<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1683</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1705</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">26153</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-122-139</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERSONALITY IN THE MODERN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN RUSSIA AND IN THE WORLD</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИЧНОСТЬ В СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЙ СРЕДЕ В РОССИИ И МИРЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Theoretical and Methodological Bases of a New School Model in Russia: Cultural-Historical Psychology and the Activity Approach as the Foundation of Educational Practice</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Теоретико-методологические основания построения модели новой школы в России: культурно-историческая психология и деятельностный подход как фундамент образовательной практики</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zaretsky</surname><given-names>Viktor K.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зарецкий</surname><given-names>Виктор Кириллович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, is Professor at Individual and Group Psychotherapy Department of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, профессор кафедры индивидуальной и групповой психотерапии факультета консультативной и клинической психологии</p></bio><email>zaretskiyvk@mgppu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zaretsky</surname><given-names>Yury V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зарецкий</surname><given-names>Юрий Викторович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Departmen of the Faculty of Clinical and Counseling Psychology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, доцент кафедры клинической психологии и психотерапии факультета консультативной и клинической психологии</p></bio><email>zaretskiyyuv@mgppu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Karyagina</surname><given-names>Tatiana D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карягина</surname><given-names>Татьяна Дмитриевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Psychology, is Senior Researcher at Laboratory of Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy of the Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, and Associate Professor at Individual and Group Psychotherapy Department of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Head of the Master’s Program on Counseling Psychology of the Moscow State University of Psychology and Education</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории консультативной психологии и психотерапии Психологического института Российской академии образования, доцент кафедры индивидуальной и групповой психотерапии, руководитель магистерской программы «Консультативная психология» факультета консультативной и клинической психологии Московского государственного психолого-педагогического университета</p></bio><email>kartan18@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ostroverkh</surname><given-names>Oksana S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Островерх</surname><given-names>Оксана Семеновна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Human Resource Psychology and Management Department of the Institute of Economics, Management and Environmental Studies</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, доцент кафедры психологии управления человеческими ресурсами Института экономики, государственного управления и финансов</p></bio><email>ostrovoksana@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tikhomirova</surname><given-names>Anna V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тихомирова</surname><given-names>Анна Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Lecturer of the Department of Individual and Group Psychotherapy Department of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Leading Analyst of the Center for Evidence-Based Social Design</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>преподаватель кафедры индивидуальной и групповой психотерапии факультета консультативной и клинической психологии, ведущий аналитик Центра доказательного социального проектирования</p></bio><email>tihomirovaav@mgppu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Fedorenko</surname><given-names>Elena Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Федоренко</surname><given-names>Елена Юрьевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, is Dean of the Faculty of Management in Education</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, декан факультета менеджмента в сфере образования</p></bio><email>e.fedorenko@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State University of Psychology and Education</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный психолого-педагогический университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Психологический институт Российской академии образования</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Siberian Federal University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Сибирский федеральный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff4"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow School of Social and Economic Science</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московская высшая школа социальных и экономических наук</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-03-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 18, NO1 (2021)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 18, №1 (2021)</issue-title><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>139</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-03-30"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Zaretsky V.K., Zaretsky Y.V., Karyagina T.D., Ostroverkh O.S., Tikhomirova A.V., Fedorenko E.Y.