RUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsRUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика2313-16832313-1705Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)1510710.22363/2313-1683-2016-4-29-36ArticlesСтатьиResearch ArticleCAPACITY, POTENTIAL, AND ABILITY: INTEGRATING DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO STUDYING ANIMAL VS HUMAN CREATIVE PROCESSESЗАДАТКИ, ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ И СПОСОБНОСТИ: ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ ПОДХОДОВ К ИССЛЕДОВАНИЮ ТВОРЧЕСКИХ ПРОЦЕССОВ У ЧЕЛОВЕКА И ЖИВОТНЫХKaufmanJames CКауфманДжеймс Кpsyj@rudn.universityKaufmanAllison BКауфманЭллисон Бpsyj@rudn.universityNeag School of Education University of ConnecticutКоннектикутский университетUniversity of Connecticut, Avery PointКоннектикутский университет151220164NO4 (2016)№4 (2016)293603022017Copyright ©; 2016, Кауфман Д.К., Кауфман Э.Б.2016Кауфман Д.К., Кауфман Э.Б.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/15107For all of the differences between studying animal and human creativity and innovation, there are enough similarities that we can gain insight by integrating both perspectives. Both research approaches focus on creative ability, but animal studies favor the concept of creative capacity whereas human scholars prefer the idea of creative potential. We explore here the implications of these differences and what each field can learn from the other.

При всех различиях в изучении творческих и инновационных процессов у животных и человека существует и определенное сходство, которое можно лучше понять при интеграции обоих подходов. Оба подхода направлены на изучение творческих способностей, но исследователи животных предпочитают концепцию творческих задатков, а исследователи человека - творческого потенциала. В статье рассмотрены следствия, вытекающие из различий в исследовательских подходах, а также то, чем данные подходы могут обогатить друг друга.На основании обзора литературы по проблеме исследования творческих процессов у человека и животных выявлены основные положения, которые позволяют исследователям человека показать путь от возможностей (потенциала) к способностям, а исследователям животных - от задатков к способностям. Исследователи животных уже рассматривают индивидуальные различия между ними и, как результат, показывают, как возможности могут опосредовать связь между задатками и способностями. Если работа в этом направлении будет продолжена, то может быть выявлено то, каким образом индивидуальные различия связаны с высокими творческими и инновационными проявлениями.

creativityanimal creativitycreative potentialcreative geniusтворчествотворческие процессы у животныхтворческие задаткитворческий потенциалтворческие способноститворческий генийAmabile T.M., Goldfarb P. & Brackfield S.C. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 1990, vol. 3, pp. 6-21.Amabile T.M., Schatzel E.A., Moneta G.B. & Kramer S.J. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, vol. 15, pp. 5-32.Baer J. & Kaufman J.C. Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Roeper Review, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 158-163.Beghetto R.A. & Kaufman J.C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 13-79.Beghetto R.A., Kaufman J.C. & Baer J. Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, 2014.Benson-Amram S. & Holekamp K.E. Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas.Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 2012. vol. 279, pp. 4087-95.Bókony V., Lendvai Á.Z., Vágási C.I., Pǎtraş L., Pap P.L., Németh J., … Liker A. Necessity or capacity? Physiological state predicts problem-solving performance in house sparrows. Behavioral Ecology, (2014), vol. 25, pp. 124-135.Burghardt G. A brief glimpse at the long evolutionary history of play. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 90-98.Chamove A.S., Eysenck H.J. & Harlow H.F. Personality in monkeys: Factor analyses of Rhesus social behavior. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, vol. 24, pp. 496-504.Cussen V.A. & Mench J.A. Personality predicts cognitive bias in captive psittacines, Amazona amazonica. Animal Behaviour, 2014, vol. 89, pp. 123-130.Dingemanse N.J. & R ale D. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour, 2005, vol. 142, pp. 1159-1184.Eskelinen H.C., Winship K.A, & Borger-turner J.L. Sex, age, and individual differences in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in response to environmental enrichment, Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 241-253.Feist G.J. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 290-309.Feist G.J. The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 113-130.Forgeard M.J.C. & Kaufman J.C. Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 250-269.Forgeard M.J.C. & Mecklenburg A.C. The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 2013, vol. 17, pp. 255-266.Garamszegi L.Z., Eens M., Török J. & Tregenza T. Birds reveal their personality when singing.PLoS ONE, 2008, vol. 3, e2647.Gosling S.D. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?Psychological Bulletin, 2001, vol. 127, pp. 45-86.Gardner H. Creating minds. New York: Basic Books, 1993.Grinsted L., Pruitt J.N., Settepani V. & Bilde T. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 2013, vol. 280, pp. 2013-1407.Gruber H.E. & Wallace D.B. Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist, 2001, vol. 56, pp. 346-349.Haldane J.B.S. The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics, 1957, vol. 55, pp. 511-524.Hegarty C.B. & Plucker J.A. Self-expression in creative leisure. International Journal of Creativityand Problem Solving, 2012, vol. 22, pp. 63-78.Hennessey B.A. If I were Secretary of Education: A focus on intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2015, vol. 9, pp. 187-192.Hennessey B.A. & Amabile T.M. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 2010, vol. 61, pp. 569-598.Hergovich A., Mauerer I. & Riemer V. Exotic animal companions and the personality of their owners. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 2011, vol. 24, pp. 317-327.Herrmann E. & Call J. Are there geniuses among the apes? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 2012, vol. 367, pp. 2753-61.Highfill L.E. & Kuczaj S.A. Do bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) have distinct and stable personalities? Aquatic Mammals, 2007, vol. 33, pp. 380-389.Highfill L.E. & Kuczaj S.A. How studies of wild and aptive dolphins contribute to our understanding of individual differences and personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2010, vol. 23, pp. 269-277.Holbrook C.T., Wright C.M. & Pruitt J.N. Individual differences in personality and behavioural plasticity facilitate division of labour in social spider colonies. Animal Behaviour, 2014, vol. 97, pp. 177-183.Jauk E., Benedek M., Dunst B. & Neubauer A.C. The relationship between intelligence and creativity: new support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 2013, vol. 41, pp. 212-221.Karwowski M. & Lebuda I. The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and The Arts, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 214-232.Kaufman A.B., Butt A.B., Colbert-White E.N. & Kaufman J.C. Towards a neurobiological model of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2011, vol. 125, pp. 255-272.Kaufman J.C. Creativity 101 (2nd Edition). New York: Springer, 2016.Kaufman J.C. & Baer J. The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 15-25.Kaufman J.C. & Beghetto R.A. Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 1-12.Kaufman J.C. & Kaufman A.B. Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 2004, vol. 22, pp. 143-155.Kawai M. Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet. Primates, 1965, vol. 6, pp. 1-30.Kralj-Fi er S. & Schneider J.M. Individual behavioural consistency and plasticity in an urban spider. Animal Behaviour, 2012, vol. 84, pp. 197-204.Kuczaj S.A., Highfill L. & Byerly H. The importance of considering context in the assessment of personality characteristics: Evidence from ratings of dolphin personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2012, vol. 25, pp. 309-329.Kummer H. & Goodall J. Conditions of Innovative Behaviour in Primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1985, vol. 308, pp. 203-214.Lloyd E. Kanzi, evolution, and language. Biology & Philosophy, 2004, vol. 19, pp. 577-588.Maslow A. Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper, 1954.Pepperberg I.M. The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Pepperberg I.M. Cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2006, vol. 100, pp. 77-86.Pepperberg I.M. Grey parrots do not always “parrot”: the roles of imitation and phonological awareness in the creation of new labels from existing vocalizations. Language Sciences, 2007, vol. 29, pp. 1-13.Pepperberg I.M. Further evidence for addition and numerical competence by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition, 2012, 711-717.Ramsey G., Bastian M.L. & van Schaik C. Animal innovation defined and operationalized. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2007, vol. 30, pp. 393-407.Reader S.M. & Laland K.N. Animal innovation: An introduction. In S.M. Reader & K.N. Laland (Eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 3-38.Russ S.W. & Fiorelli J.A. Developmental approaches to creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 233-249.Russ S.W. & Wallace C.E. Pretend play and creative processes. American Journal of Play, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 136-148.Sanderson J.L., Stott I., Young A.J., Vitikainen E.I.K., Hodge S.J. & Cant M.A. The origins of consistent individual differences in cooperation in wild banded mongooses, Mungos mungo. Animal Behaviour, 2015, vol. 107, pp. 193-200.Savage-Rumbaugh E.S. & Lewin R. Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1994.Simonton D.K. Genius 101. New York: Springer, 2009.Torrance E.P. Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1963.Triana E. & Pasnak R. Object permanence in cats and dogs. Learning & Behavior, 1981, vol. 9, pp. 135-139.Vonk J. & Povinelli D. Individual differences in long-term cognitive testing in a group of captive chimpanzees. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2011, vol. 24, pp. 137-167.Webb C.E., Franks B., Romero T., Higgins E.T. & de Waal F.B.M. Individual differences in chimpanzee reconciliation relate to social switching behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 2014, vol. 90, pp. 57-63.Weiss A., Staes N., Pereboom J.J.M., Inoue-Murayama M., Stevens J.M.G. & Eens M. Personality in bonobos. Psychological Science, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 1430-1439.