RUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsRUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика2313-16832313-1705Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)4565610.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-2-490-510KNCNOQIDENTITY, MIGRATION AND INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS IN THE POST-SOVIET SPACEИДЕНТИЧНОСТЬ, МИГРАЦИЯ И МЕЖКУЛЬТУРНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ НА ПОСТСОВЕТСКОМ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕResearch ArticleNavigating National Acceptance: Key Antecedents of Social Markers of Acceptance of Immigrants in RussiaНавигация по гражданской инклюзии: ключевые антецеденты социальных маркеров принятия иммигрантов в Россииhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-794257191706675K-3338-20151807-9739GrigoryevDmitry SergeevichГригорьевДмитрий Сергеевич

PhD, Research Fellow, Center for Sociocultural Research

PhD, научный сотрудник, Центр социокультурных исследований

dgrigoryev@hse.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-728958182813400GLV-6876-20226639-2529GallyamovaAlbina AlikovnaГаллямоваАльбина Аликовна

Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research

стажер-исследователь, Центр социокультурных исследований

aagallyamova@hse.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-1722HII-5216-20224854-0374KomyaginskayaElizaveta ShamilevnaКомягинскаяЕлизавета Шамилевна

Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research

стажер-исследователь, Центр социокультурных исследований

ekomyaginskaya@hse.ruHSE UniversityНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»15122024212VOL 21, NO2 (2024)ТОМ 21, №2 (2024)49051028082025Copyright ©; 2024, Grigoryev D.S., Gallyamova A.A., Komyaginskaya E.S.Copyright ©; 2024, Григорьев Д.С., Галлямова А.А., Комягинская Е.Ш.2024Grigoryev D.S., Gallyamova A.A., Komyaginskaya E.S.Григорьев Д.С., Галлямова А.А., Комягинская Е.Ш.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/45656

The article explores the links between four principal antecedents - deprovincialization, perceived diversity norms, autochthony belief, and relative deprivation - and social markers of acceptance of immigrants in Russia. In an epoch increasingly influenced by immigration, it is imperative to meticulously examine how these antecedents are correlated with social markers of acceptance, which hold significant implications for immigrants’ adaptation. This study aims to ascertain the extent to which these variables are correlated with social markers of immigrant acceptance within the Russian context. Survey data from 1,009 participants, predominantly self-identifying as ethnic Russians, were analyzed. The questionnaire was developed using new and original measures. The findings demonstrate that deprovincialization and perceived diversity norms within an individual’s immediate surroundings showed effects on the social acceptance of immigrants, both directly and indirectly. Furthermore, autochthony belief and relative deprivation were identified as having mediating effects in these dynamics, highlighting their significance across all social markers of acceptance. These insights deepen our understanding of the complex process of immigrant social acceptance, accentuating the importance of individual differences and social influences. The study further reveals that immigrant social acceptance extends beyond mere openness and positive attitude towards cultural diversity, involving an inclusion of ethnocultural groups into the larger society that addresses group hierarchy and inequality in a manner deemed acceptable by the host society. By exploring these associations in detail, the research offers valuable information that could inform initiatives aimed at enhancing social inclusion and promoting intercultural and interethnic relations and harmony in Russia.

В статье рассматриваются связи между четырьмя ключевыми антецедентами (депровинциализмом, воспринимаемыми нормами многообразия, верой в автохтонность, относительной депривацией) и социальными маркерами принятия иммигрантов в России (этническим, гражданским, социоэкономическим, социокультурным). В условиях демографического ландшафта, который все чаще характеризуется иммиграцией, крайне важно тщательно изучить отношения между этими антецедентами и социальными маркерами принятия, которые имеют важные последствия для адаптации иммигрантов. Целью данного исследования является определение степени, в которой эти переменные связаны с социальными маркерами принятия иммигрантов в российском контексте. В опросе участвовали 1009 человек, большинство из которых идентифицировали себя как этнические русские. Онлайн-опросник был составлен из новых, авторских методик. Результаты исследования показывают, что депровинциализм и воспринимаемые нормы многообразия в непосредственном окружении человека играют важную роль в социальном принятии иммигрантов как прямо, так и косвенно. В частности, вера в автохтонность и относительная депривация, показывая также опосредствующие эффекты в этих связях, имеют значение для важности всех социальных маркеров принятия. Эти результаты углубляют наше понимание сложного процесса социального принятия иммигрантов, подчеркивая важность как индивидуальных различий, так и социального влияния. Они также свидетельствуют, что социальное принятие иммигрантов выходит за рамки простой открытости и позитивного отношения к культурному многообразию, а предполагают такую форму инклюзии этнокультурных групп в более широкое общество, которая решает проблему групповой иерархии и неравенства приемлемым для принимающего общества образом. Благодаря детальному изучению этих взаимоотношений результаты исследования могут стать основой для инициатив, направленных на повышение социальной инклюзии и содействие межкультурной гармонии в России.

