<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39825</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-2-558-574</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">TINVVT</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Ontology and epistemology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Онтология и теория познания</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">On the Advantage of the Physics’ and Lyrics’ Cooperation: Usage of the Exact and Natural Sciences’ Conceptions in Social and Humanitarian Knowledge</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>О пользе сотрудничества «физиков» и «лириков»: концепции точных и естественных наук в социальном и гуманитарном знании</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-2152</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsibizova</surname><given-names>Irina M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цибизова</surname><given-names>Ирина Михайловна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in History, Researcher, Department of Philosophy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат исторических наук, научный сотрудник, отдел философии</p></bio><email>itsibizova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт информации по общественным наукам РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-06-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">KANT IN RUSSIA</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">КАНТ В РОССИИ</issue-title><fpage>558</fpage><lpage>574</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-07-04"><day>04</day><month>07</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Tsibizova I.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Цибизова И.М.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tsibizova I.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Цибизова И.М.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/39825">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/39825</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The study reviews particular conceptions of natural and exact sciences which had a significant impact on social and humanitarian knowledge primarily on philosophy: the theories of sets, heterarchy, cybernetic approach and others. G. Bateson’s cybernetic or systems theory allows more comprehensive understanding of religious phenomena and the Pentecostal expansion in Brasilia among others in the context of all relevant areas taking into account their interconnections and mutual influence. The heterarchy conception allowed to I.V. Krasavin to solve the problem in general intellect theory of the Italian post-operaisms (M. Lazzarato, A. Negri, P. Virno, M. Pasquinelli, C. Vercellone, T. Terranova and ect) and conclude that it’s equally able as to liberate the society of the exploitation as to be appropriated by the society of control. The reverse of conceptions, usage of connectionism although criticized for the excessive simplifications, in the philosophy of brain and pedagogy gives the possibility to improve the methods of teaching increasing its efficiency. The natural sciences’ conceptions, the quantum physics for example, are applied in the philosophy of mind. Following W.V.O. Quine the representatives of the analytic philosophy more often propose to naturalize the discipline due to the natural sciences achievements. Although the undue tendency for formalization can divert from meaning as in F. Salis’ dealing with the problem of the literature characters’ narcissism. The application of a priory developed mathematical models trying to fit phenomena into them often harm philosophy. The mathematical formalization of the «second law of criminal behavior» suggested by the Norwegian forensic psychiatrist and psychoanalyst D. Abrahamsen seems to be not only meaningless but also ethically unacceptable. Bringing methodology of other disciplines designed for practical results and really “working” to science allows take a fresh look at the problem, covering it wider and from new angles.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">В исследовании рассматриваются отдельные концепции естественных и точных наук, оказавших существенное влияние на развитие социального и гуманитарного знания, прежде всего философии: теории множеств, гетерархии, кибернетический подход и т.д. Кибернетическая теория или «теория систем» Г. Бейтсона позволяет более всестороннеe осмысление религиозных феноменов, в том числе экспансию пятидесятничества в Бразилии, в контексте всех релевантных сфер с учетом их взаимосвязей и взаимовлияния. Благодаря концепции гетерархии И.В. Красавин устранил формальные проблемы в теории общего интеллекта итальянского постопераизма (М. Лаццарато, А. Негри, П. Вирно, М. Пасквинелли, К. Верчеллоне, Т. Террановы и др) и заключил, что он равно способен как освобождать общество от эксплуатации, так и присваиваться «обществом контроля». Реверс концепций - применение коннекционизма, хотя и критикуемого за чрезмерные упрощения, в философии сознания и педагогике - дает возможность совершенствовать методы преподавания, повышая его эффективность. В философии сознания / разума используют достижения естественных наук, например, квантовой физики. Вслед за У.В.