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Зарецкий В.К., Зарецкий Ю.В., Карягина Т.Д., Островерх О.С., Тихомирова А.В., Федоренко Е.Ю.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zaretsky V.K., Zaretsky Y.V., Karyagina T.D., Ostroverkh O.S., Tikhomirova A.V., Fedorenko E.Y.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Зарецкий В.К., Зарецкий Ю.В., Карягина Т.Д., Островерх О.С., Тихомирова А.В., Федоренко Е.Ю.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/26153">https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/26153</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">To overcome the crisis of the modern school institution, it is necessary to qualitatively rethink its foundations and to design fundamentally new approaches to implementing the educational program. The theoretical and methodological bases of the concept of a new type of school as a development practice, based on the provisions of Russian cultural-historical psychology and the activity approach are presented. The purpose of the work is to consider in the modern context the key theoretical provisions of Russian psychology and to formulate the methodological principles arising from them, which set the conditions for organizing the educational process, thus ensuring the transition from theory to practice. The key concepts of the school model are ‘development’, ‘agency’ and ‘collaboration’: ‘infinite development’ is formulated as the supreme goal and value of the school, the development of the position of agency is considered as the main productive process, and collaboration is the main professional principle. Eight basic principles are formulated as follows: intent - implementation - reflection as a methodological scheme for organizing school processes, the principle of multidimensional development, the principle of equal importance of school activities, the principle of congruence, the principle of organizing the educational space as a space for growing up, the principle of fellowship of practices and the development-oriented approach to evaluation. Thus, the article presents the authors’ view of the school as a scientifically grounded anthropological practice. The implementation of the concept, which has already begun in Russia, is an experiment that will make it possible to verify these theoretical and methodological provisions.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Кризис института современной школы требует качественного переосмысления ее основ и проектирования принципиально новых подходов к реализации образовательной программы. Представлены теоретико-методологические основания концепции школы нового типа как практики развития, базирующиеся на положениях российской культурно-исторической психологии и деятельностного подхода. Цель работы - рассмотреть, переосмысляя в современном контексте, ключевые теоретические положения отечественной психологии и сформулировать вытекающие из них методологические принципы, которые задают условия организации образовательного процесса и тем самым обеспечивают переход от теории к практике. В качестве ключевых понятий концепции школы рассматриваются «развитие», «субъектность» и «сотрудничество»: «бесконечное развитие» формулируется как высшая цель и ценность школы, в качестве основного продуктивного процесса полагается становление субъектной позиции, главным профессиональным принципом - сотрудничество. Сформулированы восемь основных опорных принципов: замысел - реализация - рефлексия как методологическая схема организации процессов в школе, принцип многовекторности развития, принцип равнозначности видов деятельности в школе, принцип конгруэнтности, принцип организации образовательного пространства как пространства взросления, принцип содружества практик и подход к оцениванию, направленный на развитие. Таким образом, представлен авторский взгляд на школу как научно обоснованную антропологическую практику. Уже начавшаяся в России реализация концепции является экспериментом, позволяющим верифицировать данные теоретико-методологические положения.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>education</kwd><kwd>development</kwd><kwd>position of agency</kwd><kwd>collaboration</kwd><kwd>development practice</kwd><kwd>anthropological practice</kwd><kwd>cultural-historical psychology</kwd><kwd>activity approach</kwd><kwd>leading activity</kwd><kwd>child-adult community</kwd><kwd>growing up</kwd><kwd>educational space</kwd><kwd>zone of proximal development</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>образование</kwd><kwd>развитие</kwd><kwd>субъектная позиция</kwd><kwd>сотрудничество</kwd><kwd>практика развития</kwd><kwd>антропологическая практика</kwd><kwd>культурно-историческая психология</kwd><kwd>деятельностный подход</kwd><kwd>ведущая деятельность</kwd><kwd>детско-взрослая общность</kwd><kwd>взросление</kwd><kwd>образовательное пространство</kwd><kwd>зона ближайшего развития</kwd><kwd>рефлексия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The paper was prepared as part of the research project of the Moscow State University of Psychology and Education “Development of the conceptual model of the new school”.