acculturation expectationssocial markers of acceptancedeprovincializationautochthony beliefperceived diversity normsrelative deprivationintercultural relationsinterethnic relations and conflictsаккультурационные ожиданиясоциальные маркеры принятиявоспринимаемые нормы многообразиядепровинциализмвера в автохтонностьотносительная депривациямежкультурные отношениямежэтнические отношения и конфликтыИсследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 20-18-00268, https://rscf.ru/project/23-18-45015/The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 20-18-00268, https://rscf.ru/project/23-18-45015/Berry, J.W., Lepshokova, Z., MIRIPS Collaboration, & Grigoryev, D. (2022). How shall we all live together?: Meta-analytical review of the Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies project. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 71(3), 1014-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12332Галлямова А.А., Григорьев Д.С. Разработка методики оценки воспринимаемой культуры сообщества на основе культурной ориентации горизонтальный/вертикальный индивидуализм-коллективизм Г. Триандиса // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2022. Т. 19 № 3. С. 429–447. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-429-447Berggren, N., Ljunge, M., & Nilsson, T. (2023). Immigrants from more tolerant cultures integrate deeper into destination countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(4), 1095-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.06.005Григорьев Д.С. Проблемы концептуализации и операционализации отношения к иммигрантам в межстрановых сравнительных исследованиях // Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Социология. 2020. № 3. С. 89–100. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2020-3-89-100Bobo, L. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 445-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127Григорьев Д.С., Галлямова А.А., Комягинская Е.Ш. Как стать россиянином?: Содержание национальной идентичности, определяющее социальные маркеры принятия иммигрантов в России // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2023. Т. 20. № 4. С. 675–696. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-4-675-696Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359Иванова Н.С., Егорова Т.Д., Варшавер Е.А., Савин И.С. «Жить так же, как мы живем»: представления жителей России об интеграции мигрантов // Актуальные проблемы Европы. 2024. №3. С. 245–265. https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2024.03.14Echterhoff, G., Kopietz, R., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Adjusting shared reality: Communicators’ memory changes as their connection with their audience changes. Social Cognition, 31(2), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.162Котова М.В. Трансформация предубеждения в неявные формы как индикатор его функций в межгрупповых отношениях // Социальная психология и общество. 2024. Т. 15. № 1. C. 57–75. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150104Gallyamova, A., & Grigoryev, D. (2022). Development of a measure for assessing perceived community culture based on Triandis’s horizontal/vertical individualism-collectivism cultural orientation. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(3), 429-447. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-429-447 (In Russ.).Berry J.W., Lepshokova Z., MIRIPS Collaboration, Grigoryev D. How shall we all live together?: Meta-analytical review of the Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies project // Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2022. Vol. 71. No. 3. Pp. 1014–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12332Grigoryev, D. (2020). Problems of conceptualisation and operationalisation of attitudes toward immigrants in cross-national comparative research. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 3, 89-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2020-3-89-100Berggren N., Ljunge M., Nilsson T. Immigrants from more tolerant cultures integrate deeper into destination countries// Journal of Comparative Economics. 2023. Vol. 51. No. 4. Pp. 1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.06.005Grigoryev, D., & Berry, J. W. (2021). A taxonomy of intergroup ideologies. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(4), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170401Bobo L.D. Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations // Journal of Social Issues. 1999. Vol. 55. No. 3. Pp. 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127Grigoryev, D. Gallyamova, A. & Komyaginskaya, E. (2023). Becoming a member of the Russian nation: The content of national identity underlying the social markers of acceptance for immigrants in Russia. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 20(4), 675-696. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-4-675-696Crandall C.S., Eshleman A., O'brien L. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 82. No. 3. Pp. 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359Guimond, S., Crisp, R. J., De Oliveira, P., Kamiejski, R., Kteily, N., Kuepper, B., ... & Zick, A. (2013). Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 941-958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032069Echterhoff G., Kopietz R., Higgins E.T. Adjusting shared reality: Communicators’ memory changes as their connection with their audience changes // Social Cognition. 2013. Vol. 31. No. 2. Pp. 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.162Hasbún López, P., Martinović, B., Bobowik, M., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Ernst-Vintila, A., Franc R., Fülöp, É., Ghilani, D., Kochar, A., Lamberty, P., Leone, G., & Žeželj, I. (2019). Support for collective action against refugees: The role of national, European, and global identifications, and autochthony beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1439-1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2608Grigoryev D., Berry J.W. A taxonomy of intergroup ideologies // Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 7–15. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170401Ivanova N., Egorova T., Varshaver E., & Savin I. (2024). “To live just like we do”: Russian residents’ perceptions of migrant integration. Current Problems of Europe, 3, 245-265. https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2024.03.14 (In Russ.).Guimond S., Crisp R. J., De Oliveira P., Kamiejski R., Kteily N., Kuepper B., Zick A. Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013. Vol. 104. No. 6. Pp. 941– 958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032069Kalin, R., & Berry, J. W. (1980). Geographic mobility and ethnic tolerance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 112(1), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1980.9924305Hasbún López P., Martinović B., Bobowik M., Chryssochoou X., Cichocka A., Ernst‐Vintila A., Franc R., Fülöp É., Ghilani D., Kochar A., Lamberty P., Leone G., Žeželj I. Support for collective action against refugees: The role of national, European, and global identifications, and autochthony beliefs // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2019. Vol. 49. No. 7. Pp. 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2608Kline R.B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Kalin R., Berry J.W. Geographic mobility and ethnic tolerance // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1980. Vol. 112. No. 1. Pp. 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1980.9924305Komisarof, A., & Leong, C. H. (2020). Viewing intercultural adaptation and social inclusion through constructs of national identity: An introduction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 78, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.06.001Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2010.Komisarof, A., Leong, C. H., & Teng, E. (2020). Constructing who can be Japanese: A study of social markers of acceptance in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(2), 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12396Komisarof A., Leong C.H. Viewing intercultural adaptation and social inclusion through constructs of national identity: An introduction // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2020. Vol. 78. Pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.06.001Kotova, M. V. (2024). Prejudice transformation from overt to covert forms as an indicator of its functions in intergroup relations. Social Psychology and Society, 15(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150104 (In Russ.).Komisarof A., Leong C.H., Teng E. Constructing who can be Japanese: A study of social markers of acceptance in Japan // Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 2. Pp. 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12396Leong, C. H. (2014). Social markers of acculturation: A new research framework on intercultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.006Leong C.H. Social markers of acculturation: A new research framework on intercultural adaptation // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2014. Vol. 38. Pp. 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.006Leong, C. H., Komisarof, A., Dandy, J., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Safdar, S., Hanke, K., & Teng, E. (2020). What does it take to become “one of us?” Redefining ethnic-civic citizenship using markers of everyday nationhood. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 78, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.006Leong C.H. Komisarof A., Dandy J., Jasinskaja-Lahti I., Safdar S., Hanke K., Teng E. What does it take to become “one of us?” Redefining ethnic-civic citizenship using markers of everyday nationhood // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2020. Vol. 78. Pp. 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.006Lucarini, A., Boin, J., Fuochi, G., Voci, A., Verkuyten, M., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2023). The nature of deprovincialism: Assessment, nomological network, and comparison of cultural and group deprovincialization. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(4), 861-881. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2695Lucarini A., Boin J., Fuochi G., Voci A., Verkuyten M., Pettigrew T. F. The nature of deprovincialism: Assessment, nomological network, and comparison of cultural and group deprovincialization // Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2023. Vol. 31. No. 4. Pp. 861–881 https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2695Martinovic, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). ‘We were here first, so we determine the rules of the game’: Autochthony and prejudice towards out-groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1980Mahfud, Y., Badea, C., Verkuyten, M., Reynolds, K. Multiculturalism and attitudes toward immigrants: The impact of perceived cultural distance // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017. Vol. 49. No. 6. Pp. 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730828Meuleman, B., Abts, K., Schmidt, P., Pettigrew, T. F., & Davidov, E. (2020). Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550157Martinovic B., Verkuyten M. ‘We were here first, so we determine the rules of the game’: Autochthony and prejudice towards out‐groups // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2013. Vol. 43. No. 7. Pp. 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1980Ng Tseung-Wong, C., Dandy, J., & Lane, M. (2022). Perceived diversity norms, cultural identity styles and bicultural identity consolidation in two bicultural groups in Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 57(3), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12829Meuleman B., Abts K., Schmidt P., Pettigrew T.F., Davidov E. Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: A cross-national perspective // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2020. Vol. 46. No. 3. Pp. 