<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Political Science</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Political Science</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1438</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-1446</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">37383</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-4-801-816</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">QKUFPR</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE WORLD OF THE POLITICAL</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МИР ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОГО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The “Third Generation” Constructivism: Framing and Communication</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Конструктивизм «третьего поколения»: фрейминг и коммуникация</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6561-2281</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alekseeva</surname><given-names>Tatyana A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алексеева</surname><given-names>Татьяна Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Political Theory</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки РФ, заведующая кафедрой политической теории</p></bio><email>ataleks@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-0415</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Verkhovskaya</surname><given-names>Zhanna A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Верховская</surname><given-names>Жанна Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Cultural Studies - Associate Professor of the Department of Political Theory</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат культурологии, доцент кафедры политической теории</p></bio><email>zh.a.verkhovskaya@inno.mgimo</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">MGIMO University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">New Reversals in the Theory and Methodology of Political Science</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Новые повороты в теории и методологии политической науки</issue-title><fpage>801</fpage><lpage>816</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-01-10"><day>10</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Alekseeva T.A., Verkhovskaya Z.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Алексеева Т.А., Верховская Ж.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Alekseeva T.A., Verkhovskaya Z.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Алексеева Т.А., Верховская Ж.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/37383">https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/37383</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The research is devoted to the consideration of some new methodological trends in the constructivism of the “third generation” of scientists. Its representatives, while remaining committed to the basic postulates of constructivism, at the same time turned their main attention to issues related to the theory of communication to framing as one of the ways of constructing reality and saturating it with certain meanings. Based on Martin Buber’s theory of dialogue, constructivists draw attention to the dangers of universalism in the study of politics as a prerequisite and even a manifestation of the ideological fixation of certain concepts, positions, and theses. Meanwhile, the formation of a community as “we” presupposes a pluralism of approaches and recognition of different points of view, and at the same time “cleaning” the information space of many frames that allow, through the manipulation of “fakes,” stereotypes and false stories, to form an idea of reality that significantly distorts it and even modifying.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Исследование посвящено рассмотрению некоторых новых методологических тенденций в конструктивизме «третьего поколения» ученых. Его представители, сохраняя приверженность базовым постулатам конструктивизма, в то же время обратили свое основное внимание на вопросы, связанные с теорией коммуникации, в частности к фреймингу как одному из способов конструирования реальности и насыщения ее определенными смыслами. Опираясь на теорию диалога Мартина Бубера, конструктивисты обращают внимание на опасности универсализма в исследовании политики как предпосылки и даже манифестации идеологизированной фиксации некоторых понятий, положений и тезисов. Между тем формирование сообщества как «мы» предполагает плюрализм подходов и признание разных точек зрения и одновременно «очищение» информационного пространства от множества фреймов, позволяющих через манипулирование «фейками», стереотипами и ложными историями формировать представление о реальности, существенно ее искажающей и даже видоизменяющей.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>constructivism</kwd><kwd>communication theory</kwd><kwd>framing</kwd><kwd>dialogue theory</kwd><kwd>interactive constructivism</kwd><kwd>universalism</kwd><kwd>pluralism</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>конструктивизм</kwd><kwd>теория коммуникации</kwd><kwd>фрейминг</kwd><kwd>теория диалога</kwd><kwd>интер активный конструктивизм</kwd><kwd>универсализм</kwd><kwd>плюрализм</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда (проект № 20-78-10159 «Феномен стратегической культуры в мировой политике: специфика влияния на политику безопасности (на примере государств Скандинавско-Балтийского региона)»).</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">The research was carried out at the expense of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 20-78-10159 “The phenomenon of strategic culture in world politics: the specifics of influencing security policy (on the example of the Scandinavian-Baltic states)”).</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berger, P.L., &amp; Luckmann, T. (1995). The social construction of reality. Moscow: Medium. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М.: Медиум, 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buber, M. (1993). Me and You. Moscow: Higher School. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бубер М. Я и Ты.М.: Высшая школа, 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Finnemore, M., &amp; Sikkink, К. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Джордан Дж.Е., Сталберг А.Н., Троицкий М. Внешнеполитические ресурсы и инструменты в российско-американских отношениях // Международные процессы. 2021. Т. 19, № 1. С. 6-25. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fiske, S.T., &amp; Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social Cognition. NY: McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Калинина А.