<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">35294</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-2-229-243</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">WFIHOU</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONALITY AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИЧНОСТЬ И ВЫЗОВЫ СОВРЕМЕННОСТИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Personality Features That Contribute to Transition of Young People from Unregistered Marriage to Marital Relations</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Личностные особенности, способствующие переходу молодых людей от незарегистрированного брака к семейно-брачным отношениям</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-4589</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9187-7641</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Poznyakov</surname><given-names>Vladimir P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Позняков</surname><given-names>Владимир Петрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Psychology, Professor, chief researcher, Institute of Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор психологических наук, профессор, главный научный сотрудник</p></bio><email>pozn_v@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2271-2992</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Poddubny</surname><given-names>Sergey E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Поддубный</surname><given-names>Сергей Евтихиевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Researcher, Institute of Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, доцент, ассоциированный научный сотрудник</p></bio><email>serpodd@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-1962</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Panfilova</surname><given-names>Yuliya M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Панфилова</surname><given-names>Юлия Михайловна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>postgraduate student, Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology, Institute of Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>выпускница аспирантуры, лаборатория социальной и экономической психологии</p></bio><email>panfilova-julia@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт психологии Российской академии наук</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-06-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 20, NO2 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 20, №2 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>229</fpage><lpage>243</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-07-07"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Poznyakov V.P., Poddubny S.E., Panfilova Y.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Позняков В.П., Поддубный С.Е., Панфилова Ю.М.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Poznyakov V.P., Poddubny S.E., Panfilova Y.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Позняков В.П., Поддубный С.Е., Панфилова Ю.М.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/35294">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/35294</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The study examined the role of personality traits and value orientations of young people (both men and women) as factors contributing to the transition from an unregistered marriage to marital relations. The differences in the severity of personality traits and the importance of individual values among the partners living in unregistered and registered marriages were revealed. The sample of the study included two groups of respondents aged 18 to 35: partners in an unregistered marriage (cohabitation) - 144 persons (men and women 50% each) and partners in a registered marriage - 120 persons (men - 42.5%, women - 57.5%). The research methods and tools included: S.H. Schwartz’s Values Questionnaire (Personality Profile Section), 50-point form of L. Goldberg’s Five-Factor Personality Inventory and a scale for assessing the intention to marry and commitment to have and raise children. The results of both questionnaires were processed using the Multipsychometer hardware-software diagnostic complex, which converted the initial test scores into a 10-point equal-interval Sten scale. The presence and nature of the statistical influence was established using multiple linear regression analysis, statistical differences were identified using Student’s t -test and Mann - Whitney U -test. According to the results of the study, the personality trait “agreeableness” was the leading factor in the commitment to have and raise children as well as in the readiness to register a marriage with a partner. The significant differences in the severity of personality traits and the significance of individual values in the partners who were in a registered and unregistered marriage were identified statistically. It was found that the respondents in a registered marriage, compared with their counterparts in an unregistered marriage, had significantly more prominent personality traits such as “agreeableness” and “emotional stability” and, for them, the values “universalism”, “benevolence” and “self-direction” were more important. The obtained results can be used to scientifically substantiate practical recommendations for managers and specialists involved in the support and development of the family institution in modern Russian society, as well as in the practice of individual and family counseling.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Исследование посвящено изучению роли личностных черт и ценностных ориентаций молодых людей (мужчин и женщин) как факторов, способствующих переходу от отношений незарегистрированного брака к семейно-брачным отношениям. Выявлялись различия в выраженности личностных черт и значимости индивидуальных ценностей у партнеров, проживающих в незарегистрированном и зарегистрированном браках. Выборка включала две группы респондентов в возрасте от 18 до 35 лет: партнеров, состоящих в незарегистрированном браке (сожительстве) - 144 человека (50 % мужчин, 50 % женщин), и партнеров, состоящих в зарегистрированном браке - 120 человек (42,5 % мужчин, 57,5 % женщин). Применялись опросник ценностей Ш. Шварца (раздел «Профиль личности»), 50-пунктовая форма 5-факторного опросника Л. Голдберга, шкалы для оценки намерения вступить в брак и нацеленности на рождение и воспитание детей. Для обработки результатов использовался аппаратно-программный диагностический комплекс «Мультипсихометр» с переводом исходных тестовых оценок в 10-балльную равноинтервальную шкалу. Наличие и характер статистического влияния устанавливались с помощью множественного линейного регрессионного анализа, выявление статистических различий осуществлялось методами t -критерия Стьюдента и критерия Манна - Уитни. По результатам исследования, личностная черта «доброcердечность» выступила ведущим фактором нацеленности на рождение и воспитание детей, а также готовности зарегистрировать брак с партнером. Выявлены статистически значимые различия в выраженности личностных черт и значимости индивидуальных ценностей у партнеров, состоящих в зарегистрированном и незарегистрированном браках: у респондентов, состоящих в зарегистрированном браке, достоверно более выражены такие черты личности, как добросердечность и эмоциональная стабильность, и для них более значимы ценности «универсализм», «доброта» и «самостоятельность». Полученные данные могут быть использованы для научного обоснования практических рекомендаций для руководителей и специалистов, занимающихся поддержкой и развитием института семьи современного российского общества, а также в практике индивидуального и семейного консультирования.