosocial identity and performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 58(6), 1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12675</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>De Dreu, C.K.W. (2010). Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, &amp; G. Lindzey (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed., pp. 983–1023). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Dollinger, S.J., Burke, P.A., &amp; Gump, N.W. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701395028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Duffy, J., &amp; Kornienko, T. (2010). Does competition affect giving? Journal of Economic Behavior &amp; Organization, 74(1–2), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Erat, S., &amp; Gneezy, U. (2016). Incentives for creativity. Experimental Economics, 19(2), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9440-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Fehr, E., &amp; Krajbich, I. (2014). Social preferences and the brain. In P.W. Glimcher, &amp; E. Fehr (Eds.). Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (2nd ed., pp. 193–218). London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00011-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Fetiskin, N.P., Kozlov, V.V., &amp; Manuilov, G.M. (2002). Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality and small group development. Moscow: Psikhoterapiya Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Förster, J., &amp; Higgins, E.T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Fung, D., &amp; Howe, C. (2012). Liberal studies in Hong Kong: A new perspective on critical thinking through group work. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Q., Chen, P., Zhou, Z., &amp; Jiang, J. (2020). The impact of school climate on trait creativity in primary school students: The mediating role of achievement motivation and proactive personality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1707644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Z., Cheng, L., Li, J., Chen, Q., &amp; Hao, N. (2022). The dark side of creativity: Neural correlates of malevolent creative idea generation. Neuropsychologia, 167, 108164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Ge, J.-J., Zhang, P., &amp; Dong, D. (2022). Can extrinsic motivational state hinder good behavior? The mediating role of ambition and competition in relationships of contingent rewards and punishments with work performance. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2162–2183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00688-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Gentile, D.A., Anderson, C.A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L.K., Shibuya, A., Liau, A.K., Khoo, A., Bushman, B.J., Huesmann, L.R., &amp; Sakamoto, A. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Grant, A.M., &amp; Berry, J.W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Gross, D.P. (2020). Creativity under fire: The effects of competition on creative production. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00831</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Hegarty, W.H., &amp; Sims, H.P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Hurtado, S., Eagan, M.K., Tran, M.C., Newman, C.B., Chang, M.J., &amp; Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01714.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Hyde, M.S., &amp; Gess-Newsome, J. (2000). Factors that increase persistence of female undergraduate science students. In J. Bart (Ed.). Women succeeding in the sciences: Theories and practices across disciplines (pp. 115­137). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, D.W., &amp; Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, D.W., &amp; Johnson, R.T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09339057</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Johnson, J., &amp; Anderson, D. (1976). Effects of cooperative versus individualized instruction on student prosocial behavior, attitudes toward learning, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.4.446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Kahveci, A., Southerland, S.A., &amp; Gilmer, P.J. (2008). From marginality to legitimate peripherality: Understanding the essential functions of a women’s program. Science Education, 92(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20234</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Kapoor, H., &amp; Khan, A. (2017). Deceptively yours: Valence-based creativity and deception. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Karau, S.J., &amp; Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman, J.C., &amp; Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Koran, C.M. (1989). School climate and student affective needs: A descriptive study of four junior high schools. M.Ed. Thesis. Lethbridge, AB: University of Lethbridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology (F. Heider &amp; G. M. Heider, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill. http://doi.org/10.1037/10019-000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T., Sam Liu, C.-H., &amp; Li, P.-H. (2021). The influences of cooperative climate, competitive climate and customer empowerment on service creativity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Lin, S.-Y. (S.), Park, G., Zhou, Q., &amp; Hirst, G. (2023). Two birds, one stone: How altruism can facilitate both individual creativity and prosocial behavior in two different team contexts. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 27(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000188</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Lombardi, E., Traficante, D., Bettoni, R., Offredi, I., Giorgetti, M., &amp; Vernice, M. (2019). The impact of school climate on well-being experience and school engagement: A study with high-school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02482</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Lu, K., Xue, H., Nozawa, T., &amp; Hao, N. (2019). Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex, 29(8), 3457–3470. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Luengo Kanacri, B.P., Eisenberg, N., Thartori, E., Pastorelli, C., Uribe Tirado, L.M., Gerbino, M., &amp; Caprara, G.V. (2017). Longitudinal relations among positivity, perceived positive school climate, and prosocial behavior in colombian adolescents. Child Development, 88(4), 1100–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12863</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Manzano-Sánchez, D., Gómez-Mármol, A., Valero-Valenzuela, A., &amp; Jiménez-Parra, J.F. (2021). School climate and responsibility as predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviors and violence: A study towards self-determination theory. Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11030036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Maxwell, S., Reynolds, K.J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., &amp; Bromhead, D. (2017). The impact of school climate and school identification on academic achievement: Multilevel modeling with student and teacher data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Mayseless, N., Saggar, M., Hawthorne, G., &amp; Reiss, A. (2018). Creativity in the twenty-first century: The added benefit of training and cooperation. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel &amp; L. Leifer (Eds.). Design Thinking Research. Making Distinctions: Collaboration versus Cooperation (pp. 239–249). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Mcglynn, R.P., Gibbs, M.E., &amp; Roberts, S.J. (1982). Effects of cooperative versus competitive set and coaction on creative responding. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118(2), 281–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9922809</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Meshkova, N.V., &amp; Enikolopov, S.N. (2016). The directions of creativity research in social interaction. Voprosy Psychologii, (4), 118-128. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Moos, R.H., &amp; Moos, B.S. (1978). Classroom social climate and student absences and grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.263</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Moyal, A., &amp; Ritov, I. (2020). The effect of contest participation and contest outcome on subsequent prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0240712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240712</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, R.O., &amp; Ackermann, K.A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Naumov, A., &amp; Puffer, S. (2000). Measuring Russian culture using Hofstede’s dimensions. Applied Psychology, 49(4), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Nijstad, B.A., &amp; De Dreu, C.K.W. (2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Ogrutan, P.L., Machidon, A.L., &amp; Dinu, A. (2019). Is there a link between creativity and multiculturalism in education? TEM Journal, 8(2), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem82-34</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Pavlova, E.M. (2018). Model of connections between self-esteem of creativity and intelligence, tolerance of uncertainty and creativity. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 15(1), 69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2018-1-69-78</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Pearsall, M.J., &amp; Venkataramani, V. (2015). Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: The interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Posselt, J.R., &amp; Lipson, S.K. (2016). Competition, anxiety, and depression in the college classroom: Variations by student identity and field of study. Journal of College Student Development, 57(8), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0094</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Prabhu, R., Miller, S.R., Simpson, T.W., &amp; Meisel, N.A. (2020). Built to win? Exploring the role of competitive environments on students’ creativity in design for additive manufacturing tasks. Journal of Engineering Design, 31(11–12), 574–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2020.1851661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Roseth, C.J., Johnson, D.W., &amp; Johnson, R.T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Schei, V. (2013). Creative people create values: Creativity and positive arousal in negotiations. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S.H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer &amp; P.R. Shaver (Eds.). Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Seymour, E. (2002). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, C.A., &amp; Sax, L.J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Sommet, N., Darnon, C., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Pulfrey, C., Dompnier, B., &amp; Butera, F. (2014). Performance goals in conflictual social interactions: Towards the distinction between two modes of relational conflict regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Sternberg, R.J., &amp; Chowkase, A. (2021). When we teach for positive creativity, what exactly do we teach for? Education Sciences, 11(5), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Sternberg, R.J., &amp; Karami, S. (2021, April 8). Teaching for Positive Creativity. ASCD. Retrieved January 12, 2025, from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/teaching-for-positive-creativity</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Sternberg, R.J., &amp; Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807916.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., &amp; Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Vaccaro, A. (2010). What lies beneath seemingly positive campus climate results: Institutional sexism, racism, and male hostility toward equity initiatives and liberal bias. Equity &amp; Excellence in Education, 43(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903520231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H.-H., &amp; Deng, X. (2022). The bridging role of goals between affective traits and positive creativity. Education Sciences, 12(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M.-T., &amp; Degol, J.L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Waring, T.M., Sullivan, A.V., &amp; Stapp, J.R. (2016). Campus prosociality as a sustainability indicator. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(6), 895–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2015-0091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Wasburn, M.H., &amp; Miller, S.G. (2004). Retaining undergraduate women in science, engineering, and technology: A survey of a student organization. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory &amp; Practice, 6(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.2190/ndxh-ym83-tkwy-4e6c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Yamagishi, T., &amp; Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02249397</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Yan, B. (2019). Social value orientation, social influence and crowdsourced creativity. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 13434. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.13434abstract</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Z., Renard, D., Elmoukhliss, M., &amp; Balague, C. (2016). What affects creative performance in idea co-creation: Competitive, cooperative or coopetitive climate? International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(04), 1640002. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919616400028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y.-Q., Gardner, D.G., &amp; Chen, H.-G. (2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094–2115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638161</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
