<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">40392</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-4-896-913</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">YERTEE</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONALITY AND ENVIRONMENT: NATURE, CITY, SOCIETY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИЧНОСТЬ И ОКРУЖАЮЩАЯ СРЕДА: ПРИРОДА, ГОРОД, СОЦИУМ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Visual Image of the City in the Representations of Its Citizens: A Study of Krasnodar Residents</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Визуальный образ города в представлениях горожан (на материале исследования жителей Краснодара)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-7645</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">6989-5374</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tuchina</surname><given-names>Oksana R.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тучина</surname><given-names>Оксана Роальдовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор психологических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры истории, философии и психологии</p></bio><email>tuchena@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-8213</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">7423-6142</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Apollonov</surname><given-names>Ivan A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Аполлонов</surname><given-names>Иван Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, доцент, профессор кафедры истории, философии и психологии</p></bio><email>obligo@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Kuban State Technological University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Кубанский государственный технологический университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 20, NO4 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 20, №4 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>896</fpage><lpage>913</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-08-12"><day>12</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Tuchina O.R., Apollonov I.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Тучина О.Р., Аполлонов И.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tuchina O.R., Apollonov I.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Тучина О.Р., Аполлонов И.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/40392">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/40392</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The visual image of a city is an important factor in the subjective well-being of its residents. The perception of the visual side of the urban environment and its impact on the emotional, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of citizens has been studied by both international and Russian scientists. However, most of them focus on certain aspects of the urban environment. In this regard, of research interest are the citizens’ complex impressions about the visual image of their city. The study of the visual image of the city was carried out on the basis of the theory of social representations. The purpose of the work was to examine the social representations (SRs) of the visual image of the city and particularly the visual image of Krasnodar. The sample of the study consisted of respondents permanently residing in Krasnodar ( n = 354). The research methods were associative experiment and P. Vergès’ “prototypical analysis”, which made it possible to identify the hypothetical structure of SRs, using the frequency and rank of occurrence of the concept. The structure of the respondents’ SRs of the visual image of their city, obtained as a result of the study, revealed that the core of the citizens’ SRs included the architectural ensemble creating the style of the city and the visual characteristics of a well-planned and organized everyday urban space, whereas tourist-attractive elements of the urban environment were on the periphery of their SRs. The respondents’ SRs about the visual image of Krasnodar include, first of all, its centers of attraction, i.e., the historical center of the city and the “new center” (Krasnodar Park), as well as visual signs of comfortable and safe living. In general, the results of the study showed that the idea of the visual image of a city is largely determined by the specifics of an individual’s place of permanent residence, the historically established features of the urban environment, its opportunities and problems.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Визуальный образ города является важным фактором субъективного благополучия его жителей. Восприятие визуальной стороны городской среды и его влияние на эмоциональные, когнитивные и поведенческие характеристики горожан нашли отражение в работах как зарубежных, так и российских ученых, однако их внимание в основном фокусировалось на отдельных аспектах городской среды. В этой связи представляет интерес исследование комплексного впечатления респондентов о визуальном образе города. Изучение визуального образа города проводилось на основе теории социальных представлений и было нацелено на рассмотрение социальных представлений (СП) о визуальном образе города в целом и конкретно на визуальном образе Краснодара у постоянно проживающих в нем респондентов. Выборку составили респонденты, постоянно проживающие в Краснодаре ( n = 354). В качестве методов применялись ассоциативный эксперимент, прототипический анализ П. Вержеса, позволяющий выявить гипотетическую структуру СП, используя частоту встречаемости понятия и ранг появления понятия. Полученные в результате структуры СП респондентов о визуальном образе города позволили выявить, что в ядро СП входят архитектурный ансамбль, создающий стиль города и визуальные характеристики хорошо спланированного и организованного повседневного городского пространства, а туристически привлекательные элементы городской среды находятся на периферии СП горожан. СП о визуальном образе Краснодара включают, прежде всего, центры городского притяжения - исторический центр города и «новый центр» - парк «Краснодар», а также визуальные признаки комфортного и безопасного проживания. Результаты исследования показали, что представление о визуальном образе города во многом определяется спецификой места постоянного проживания индивида, исторически сложившимися особенностями городской среды, ее возможностями и проблемами.