RUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsRUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика2313-16832313-1705Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)2691010.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-2-375-390THE DIFFERENTIATED EXPRESSION OF SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONSМНОГООБРАЗИЕ ПРОЯВЛЕНИЯ СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ПРЕДСТАВЛЕНИЙResearch ArticleThe Mute Zone of Social Representations and the Effects of (Un)Masking: Review and ProspectsСкрытая зона социальных представлений и эффекты (де)маскировки: обзор и перспективыhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-4676RateauPatrickРатоПатрик

Ph.D. in Psychology, Full Professor of Social Psychology

Ph.D., профессор социальной психологии лаборатории EPSYLON EA4556

patrick.rateau@univ-montp3.frhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-539XLo MonacoGrégoryЛо МонакоГрегори

Ph.D. in Psychology, Full Professor in Education Sciences

Ph.D., профессор наук об образовании ADEF лаборатории UR 4671

gregory.lo-monaco@univ-amu.frPaul Valéry University Montpellier 3Университет Поля Валери, Монпелье 3Aix-Marseille UniversityУниверситет Экс-Марсель25082021182Theory of Social Representations around the WorldРазвитие теории социальных представлений в России и мирe37539001072021Copyright ©; 2021, Rateau P., Lo Monaco G.Copyright ©; 2021, Рато П., Ло Монако Г.2021Rateau P., Lo Monaco G.Рато П., Ло Монако Г.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/26910

Twenty years ago, Guimelli and Deschamps (2000) hypothesised the existence of the mute zone of social representations. According to the authors, certain parts of the social representations of objects, described as “sensitive”, were not expressed under normal survey conditions. This fundamental question was curiously addressed very late in literature on social representations, but has been having significant success within the community of researchers working in this field since then. This seminal work, which offered a methodological perspective capable of highlighting such unspoken facts, paved the way for studies that proposed several theoretical interpretations and new techniques for exploring this ‘mute zone’. The challenge was twofold: to identify the processes involved and to invent the appropriate tools to express the counter-normative contents potentially attached to certain objects of representation. This article proposes to take stock of these 20 years of research and to anticipate new avenues oriented on the one hand on the study of the socio-cognitive processes involved in the mute zone phenomenon, and on the other hand on the proposal of new theoretical and methodological articulations with other concepts dealing with similar issues.

Двадцать лет назад Гимелли и Дешам (2000) выдвинули гипотезу о существовании скрытой зоны социальных представлений. По мнению этих ученых, некоторые части социальных представлений об объектах, описанных как «чувствительные», не выявляются в обычных условиях исследования без дополнительных приемов. Этот фундаментальный вопрос на удивление поздно был поднят в литературе по социальным представлениям, но с тех пор он привлекает все больше внимания исследователей, работающих в данной области. В своей основополагающей работе Гимелли и Дешам предложили методологическую перспективу, позволяющую выявлять такие «невысказанные факты» и проложившую путь для дальнейших исследований, в которых были выдвинуты несколько теоретических интерпретаций и новых методов изучения «скрытой зоны» социальных представлений. При этом исследователям было важно как определить лежащие в основе «маскировки» процессы, так и разработать соответствующие инструменты для выявления контрнормативного содержания, потенциально связанного с определенными объектами представления. В настоящей работе предлагается подвести итоги этих двадцатилетних изысканий и наметить новые направления исследований, ориентированных, с одной стороны, на изучение социально-когнитивных процессов, связанных с феноменом скрытой зоны, а с другой - на поиск новых теоретических и методологических связей с другими концепциями, исследующими аналогичные вопросы.