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>unregistered marriage</kwd><kwd>marital relations</kwd><kwd>personality factors</kwd><kwd>value orientations</kwd><kwd>personality traits</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>незарегистрированный брак</kwd><kwd>семейно-брачные отношения</kwd><kwd>личностные особенности</kwd><kwd>ценностные ориентации</kwd><kwd>личностные черты</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study was supported by Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-28-00356.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при поддержке гранта Российского научного фонда № 22-28-00356.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bagdanova, L.P., &amp; Shchukina, A.S. (2003). Civil marriage in the modern demographic. Social Studies, (7), 100-105. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Багданова Л.П., Щукина А.С. Гражданский брак в современной демографической ситуации // Социальные исследования. 2003. № 7 (231). С. 100‒105.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Billari, F.C., &amp; Liefbroer, A.C. (2016). Why still marry? The role of feelings in the persistence of marriage as an institution. The British Journal of Sociology, 67, 516-540. http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12202</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бим-Бад Б.М., Гавров С.Н. Модернизация института семьи: социологический, экономический и антрополого-педагогический анализ. М.: Интеллектуальная книга – Новый хронограф, 2010. 352 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bim-Bad, B.M., &amp; Gavrov, S.N. (2010) Modernization of the family institute: Sociological, economic, anthropological and pedagogical analysis. Moscow: Intellektualnaya Kniga - Novyi Khronograf Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воеводина Ю.С. Незарегистрированный брак как социальный механизм формирования брачно-семейных отношений в российском обществе: методология социологического анализа: автореф. дис. ... канд. социол. наук. М.: МГУ, 2009. 30 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown, L.S., Manning, W.D., &amp; Wu, H. (2022). Relationship quality in midlife: A comparison of dating, living apart together, cohabitation and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(3), 860-878. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12813</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Галкина Е.П., Кадничанская М.И. Трансформация института семьи в условиях современных модернизационных процессов // Вестник ОмГУ. 2015. № 3. С. 193‒200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Emelyanova, T.P., &amp; Schmidt, D.A. (2021). Social representations of the marriage partner: A generational approach. Social Psychology and Society, 12(1), 126-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120109</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Емельянова Т.П., Шмидт Д.А. Социальные представления о брачном партнере: поколенческий подход // Социальная психология и общество. 2021. Т. 12. № 1. С. 126–142. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120109</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galkina, E.P., &amp; Kadnichanskaya, M.I. (2015). Transformation of the family institution in the context of modern modernization processes. Vestnik OmSU, (3), 193-200. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жолудева С.В. Психологическая готовность к браку на разных этапах периода взрослости: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. Ростов н / Д.: Южный федеральный университет, 2009. 26 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goldberg, L.R. (1997). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe (vol. 7, pp. 7-28.). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зимина Н.А. Личностная зрелость молодежи как критерий готовности к семейной жизни // Концепт. 2016. Т. 15. С. 1096–1100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hiekel, N., &amp; Castro-Martin, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 489-505. http://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12112</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кабанова К.В. Анализ основных направлений современных социально-психологических исследований семьи и брачных отношений // Психология и Психотехника. 2021. № 4. С. 99‒110. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0722.2021.4.34834</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joshi, P., Quan, J.M., &amp; Cherlin, A.J. (2009). Contemporary work and family issues affecting marriage and cohabitation among low-income single mothers. Family Relations, 5, 647-661. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00581.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Карандашев В.Н. Методика Шварца для изучения ценностей личности: концепция и методическое руководство. СПб.: Речь, 2004. 70 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kabanova, K.V. (2021). Analysis of the main directions of modern socio-psychological research of family and marital relations. Psychology and Psychotechnic, (4), 99-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0722.2021.4.34834</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ковалева А.В. Гражданский брак как дестабилизатор института семьи // Власть и управление на Востоке России. 2009. № 1 (46). С. 142‒148.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kanter, J.B., Lavner, J.A., Lannin, D.G., Hilgard, J., &amp; Monk, J.K. (2021). Does couple communication predict later relationship quality and dissolution? A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(2), 533-551. http://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12804</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кольцова В.А., Левкович В.П. Социально-психологические проблемы супружеских отношений. История и современное состояние. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2018. 