<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">41496</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-1-157-176</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">VHXYGQ</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONALITY IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИЧНОСТЬ В МЕЖКУЛЬТУРНОЙ КОММУНИКАЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Russian Specialists’ Perception of Negotiations with Chinese Partners: Expectations, Strategies and Challenges</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Переговоры с китайскими партнерами: ожидания, стратегии и вызовы глазами российских специалистов</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-953X</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">X-8185-2018</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">8077-0132</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vasilyeva</surname><given-names>Ekaterina D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Васильева</surname><given-names>Екатерина Дмитриевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Centre for Sociocultural Research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, научный сотрудник, Центр социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>edvasilyeva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-7289</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">58182813400</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">GLV-6876-2022</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">6639-2529</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gallyamova</surname><given-names>Albina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Галлямова</surname><given-names>Альбина Аликовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>стажер-исследователь, Центр социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>aagallyamova@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-1722</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">HII-5216-2022</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4854-0374</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Komyaginskaya</surname><given-names>Elizaveta Sh.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Комягинская</surname><given-names>Елизавета Шамилевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>стажер-исследователь, Центр социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>ekomyaginskaya@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2046-4529</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">8719892500</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">H-4866-2015</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">8197-3858</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lebedeva</surname><given-names>Nadezhda M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лебедева</surname><given-names>Надежда Михайловна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Psychology, Academic Supervisor, Centre for Sociocultural Research, Professor, Faculty of Social Science, School of Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор психологических наук, профессор, профессор департамента психологии факультета социальных наук, научный руководитель Центра социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>nlebedeva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">HSE University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-11-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 21, NO1 (2024)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 21, №1 (2024)</issue-title><fpage>157</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-11-10"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Vasilyeva E.D., Gallyamova A.A., Komyaginskaya E.S., Lebedeva N.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Васильева Е.Д., Галлямова А.А., Комягинская Е.Ш., Лебедева Н.М.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Vasilyeva E.D., Gallyamova A.A., Komyaginskaya E.S., Lebedeva N.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Васильева Е.Д., Галлямова А.А., Комягинская Е.Ш., Лебедева Н.М.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/41496">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/41496</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">In the context of global challenges and changing geopolitical situations around the world, Russian organizations are increasingly facing the necessity of active cooperation with countries in the Far East, especially China. The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify how Russian business representatives perceive and manage this process, with special attention to expectations and perceptions of communication effectiveness. The study focused on two key aspects: firstly, the analysis of expectations of Russian representatives, which shape their approaches to negotiations, and secondly, the assessment of their perception of the dynamics and effectiveness of these negotiations. The study sample included 13 Russian employees of Russian companies who had experience in negotiations with Chinese partners. The study used semi-structured qualitative interviews. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Further coding and analysis of the text were carried out in the Atlas.ti. As a result of the analysis of the interview, the main topics were identified that describe the perception of the negotiation process: expectations regarding the negotiation process, strategies for preparing for negotiations, behavior strategies in negotiations, perception of behavior strategies of partners in interaction, emotions in the negotiation process, perception of a communicative situation (characteristics), perception of oneself in the process of negotiations, the perception of a negotiating partner, the perception of the effectiveness of negotiations. The study showed that successful intercultural business communication requires a combination of professional and culturally oriented approaches. Attention to cultural features and specifics and consideration of their influence on communication contributes to more effective interaction. However, difficulties arise due to the indirect style of communication and differences in the manifestation of emotions, which can make negotiations difficult. In addition, situations that are threatening to the negotiator’s "face" may have an impact on professional and ethnic/ civil identity. As a result of the study, the features of Russian managers’perception of intercultural business communication with Chinese partners were identified, and recommendations were formulated regarding the preparation of Russian managers for international negotiations.