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена в рамках научно-исследовательского проекта Московского государственного психолого-педагогического университета «Разработка концептуальной модели новой школы».</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Arievitch, I.M (2017). Beyond the Brain: An Agentive Activity Perspective on Mind, Development, and Learning. Sense Publishers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Alekseev, N.G. (2002). Proektirovanie uslovii razvitiya refleksivnogo myshleniya. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow: MPSU. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Belopolskaya, N.L. (1997). Otsenka kognitivnykh i emotsionalnykh komponentov zony blizhayshego razvitiya u detey s zaderzhkoy psikhicheskogo razvitiya. Voprosy Psikhologii, (1), 19-25. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Blonsky, P.P. (1979). Izbrannye pedagogicheskie i psikhologicheskie sochineniya. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chudinova, E.V., &amp; Sanina, S.P. (2016). Ekspress-diagnostika osnovnykh obrazovatelnykh rezultatov v nachalnoy i osnovnoy shkole. Moscow: Avtorsky klub Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Davydov, V.V. (1996). Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya. Moscow: INTOR. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Davydov, V.V., Slobodchikov, V.I., &amp; Tsukerman, G.A. (1992). Mladshy shkolnik kak subyekt deyatelnosti. Voprosy Psikhologii, (3), 14-19. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Elkonin, B.D., &amp; Frumin, I.D. (1993). Obrazovatelnoe prostranstvo kak prostranstvo razvitiya (“shkola vzrosleniya”). Voprosy Psikhologii, (1), 24-33. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Elkonin, B.D. (2015). Pedagogicheskaya ideya razvivayushchego obucheniya. In B.D. El-konin, B.A. Arkhipov, O.S. Ostroverkh &amp; O.I. Sviridova (Eds.), Sovremennost i vozrast (pp. 26-28). Moscow: Avtorsky klub Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Elkonin, D.B. (1989). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, M.M., &amp; Zaretsky, V.K. (2000). Proekt Obshchestvennogo dogovora “Ob usloviyakh normalnogo razvitiya osobennogo rebenka”. Pervoe Sentyabrya, (40). (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gromyko, Yu.V., Margolis, A.A., &amp; Rubtsov, V.V. (2020). The school as ecosystem of developing child-adult communities: activity approach to designing the school of the future. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 16(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160106 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Khasan, B.I. (1990). Soderzhatelnyy konflikt - uslovie uchebnoy deyatelnosti i mekhanizm yeyo razvitiya. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvivayushchego obucheniya (pp. 22-27). Krasnoyarsk: KSU Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Kholmogorova, A.B. (2016). Significance of Cultural-Historical Theory of psychological development of L.S. Vygotsky for the development of modern models of social cognition and psychotherapy. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 12(3), 58-92. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120305 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kravtsova, E.E. (2001). Kulturno-istoricheskie osnovy zony blizhaishego razvitiya. Psikhologichesky Zhurnal, 22(4), 42-50. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Leontev, A.N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Leontiev, D.A. (1997). Samorealizatsiya i sushchnostnye sily cheloveka. In D.A. Leontiev &amp; V.G. Shchur (Eds.), Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v post-sovetskoy psikhologii (pp. 156-176). Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Nikolaevskaya, I.A. (2020). Situational-vectorial analysis of transcripts of sessions, aimed at overcoming of learning difficulties: a case study. Klinicheskaya i Spetsialnaya Psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 9(1), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2020090110 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Obukhova, L.F., &amp; Korepanova, I.A. (2005). Prostranstvenno-vremennaya skhema zony blizhayshego razvitiya. Voprosy Psikhologii, (5), 13-26. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Ostroverkh, O.S. (2012). Pedagogical Action in Educational Space of the Younger Pupils Schooling Activities. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences, 11(5), 1628-1638.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Petrovsky, V. A. (2010). Sushchestvuet li Ya - subyekt poznaniya. Metodologiya i Istoriya Psikhologii, (1), 136-148. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Polivanova, K.N. (2012). Praktiki razvitiya: Vzroslenie v sovremennom mire. “Novoe detstvo” Seminar Proceedings. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://psyjournals.ru/newchildhood/issue/56292.shtml (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Rubinshteyn, S.L. (1986). Printsip tvorcheskoy samodeyatelnosti (k filosofskim osnovam sovremennoy pedagogiki). Voprosy Psikhologii, (4), 101-109. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Rubtsov, V.V., Margolis, A.A., &amp; Guruzhapov, V.A. (1996). Kulturno-istorichesky tip shkoly (proyekt razrabotki). Psychological Science and Education, 1(4), 79-93. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Sanina, S.P. (2016). Development of primary school teacher’s competences in the process of solving professional tasks. Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie Psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru] 8(4), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2016080405 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Slobodchikov, V.I., &amp; Isaev, E.M. (1991). Kategoriya vozrasta v psikhologii i pedagogike razvitiya. Voprosy Psikhologii, (2), 37-50. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Stetsenko, A. P. (2020). Critical Challenges in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: the Urgency of Agency. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 16(2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Tsukerman, G.A. (1996). Ot umeniya sotrudnichat k umeniyu uchit sebya. Psychological Science and Education, (2), 27-42. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Tsukerman, G.A. (2006). Child-adult interaction: the creation of zone of proximal development. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], (4), 61-73. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Tsukerman, G.A., &amp; Venger, A.L. (2010). Razvitie uchebnoy samostoyatelnosti. Moscow: OIRO Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Tsukerman, G.A., &amp; Masterov, B.M. (1995). Psikhologiya samorazvitiya. Moscow: Interpraks Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Vasilyuk, F.E. (1996). Metodologichesky smysl psikhologicheskogo skhizisa. Voprosy Psikhologii, (6), 25-40. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Vasilyuk, F.E. (2007) Ponimayushchaya psikhoterapiya kak psikhotekhnicheskaya sistema. Doctor of Psychology Thesis. Moscow: Psychological Institute of RAE. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Vasilyuk, F.E. (2015). Coexperiencing Psychotherapy as a Psychotechnical System. Journal of Russian &amp; East European Psychology, 52(1), 1-58. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10610405.2015.1064721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Dinamika umstvennogo razvitiya shkolnika v svyazi s obucheniem. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya. Moscow: Pedagogika Press. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. The Collected Works of Vygotsky. Plenum Press. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/index.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thinking and Speaking. Thought and Language. The M.I.T. Press. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/words/index.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Vygotsky, L.S. (1984). Problemy detskoy (vozrastnoy psikhologii). In L.S. Vygotsky, Collected Works (vol. 4, pp. 243-432). Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Wertsch, J.V. (2004). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, (51), 66-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Zaretsky, V.K. (2009). The zone of proximal development - What Vygotsky did not have time to write. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(6), 70-93. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405470604</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Zaretsky, V.K. (2013). Stanovlenie i sushchnost refleksivno-deyatelnostnogo podkhoda v okazanii konsultativnoy psikhologicheskoy pomoshchi. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 21(2), 8-37. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Zaretsky, V.K. (2016). Vygotsky’s Principle “One step in learning - one hundred steps in development”: From Idea to Practice. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 12(3), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Zaretsky, V.K., Zaretsky, Yu.V., Ostroverkh, O.S., Tikhomirova, A.V., Fedorenko, E.Yu. (2020). Sravnitelny analiz kontseptualnykh osnovanii sovremennykh obrazovatelnykh sistem i obrazovatelnykh praktik (na primere sravneniya sistemy razvivayushchego obucheniya i refleksivno-deyatelnostnogo podkhoda). Psikhologo-Pedagogicheskie Issledovaniya, 12(4), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2020120401 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Zaretsky, Yu.V. (2014). Subyektnaya pozitsiya shkolnikov po otnosheniyu k uchebnoy deyatelnosti v raznykh vozrastnykh periodakh. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Zaretsky, Yu.V. (2013). Subject position on learning activity as a resource for the development and the subject of the study. Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], (2), 110-128. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Zinchenko, V.P. (2011). Lev Semenovich Vygotsky: Zhizn i deyatelnost. In T.G. Shchedrina (Ed.), Stil myshleniya: Problema istoricheskogo yedinstva nauchnogo znaniya. K 80-letiyu Vladimira Petrovicha Zinchenko (pp. 294-299). Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