172 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kapelle, N., &amp; Lersch, P.M. (2020). The accumulation of wealth in marriage. Over-time change and within-couple inequalities. European Sociological Review, 36(4), 580-593. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лидовская Н.Н. Взаимоотношения супругов в незарегистрированном браке: автореф. дис. ... канд. психол. наук. СПб.: С.-Петерб. гос. ун-т., 2009. 24 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karandashev, V.N. (2004) Schwartz's Questionnaire for the study of personality values: Concept and methodological guidance. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Махнач А.В. Жизнеспособность человека и семьи: социально-психологическая парадигма. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2016. 459 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koltsova, V.A., &amp; Levkovich, V.P. (2018). Socio-psychological problems of marital relations. History and current state. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of RAS. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Орлова И.Н. Социально-психологическая готовность студенческой молодежи к созданию семьи: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. М.: Моск. гор. психол.-пед. ун-т., 2013. 28 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koops, J.C., Liefbroer, A.C., &amp; Gauthier, A.H. (2021). Having a child within a cohabiting union in Europe and North America: What is the role of parents' socio-economic status? Population, Space and Place, 27(6), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2434</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Папа О.М. Сожительство как альтернатива браку // Современные исследования социальных проблем. 2012. № 2 (10). С. 1‒9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kovaleva, A.V. (2009). Civil marriage as a destabilizer of the institution of the family. Power and Administration in Eastern Russia, (1), 142-148. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Позняков В.П., Панфилова Ю.М. Юридические и социально-психологические аспекты незарегистрированного брака // Наука. Культура. Общество. 2017. № 3‒4. С. 92‒101.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lidovskaya, N.N. (2009). The relationship of spouses in an unregistered marriage. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Позняков В.П., Поддубный С.Е., Панфилова Ю.М. Личностные факторы перехода молодых людей к семейно-брачным отношениям: замысел и программа эмпирического исследования // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2022. № 3 (126). С. 144‒150.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makhnach, A.V. (2016) Human and family viability: A socio-psychological paradigm. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of RAS. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Реан А.А., Андреева Т.В. Психологические проблемы гражданского брака // Вестник Балтийского федерального университета имени И. Канта. Серия: Филология, педагогика, психология. 2009. № 5. С. 36‒44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makhnach, A.V., &amp; Zuev, K.B. (Eds.). (2015). Family, marriage and parenthood in modern Russia (issue 2). Moscow: Institute of Psychology of RAS. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рябикина З.И., Хозяинова Т.К., Босенко М.В., Аверина Е.Н. Эго-идентичность и ценностная направленность мужчин и женщин, состоящих в незарегистрированных отношениях и в браке // Южно-российский журнал социальных наук. 2020. Т. 21. № 3. С. 78‒96. https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-3-78-96</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nagornova, A.Y. (Eds.). (2019). Family relations in modern society: Problems and transformations. Ulyanovsk: Zebra Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Саралиева З.Х., Блонин В.А., Егорова Н.Ю. Жизненные миры современной российской семьи. Н. Новгород: Изд-во ННГУ, 2015. 264 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orlova, I.N. (2013). Social and psychological readiness of student youth to create a family. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow: Moscow City Psychological and Pedagogical University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семейные отношения в современном обществе: проблемы и трансформации: коллективная монография / отв. ред. А.Ю. Нагорнова. Ульяновск: Зебра, 2019. 423 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Papa, O.M. (2012). Cohabitation as an alternative to marriage. Modern Studies of Social Problems, (2), 1-9. (In Russ.) Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-399730</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семья, брак и родительство в современной России / под ред. А.В. Махнача, К.Б. Зуева. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2015. Вып. 2. 408 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poznyakov, V.P., &amp; Panfilova Yu.M. (2017). Legal and socio-psychological aspects of unregistered marriage. Nauka. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo, (3-4), 92-101. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стасюк В.В. Статус «гражданского брака»: как понимается этот институт современным обществом // Белорусская думка. 2009. № 12. С. 168‒173.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Quari, S. (2014). Marriage, adaptation and happiness: Are there long-lasting gains to marriage? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 50, 29-39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.01.003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тихомиров Д.А. Либерализация половой морали в современном мире // Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2015. № 3. С. 96–103. http://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2015.3.8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rean, A.A., &amp; Andreeva, T.V. (2009). Psychological problems of civil marriage. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University named after I. Kant. Series: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology, (5), 36-44. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Универсальная психодиагностическая система «Мультипсихометр»: методическое руководство. М.: Информационные психотехнологии, 2014. Т. 1. 200 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ryabikina, Z.I., Khozyainova, T.K., Bosenko, M.V., &amp; Averina, E.N. (2020). The identity and value orientation of men and women in unregistered relationships and in marriage. South Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 21(3), 78-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-3-78-96</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шукшина Л.В., Мизонова О.В. Психологические особенности отношения современной молодежи к гражданскому браку и семье // Проблемы современного педагогического образования. 2018. № 60‒2. С. 486‒488.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saralieva, Z.H., Blonin, V.