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">В условиях глобальных вызовов и изменяющейся геополитической ситуации в мире российские организации все чаще сталкиваются с необходимостью активного сотрудничества со странами Дальнего Востока, в особенности с Китаем. Цель данного поискового исследования - выявить, как российские деловые представители воспринимают и управляют этим процессом, с особым вниманием к ожиданиям и восприятию эффективности коммуникации. Исследование сфокусировано на двух ключевых аспектах: во-первых, анализе ожиданий российских представителей, которые формируют их подходы к переговорам, и во-вторых, оценке их восприятия динамики и результативности этих переговоров. Выборку исследования составили 13 российских сотрудников российских компаний, имевших опыт переговоров с китайскими партнерами. В качестве метода использовались полуструктурированные качественные интервью. Для анализа данных был использован качественный контент-анализ. Кодирование и анализ текста проведены в программе Atlas.ti. В результате анализа интервью выделены основные темы, описывающие восприятие переговорного процесса: ожидания относительно переговорного процесса, стратегии подготовки к переговорам, стратегии поведения в переговорах, восприятие стратегий поведения партнеров по взаимодействию, эмоции в процессе переговоров, восприятие коммуникативной ситуации, восприятие себя в процессе переговоров, восприятие партнера по переговорам, восприятие эффективности переговоров. Исследование показало, что успешное межкультурное деловое общение требует сочетания профессионального и культурно-ориентированного подходов. Внимание к культурным особенностям и учет их влияния на коммуникацию способствуют более эффективному взаимодействию. Однако возникающие трудности связаны с непрямым стилем коммуникации и различиями в проявлении эмоций, что может затруднять переговоры. Кроме того, ситуации, угрожающие «лицу», могут иметь влияние на профессиональную и этническую/гражданскую идентичность. Таким образом, в результате исследования были выявлены особенности восприятия российскими менеджерами ситуации межкультурного делового общения с китайскими партнерами, а также сформулированы рекомендации относительно подготовки российских менеджеров к международным переговорам.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>intercultural communication</kwd><kwd>international negotiations</kwd><kwd>perception</kwd><kwd>behavior strategies</kwd><kwd>cultural differences</kwd><kwd>communication styles</kwd><kwd>identity</kwd><kwd>Russian business culture</kwd><kwd>Chinese business culture</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>межкультурная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>международные переговоры</kwd><kwd>восприятие</kwd><kwd>стратегии поведения</kwd><kwd>культурные различия</kwd><kwd>коммуникативные стили</kwd><kwd>идентичность</kwd><kwd>российская деловая культура</kwd><kwd>китайская деловая культура</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study was implemented in the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University) in 2023.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование осуществлено в рамках Программы фундаментальных исследований НИУ ВШЭ в 2023 г.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Adair, W., Brett, J., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., &amp; Lytle, A. (2004). Culture and negotiation strategy. Negotiation Journal, 20(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2004.00008.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Amanatullah, E.T., Morris, M.W., &amp; Curhan, J.R. (2008). Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012612</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Batkhina, A.A., &amp; Lebedeva, N.M. (2019). Рredictors of behavioral strategy choice among Russians in intercultural conflict. Social Psychology and Society, 10(1), 70-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100105</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Батхина А.А., Лебедева Н.М. Предикторы выбора русскими стратегии поведения в межкультурном конфликте // Социальная психология и общество. 2019. Т. 10. № 1. С. 70-91. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100105</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Benetti, S., Ogliastri, E., &amp; Caputo, A. (2021). Distributive/integrative negotiation strategies in cross-cultural contexts: A comparative study of the USA and Italy. Journal of Management &amp; Organization, 27(4), 786-808. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Cai, D.A. (2016). Looking below the surface: Comparing subtleties of U.S. and Chinese cultures in negotiation. In J. Weiss (Ed.). Tigers roar: Asia’s recovery and its impact (pp. 213-220). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315291413</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Cohen, W.A. (2003). The importance of expectations on negotiation results. European Business Review, 15(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340310464713</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Cullinan, M.E., Purtell, R., &amp; Canary, H.E. (2022). Emerging professional identity in patient hand-off routines: A practical application of performative face theory. Health Communication, 37(5), 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1857518</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Dervin, F. (2010). Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts. In F. Dervin &amp; E. Suomela-Salmi (Eds.), New Approaches to Assessment in Higher Education (vol. 5, pp. 155-172). Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Grigoryev, D., Fiske, S.T., &amp; Batkhina, A. (2019). Mapping ethnic stereotypes and their antecedents in Russia: The stereotype content model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigoryev, D.S. (2022). Cognitive and motivational foundations underlying acculturation expectations: Applications of ethnic group position model. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(1), 86-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-1-86-109</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Григорьев Д.С. Когнитивно-мотивационные основы аккультурационных ожиданий: применение модели групповой позиции этнических групп // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2022. Т. 19. № 1. С. 86-109. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-1-86-109</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigoryev, D.S., &amp; Komyaginskaya, E.S. (2023). Intergroup contact and personal and cultural Stereotypes in intercultural relations: A case of the stereotype content in Moscow for Belarusians, Chinese, Uzbeks, and Chechens. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 20(1), 41-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-1-41-66</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Григорьев Д.С., Комягинская Е.Ш. Межгрупповой контакт, личные и общекультурные стереотипы в межкультурных отношениях: содержание стереотипов о белорусах, китайцах, узбеках и чеченцах в Москве // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2023. Т. 20. № 1. С. 41-66. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-1-41-66</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Holliday, A. (2020). Culture, communication, context, and power. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (pp. 39-54). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036210-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Imahori, T.T., &amp; Cupach, W.R. (2005). Identity management theory: Facework in intercultural relationships. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about Intercultural Communication (pp. 195-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Jenks, C., Bhatia, A., &amp; Lou, J. (2013). The discourse of culture and identity in national and transnational contexts. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.770862</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Kim, D., Pan, Y., &amp; Park, H.S. (1998). High-versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures. Psychology and Marketing, 15(6), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199809)15:6&lt;507::aid-mar2&gt;3.0.co;2-a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Kramer, R.M. (2004). The “dark side” of social context: the role of intergroup paranoia in intergroup negotiations. In M.J. Gelfand &amp; J.M. Brett (Eds.), The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture (pp. 219-237). Stanford: Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Malik, T.H. (2021). Sino-Russian negotiation styles: A cross-cultural analysis of situated patterns. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 6(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119887812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Martin, J.N., &amp; Nakayama, T.K. (2015). Reconsidering intercultural (communication) competence in the workplace: A dialectical approach. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Michailova, S., &amp; Hutchings, K. (2006). National cultural influences on knowledge sharing: A comparison of China and Russia. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 383-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00595.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Michailova, S., &amp; Worm, V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and Guanxi. European Management Journal, 21(4), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-2373(03)00077-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. (2017). Performative face theory: A critical perspective on interpersonal identity work. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 258-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1315891</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Oliver, R.L., Balakrishnan, P.V. (Sundar), &amp; Barry, B. (1994). Outcome satisfaction in negotiation: A test of expectancy disconfirmation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(2), 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Osland, J.S. (2008). Global leadership. AIB Insights, 8(1), 10-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Osland, J.S., &amp; Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909840</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, M.G. (2016). Hybrid and multiple organizational identities. In M.G. Pratt, M. Schultz, B.E. Ashforth, &amp; D. Ravasi (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (pp. 106-120). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199689576.013.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Puffer, S.M., &amp; McCarthy, D.J. (2011). Two decades of Russian business and management research: An institutional theory perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.61020800</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Ramirez-Marin, J.Y., &amp; Brett, J.M. (2011). Relational construal in negotiation: Propositions and examples from Latin and Anglo cultures. International Negotiation, 16(3), 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180611x592923</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Salacuse, J.W. (1998). Ten ways that culture affects negotiating style: Some survey results. Negotiation Journal, 14(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1998.tb00162.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Schaerer, M., Teo, L., Madan, N., &amp; Swaab, R.I. (2020). Power and negotiation: Review of current evidence and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Schoop, M. (2021). Negotiation communication revisited. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 29, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00730-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, D.L. (2010). Relational identity theory: A systematic approach for transforming the emotional dimension of conflict. American Psychologist, 65(7), 634-645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Smith, B., Sparkes, A.C., &amp; Caddick, N. (2014). Judging qualitative research. In L. Nelson, R. Groom &amp; P. Potrac (Eds.), Research Methods in Sports Coaching (pp. 192-201). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797549-18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, S.P., Thomas, R.W., Manrodt, K.B., &amp; Rutner, S.M. (2013). An experimental test of negotiation strategy effects on knowledge sharing intentions in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about Intercultural Communication (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Vaara, E., Tienari, J., &amp; Koveshnikov, A. (2019). From cultural differences to identity politics: A critical discursive approach to national identity in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 58(8), 2052-2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12517</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasilyeva, E.D. (2020). Psychological difficulties of Russian-Chinese intercultural communication: Qualitative study of Russian entrepreneurs and employees. Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 124-139. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Васильева Е.Д. Психологические трудности в процессе российско-китайской межкультурной коммуникации: опыт качественного исследования российской деловой среды // Организационная психология. 2020. Т. 10. № 3. С. 124-139.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasilyeva, E.D. (2022). The role of face-saving strategies in intercultural and monocultural business interaction. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow: HSE University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Васильева Е.Д. Роль стратегий сохранения «лица» в межкультурном и монокультурном деловом взаимодействии: дис. ... канд. психол. наук. М.: Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», 2022. 186 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