С. Понятие Другого и этика в философии Э. Левинаса // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2020. № 5 (439). С. 124-129. https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2020-10516</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gallie, W.B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Левинас Э. Забота о добре // Эмманюэль Левинас: Путь к Другому: сб. ст. и пер., посвящ. 100-летию со дня рождения Э. Левинаса. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петербургского университета, 2006. С. 177-180.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Луман Н. Общество как социальная система (Общество общества), Часть 1. М.: Логос, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сморгунов Л.В. Онтологические повороты в современной политической науке: в поисках адекватности политики // Социальные и гуманитарные знания. 2020. Т. 6. С. 122-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2020-2-122-133</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jordan, J., Stulberg, A., &amp; Troitskiy M. (2021). Statecraft in U.S. — Russia relations. International processes, 19(1), 6–25. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Finnmore M., Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program // International Relations and Comparative Politics, Annual Review of Political Science. 2001. № 4. P. 391-416.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kalinina, A.S. (2020). The concept of the other and ethics in the philosophy of E . L evinas. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 56(439), 124–129. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2020-10516</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E. Social Cognition. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levinas, E. (2006). Emmanuel Levinas: The path to the Other. In Collection of articles and translations dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of E. Levinas (pp. 177–180). St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gallie W.B. Essentially Contested Concepts // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1956. Vol. 56. P. 167-198</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luhmann, N. (2004). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaf [Society as a social system]. Part 1. Moscow: Logos. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goffman E., Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1974.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matthews, M. (2000). Time for Science Education. How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion Can Contribute to Science Literacy. NY: Kluwer academic plenum publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1987.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McQuail, D. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory. London: Sage.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Matthews M. Time for Science Education. How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion Can Contribute to Science Literacy. NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mouffe, Ch. (1996). Deconstruction, pragmatism and the politics of democracy. In C h. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and Pragmatism. London-NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431481</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McQuail D. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neubert, S., &amp; Reich, K. (2001). The ethnocentric view. Constructivism and the practice of intercultural discourse. In B. Cope &amp; M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Learning for the Future. Proceeding of the Learning Conference. Spetses: Dimotiko Skolio of Spetses.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mouffe Ch. Deconstruction, Pragmatism and the Politics of Democracy // Deconstruction and Pragmatism / ed. by Mouffe Ch. London-NY: Routledge, 1996. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431481</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Onuf, N.G. (1989). World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Neubert S., Reich K. The Ethnocentric View. Constructivism and the Practice of Intercultural Discourse // Proceeding of the Learning Conference “Learning for the Future” / ed. by C. Bill, M. Kalantzis. Spetses: Dimotiko Skolio of Spetses, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reich, K. (1998). Die Ordnung der Blicke. Perspektiven des interaktionistischen Konstruktivismus, Bd. 1. Beobachtung und die Unscharfen der Erkenntnis. Bd. 2. Beziehungen und Lebenswelt. Neuwied u.a.: Luchterhand.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Onuf N. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rockmore, T. (2005). On Constructivist Epistemology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reich K. Die Ordnung der Blicke. Perspektiven des interaktionistischen Konstruktivismus, Bd. 1: Beobachtung und die Unscharfen der Erkenntnis. Bd.2. Beziehungen und Lebenswelt. Neuwied u.a.: Luchterhand, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scheufele, B. (2004). “Framing-effects Approach: A theoretical and Methodological Critique”. Communications, (29), 401–428.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rockmore T. On Constructivist Epistemology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smorgunov, L.V. (2020). Ontological turns in contemporary political science: in search for compliance with politics. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 6, 122–133. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2020-2-122-133</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scheufele B. Framing-effects Approach: A theoretical and Methodological Critique // Communications. 2004. No. 29. P. 401-428.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Subotic, J., &amp; Zarakol, A. (2013). Cultural Intimacy in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(4), 915–938.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Subotic J., Zarakol A. Cultural Intimacy in International Relations // European Journal of International Relations. 2013. Vol. 19, no. 4. P. 915-938.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Gorp, B. (2007). “The Constructivist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In”. Journal of Communication, 57, 60–78.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Gorp B. The Constructivist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In // Journal of Communication. 2007. No. 57. P. 60-78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zarakol, A. (2017). “TRIPping Constructivism”. Political Science, 50, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1049096516002183 .</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zarakol A. TRIPping Constructivism // Political Science. 2017. Vol. 50. P. 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002183</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