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>visual image</kwd><kwd>city</kwd><kwd>theory of social representations</kwd><kwd>urban environment</kwd><kwd>Krasnodar</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>визуальный образ города</kwd><kwd>теория социальных представлений</kwd><kwd>городская среда</kwd><kwd>Краснодар</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation and the Kuban Science Foundation (project no. 22-28-20292 “Works of fine art in the urban cultural space as a factor in the formation of local identity”).</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование осуществлено при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда и Кубанского научного фонда (проект № 22-28-20292 «Произведения изобразительного искусства в городском пространстве культуры как фактор формирования локальной идентичности»).</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Artemyeva, E.Yu. (1999). Fundamentals of the psychology of subjective semantics. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Артемьева Е.Ю. Основы психологии субъективной семантики. М.: Смысл, 1999. 350 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berman, M.G., Jonides, J., &amp; Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бовина И.Б., Дворянчиков Н.В., Мельникова Д.В., Лаврешкин Н.В. К вопросу об исследовании социальных представлений: взгляд со стороны // Социальная психология и общество. 2022. Т. 13. № 3. С. 8-25. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130302</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bovina, I.B., Dvoryanchikov, N.V., Melnikova, D.V., &amp; Lavreshkin, N.V. (2022). Studying social representations: An outsider’s perspective. Social Psychology and Society, 13(3), 8–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130302</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Володарская Е.А. Исследование образа ученого в контексте концепции социальных представлений Сержа Московиси // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2021. Т. 18. № 2. С. 402-421. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-402-421</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen, S., &amp; Liu, Z. (2016). What determines the settlement intention of rural migrants in China? Economic incentives versus sociocultural conditions. Habitat International, 58, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.09.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воробьева И.В., Кружкова О.В. Психология городской среды. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Рос. гос. проф.-пед. ун-та, 2012. 244 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernyavskaya, O.S. (2013). Nizhny Novgorod through the eyes of Nizhny Novgorod residents: The inner image of the city. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. Social Sciences, (1), 69–76. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вырва А.Ю. Изучение особенностей восприятия архитектурной городской среды на основе исследования панорам Google // Экспериментальная психология. 2017. Т. 10. № 1. С. 89-108. http://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100107</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drobysheva, T.V., &amp; Zhuravlev, A.L. (Eds.). (2016). Social-psychological studies of city. Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вырва А.Ю., Леонтьев Д.А. Субъективная семантика архитектурных образов. Возможности субъективно-семантических методов в исследовании восприятия архитектуры // Культурно-историческая психология. 2015. Т. 11. № 4. С. 96-111. http://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2015110409</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fedotova, N.G. (2019). Visual carriers of the cultural memory of the city (on the example of Veliky Novgorod). Praxema. Problems of Visual Semiotic, (2), 42–62. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2019-2-42-62</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Габидулина С.Э. Психология городской среды. М.: Смысл, 2012. 152 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Filko, A. (2015). Visual perception of the image of the city and methods of its research. Urbanistics, (3), 1–15. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2015.3.16497</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жоголева А.В., Леонова В.А., Полукеева Т.С. Особенности восприятия городского пространства исторического центра крупного города // Innovative project. 2020. Т. 5. № 11. С. 24-29. http://doi.org/10.17673/IP.2020.5.11.2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Franek, M., Petruzalek, J., &amp; Sefara, D. (2019). Eye movements in viewing urban images and natural images in diverse vegetation periods. Urban Forestry &amp; Urban Greening, 46, 1264773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126477</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зотова О.Ю. Предметно-пространственная и физическая среда города как условие психологической безопасности жителей городов // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2023. Т. 20. № 2. С. 352-373. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-2-352-373</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gabidulina, S.E. (2012). Psychology of the urban environment. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Избасарова С.А., Мельникова О.Т., Сухина Т.В. Роль логотипа в актуализации визуальной выразительности бренда // Национальный психологический журнал. 2022. № 2 (46). С. 56-64. http://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0206</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galindo, M.P., &amp; Hidalgo, M.C. (2005). Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes. International Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 19–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000104</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Капцевич О.А. Психологические эффекты визуального восприятия городской среды: систематический обзор // Психология. 2021. № 3. С. 575-597. http://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-575-597</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galli, I., &amp; Fasanelli, R. (2021). From prototypical stimuli to iconographic stimuli: The power of images in the study of social representations. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(2), 391–401. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-391-401</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Капцевич О.