<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">40999</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-885-902</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">UWYQCN</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИАЛЬНАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Confucian Thesis of Moral Politics and its Development</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Конфуцианский тезис о моральной политике и его развитие</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>Wei-Ding</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цай</surname><given-names>Вей-Динг</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">PhD (философия), доцент, кафедра философии</bio><email>sprache@nccu.edu.tw</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-297X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chistyakov</surname><given-names>Denis I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чистяков</surname><given-names>Денис Игоревич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>CSc in Sociology, Deputy Director for Science and International Collaboration, Higher School of Management</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат социологических наук, заместитель директора по научной работе и международному сотрудничеству, Высшая школа управления</p></bio><email>chistyakov-di@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-0913</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chistyakova</surname><given-names>Olga V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чистякова</surname><given-names>Ольга Васильевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Department of History of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор, кафедра истории философии, факультет гуманитарных и социальных наук</p></bio><email>chistyakova-ov@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Chengchi University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Государственный университет Чжэнчжи</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">RUDN University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-10-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">POST-NEO-KANTIANISM</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ПОСТНЕОКАНТИАНСТВО</issue-title><fpage>885</fpage><lpage>902</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-10-07"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Tsai W., Chistyakov D.I., Chistyakova O.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Цай В., Чистяков Д.И., Чистякова О.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tsai W., Chistyakov D.I., Chistyakova O.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Цай В., Чистяков Д.И., Чистякова О.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/40999">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/40999</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">This paper aims to examine Confucian thesis of moral politics. By comparing three types of administration, Confucius’ thoughts on the problematics of moral politics are analyzed in more detail, highlighting the inner tension between the moral and the political. The difficulty of the concept is shown by discussing its development so that the validity question can be brought to the fore. In order to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the moral politics, it is necessary to first address three distinct approaches to its development. We call the consanguinity-based system of administration of the Western Zhou feudal system Lĭ-Chìh (禮治). This implies using the rites (禮) as the primary means of state governance. Comparatively speaking, the morality-governed administrative method is known as Dé-Chìh (德治). The third, Fă-Chìh (法治), denotes that laws are the basis for state governance. The interdependence of rites, morals, and law makes it impossible to simply divide the three modes of administration. The theory of moral politics offers new avenues for development since China adopted the democratic system. A group of Chinese academics known as the New Confucians attempted to integrate this theory with the democratic system in the early 20th century in an attempt to find a fresh approach to the theory’s application issue. This theory still revolves around Dé-Chìh. Fă-Chìh’s authenticity is amply verified. The New Confucians regard the conflict between Dé-Chíh and Dé-Chìh as a dialectical evolution.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">В работе рассматриваются принципы моральной политики исторического конфуцианства и предлагаются положения морали в политике в дальнейшем развитии конфуцианской мысли. Представлены три типа государственного управления с точки зрения конфуцианства. Подробно анализируются концепции Конфуция относительно моральной политики, подчеркивается внутренняя связь между моральным и политическим. Сложность концепции моральной политики показана через историю ее развития, выводя на первый план три различных подхода: систему управления династией Западного Чжоу Lĭ-Chìh (禮治), основанную на кровосмешении и использовании обрядов (禮) в качестве основного средства управления государством; административный метод, основанный на морали, известный как Dé-Chìh (德治); и третий, Fă-Chìh (法治), предполагающий, что в основе управления государством лежат законы. Взаимозависимость обрядов, морали и закона делает невозможным простое разделение трех способов управления, однако теория моральной политики предлагает новые возможности для развития. Группа китайских ученых, известных как «Новые Конфуцианцы», в начале XX века предприняла попытку интегрировать эту теорию с демократической системой для поиска нового подхода к применению теории. «Новые Конфуцианцы» рассматривают конфликт между Fă-Chìh и Fă-Chìh как диалектическую эволюцию.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Confucianism</kwd><kwd>morality</kwd><kwd>rituals and rites in politics</kwd><kwd>Fă-Chìh</kwd><kwd>Lĭ-Chìh</kwd><kwd>Dé-Chìh</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>конфуцианство</kwd><kwd>мораль</kwd><kwd>ритуалы и обряды в политике</kwd><kwd>Fă-Chìh</kwd><kwd>Lĭ-Chìh</kwd><kwd>Dé-Chìh</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Sun S (孫奭), Ruan Y (阮元). Mengzi Zhu Shu (孟子注疏). In: Shisanjing Zhu Shu Fu Jiaokan Ji (十三經注疏附校勘記). Vol. 8. Taipei: Dahua Bookstore; 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Chang C (張君勱). Zhongxi Yin Zhexue Wenji (中西印哲學文集). Vol. 2. Cheng WX (程文熙), editor. Taipei: Taiwan Student Bookstore; 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Reinhold G. Soziologie-Lexikon. 4. Auflage. München/Wien: R. Oldenbourg Verlag; 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Roetz H. Konfuzius. München: Beck; 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chen DX. (陳獨秀). Duxiu Wencun (獨秀文存). Vol. 1. Kowloon: Far East Bookstore; 1965.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Zuo QM (左丘明), Du Y (杜預), Kong YD (孔穎達), Ruan Y (阮元). Chunqiu Zuozhuan Zhengyi (春秋左傳正義) In: Shisanjing Zhu Shu Fu Jiaokan Ji (十三經注疏附校勘記). Vol. 6. Taipei: Dahua Bookstore; 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Zheng X (鄭玄), Kong YD (孔穎達), Ruan Y (阮元). Liji Zhengyi (禮記正義). In: Shisanjing Zhu Shu Fu Jiaokan Ji (十三經注疏附校勘記). Vol. 5. Taipei: Dahua Bookstore; 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>He Y (何晏), Xing B (邢昺), Ruan Y (阮元). Lunyu Zhu Shu (論語注疏). In: Shisanjing Zhu Shu Fu Jiaokan Ji (十三經注疏附校勘記). Vol. 8. Taipei: Dahua Bookstore; 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Roetz H. Mensch und Natur im alten China. Zum Subjekt-Objekt-Gegensatz in der klassischen chinesichen Philosophie, zugleich eine Kritik des Klischees vom chinesischen Universismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang; 1984.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Wu K (吳康). Kong Meng Xun Zhexue (孔孟荀哲學). Vol. 1 (5th ed). Taipei: Taiwan Commercial Press; 1987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Yang J (楊倞), Wang XQ (王先謙). Xunzi Ji Jie (荀子集解). In: Xinbian Zhuzi Jichen (新編諸子集成). Vol. 2. Taipei: World Bookstore; 1983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Wang XQ (王先謙). Hanfeizi Ji Jie (韓非子集解). In: Xinbian Zhuzi Jicheng (新編諸子集成). Vol. 5. Taipei: World Bookstore; 1983.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
