RUDN Journal of Political ScienceRUDN Journal of Political ScienceВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология2313-14382313-1446Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)4962510.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-25-39NZRLORPUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENTГОСУДАРСТВЕННАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И УПРАВЛЕНИЕResearch ArticleTransformation of Public Administration in the Context of Contingent Social SystemsТрансформация государственного управления в условиях контингентности социальных системhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-2975SmorgunovLeonid V.СморгуновЛеонид Владимирович

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Chief Researcher

доктор философских наук, профессор, главный научный сотрудник

lvsmorgunov@gmail.comSociological Institute of the RAS - Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the RASСоциологический институт РАН - филиал ФНИСЦ РАН08042026281Public Policy and Public AdministrationПубличная политика и государственное управление253908042026Copyright ©; 2026, Smorgunov L.V.Copyright ©; 2026, Сморгунов Л.В.2026Smorgunov L.V.Сморгунов Л.В.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/49625

This study examines the transformation of public administration theory and practice in the new context of contingent social systems. The relationship between the bifurcation development of modern society and trends in administrative reforms is determined. The uncertainty and randomness of social and political processes is reflected in the mixed nature of administrative reforms, which simultaneously employ ideas of state bureaucracy, new public management, network governance, public governance, crisis management, and others. The persistence of bifurcation processes has posed new challenges for public governability, which has led to a search for new approaches and governance models. As the research demonstrates, this has also been facilitated by the development of the concept of contingency and its widespread adoption in governance science. Ontologically, contingency has come to be understood as a necessary variability of reality, which has been incorporated into the consideration of the conditions for the sustainable development of social systems. Concepts of crisis, prototypical, modular, and robust public governance have begun to emerge in the sociology of governance. Author focuses on modular public governance with its principles of decomposition, autonomy, interoperability, recombinability, scalability, and flexibility. The conclusion suggests that the development of various public governance models must now be analyzed in the context of socio- and political-technical systems.

Рассмотрены вопросы трансформации теории и практики государственного управления в новых условиях контингентности социальных систем. Определяется связь бифуркационного развития современного общества с тенденциями административных реформ. Неопределенность и случайность социальных и политических процессов выражается в смешанном характере административных реформ, оперирующих одновременно идеями государственной бюрократии, нового государственного менеджмента, сетевого управления, соуправления, кризисного менеджмента и др. Устойчивость бифуркационных процессов поставила новые проблемы для публичной управляемости, что отразилось в поисках новых подходов и управленческих моделей. Как показано автором, этому способствовало и развитие концепта контингентности и его широкое принятие в управленческой науке. Онтологически контингентность стала пониматься как необходимая изменчивость реальности, которая включалась в рассмотрение условий устойчивого развития социальных систем. В социологии управления стали формироваться концепции кризисного, прототипического, модульного, робастного (надежного) государственного управления. Особое внимание уделено модульному государственному управлению с его принципами декомпозиции, автономности, интероперабельности, рекомбинируемости, масштабируемости и гибкости. Сделан вывод о том, что динамику развития различных моделей государственного управления сегодня необходимо анализировать в контексте социально- и политико-технических систем.