О. Куайном представители аналитической философии все чаще предлагают «натурализовать» ее посредством достижений естественных наук. Применение «неработающих» математических моделей в попытках вписать в них рассматриваемую вещь зачастую вредит философии. Математическая формализация «второго закона преступного поведения», предложенного норвежским судебным психиатром и психоаналитиком Д. Абрахамсеном, представляется не только лишенной смысла, но и этически неприемлемой. Мультидисциплинарность и междисциплинарный диалог позволяют по-новому взглянуть на проблему, освещая ее шире и с новых ракурсов.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>heterarchy</kwd><kwd>cybernetic theory</kwd><kwd>set theory</kwd><kwd>philosophy of consciousness</kwd><kwd>philosophy of mind</kwd><kwd>formalization</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>гетерархия</kwd><kwd>кибернетическая теория</kwd><kwd>теория множества</kwd><kwd>философия сознания</kwd><kwd>философия разума</kwd><kwd>формализация</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Palano D. La «fine della teoria». Scienzi sociale al. capolinea? Vita e pensiero. Milano. 2018;101(4):108-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Markuze G. A one-dimensional man. A study of the ideology of a developed industrial society. Moscow: REFL-book; 1994. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркузе Г. Одномерный человек. Исследование идеологии развитого индустриального общества. М. : REFL-book, 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Velmans M, Schneider S, editors. The Blackwell companion to consciousness. 2-nd ed. Malden: Blackwell; 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Siuda-Ambroziak R. Jumping into faith: The Phenomenon of Brazilian Pentecostal conversations. Studia religiologica. 2018;51(1):11-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasil’ev VV. The philosophy of consciousness. The latest trends // Faculty of Philosophy of Lomonosov Moscow State University - teach-in. Lectures by MSU scientists. Available from: https://teach-in.ru/file/synopsis/pdf/philosophy-of-consciousness-latest-trends-vasilyev-M.pdf (accessed: 06.03.2023). (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Васильев В.В. Философия сознания. Новейшие тенденции // Философский факультет МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова - teach-in. Лекции ученых МГУ. Режим доступа: https://teach-in.ru/file/synopsis/pdf/philosophy-of-consciousness-latest-trends-vasilyev-M.pdf (дата обращения: 06.03.2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Riffert F. Consciousness: The point of view of process philosophy and genetic structuralism - A critical comparison and some consequences. Balkan journal of philosophy. 2019;11(2):83-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Quine WV. Ontological reality and other essays. NY: Columbia University Press; 1969.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Nagel T. What does it all mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Baars BJ. The global workspace theory of consciousness. In: Velmans M, Schneider S, editors. The Blackwell companion to consciousness. Malden: Blakewell; 2007. P. 236-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Chalmers DJ. Moving forward on the problem of consciousness. Journal of consciousness studies. 1997;4(1):3-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Ryle G. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson; 1943.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oshchepkov IV. The difficult problem of consciousness: Is a solution conceivable. Filosofskii zhurnal. 2012;2(9):141-151. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ощепков И.В. Трудная проблема сознания: Мыслимо ли решение // Философский журнал. 2012. Т. 2. № 9. С. 141-151.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Jackson F. What Mary Didn't Know. The Journal of Philosophy. 1986;83(5):291-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Smith G. The process approach to personality. Perceptgenesis and kindred approaches in focus. NY: Springer; 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Malec M. Yet another look at the conceivability and possibility of zombies. Balkan journal of philosophy. 2015;7(2):107-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Whitehead AN, Griffin DR, Sherburne DW, editors. Process and reality. NY: Free Press; 1978.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Huxley JS. Religion without Relevation. London: Ernest Benn Limited; 1929.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Gómez JAV. Human transformations through technology: A Contribution to a Historical Study on Transhumanism. Revista Logos Ciencia &amp; Tecnologia. 2019;11(1):138-151.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cukanov I. The Most Influential Science Fiction Writer You Didn't Know About: The Work of Olaf Stapledon: Three Books That Changed Fiction. Available from: https://dtf.ru/read/12056-samyy-vliyatelnyy-fantast-o-kotorom-vy-ne-znali-tvorchestvo-olafa-stepldona (accessed: 24.02.2023). (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цуканов И. Самый влиятельный фантаст, о котором вы не знали: творчество Олафа Стэплдона: Три книги, которые изменили фантастику. Режим доступа: https://dtf.ru/read/12056-samyy-vliyatelnyy-fantast-o-kotorom-vy-ne-znali-tvorchestvo-olafa-stepldona (дата обращения 24.02.2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Ettinger RCW. The Prospect of Immortality. Terre Haute: Indiana State University; 1962.