mute zonesocial representations(un)maskingsocial comparisonbehaviourpowermethodologyскрытая зонасоциальные представления(де)маскировкасоциальное сравнениеповедениевластьметодологияAbric, J.C. (1976). Jeux, conflits et représentations sociales. Aix-en-Provence: Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat de l’Université de Provence.Abric, J.-C. (1994). Pratiques sociales et représentations. Presses Universitaires de France.Abric, J.-C. (2003). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette des représentations sociales. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d’études des représentations sociales (pp. 59-80). Ramonville Saint Agne: Érès.Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T., & Zanna, M.P. (2005). Handbook of attitudes. New York: Psychology Press.Allport, G.W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. Henry Holt.Anderson, B.A., Silver, B.D., & Abramson, P.R. (1988). The effects of the race of the interviewer on race-related attitudes of black respondents in SRC/CPS national election studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(3), 289-324. https://doi.org/10.1086/269108Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J.L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362-1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1362Campbell, B. (1981). Race-of-interviewer effects among southern adolescents. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 231-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268654Chambers, J.R. (2008). Explaining false uniqueness: Why we are both better and worse than others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 878-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00076.xChesterman, A. (2015). Des prescriptions aux comportements de protection du risque sismique en région Provence-Alpes-Cote-d’Azur. Développement d’un paradigme substitutif. Aix-en-Provence: Thèse de doctorat de l’université d’Aix-MarseilleChesterman, A., & Rateau, P. (2012a). Implicit social comparison through self-other substitution and its role in behaviour change. 30th International Congress of Psychology, Cap Town (South Africa), 22-27 July 2012Chesterman, A., & Rateau, P. (2012b). Using self-other substitution to induce pro-environmental behaviour: A new line in behaviour change research. 22nd Conference of the International Association for People-Environment Studies, Glasgow (Scotland), 24-29 June 2012Chokier, N., & Moliner, P. (2006). La “zone muette” des représentations sociales. Pression normative et/ou comparaison sociale? Bulletin de Psychologie, 3, 281-286. https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.483.0281Chokier, N., & Rateau, P. (2009). Représentations sociales et comparaison soi-autrui. In P. Rateau & P. Moliner (Eds.), Représentations sociales et processus sociocognitifs (pp. 31-44). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de RennesCialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., & Reno, R.R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 24, pp. 201-234). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015Codol, J.-P. (1984). La perception de la similitude interpersonnelle: influence de l’appartenance catégorielle et du point de référence de la comparaison. L’Année Psychologique, 84(1), 43-56. https://www.persee.fr/doc/psy_0003-5033_1984_num_84_1_29000Davis, D.W. (1997). Nonrandom measurement error and race of interviewer effects among African Americans. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 183-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297792De Oliveira, P., Dambrun, M., & Guimond, S. (2008). L'effet de la dominance sociale sur les idéologies de légitimation: le rôle modérateur de l'environnement normatif. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 21(4), 115-150De Oliveira, P., Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2012). Power and legitimizing ideologies in hierarchy-enhancing vs. hierarchy-attenuatin environments. Political Psychology, 33(6), 867-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00909.xDegraeve, B., Granié, M.-A., Pravossoudovitch, K., & Lo Monaco, G. (2015). Social representations associated with men and women drivers among French adolescents and adults. Effects of the perceiver’s age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 34, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.019Deschamps, J.C., & Guimelli, C. (2002). La composante émotionnelle des représentations sociales: émotions rapportées et tendances à l’action dans une étude comparative des représentations sociales de l’insécurité en France et en Suisse. Nouvelle Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 1(1), 78-84Deschamps, J.C., & Guimelli, C. (2004). L’organisation interne des représentations sociales de la sécurité/insécurité et l’hypothèse de la «zone muette». In J.-L. Beauvois, R.-V. Joule & J.-M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales, (vol. 9, pp. 105-130). Rennes: Presses universitaires de RennesDevine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5Doise, W. (1973). Relations et représentations intergroupes. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (pp. 195-214). LarousseDubois, D., Rucker, D.D., & Galinsky, A.D. (2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally larger (and sometimes smarter) than powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610365170Falomir-Pichastor, J.-M., Muñoz, D., Invernizzi, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Perceived in-group threat as a factor moderating the influence of in-group norms on discrimination against foreigners. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.189Fazio, R.H., & Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225Fazio, R.H., Jackson, J.R., Dunton, B.C., & Williams, C.J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1013-1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229Finkel, S.E., Guterbock, T.M., & Borg, M.J. (1991). Race-of-interviewer effects in a preelection poll Virginia 1989. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1086/269264Flament, C. (1994). Le plaisir et la rémunération dans la représentation sociale du travail. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 23, 61-69Flament, C., & Milland, L. (2010). La substitution dans les études de représentations sociales: quel processus impliqué? Psychologie Française, 55(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2010.05.003Flament, C., & Rouquette, M.-L. (2003). Anatomie des idées ordinaires. Paris: Armand ColinFlament, C., Guimelli, C., & Abric, J. C. (2006). Effets de masquage dans l'expression d'une représentation sociale. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 15-31. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.069.0015Galinsky, A.D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Magee, J.C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453Gilbert, D.T., & Hixon, J.G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 60(4), 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York (NY): DoubledayGreenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27Guegan, J., Moliner, P., & Vidal, J. (2013). Enquête en ligne et masquage/démasquage des opinions sensibles: une autre approche des effets de contexte. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 26(1), 101-124Guimelli, C., & Deschamps, J.C. (2000). Effets de contexte sur la production d’associations verbales. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 47-48, 44-54Guimelli, C., Hidalgo, H., Piermattéo, A., Lo Monaco, G., & Abric, J.C. (2012, Juin). Zone muette des représentations sociales et comportements. 11ème Conférence Internationale sur les Représentations Sociales, Evorà, PortugalHardoin, M., & Codol, J.P. (1984). Self and others descriptions: The influence of the descriptions order on categories used. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 4, 295-302Hidalgo, M. (2012). Représentations sociales et contextes: études autour de l'expression et des comportements en lien avec les éléments masqués. Aix-en-Provence: Thèse de doctorat de l’Université d’Aix-MarseilleHimmelfarb, S., & Lickteig, C. (1982). Social desirability and the randomized response technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.710Jellison, J., & Green, J. (1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643-649. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.643Jodelet, D. (1989). Folies et représentations sociales. Paris: Presses universitaires de FranceJones, E.E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031617Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R., & Cialdini, R.B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610009Kelman, H.C (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60Kelman, H.C. (2001). Reflections on social and psychological processes of legitimization and delegitimization. In J.T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 54-73). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressKeltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265Klein, O., Licata, L., Azzi, A.E., & Durala, I. (2003). “How European am I?” Prejudice Expression and the Presentation of Social Identity. Self & Identity, 2, 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309025Klein, O., Livingston, R.W., & Snyder, M. (2005). Être ou ne pas être politiquement correct? La relation entre préjugé et expression d’impressions stéréotypées en fonction du self-monitoring. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 67/68, 55-64Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University PressLajunen, T., & Summala, H. (2003). Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation research part F: Traffic psychology and behaviour, 6(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2011). Hegemonic and polemical beliefs: Culture and consumption in the social representation of wine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 232-245. https://10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.21Lo Monaco, G., Lheureux, F., Chianèse, L., Codaccioni, C., Halimi-Falkowicz, S., & Cano, P. (2009). Contexte d’expression, statut social des intervenants de santé et production d’un discours normatif: le cas de l’alcool et des jeunes. Pratiques psychologiques, 15(3), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2008.02.002Maner, J.K., & Mead, N.L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 482-497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018559Maner, J.K., Gailliot, M.T., Butz, D.A., & Peruche, B.M. (2007). Power, risk and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297405Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72Milland, L., & Flament, C. (2010). Les facettes d'une représentations sociale: nouvelle approche des effets de masquage. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2(86), 213-240.Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Mullen, B., Atkins, J.L., Champion, D.S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J.E., & Venderklok, M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4Overbeck, J.R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549Pérez, J.A., & Mugny, G. (1993). Influences sociales: la théorie de l'élaboration du conflit. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et NiestléPettigrew, T.F., & Meertens, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106Piermattéo, A., Lo Monaco, G., Moreau, L., Girandola, F., & Tavani, J.L. (2014). Context variations and pluri-methodological issues concerning the expression of a social representation: The example of the Gypsy Community. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1-12. https://10.1017/sjp.2014.84Rateau, P., & Chesterman, A. (2017). I’m more eco-friendly than other people and I’ll prove it: Substitution and pro-environmental behaviors. IAPS 2017 Symposium, Dar Es Salaam (Tanzanie), 27-29 september 2017Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., & Kallgren, C.A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104Richeson, J.A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Effects or situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00521-8Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-XSchuman, H., & Converse, J.M. (1971). The effects of black and white interviewers on black responses in 1968. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35(1), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1086/267866Stangor, C., Swim, J.K., Van Allen, K.L., & Sechrist, G.B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.69Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N.M. (1974). Response effects in surveys: A review and synthesis. Chicago: Aldine PublishingSwingle, P.G. (1970). Exploitative behavior in non-zero-sum games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029844Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York: Academic PressTrémolière, B., & Rateau, P. (Submitted). You’re heartless, I’m less: Self-image and social norm in moral judgment. https://psyarxiv.com/9qnpy/Vescio, T.K., Gervais, S.J., Heiphetz, L., & Bloodhart, B. (2009). The stereotypic behaviors of the powerful and their effect on the relatively powerless. In T.D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 247-265). Psychology PressWarner, S.L. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309), 63-69. https://10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775Yzerbyt, V. (1997). Automaticité et contrôle. In J.-Ph. Leyens & J.-L. Beauvois (Eds.), La psychologie sociale: l'ère de la cognition (vol. 3, pp. 173-189). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble