<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Political Science</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Political Science</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1438</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1446</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">8885</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">(Re-) Reading Adam Smith in a Time of Crisis</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Перепрочтение А. Смита в период кризиса</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dutkiewicz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дуткевич</surname><given-names>Ян</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">New School for Social Research</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Новая школа социальных исследований</bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">New School for Social Research</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Новая школа социальных исследований</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO1 (2012)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№1 (2012)</issue-title><fpage>92</fpage><lpage>97</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-09"><day>09</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2012, Дуткевич Я.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Дуткевич Я.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/8885">https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/8885</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">At a time of not only empirical crisis, but also a philosophical crisis of the underpinning ideologies of the liberal capitalist economic system, there is an increasing tendency to dogmatize the work of classical thinkers, using selective readings of their work as the basis for support or critique of the status quo. Few are as subject to selective reading as the so-called father of modern economics, Adam Smith. This paper seeks to reflect on Smith's thought on two central aspects of the modern crisis: the nature of the limited liability corporation (whose profit motive is increasingly being challenged on a number of grounds) and the role of the individual in a market economy (amid accusations from across the political and philosophical spectrum about the increasing isolation, individualization, and neo-liberalization of the self). These subjects are not as different as they might seem as they both relate to Smith's conception of the nature role of the individual actor - homo oeconomicus - not only in a market in and of itself, but in a market that Smith saw as a social creation and a part of a human community.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">В период кризиса как мировой экономики, так и самих идеологических оснований экономической системы либерального капитализма отчетливо наблюдается тенденция к догматизации работ классических мыслителей через выборочное использование отдельных фрагментов их работ, для оправдания или критики статуса-кво. Такое выборочное прочтение особенно характерно для трудов А. Смита - т.н. «отца современной экономики». Представленная статья имеет целью отразить мысли А. Смита по поводу двух центральных аспектов современного кризиса: причин ограниченной ответственности корпораций (чьи мотивы извлечения прибыли в ряде сфер все в большей степени подвергаются критике) и роли индивида в рыночной экономике. Данные вопросы не настолько различны как может показаться, ведь они оба относятся к концепции А. Смита о естественной роли индивида (homo oeconomicus), так как А. Смит рассматривал рынок не только как экономический, но и как социальный институт.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Adam Smith</kwd><kwd>invisible hand</kwd><kwd>free market</kwd><kwd>liberal capitalism</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Адам Смит</kwd><kwd>«невидимая рука»</kwd><kwd>свободный рынок</kwd><kwd>либеральный капитализм</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Anspach R. The Implications of the Theory of Moral Sentiments for Adam Smith's Economic Thought // History of Political Economy. - 1972. - № 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Coase R.H. Adam Smith's View of Man // The Journal of Law and Economics. - (3), 1976. - Vol. 19 University of Chicago Selected Papers version. No. 50, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Condon S. Herman Cain to «Occupy Wall Street» protesters: Don't blame Wall St, blame yourself // CBS News. - Oct. 5, 2011. URL: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20116087-503544.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Evensky J. Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. - Cambridge University Press, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Fitzgibbons A. Adam Smith's System of Liberty, Wealth and Virtue. - Clarendon Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman M. Economic Freedom, Human Freedom, Political Freedom. Speech to the Smith Centre, California State University, East Bay. - November 1, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits // The New York Times Magazine. - 1970. - September 13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman M. Freedom and Philanthropy: An Interview with Milton Friedman // Business and Society Review. - Fall 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Hodac M. Adam Smith's Folly // Forbes.com. - 2007. - Oct. 25. URL: http://www.forbes.com/ 2007/10/24/adam-smith-corporations-markets-marketsp07-cx_mh_1025hodak.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Lindblom Ch. The Market as Prison // The Journal of Politics. - 1982. - 44 (2), May.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Jensen M. Value Maximization and the Corporate Objective Function // Harvard Business School Working Paper. - № 00-058. - January 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Macfie A.L. Adam Smith's Moral Sentiments As Foundation for his Wealth of Nations // Oxford Economic Papers. - 11:3. - Oct. 1959.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Macfie A.L. The Individual in Society: Papers on Adam Smith // George Allen &amp; Unwin, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Smith A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. - Liberty Fund, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Smith A. The Wealth of Nations. - Bantam, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Viner J. Adam Smith and Laissez Faire // The Journal of Political Economy. - 1927. - Vol. 35. - № 2.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