А., &amp; Yegorova N.Y. (2015). Life worlds of the modern Russian family. Nizhny Novgorod: NNSU Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ярыгина Н.Ю. Мотивационно-смысловая готовность к семейной жизни: автореф. дис. ... канд. психол. наук. М.: ПИ РАО, 2007. 20 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sassler, S., &amp; Miller, A. (2011). Class differences in cohabitation processes. Family Relations, 60(2), 163-177. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00640.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Billari F.C., Liefbroer A.C. Why still marry? The role of feelings in the persistence of marriage as an institution // The British Journal of Sociology. 2016. Vol. 67. Pp. 516‒540. http:// doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12202</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schwartz, S.H. (2015). Handbook of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown L.S., Manning W.D., Wu H. Relationship quality in midlife: a comparison of dating, living apart together, cohabitation and marriage // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2021. Vol. 84. No 3. Pp. 860‒878. http:// doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12813</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shukshina, L.V., &amp; Mizonova, O.V. (2018). Psychological features of the attitude of modern youth to civil marriage and family. Problemy Sovremennogo Pedagogicheskogo Obrazovaniya, (60-2), 486-488. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goldberg L.R. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models // Personality Psychology in Europe. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1997. Vоl. 7. Pp. 7‒28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stasyuk, V.V. (2009). The status of “civil marriage”: How this institution is understood by modern society. Belorussian Dumka, (12), 168-173. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hiekel N., Castro-Martin T. Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. 2014. Vol. 76. No 3. Pp. 489‒505. http://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12112</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Marriage and Family Code of the RSFSR of June 30, 1969. (1969). Vedomosti of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, (32). (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joshi P., Quan J.M., Cherlin A.J. Contemporary work and family issues affecting marriage and cohabitation among low-income single mothers // Family Relations. 2009. Vol. 5. Pp. 647‒661. http:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00581.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tikhomirov, D.A. (2015). Liberalization of sexual in the modern world. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, (3), 96-103. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kanter J.B., Lavner J.A., Lannin D.G., Hilgard J., Monk J.K. Does couple communication predict later relationship quality and dissolution? A meta-analysis // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2021. Vol. 84. No 2. Pp. 533‒551. http://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12804</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Treter, M.O., Rhoades, G.K., Scott, S.B., Markman, J.H., &amp; Stanley, M.S. (2021). Having a baby: Impact on married and cohabiting parents. Relationships. Family Process, 61(2), 477-492. http://doi.org/10.10.1111/famp.12567</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kapelle N., Lersch P.M. The accumulation of wealth in marriage. Over-time change and within-couple inequalities // European Sociological Review. 2020. Vol. 36. No 4. Pp. 580–593. http:// doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Universal psychodiagnostic system “Multipsychometer”. Methodological guidance (2014, vol. 1). Moscow: Informatsionnye Psikhotekhnologii Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koops J.C., Liefbroer A.C., Gauthier A.H. Having a child within a cohabiting union in Europe and North America: what is the role of parents' socio-economic status? // Population, Space and Place. 2021. Vol. 27. No 6. Pp. 1‒15. http://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2434</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voevodina, Yu.S. (2009). Unregistered marriage as a social mechanism for the formation of marital and family relations in Russian society: Methodology of sociological analysis. Ph.D. in Sociology Thesis. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Quari S. Marriage, adaptation and happiness: are there long-lasting gains to marriage? // Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 2014. Vol. 50. Pp. 29‒39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.01.003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Willoughby, B.J., Carroll, J.S., &amp; Busby, D.M. (2012). The different effects of “living together”: Determining and comparing types of cohabiting couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 397-419. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431184</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sassler S., Miller A. Class differences in cohabitation processes // Family Relations. 2011. Vol. 60. Issue 2. Pp. 163‒177. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00640.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yarygina, N.Yu. (2007). Motivational and semantic readiness for family life. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow: Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schwartz S.H. Handbook of value / e. by D. Sander, T. Brosch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 432 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zholudeva, S.V. (2009). Psychological readiness for marriage at different stages of the adulthood period. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Rostov-on-Don: South Federal University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Treter M.O., Rhoades G.K., Scott S.B., Markman J.H., Stanley M.S. Having a baby: impact on married and cohabiting parents’ relationships // Family Process. 2021. Vol. 61. No 2. Pp. 477‒492. http://doi.org/10.10.1111/famp.12567</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimina, N.A. (2016). Psychological analysis of youth readiness for family life. Psychological science and Practice: Problems and Prospects: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 188-194). Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Willoughby B.J., Carroll J.S., Busby D.M. The different effects of “living together”. Determining and comparing types of cohabiting couples // Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2012. Vol. 29. Pp. 397–419. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431184</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
