<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">32241</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-429-447</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONALITY IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИЧНОСТЬ В МЕЖКУЛЬТУРНОЙ КОММУНИКАЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Development of a Measure for Assessing Perceived Community Culture Based on Triandis’s Horizontal/Vertical Individualism-Collectivism Cultural Orientation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Разработка методики оценки воспринимаемой культуры сообщества на основе культурной ориентации «горизонтальный/вертикальный индивидуализм - коллективизм» Г. Триандиса</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-7289</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gallyamova</surname><given-names>Albina Alikovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Галлямова</surname><given-names>Альбина Аликовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>стажер-исследователь, Центр социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>aagallyamova@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-7942</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Grigoryev</surname><given-names>Dmitry Sergeevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Григорьев</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Research Fellow, Center for Sociocultural Research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>PhD, научный сотрудник, Центр социокультурных исследований</p></bio><email>dgrigoryev@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">HSE University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-10-07" publication-format="electronic"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 19, NO3 (2022)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 19, №3 (2022)</issue-title><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>447</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-10-07"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2022, Gallyamova A.A., Grigoryev D.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2022, Галлямова А.А., Григорьев Д.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gallyamova A.A., Grigoryev D.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Галлямова А.А., Григорьев Д.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/32241">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/32241</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">A new measure based on Triandis’s horizontal/vertical individualism-collectivism cultural orientation was developed to assess perceived community culture though the lens of horizontal individualism, vertical individualism, horizontal collectivism, and vertical collectivism. In the first step, a qualitative analysis using cognitive interviews showed that item wordings were appropriate to the Russian context, meaningfully accurate, and tangible to participants. In the second step, there was empirical testing of measure with 300 participants of the sociopsychological survey (questionnaire). The results showed that the expected factor structure had acceptable global and local fit of measurement model with the collected data. The measures had measurement equivalence by gender and acceptable indicators of reliability and validity. Comparison of obtained results with those published earlier showed that presented measure of the cultural orientations provided better model fit and indicators than the original measure or its other modifications, adaptations, and translations into Russian. Moreover, the developed measure showed that the assessment results were meaningfully correlated with the individual values of the participants assessed by Schwartz’s basic human values approach. Finally, the measure is particularly useful and can be successfully applied in a variety of studies aimed to study social influence. The questionnaire in English is available at Appendix in the end of the paper.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">На основе культурной ориентации «горизонтальный/вертикальный индивидуализм - коллективизм» Г. Триандиса разработана новая методика измерения воспринимаемой культуры сообщества на базе оценки уровня ее горизонтального индивидуализма, вертикального индивидуализма, горизонтального коллективизма и вертикального коллективизма. На первом этапе качественный анализ содержания пунктов посредством когнитивных интервью показал, что формулировки адекватны российскому контексту и являются содержательно точными и понятными для респондентов. Во втором этапе эмпирической проверки методики с помощью социально-психологического опроса (анкетирование) приняло участие 300 человек. Результаты свидетельствуют, что предложенная факторная структура имеет удовлетворительное глобальное и локальное соответствие измерительной модели собранным эмпирическим данным. Методика обладает измерительной эквивалентностью по полу, а также удовлетворительными показателями надежности и валидности. Сравнение полученных результатов с опубликованными ранее продемонстрировало, что представленная методика измерения культурных ориентаций имела лучшие показатели, чем оригинальная или другие ее модификации, адаптации и переводы на русский язык. Кроме того, разработанная методика показала, что полученные результаты измерения содержательно соотносятся с личными индивидуальными ценностями участников, которые оценивались с помощью методики базовых человеческих ценностей Ш. Шварца. Методика будет особенно полезна и может успешно применяться в различных исследованиях, посвященных социальному влиянию.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cultural orientations</kwd><kwd>social ecology</kwd><kwd>community culture</kwd><kwd>social influence</kwd><kwd>horizontal individualism</kwd><kwd>vertical individualism</kwd><kwd>horizontal collectivism</kwd><kwd>vertical collectivism</kwd><kwd>psychological measurement</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>культурные ориентации</kwd><kwd>социальная экология</kwd><kwd>культура сообщества</kwd><kwd>социальное влияние</kwd><kwd>горизонтальный индивидуализм</kwd><kwd>вертикальный индивидуализм</kwd><kwd>горизонтальный коллективизм</kwd><kwd>вертикальный коллективизм</kwd><kwd>методика</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agadullina, E.R., Ivanov, A.A., Sarieva, I.R., &amp; Prusova, I.S. (2021). System justification theory: A new perspective on the problem of inequality. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 10(1), 132-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100113</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Агадуллина Е.Р., Иванов А.А., Сариева И.Р., Прусова И.С. Теория оправдания системы: новый взгляд на проблему неравенства // Современная зарубежная психология. 2021. Т. 10. № 1. С. 132-141. http://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100113</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berry, J.W. (2019). Ecocultural psychology (D. Grigoryev, Transl.). Cultural-Historical Psychology, 15(4), 4-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150401</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Берри Дж.У. Экокультурная психология / пер. с англ. Д.С. Григорьев // Культурно-историческая психология. 2019. Т. 15. № 4. С. 4-16. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150401</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Echterhoff, G., Kopietz, R., &amp; Higgins, E.T. (2013). Adjusting shared reality: Communicators’ memory changes as their connection with their audience changes. Social Cognition, 31(2), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Efremova, M., Panyusheva, T., Schmidt, P., &amp; Zercher, F. (2017). Mixed methods in value research: An analysis of the validity of the Russian version of the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) using cognitive interviews, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Ask: Research and Methods, 26(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/81933</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Fornell, C., &amp; Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., &amp; Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Inglehart, R.F. (2008). Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1-2), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701834747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Inglehart, R.F., &amp; Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Jost, J.T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., &amp; Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Kline, R.B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kryukova, T.L. (2013) Sociocultural syndromes of collectivism vs. individualism as coping research context in Russians. Vestnik Kostromskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Imeni N.A. Nekrasova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sotsial'naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sociokinetika, 19(4), 130-134. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крюкова Т.Л. Социокультурные синдромы коллективизм/индивидуализм как контекст совладания со стрессом у россиян // Вестник Костромского государственного университета имени Н.А. Некрасова. Серия: Педагогика. Психология. Социальная работа. Ювенология. Социокинетика. 2013. Т. 19. № 4. С. 130-134</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Kyriazos, T.A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 9(8), 2207-2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lebedeva, N.M., &amp; Tatarko, A.N. (2007). Cultural values and social development. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лебедева Н.М., Татарко А.Н. Ценности культуры и развитие общества. М.: ГУ-ВШЭ, 2007. 527 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lebedeva, N.M., Chirkov, V.I., &amp; Tatarko, A.N. (2007). Culture and attitude to health: Russia, Canada, China. Moscow: RUDN University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лебедева Н.М., Чирков В.И., Татарко А.Н. Культура и отношение к здоровью: Россия, Канада, Китай. М.: РУДН, 2007. 314 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Mai, R., Niemand, T., &amp; Kraus, S. (2021). A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions about structural equation models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muminova A.M., Titov A.S., Batkhina A.A., &amp; Grigoryev D.S. (2022). Russian political identity profiles: The role of moral foundations, system justification, and resistance to change. Social Psychology and Society, 13(1), pp. 104-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130107</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Муминова А.М., Титов А.С., Батхина А.А., Григорьев Д.С. Профили политической идентичности россиян: роль моральных оснований, оправдания системы и сопротивления изменениям // Социальная психология и общество. 2022. Т. 13. № 1. С. 104-123. http://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130107</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (2019). Human environments as a source of stress and a resource to overcome it: Returning to the psychology of everyday life. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 40(5), 15-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920006072-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нартова-Бочавер С.К. Жизненная среда как источник стресса и ресурс его преодоления: возвращаясь к психологии повседневности // Психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 40. № 5. С. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920006072-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pankratova А.A., Osin Е.N., &amp; Hasanova, U.U. (2017). Levels of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism in Russia and Azerbaijan. Psychological Studies, 10(55), 3. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i55.352</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Панкратова А.А., Осин Е.Н., Гасанова У.У. Уровень горизонтального и вертикального индивидуализма и коллективизма в России и Азербайджане // Психологические исследования. 2017. Т. 10. № 55. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i55.352</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Ponizovskiy, V., Arant, R., Larsen, M., &amp; Boehnke, K. (2020). Sticking to common values: Neighbourhood social cohesion moderates the effect of value congruence on life satisfaction. Journal of Community &amp; Applied Social Psychology, 30(5), 530-546. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2457</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Rentfrow, P.J., Gosling, S.D., &amp; Potter, J. (2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 339-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00084.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Saris, W.E., Satorra, A., &amp; van der Veld, W.M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2-3), 137-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S.H., &amp; Ros, M. (1995). Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 91-122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D.P.S., &amp; Gelfand, M.J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Sirganci, G., Uyumaz, G., &amp; Yandi, A. (2020). Measurement invariance testing with alignment method: Many groups comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(4), 657-673. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.714218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Sivadas, E., Bruvold, N.T., &amp; Nelson, M.R. (2008). A reduced version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale: A four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research, 61(3), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Smith, P.B., &amp; Bond, M.H. (2019). Cultures and persons: Characterizing national and other types of cultural difference can also aid our understanding and prediction of individual variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02689</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Tehrani, D.H., &amp; Yamini, S. (2022). Gender differences concerning the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: A meta-analysis. Psychological Studies, 67(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00638-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Triandis, H.C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.51.4.407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Triandis, H.C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Triandis, H.C., &amp; Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., &amp; Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Vargas, J.H., &amp; Kemmelmeier, M. (2013). Ethnicity and contemporary American culture: A meta-analytic investigation of horizontal - vertical individualism-collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112443733</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
