<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">42156</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-4-1050-1066</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">JVEOHZ</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Methodological Interaction between Experimental and Computer Philosophy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Методологическое взаимодействие экспериментальной и компьютерной философии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-5942</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">2328-7230</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alekseeva</surname><given-names>Ekaterina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алексеева</surname><given-names>Екатерина Алексеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Epistemology and Logic, Faculty of Philosophy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат философских наук, доцент, кафедра эпистемологии и логики, философский факультет</p></bio><email>eaalekseeva@gaugn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">State Academic University for the Humanities</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Государственный академический университет гуманитарных наук</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ</issue-title><fpage>1050</fpage><lpage>1066</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-12-25"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Alekseeva E.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Алексеева Е.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Alekseeva E.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Алексеева Е.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/42156">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/42156</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The study is devoted to the problem of the relationship between the methods of two contemporary philosophical trends: experimental and computer philosophy. Both of these trends are distinguished by the fact that they depart from the principles of “armchair” philosophy, although they do not break with it completely, turn to empirical data, etc. The key principles of experimental philosophy are considered, which allow integrating the methodological structure of experimental philosophical research with approaches in the field of computer philosophy. It is also demonstrated that with the help of computer philosophy, such classical philosophical methods as conceptual analysis and thought experiments can be transformed. This, among other things, allows integrating them into experimental philosophical research. Four groups of computer technologies are distinguished that can be used in conjunction with philosophical methods. These are data analysis technologies, computer modeling (multi-agent systems, etc.), generative technologies, computer games. In the context of philosophical research, the results obtained with the help of these technological tools receive a semantic interpretation. This paper proposes the problematic of a potential experimental philosophical study devoted to the problem of confirmation/proof in the field of evidence-based medicine and medical activity. Options are offered for how the methods of computational philosophy could be used to conduct such a study.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Исследование посвящено проблеме взаимосвязи методов двух современных философских направлений: экспериментальной и компьютерной философии. Оба эти направления отличаются тем, что они отходят от принципов «кабинетной» философии, хотя и не порывают к ней полностью, обращаются к эмпирическим данным и т.п. Рассматриваются ключевые принципы экспериментальной философии, которые позволяют интегрировать методологическую структуру экспериментальных философских исследований с подходами в области компьютерной философии. Также демонстрируется, что с помощью компьютерной философии могут быть трансформированы такие классические философские методы, как концептуальный анализ и мысленные эксперименты, что в том числе позволяет частично объединить между собой экспериментальную и компьютерную философию. Выделяются четыре группы компьютерных технологий, которые могут быть использованы в связке с философскими методами. Это технологии анализа данных, компьютерного моделирования (многоагентные системы и т.п.), генеративные ИИ-технологии, компьютерные игры. В контексте философских исследований результаты, полученные с помощью этих ИКТ-инструментов, требуют особой смысловой интерпретации. В данной работе рассматривается проблематика потенциально возможного экспериментального философского исследования, посвященного проблеме подтверждения/доказательства в области доказательной медицины и медицинской деятельности. Предлагаются варианты того, каким образом можно было бы использовать методы компьютерной философии для проведения такого исследования.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>metaphilosophy</kwd><kwd>philosophical methods</kwd><kwd>conceptual analysis</kwd><kwd>conceptual engineering</kwd><kwd>thought experiment</kwd><kwd>philosophical experiment</kwd><kwd>data analysis</kwd><kwd>multi-agent systems</kwd><kwd>generative technologies</kwd><kwd>computer games</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>метафилософия</kwd><kwd>философские методы</kwd><kwd>концептуальный анализ</kwd><kwd>концептуальный инжиниринг</kwd><kwd>мысленный эксперимент</kwd><kwd>философский эксперимент</kwd><kwd>анализ данных</kwd><kwd>многоагентные системы</kwd><kwd>генеративные ИИ-технологии</kwd><kwd>компьютерные игры</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research was prepared at the State Academic University for the Humanities within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (topic No. FZNF-2023-0004 “Digitalization and methods of the modern information society: cognitive, physical, political and legal aspects”).</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено в Государственном академическом университете гуманитарных наук в рамках государственного задания Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации (тема № FZNF-2023-0004 «Цифровизация и формирование современного информационного общества: когнитивные, экономические, политические и правовые аспекты»)</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Wiegel V, van den Berg J. Experimental Computational Philosophy: shedding new lights on old philosophical debates. In: Dastani MM, de Jong E, editors. Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial intelligence (BNAIC’07). 2007. P. 291-298.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Nadelhoffer T, Nahmias E. The past and future of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations. 2007;10(2):123-149.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Timoshenko TV, Skripnik KD. Experimental philosophy: the problem of intuition. South Pole. 2020;(1-2):27-39. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тимошенко Т.В., Скрипник К.Д. Экспериментальная философия: проблема интуиции // ЮП. 2020. № 1-2. C. 27- 39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Nichols Sh. Experimental Philosophy and Statistical Learning. In: Fischer E, Curtis M, editors. Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Press; 2019. P. 13-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Griffiths Pl, Machery E, Linquist S. The Vernacular Concept of Innateness. In: Knobe J, Nichols Sh, editors. Experimental Philosophy: Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. P. 281-306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Andow J, Cova F. Why compatibilist intuitions are not mistaken: A reply to Feltz and Millan. Philosophical Psychology. 2015;29(4):550-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09515089.2015.1082542</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Fischer E, Curtis M, editors. Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Press; 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Grim P, Singer D. Computational Philosophy. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/computational-philosophy/ (accessed: 20.06.2024).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Rees T. Non-Human Words: On GPT-3 as a Philosophical Laboratory. Daedalus. 2022;151(2):168-182. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alekseeva EA. The Extended Cyborg: Conceptualizing the Interconnection of Humans and Intelligent Systems. Philosophy of Science and Technics. 2024;29(1):98-111. (In Russian). https://doi.org//10.21146/2413-9084-2024-29-1-98-111</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алексеева Е.А. Расширенный киборг: концептуализация взаимосвязи людей и интеллектуальных систем // Философия науки и техники. 2024. Т. 29. № 1. С. 98-111. https://doi.org//10.21146/2413-9084-2024-29-1-98-111</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>King JC. Philosophical and Conceptual Analysis. In: Cappelen H, Gendler T, Hawthorne J, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. P. 249-261.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Stuart MT. Philosophical Conceptual Analysis as an Experimental Method. In: Gamerschlag T, Gerland D, Osswald R, Petersen W, editors. Meaning, Frames, and Conceptual Representation. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press; 2015. P. 267-292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Van Remoortel H, De Buck E, Seifried E, Vandekerckhove P. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles and Values as Illustrated by the Case of Patient Blood Management. Hamostaseologie. 2023;43(1):16-21. https://doi.org//10.1055/a-1985-7660</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Berg H. Is evidence-based practice justified? - A philosophical critique. J Eval Clin Pract. 2024;30:855-859. https://doi.org//10.1111/jep.14059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dumov AV. Bayesian approach to understanding scientific rationality. In: Secular age: challenges of civilization: Proceedings of the national scientific conference dedicated to World Philosophy Day, Krasnoyarsk, November 18, 2021. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University publ.; 2021. P. 23-26. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Думов А.В. Байесовский подход к пониманию научной рациональности // Секулярный век: вызовы цивилизации: Материалы национальной научной конференции, посвященной Всемирному дню философии, Красноярск, 18 ноября 2021 года. Красноярск: Красноярский государственный аграрный университет, 2021. С. 23-26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makeeva LB. Subjective probability, confirmation theory and rationality. Ratio.ru. 2015;(15):80-96. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Макеева Л.Б. Субъективная вероятность, теория подтверждения и рациональность // Рацио.ru. 2015. № 15. С. 80-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Mizrahi M. Theoretical Virtues in Scientific Practice: An Empirical Study. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2021;73(4):879-902. https://doi.org//10.1086/714790</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Mejía-Ramos HP, Alcock L, Lew K, Rago P, Sangwin Ch, Inglis M. Using Corpus Linguistics to Investigate Mathematical Explanation. In: Fischer E, Curtis M, editors. Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Press; 2019. P. 239-263.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Mayo-Wilson C, Zollman KJS. The computational philosophy: simulation as a core philosophical method. Synthese. 2021;(199):3647-3673. https://doi.org//10.1007/s11229-020-02950-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Mar GR, Grim P, Denis PS. The Philosophical Computer: Exploratory Essays in Philosophical Computer Modeling. US Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alekseeva EA. Projects of computer epistemology. Philosophy of science and technology. 2023;28(4):88-101. (In Russian). https://doi.org//10.21146/2413-9084-2023-28-2-88-101</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алексеева Е.А. Проекты компьютерной эпистемологии // Философия науки и техники. 2023. Т. 28. № 4. С. 88-101. https://doi.org//10.21146/2413-9084-2023-28-2-88-101</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Baumgaertner B. Yes, no, maybe so: a veritistic approach to echo chambers using a trichotomous belief model. Synthese. 2014;(191):2549-2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0439-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Hong L, Page SE. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of highability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101(46):16385-16389. https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0403723101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Bender E, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In: FAccT ‘21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York NY United States: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. P. 610-623.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Schwitzgebel E, Schwitzgebel D, Strasser A. Creating a large language model of a philosopher. Mind &amp; Language. 2024;39(2):237-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12466</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaitsev DV. Why don’t large language models (always) reason like people? Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7: Philosophy. 2024;48(1):76-93. (In Russian). https://doi.org//10.55959/MSU0201-7385-7-2024-1-76-93</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зайцев Д.В. Почему большие языковые модели не (всегда) рассуждают как люди? // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7: Философия. 2024. Т. 48. № 1. С. 76-93. https://doi.org//10.55959/MSU0201-7385-7-2024-1-76-93</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vetushinsky AS, Salin AS. Game Studies in Russia: Year Eight. Sociology of Power. 2020;32(3):8-13. (In Russian). https://doi.org//10.22394/2074-0492-2020-3-8-13</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ветушинский А.С., Салин А.С. Game Studies в России: год восьмой // Социология власти. 2020. Т. 32. № 3. С. 8-13. https://doi.org//10.22394/2074-0492-2020-3-8-13</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Bogost I. How to Talk about Videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2015.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