А. Семантические аспекты восприятия объектов городской среды по данным ассоциативного эксперимента // Известия РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена. Психологические науки 2022. № 204. С. 115-128. https://www.doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2022-204-115-128</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galli, I., Fasanelli, R., &amp; Schember, E. (2018). The construction of icons as a means of access to the social representation of culture. Culture &amp; Psychology, 24(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X17721860</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кашкабаш Т.В. Особенности восприятия визуально-коммуникативного пространства Москвы // Наука и бизнес: пути развития. 2013. № 10 (28). С. 25-28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyapina, V.N., &amp; Lebedeva, N.M. (Eds.). (2022). Values, identities and intercultural relations in Russia: Cross-regional analysis. Krasnodar: KubSTU Publishing House. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колчин Е.А., Иванов В.А., Тналиева Д.Б. Физическое восприятие цвета в городском пространстве // Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2016. Т. 3. № 1. С. 115-117.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hidalgo, M.C., Berto, R., Galindo, M.P., &amp; Getrevi, A. (2006). Identifying attractive and unattractive urban places: Categories, restorativeness and aesthetic attributes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 7(2), 115–133</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крашенинников А.В. Когнитивная урбанистика: архетипы и прототипы городской среды. М.: КУРС, 2020. 208 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Izbasarova, S.A., Melnikova, O.T., &amp; Sukhina, T.V. (2022). The role of the logo in the actualization of the visual expressiveness of the brand. National Psychological Journal, (2), 56–64. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0206</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Логунова Е.Н. Особенности формирования визуального образа крупного города (на примере Красноярска) // Молодежь и наука: сборник материалов VIII Всероссийской научно-технической конференции студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых, посвященной 155-летию со дня рождения К.Э. Циолковского. Красноярск: Сибирский федеральный ун-т, 2012. URL: https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/7593 (дата обращения: 01.07.2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaptsevich, O.A. (2021). Psychological effects of visual perception of the urban environment: A systematic review. Psychology, (3), 575–597. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-575-597</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мельникова О.Т., Мезенцева А.С. Визуальные методы в социально-психологическом исследовании // Социальная психология и общество. 2018. Т. 9. № 3. С. 42-52. http://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090305</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaptsevich, O.A. (2022). Semantic aspects of urban objects perception: Evidence from the associative experiment. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities &amp; Sciences, (204), 115–128. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2022-204-115-128</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Озерина А.А., Тимофеев Н.Е. Визуальный образ города в представлении студентов (на примере города Волгограда) // Герценовские чтения: психологические исследования в образовании. 2020. Вып. 3. С. 516-521. http://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-95</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karmanov, D., &amp; Hamel, R. (2008). Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2), 115–125.  http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пискунова А.Е. Городское пространство как конструкт восприятия: антропологическая размерность Новокузнецка // Томский журнал лингвистических и антропологических исследований. 2022. № 1 (35). С. 146-156.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashkabash, T.V. (2013). Features of the perception of the visual-communicative space of Moscow. Science and Business: Ways of Development, (10), 25–28. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Радина Н.К. Урбанистика и социальная психология: город в представлениях горожан // Социально-психологические исследования города / под общ. ред. Т.В. Дробышевой, А.Л. Журавлева. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2016. С. 61-82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrapova, V.A., &amp; Vlasova, Ya.M. (2010). Fury of color: Visual images of the modern city. Sociology of the City, (4), 12–14. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смолова Л.В. Психология взаимодействия с окружающей средой (экологическая психология). М.: ФЛИНТА, 2015. 711 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolchin, E.A., Ivanov, V.A., &amp; Tnalieva, D.B. (2016). Physical perception of color in urban space. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, 3(1), 115–117. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Социально-психологические исследования города / под общ. ред. Т.В. Дробышевой, А.Л. Журавлева. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2016. С. 61-82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasheninnikov, A.V. (2020). Cognitive urban studies: Archetypes and prototypes of the urban environment. Moscow: KURS Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сурков А.В. Динамическая модель восприятия мегаполиса в контексте городских культурных процессов // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 1. Проблемы образования, науки и культуры. 2017. № 3 (165). С. 183-190.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuo, F., &amp; Sullivan, W. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916501333002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тучина О.Р., Аполлонов И.А. Региональная идентичность как фактор психологической безопасности // Гуманизация образования. 2019. № 5. С. 166-179. http://doi.org/10.24411/1029-3388-20</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lindal, P.J., &amp; Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 26–36.  http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Федотова Н.Г. Визуальные носители культурной памяти города (на примере Великого Новгорода) // Праксема. Проблемы визуальной семиотики. 2019. № 2 (20). С. 42-62. http://doi.org/ 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-2-42-62</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Logunova, E.N. (2012). Features of the formation of a visual image of a large city (on the example of Krasnoyarsk). Youth and Science: Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference of Students, Graduate Students and Young Scientists, Dedicated to the 155th Anniversary of K.E. Tsiolkovsky. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University. (In Russ.) Retrieved July 1, 2023, from http://elib.krasu.ru/handle/2311/7593</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Филько А. Визуальное восприятие образа города и методы его исследования // Урбанистика. 2015. № 3. С. 1-15. http://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2015.3.16497</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Melnikova, O.T., &amp; Mezentseva, A.S. (2018). Visual methods in socio-psychological research. Social Psychology and Society, 9(3), 42–52. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090305</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Храпова В.А., Власова Я.М. Неистовство цвета: визуальные образы современного города // Социология города. 2010. № 4. С. 12-14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moliner, P., &amp; Bovina, I. (2021). Introduction: The heuristic value of social representations theory. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(2), 291–298. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-291-298</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ценности, идентичности и межкультурные отношения в России: кросс-региональный анализ / под ред. В.Н. Галяпиной, Н.М. Лебедевой. Краснодар: Изд-во КубГТУ, 2022. 212 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moscovici, S., &amp; Duveen, G. (2000). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чернявская О. С. Нижний Новгород глазами нижегородцев: внутренний образ города // Вестник Нижегородского университета имени Н. И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки. 2013. № 1 (29). С. 69-76.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Negami, H.R., Mazumder, R., Reardon, M., &amp; Ellard, C.G. (2018). Field analysis of psychological effects of urban design: A case study in Vancouver. Cities &amp; Health, 2(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2018.1548257</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шмелина О.С., Цыганкова О.Е. Образы «города-мечты» и реального города в представлении жителей крупного и малого городов // Социально-психологические исследования города / под общ. ред. Т.В. Дробышевой, А.Л. Журавлева. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2016. С. 61-82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ozerina, A.A., &amp; Timofeev, N.E. (2020). Visual image of the city in the minds of students (on the example of the city of Volgograd). Herzen Readings: Psychological Research in Education, (3), 516–521. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-95</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berman M.G., Jonides J., Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature // Psychological Science. 2008. Vol. 19. No. 12. Pp. 1207-1212. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piskunova, A.E. (2022). Urban space as a construct of perception: the anthropological dimension of Novokuznetsk. Tomsk Journal of Linguistic and Anthropological Research, (1), 146–156. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen S., Liu Z. What determines the settlement intention of rural migrants in China? Economic incentives versus sociocultural conditions // Habitat International. 2016. Vol. 58. Pp. 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.09.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Radina, N.K. (2016). Urban studies and social psychology: The city in the minds of the townspeople. Social-Psychological Studies of the City (pp. 61–82). Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Franek M., Petruzalek J., Sefara D. Eye movements in viewing urban images and natural images in diverse vegetation periods // Urban Forestry &amp; Urban Greening. 2019. Vol. 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126477</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies. An introduction to researching with visual materials. London: Sage.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galindo M.P., Hidalgo M.C. Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes // International Journal of Psychology. 2005. Vol. 40. No. 1. Pp. 19-27. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000104</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schember, E., Tuselli, A., Fasanelli, R., &amp; Galli, I. (2015). The internal structure of the social representation of culture: An empirical contribution. International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 1, 174–179</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galli I., Fasanelli R. From prototypical stimuli to iconographic stimuli: the power of images in the study of social representations // RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2021. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 391-401. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-391-401</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shmelina, O.S., &amp; Tsygankova, O.E. (2016). Images of a “dream city” and a real city in the minds of residents of large and small cities. Social-Psychological Studies of City (pp. 27–49). Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galli I., Fasanelli R., Schember E. The construction of icons as a means of access to the social representation of culture // Culture &amp; Psychology. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 2. Pp. 212-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X17721860</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smolova, L.V. (2015). Psychology of interaction with the environment (ecological psychology). Moscow: FLINTA Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hidalgo M.C., Berto R., Galindo M.P., Getrevi A. Identifying attractive and unattractive urban places: categories, restorativeness and aesthetic attributes // Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano. 2006. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 115-133</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Surkov, A.V. (2017). Dynamic model of metropolis perception in the context of urban cultural processes. Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Problems of Education, Science and Culture, (3), 183–190. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karmanov D., Hamel R. Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2008. Vol. 86. Pp. 115-125. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tennessen, C.M., &amp; Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuo F., Sullivan W. Environment and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime? // Environment and Behavior. 2001. Vol. 33. No. 3. Pp. 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916501333002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tuchina, O.R., &amp; Apollonov, I.A. (2019). Regional identity as a factor of psychological security. Humanization of Education, (5), 166–179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1029-3388-2019-10061</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lindal P.J., Hartig T. Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2013. Vol. 33. Pp. 26-36. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulrich, R.S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moliner P., Bovina I. Introduction: the heuristic value of social representations theory // RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2021. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 291-298. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-291-298</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Valtchanov, D., &amp; Ellard, C.G. (2015). Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 184–195. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2015.07.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moscovici S., Duveen G. Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van den Berg, A.E., Joye, Y., &amp; Koole, S.L. (2016). Why viewing nature is more fascinating and restorative than viewing buildings: A closer look at perceived complexity. Urban Forestry &amp; Urban Greening, 20, 397–401. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.011</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Negami H.R., Mazumder R., Reardon M., Ellard C.G. Field analysis of psychological effects of urban design: a case study in Vancouver // Cities &amp; Health. 2018. Vol. 2. No. 2. Рр. 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2018.1548257</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volodarskaya, E.A. (2021). Study of the image of a scientist in the context of the concept of social representations of Serge Moskovisi. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(2), 402–421. (In Russ.) http://doi.org//10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-402-421</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose G. Visual methodologies. An introduction to researching with visual materials. London: Sage, 2007. 240 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vorobieva, I.V., &amp; Kruzhkova, O.V. (2012). Psychology of the urban environment. Ekaterinburg: Publishing house of Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schember E., Tuselli A., Fasanelli R., Galli I. The internal structure of the social representation of culture: an empirical contribution // International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 1. Рр. 174-179.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vyrva, A.Yu. (2017). The study of the perception of the architectural urban environment based on the study of Google panoramas. Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 89–108. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100107</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tennessen C.M., Cimprich B. Views to nature: effects on attention // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1995. Vol. 15. No. 1. Рр. 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vyrva, A.Yu., &amp; Leontiev, D.A. (2015). Subjective semantics of architectural images. Possibilities of subjective-semantic methods in the study of the perception of architecture. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 11(4), 96–111. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2015110409</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ulrich R.S. Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects // Environment and Behavior. 1981. Vol. 13. No. 5. Рр. 523-556.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A.K., &amp; Ryan, R.M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1315–1329.  http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341649</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valtchanov D., Ellard C.G. Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2015. Vol. 43. Рр. 184-195. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2015.07.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., &amp; Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482–493. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2010.04.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van den Berg A.E., Joye Y., Koole S.L. Why viewing nature is more fascinating and restorative than viewing buildings: a closer look at perceived complexity // Urban Forestry &amp; Urban Greening. 2016. Vol. 20. Рр. 397-401. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.011</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wilson, J., &amp; Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows: Police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weinstein N., Przybylski A.K., Ryan R.M. Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2009. Vol. 35. No. 10. Рр. 1315-1329. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341649</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhogoleva, A.V., Leonova, V.A., &amp; Polukeeva, T.S. (2020). Peculiarities of urban space perception of the historical center of a large city. Innovative Project, 5(11), 24–29. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17673/IP.2020.5.11.2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">White M., Smith A., Humphryes K., Pahl S., Snelling D., Depledge M. Blue space: the importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010. Vol. 30. No. 4. Pp. 482-493. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2010.04.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zotova, O.Yu. (2023). Subject-spatial and physical urban environment as a condition for the psychological security of urban residents. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 20(2), 352–373. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-2-352-373</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wilson J., Kelling G. Broken windows: police and neighborhood safety // Atlantic Monthly. 1982. Vol. 249. Pp. 29-38</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