public administrationpublic governabilitybifurcationadministrative reformscontingent social systemsmodular public governanceгосударственное управлениепубличная управляемостьбифуркацияадминистративные реформыконтингентность социальных системмодульное государственное управлениеAnsell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J., & Trondal, J. (2025). The challenge of societal turbulence and the need for robust public governance. In C. Ansell, E. Sørensen, J. Torfing, & J. Trondal (Eds.), Robust Public Governance in a Turbulent Era. Cheltenham: Elgar.Аристотель. Никомахова этика. Соч. : в 4 томах. Т. 4. Москва : Мысль,1983.Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101, 3–22. http:10.1111/padm.12874.Гаман-Голутвина, О.В., Сморгунов, Л.В. Политическое в пространстве турбулентного мира // Полис. Политические исследования. 2023. № 1. С. 7–10. http:10.17976/jpps/2023.01.02 EDN: AMJPQYAristotle (1983). Nikomahova etika. Vol. 4. Moscow: Myisl.(In Russian).Гидденс Э. Устроение общества: Очерк теории структурации. Москва : Академический проект, 2003.Barabanov, O., Bespalov, A., Bordachev, T., Lukyanov, F., Sushentsov, A., Timofeev, I. (2025). Dr. Chaos or: How to Stop Worrying and Love the Disorder. The Annual Report of the Valdai Discussion Club, 28 p. (Retrieved from https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/reports/doktor-khaos-ili-kak-perestat-boyatsya/) (In Russian).Купряшин Г.Л. О робастности системы государственного управления в турбулентной среде // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2023. Т. 4. № 61. С. 236–241. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_241-246 EDN: UTISKRCampagnolo, D., Camuffo A. (2010). The Concept of Modularity in Management Studies: A Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 259–283. http:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00260.x.Майоров Г.Г. Дунс Скот как метафизик // Блаженный Иоанн Дунс Скот. Избранное / сост. и общ. ред. Г.Г. Майорова. Москва : Изд-во Францисканцев, 2001. С. 28–83.Gaman-Golutvina, O.V., & Smorgunov, L.V. (2023). Politics in the Space of a Turbulent World. Political Studies. Polis, 1, 7–10. http:10.17976/jpps/2023.01.02 (In Russian).Мейясу К. После конечности. Эссе о необходимости контингентности. Екатеринбург, Москва : Кабинетный ученый, 2015.Giddens, A. (2003). The Structure of Society: An Essay on the Theory of Structure. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt.Покок Дж. Момент Макиавелли. Политическая мысль Флоренции и атлантическая республиканская традиция. Москва : Новое литературное обозрение, 2020.Goldfinch, S.F. (2023). The challenge of public administration reform: introduction to the Handbook of Public Administration Reform. Handbook of Public Administration Reform. S.F. Goldfinch (Ed.). Cheltenham: Elgar, 1–26.Хуэй Ю. Рекурсивность и контингентность. Москва : V-A-C Press, 2020.Hadiyanti, E., Jannah, L.M., Lutfi, A. (2024). The Development of Contingency Theory in the Public Sector: An Overview. Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(9), 1–14.Ansell C., Sørensen E., Torfing J. Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses // Public Administration. 2023. Vol. 101. Р. 3–22. http://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874 EDN: RMQDKHHofkirchner, W. (2020). A paradigm shift for the Great Bifurcation. Biosystems, 197, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104193Ansell C., Sørensen E., Torfing J., Trondal J. The challenge of societal turbulence and the need for robust public governance // Robust Public Governance in a Turbulent Era / edited by C. Ansell, E. Sørensen, J. Torfing, & J. Trondal. Cheltenham : Elgar, 2025.Hollis, S., Ekengren, M. (2025). The Reality of Contingency: Implications for Crisis Management. Risk, Hazards & Crisis, in Public Policy, 16(3), 1–11.Campagnolo D., Camuffo A. The Concept of Modularity in Management Studies: A Literature Review // International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 259–283. http:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00260.xHui, Y. (2020). Recursivity and Contingency. Moscow: VAC Press (In Russian).Goldfinch S.F. The challenge of public administration reform: Introduction to the Handbook of Public Administration Reform // Handbook of Public Administration Reform / ed. S.F. Goldfinch. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2023. P. 1–26.Itzkowitz, G. (1996). Contingency Theory. Rethinking the Boundaries of Social Thought. L.: Bloomsbury Publishing.Hadiyanti E., Jannah L.M., Lutfi A. The Development of Contingency Theory in Public Sector: An Overview // Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 2024. Vol. 2. No. 9. P. 1–14. http://doi.org/10.55324/enrichment.v2i7.169 EDN: XICNUUJha, S.K., Gold, E.R., Dubé, L. (2021). Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems. Sustainability, 13, 1–20.Hofkirchner W. A paradigm shift for the Great Bifurcation // Biosystems. 2020. Vol. 197. P. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104193 EDN: IFEOIHJohns, F. (2022). State Changes: Prototypical Governance Figured and Prefigured. Law and Critique, 33(3), 251–271.Hollis S., Ekengren M. The Reality of Contingency: Implications for Crisis Management // Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70020Kemp, S., Holmwood, J. (2012). Questioning Contingency in Social Life: Roles, Agreement and Agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 42(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-5914.2012.00499.xItzkowitz G. Contingency Theory. Rethinking the Boundaries of Social Thought. London : Bloomsbury Publishing, 1996.Kim, S. (2018). Contingency and responsibility in Confucian political theory. Philosophy & Social, Criticism, 44(6), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715601465Jha S.K., Gold E.R., Dubé L. Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810292 EDN: IUCCPNKuipers, S.L. (2022). Crisis management in government. In K. Schedler (Ed.), Elgar encyclopedia of public management (pp. 217–221). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. http:10.4337/9781800375499.Johns F. State Changes: Prototypical Governance Figured and Prefigured // Law and Critique. 2022. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-022-09329-y EDN: UKMDLXKupyrashin, G.L. (2023). On the Robustness of the Public Administration System in a Turbulent Environment. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2023, 4(61), 236–241. http:10.31737/22212264_2023_4_236-241.Kemp S., Holmwood J. Questioning Contingency in Social Life: Roles, Agreement and Agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 2012. Vol. 42, No. 4. P. 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-5914.2012.00499.xLanglois, R.N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49(1), 19–37.Kim S. Contingency and responsibility in Confucian political theory // Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2018. Vol. 44. No. 6. P. 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715601465Manning, S., Reinecke J. (2016). A Modular Governance Architecture In-the-Making: How Transnational Standard-Setters Govern Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy, 45(3): 618–33.Kuipers S.L. Crisis management in government // Elgar encyclopedia of public management / K. Schedler (ed.), Cheltenham, UK : Elgar, 2022. P. 217–221. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375499Meillassoux, Q. (2008). After finitude. Essay on the necessity of contingency. London, New York: Continuum.Langlois R.N. Modularity in technology and organization // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2002. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 19–37.Palonen, K. (1999). Contingency in political theory. Redescription. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 3(1), 5–10.Manning S., Reinecke J. A Modular Governance Architecture In-the-Making: How Transnational Standard-Setters Govern Sustainability Transitions // Research Policy. 2016. Vol. 45. No. 3. P. 618–633.Pocock, Dj. (2020). The Machiavelli Moment. The Political Thought of Florence and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.Palonen K. Contingency in political theory // Redescription. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 1999. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 5–10.Public governance and administration reforms. (2023). OECD Site: Retrieved September 24, 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/public-governance-and-administration-modernisation.htmlStrydom P. Triple contingency: The theoretical problem of the public in communication societies // Philosophy & Social Criticism. 1999. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379902500201 EDN: JOZKVPStrydom, P. (1999). Triple contingency: The theoretical problem of the public in communication societies. Philosophy & Social, Criticism, 25(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379902500201Tribe K. Capitalism, Contingency and Economic Development. The Routledge International Handbook on Max Weber / ed. A. Sica. London: Routledge, 2022.Tribe, K. (2022). Capitalism, Contingency and Economic Development. The Routledge International Handbook on Max Weber. A. Sica (Ed.). L.: Routledge.Vanderstraeten R. Parsons, Luhmann and the Theorem of Double Contingency // Journal of Classical Sociology. 2002. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X02002001684Vanderstraeten, R. (2002). Parsons, Luhmann and the Theorem of Double Contingency. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X02002001684Volinz L. Governance through pluralization: Jerusalem’s modular security provision // Security Dialogue. 2018. Vol. 49. No. 6. P. 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618789758Volinz, L. (2018). Governance through pluralization: Jerusalem’s modular security provision. Security Dialogue, 49(6), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618789758Waesche N. Modular Government: An Industry Perspective on Public Innovation // Halduskultuur. 2008. Vol. 9. P. 52–59.Waesche, N. (2008). Modular Government: An Industry Perspective on Public Innovation. Halduskultuur, 9, 52–59.Zimmerman P., Ofori M., Barrett D., Soler J., Harriman A. Considerations and examples of a modular open systems approach in defense systems // The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 373–388.Zimmerman, P., Ofori, M., Barrett, D., Soler, J., & Harriman, A. (2018). Considerations and examples of a modular open systems approach in defense systems. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 16(4), 373–388.