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550157Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40(2), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55Ng Tseung‐Wong C., Dandy J., Lane M. Perceived diversity norms, cultural identity styles and bicultural identity consolidation in two bicultural groups in Australia // International Journal of Psychology. 2022. Vol. 57. No. 3. Pp. 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12829Pettigrew, T. F. (2011). Deprovincialization. In D.J. Christie (Ed.). The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp081Pettigrew T.F. Deprovincialization // The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology / Ed. by D.J. Christie. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp081Piontkowski, U., Rohmann, A., & Florack, A. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430202005003003Pettigrew T.F. Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to non-participating outgroups? // Social Psychology. 2009. Vol. 40. No. 2. Pp. 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825Piontkowski U., Rohmann A., Florack A. Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2002. Vol. 37. No. 6. Pp. 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430202005003003Smith, H. J., Ryan, D. A., Jaurique, A., Pettigrew, T. F., Jetten, J., Ariyanto, A., ... & Wohl, M. (2018). Cultural values moderate the impact of relative deprivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(8), 1183-1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202211878421Smith H.J., Pettigrew T.F., Pippin G.M., Bialosiewicz S. Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and social psychology review. 2012. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825Velthuis, E., Verkuyten, M., & Smeekes, A. (2020). Supporting immigrant cultural rights: The roles of deprovincialization and identity continuity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(12), 733-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12709Smith H.J., Ryan D.A., Jaurique A., Pettigrew T.F., Jetten J., Ariyanto A., Wohl M. Cultural values moderate the impact of relative deprivation // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2018. Vol. 49. No. 8. Pp. 1183–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202211878421Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2015). Majority member’s recognition and protest against discrimination of immigrants: The role of power threat, deprovin- cialization and common national identity. Social Justice Research, 28, 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0248-4Velthuis E., Verkuyten M., Smeekes A. Supporting immigrant cultural rights: The roles of deprovincialization and identity continuity // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 50. No. 12. Pp. 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12709Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., Mepham, K., & Sprong, S. (2020). Interculturalism: A new diversity ideology with interrelated components of dialogue, unity, and identity flexibility. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2628Verkuyten M., Martinovic B. Collective psychological ownership and intergroup relations // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 6. Pp. 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706514Verkuyten, M., Kollar, R., Gale, J., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2022). Right-wing political orientation, national identification and the acceptance of immigrants and minorities. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111217Verkuyten M. Martinovic B. Majority member’s recognition and protest against discrimination of immigrants: The role of power threat, deprovincialization and common national identity // Social Justice Research. 2015. Vol. 28. Pp. 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0248-4Walsh, S. D., & Tartakovsky, E. (2021). Personal value preferences, threat-benefit appraisal of immigrants and levels of social contact: Looking through the lens of the Stereotype Content Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609219Verkuyten M., Yogeeswaran K., Mepham K. Sprong S. Interculturalism: A new diversity ideology with interrelated components of dialogue, unity, and identity flexibility // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2020. Vol. 50. Pp. 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2628Ward, C., Kim, I., Karl, J. A., Epstein, S., & Park, H. J. (2020). How normative multiculturalism relates to immigrant well-being. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 26(4), 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000317Verkuyten M., Kollar R., Gale J., Yogeeswaran K. Right-wing political orientation, national identification and the acceptance of immigrants and minorities // Personality and Individual Differences. 2022. Vol. 184. Pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111217Zenker, O. (2011). Autochthony, ethnicity, indigeneity and nationalism: Time-honouring and state-oriented modes of rooting individual-territory-group triads in a globalizing world. Critique of Anthropology, 31(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10393438Walsh S.D., Tartakovsky E. Personal value preferences, threat-benefit appraisal of immigrants and levels of social contact: Looking through the lens of the Stereotype Content Model // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. Pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609219Ward C., Kim I., Karl J.A., Epstein S., Park H.J. How normative multiculturalism relates to immigrant well-being // Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. 2020. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp. 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000317Wolski C., Park B., Judd C.M., Wittenbrink B. Framing interethnic ideology: effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 78. No. 4. Pp. 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.78.4.635Zenker O. Autochthony, ethnicity, indigeneity and nationalism: Time-honouring and state-oriented modes of rooting individual-territory-group triads in a globalizing world // Critique of Anthropology. 2011. Vol. 31. No. 1. Pp. 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10393438