<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Political Science</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Political Science</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1438</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1446</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">8933</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Strategic Culture: the Concept and the Directions of Research</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Стратегическая культура: понятие и направления исследований</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ozhiganov</surname><given-names>E N</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ожиганов</surname><given-names>Эдуард Николаевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Кафедра политических наук; Российский университет дружбы народов; People's Friendship University of Russia</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Кафедра политических наук; Российский университет дружбы народов</bio><email>edwardozhiganov@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">People's Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-02-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO2 (2012)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№2 (2012)</issue-title><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-09"><day>09</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2012, Ожиганов Э.Н.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ожиганов Э.Н.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/8933">https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/8933</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">The definition and estimation of political qualification of the ruling groups and long-term prognosis of their activities is a paramount task of strategical analysis. The ruling groups have their own interests and strategical manipulations with them (both successful and poor) constitute the important part of their game behavior, which effectiveness in defined periods is more or less computational. The game behavior of the ruling groups by-turn depends on the characteristics of strategic culture. This link is evident under their comparative analysis.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">Определение и оценка «политической квалификации» групп господства и долгосрочный прогноз их действий составляют первостепенную задачу стратегического анализа, которая имеет несколько граней и может решаться с помощью различных подходов и средств. Группы господства имеют определенные интересы, стратегическое управление которыми - успешное или бездарное - составляет существенную часть их «игрового» поведения, относительная результативность которого в определенные отрезки времени является более или менее вычисляемой. В свою очередь, «игровое поведение» групп господства сильно зависит от характеристик стратегической культуры, что становится очевидным в свете их сравнительного анализа (к примеру, британской [18] или иранской [8] моделей).</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>strategic culture</kwd><kwd>the ruling groups</kwd><kwd>political interests</kwd><kwd>political analysis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>стратегическая культура</kwd><kwd>группы господства</kwd><kwd>политические интересы</kwd><kwd>политический анализ</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Клаузевиц К. О войне. - Изд. Эксмо, Мидгард, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Стратегия управления по Клаузевицу / Пер. с англ. под ред. Гикзи Тиа фон и др. - М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Basrur R.M. Nuclear Weapons and Indian Strategic Culture // Journal of Peace Research. - March 2001. - Vol. 38. - № 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Betts R.K. Should Strategic Studies Survive? // World Politics. - 1997 - 50:1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Booth K. Strategic Culture: Validity and Validation  // The Oxford Journal on Good Governance. - March 2005. - Vol. 2. - № 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Booth K. Strategy and Ethnocentrism. - New York: Holmes and Meier, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Booth K., Trood R. Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific Region. - New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Cain A.C. Iran's Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction // Air War College Maxwell Paper. - April 2002. - № 26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Checkel J. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. - World Politics. - 1998. - Vol. 50. - № 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Eckstein H. A Culturalist Theory of Political Change // American Political Science Review. - 1998. - Vol. 82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gray C. National Style in Strategy: The American Example // International Security. - Fall 1981. - Vol. 6. - № 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations // International Security. - Summer 1998. - Vol. 23. - № 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hudson V.M. ed. Culture and Foreign Policy. - Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Johnston A.I. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. - Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Klein Y. A Theory of Strategic Culture // Comparative Strategy. - 1991 - 10, 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Kupchan Ch. The Vulnerability of Empire. - Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Lucian W. Pye, Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimension of Authority. - Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Miskimmon A. Continuity in the Face of Upheaval - British Strategic Culture and the Impact of the Blair government // Special Issue, European Security - Longhurst, Kerry and Zaborowski, Marcin (eds), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Richards C.W. Certain To Win: The Strategy Of John Boyd, Applied To Business. - N.Y.: Xlibris Corporation, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Snyder J. The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Nuclear Options, R-2154-AF. - Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Strategic Insights. - Volume IV. - Issue 10 (October 2005). URL: http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/index.asp</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Tannenwald N. Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo // International Security. - Spring 2005. - Vol. 29. - № 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Wendt A. Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics // International Organization. - Spring 1992. - Vol. 46. - № 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson M. The Many Voices of Political Culture: Assessing Different Approaches // World Politics. - January 2000. - Vol. 52. - № 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson R. Compliance Ideologies: Rethinking Political Culture. - New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