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haksli G. Трансгуманизм. Available from: https://eroskosmos.org/transhumanism/ (accessed: 24.02.2023). (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хаксли Дж. Трансгуманизм. Режим доступа: https://eroskosmos.org/transhumanism/ (дата обращения: 24.02.2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Hughes JJ. Report on the 2005 Interests and Beliefs Survey of the Members of the World Transhumanist Association. WTA. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/ 20060524181809/http://transhumanism.org/resources/survey2005.pdf (accessed: 24.02.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Cobos-Sanchiz D. The path to transcendence or illusory escapism? A philosophical approach. Filosofija / Sociologija. Vilnius. 2020;31(3):233-241.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seung S. Connect: How the brain makes Us what We Are. 2-nd ed. Kapanadze A, translator. Moscow: Laboratorija znanija publ.; 2016. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сеунг С. Коннектом: Как мозг делает нас тем, что мы есть / пер. с англ. А. Капанадзе. М. : Лаборатория знаний, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marks K., Engels F. The development of fixed capital as an indicator of the development of capitalist production. Critique of political Economy. A rough sketch of 1857-1858. In: Collected works. 2nd ed. Vol. 46. Pt. 2. Moscow: IML Publ.; 1969. P. 201-222. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Развитие основного капитала как показатель развития капиталистического производства. Критика политической экономии. Черновой набросок 1857-1858 гг. // Собр. соч. 2-е изд. Т. 46. Ч. 2. М. : ИМЛ, 1969. С. 201-222.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Krasavin I. Heterarchy of general intellect. Filosofija / Sociologija. Vilnius. 2020;31(3):225-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Virno P. The Grammar of the Multitude: an analysis of the forms of modern life. Petrova A, transl. Penzin A, editor. Moscow: OOO “Ad Marginem Press” Publ.; 2013. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вирно П. Грамматика множества: к анализу форм современной жизни / пер. с ит. А. Петровой, под ред. А. Пензина. М. : ООО «Ад Маргинем Пресс», 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korvalan A, Pankov M. The amazing adventures of intellectuals in Marx’s drafts. Antonio Negri and Paolo Virno. Available from: https://levoradikal.ru/archives/16179 (accessed: 13.11.2022). (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Корвалан А., Панков М. Удивительные приключения интеллектуалов в черновиках Маркса. Антонио Негри и Паоло Вирно. Режим доступа: https://levoradikal.ru/ archives/16179 (дата обращения: 13.11.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Lazzarato M, Jordan JD, transl. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. NY: Semiotext(e); 2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Lazzarato M, Ossandón C, transl. El capital odia a todo el mundo: Fascismo y revolución, Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia; 2020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Lazzarato M, Rodríguez F, transl. ¿Te acuerdas de la revolución? Minorías y clases. Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia; 2022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hart M, Negri A. Empire. Kamenskaja GV, transl., editor. Moscow: Praksis publ.; 2004. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хардт М., Негри А. Империя / пер. с англ. под общей редакцией Г.В. Каменской. М. : Праксис, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hart M, Negri A. The Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Inozemcev VL, transl., editor. Moscow: Kul’turnaja revol’ucija publ.; 2006. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хардт М., Негри А. Множество: Война и демократия в эпоху империи / пер. с англ. под ред. В.Л. Иноземцева. М. : Культурная революция, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasavin I. The heterarchy of the multitude. Logos. 2017;27(3,118):173-198. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Красавин И. Гетерархия множества // Логос. 2017. Т. 27. № 3 (118). С. 173-198.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Kerimov TKh, Krasavin IV. Ontology of multitude and heterarchy of the common. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences. 2020;13(8):1298-1309.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Bates JE. Abrahamsen 's Theory of the Etiology of Criminal Acts. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1950;40(4):471-475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Zach M. Conceptual analysis in the philosophy of science. Balkan journal of philosophy. 2019;11(2):107-124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Haak S. Defending science - within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst; NY: Prometheus Books; 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Moeller HG, Whitehed AK, editors. Wisdom and philosophy: Contemporary and comparative approaches. London; NY: Bloomsbury; 2016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Campbell J. Considering value - What are the ways and means of its expression? Dialogue and universalism. 2015;25(2):18-28.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
