<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">43764</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-3-910-926</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">HGWHLI</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CURRENT TRENDS IN PERSONALITY RESEARCH</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ ЛИЧНОСТИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Neural Bases of Word Learning in the Context Across Different Age Range: A Narrative Review of International Research</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Нейронные основы усвоения слов в контексте в разных возрастных группах: обзор зарубежных исследований</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0359-9453</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5415-6470</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Norkina</surname><given-names>Marina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Норкина</surname><given-names>Марина Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Junior Researcher, Sirius Center for Cognitive Sciences</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>младший научный сотрудник</p></bio><email>norkina.marina.v@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Sirius University of Science and Technology</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Научно-технологический университет «Сириус»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-03" publication-format="electronic"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>910</fpage><lpage>926</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-09"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Norkina M.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Норкина М.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Norkina M.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Норкина М.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/43764">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/43764</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Context is crucial during reading and new word acquisition as it provides important clues that help individuals understand the meaning of unknown words. In early development, children employ words broadly to describe diverse objects and actions. As their vocabulary and conceptual understanding grow, they refine word meanings based on context. Context is particularly critical during schooling, where reading facilitates the acquisition of new vocabulary. Context remains vital for adults, as they use contextual cues to understand unfamiliar words, including in professional environments. The article presents a narrative review of contemporary literature on the neural basis of word learning in different context constraints across different age ranges in the international research field. The review aims to identify experiment designs employed to assess word learning within a context and describe differences and similarities in neural markers across different ages. The majority of the reviewed articles focused on young adults, with fewer studies examining children, and only one study addressing adolescents. In this narrative review, the authors described the used paradigms in word learning in different contexts: weakly, moderately and strongly constrained, meaningful and unrelated, and episodic ones. Among electrophysiological markers the N400, P200, and N300 components were investigated across the reviewed studies, as well as theta, alpha, and low beta bands were analysed to understand the rapid neural responses to novel words.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Контекст играет ключевую роль при чтении и усвоении новых слов, предоставляя важные подсказки для понимания значения новых слов. Дети активно используют слова для описания окружающего мира. По мере расширения словарного запаса они уточняют значения слов, опираясь на контекст. Значение контекста особенно важно в процессе изучения новых слов в школе и в подростковом возрасте, когда чтение становится ключевой частью образовательной программы. Взрослые также полагаются на контекстные подсказки для понимания незнакомых слов, особенно в профессиональной среде. Рассмотрены современные исследования с применением ЭЭГ, изучающие нейронную активность, лежащую в основе усвоения слов в различных контекстах. Цель обзора - определить методы, используемые в экспериментах для оценки усвоения слов в контексте, а также описать различия и сходства нейрональных маркеров в разных возрастных группах. В большинстве проанализированных работ исследовались выборки взрослых, в нескольких работах рассмотрен детский возраст, и только в одной работе - подростковый возраст. В обзоре рассмотрены парадигмы изучения слов в различных контекстах: слабо-, средне- и сильно ограничивающем контексте, несвязанном и содержательном контексте, а также эпизодическом контексте. Среди электрофизиологических маркеров в рассмотренных исследованиях изучены компоненты N400, P200 и N300, а также проанализированы тета-, альфа- и низкие бета-диапазоны с целью изучения быстрых нейронных реакций во время изучения новых слов.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>word learning</kwd><kwd>context</kwd><kwd>sentence constraint</kwd><kwd>neural markers</kwd><kwd>EEG</kwd><kwd>age range</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>усвоение слов</kwd><kwd>контекст</kwd><kwd>чтение</kwd><kwd>нейрокорреляты</kwd><kwd>ЭЭГ</kwd><kwd>возрастные группы</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Agreement 075-10-2021-093, Project COG-RND-2138).</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Финансирование проекта осуществлялось Министерством науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации (Соглашение № 075-10-2021-093; Проект COG-RND-2138).</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Abel, A. D., Schneider, J., &amp; Maguire, M. J. (2017). N400 response indexes word learning from linguistic context in children. Language Learning and Development, 14(1), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2017.1362347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Abel, A. D., Sharp, B. J., &amp; Konja, C. (2020). Investigating implicit and explicit word learning in school-age children using a combined behavioral-event related potential (ERP) approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 45(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2019.1709465</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., &amp; Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44-45, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Anglin, J. M. (1993). Knowing versus learning words. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1993.tb00377.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bastiaansen, M., &amp; Hagoort, P. (2006). Oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59012-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bastiaansen, M., Magyari, L., &amp; Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1333-1347. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Batterink, L., &amp; Neville, H. (2011). Implicit and explicit mechanisms of word learning in a narrative context: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3181-3196. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., &amp; Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Borovsky, A., Elman, J., &amp; Kutas, M. (2010). Semantic integration of novel word meanings after a single exposure in context. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32, 1307-1312.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Borovsky, A., Kutas, M., &amp; Elman, J. L. (2013). Getting it right: Word learning across the hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 51(5), 825-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Cromley, J. G., &amp; Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comp-rehension. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 491-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Frishkoff, G. A., Perfetti, C. A., &amp; Collins-Thompson, K. (2010). Lexical quality in the brain: ERP evidence for robust word learning from context. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 376-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2010.480915</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Frishkoff, G. A., Perfetti, C. A., &amp; Collins-Thompson, K. (2011). Predicting robust vocabulary growth from measures of incremental learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.539076</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Z.-K., Cai, Q., Yang, Y.-X., Dong, N., &amp; Zhang, S.-S. (2017). Visibility graph from adaptive optimal kernel time-frequency representation for classification of epileptiform EEG. International Journal of Neural Systems, 27(04), 1750005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065717500058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., &amp; Hagoort, P. (2006). EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing. Brain and Language, 96(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Hanslmayr, S., Staudigl, T., &amp; Fellner, M.-C. (2012). Oscillatory power decreases and long-term memory: the information via desynchronization hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Huettig, F., &amp; Mani, N. (2015). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Kaan, E. (2023). The neurocognition of prediction in second language processing and learning. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Neurolinguistics (pp. 329-340). N.Y.: Taylor &amp; Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003190912-31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Klimesch, W. (2012). Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., &amp; Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In Bar, M. (Ed.). Predictions in the Brain: Using our Past to Generate a Future (pp. 190-207). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Mani, N., &amp; Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake - But only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843-847. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Markman, E. M., &amp; Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90017-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Mestres-Missé, A., Càmara, E., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., &amp; Münte, T. F. (2008). Functional neuroanatomy of meaning acquisition from context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2153-2166. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20150</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Mestres-Missé, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., &amp; Münte, T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858-1866. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl094</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Momsen, J. P., &amp; Abel, A. D. (2022). Neural oscillations reflect meaning identi- fication for novel words in context. Neurobiology of Language, 3(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Momsen, J., Schneider, J. M., &amp; Abel, A. D. (2022). Developmental differences in EEG oscillations supporting the identification of novel word meaning from context. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 58, 101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101185</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Piai, V., Roelofs, A., &amp; Maris, E. (2014). Oscillatory brain responses in spoken word production reflect lexical frequency and sentential constraint. Neuropsychologia, 53, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Pickering, M. J., &amp; Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002-1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Rabagliati, H., Gambi, C., &amp; Pickering, M. J. (2015). Learning to predict or predicting to learn? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1077979</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Ralph, Y. K., Schneider, J. M., Abel, A. D., &amp; Maguire, M. J. (2020). Using the N400 event-related potential to study word learning from context in children from low-and higher-socioeconomic status homes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104758</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Reber, P. J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026-2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Segalowitz, S. J., &amp; Zheng, X. (2009). An ERP study of category priming: Evidence of early lexical semantic access. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, J. M., &amp; Maguire, M. J. (2018). Identifying the relationship between oscillatory dynamics and event-related responses. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 133, 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Shtyrov, Y. (2012). Neural bases of rapid word learning. The Neuroscientist, 18(4), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858411420299</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Vergilova, Y., Jachmann, T.K., Mani, N., &amp; Kray, J. (2022). Age-related differences in expectation-based novel word learning. Psychophysiology, 59(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, M., Ding, J., Li, X., &amp; Yang, Y. (2018). The impact of variety of episodic contexts on the integration of novel words into semantic network. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(2), 214-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1522446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Clark, A., &amp; O'Connell, R. G. (2020). Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1464(1), 242-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Weiss, S., &amp; Mueller, H. M. (2012). “Too many betas do not spoil the broth”: the role of beta brain oscillations in language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00201</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
