<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">25013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-669-680</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ONTOLOGY AND GNOSEOLOGY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОНТОЛОГИЯ И ГНОСЕОЛОГИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Hellenic Theology of Early Classical Period</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Эллинская теология эпохи ранней классики</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Naidysh</surname><given-names>Vyacheslav M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Найдыш</surname><given-names>Вячеслав Михайлович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Ontology and Theory of Knowledge</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор, профессор кафедры онтологии и теории познания</p></bio><email>v.naidysh@bk.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">HISTORY OF INDIAN AND CHINESE PHILOSOPHY</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИ ИНДИИ И КИТАЯ</issue-title><fpage>669</fpage><lpage>680</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-11-22"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Naidysh V.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Найдыш В.М.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Naidysh V.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Найдыш В.М.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/25013">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/25013</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The author analyzes the transformations of Hellenic theology’s content and forms in the epoch of early antique classics (1st half of the 5th century B.C.). The general orientation of such transformations is the generalization of mythological gods’ meanings into the abstract implications of the Absolute, which is not yet sacral in its full sense and not transcendent. Besides, this period is the end of the “decentralization of consciousness”. Cognitive limitations to the development of abstract conceptual thinking and the rational component of consciousness are removed. This process’s main points transform mythology into artistic and aesthetic creativity (folklore, mythopoetic epic, etc.), religious consciousness, and theology. Rationalism is always critical. Critical rationalism inevitably leads to historicism. Therefore, the formation of a historical attitude strengthens at the sight of the critical approach. The world's mythological image is increasingly being questioned (first in parts, and then in general). Its content is being transferred to the past. Finally, the era of early classicism comes into play. It is a time when theology becomes a field of philosophical and theoretical reflection on myth and an area of its artistic and aesthetic experience. The most influential form of such an understanding of myth was the theater. The ancient theater served as a “spiritual and practical” form of ancient theology, a subject embodiment of theology in stage action.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье анализируются трансформации содержания и форм эллинской теологии в эпоху ранней античной классики (1-я половина V в. до н. э.). Общая направленность таких трансформаций - обобщение смыслообразов мифологических богов в абстрактный смыслообраз Абсолюта, пока еще не сакрального в полном смысле и не трансцендентного. Кроме того, в этот период завершается «децентрация сознания», снимаются когнитивные ограничения развитию абстрактно-понятийного мышления, рациональной составляющей сознания. Основные моменты этого процесса - трансформация мифологии в формы художественно-эстетического творчества (фольклор, мифопоэтический эпос и др.), религиозного сознания, теологии. Рационализм всегда критичен, а критический рационализм неизбежно ведет к историзму. Поэтому критическое отношение к мифологии усиливается формированием исторического отношения к ней. Мифологический образ мира все чаще ставится под сомнение (сначала в частностях, а затем и в целом), его содержание переносится в прошлое. И, наконец, эпоха ранней классики - это время, когда теология становится не только областью философско-теоретической рефлексии над мифом, но и областью художественно-эстетического переживания мифа. Наиболее влиятельной формой такого переживания мифа являлся театр. Античный театр выступил «духовно-практической» формой античной теологии, предметным воплощением теологии в сценическом действии.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>theology</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>consciousness</kwd><kwd>theory</kwd><kwd>mythology</kwd><kwd>image</kwd><kwd>values</kwd><kwd>meaning</kwd><kwd>theater</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>теология</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>сознание</kwd><kwd>теория</kwd><kwd>мифология</kwd><kwd>образ</kwd><kwd>ценности</kwd><kwd>смысл</kwd><kwd>театр</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project №18-011-00186а.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена при&#13;
финансовой поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований, проект&#13;
№ 18-011-00186а.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Naidysh VM. Mythology and Theology. First article. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2017;21 (2):134-146. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2017-21-2-134-146. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Naidysh VM. Mythology and Theology. Second Article. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2019; 23 (2):210-221. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-2-210-221. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Naidysh VM. Mythmaking in the Activities of Consciousness. Voprosy Filosofii. 2017;5:26-34. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Onians RB. The origin of European thought about the body, the mind, the soul, the world, and fate. 2nd ed. Cambridge; 1954.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Kerènyi K. Dionysos: Archetypal Image of Indestructible Life. Moscow: “Ladomir”; 2007. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Parke HW. Greek oracles. L.; 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Akimova LI. Iskusstvo Drevnej Grecii: Klassika. St Petersburg: Azbuka-Klassika; 2007. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Naidysh VM. Filosofia mifologii. Ot antichnosti do epohi romantizma. Moscow; 2002. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Grinbaum NS. Hudozhestvennyj mir antichnoj pojezii. Tvorcheskij poisk Pindara: k 2500-letiju so dnja rozhdenija pojeta. Moscow: Nauka; 1990. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Pindar, Bacchylides. Ody. Fragmenty. Moscow: Nauka; 1980. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Long AA. Language and thought in Sophocles. A study of abstract nouns and poetic technique. L.;1968.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Pavlenko AN. Teorija i teatr. St. Petersburg; 2006. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Aeschylus. Agamemnon. In: Aeschylus. Tragedii. Moscow: Izd. Hudozhestvennaya literature; 1971. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Takho-Godi AA. Ionijskoe i atticheskoe ponimanie termina “istorija” i rodstvennyh s nim. Voprosy klassicheskoj filologii. V. 2. Moscow, 1969. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Fragmenty rannih grecheskih filosofov. Vol. 1. Moscow; 1989. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Herodotus. Historial. (In 9 Vols.). Transl. by GA Stratanovskij. Moscow: “Ladomir”; 1999. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Dovatur AI. Povestdovatel’nyj i nauchnyj stil’ Gerodota. L., LGU; 1957.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Losev AF. Istoria antichnoy estetiki. Vol. 1. Moscow; 1963. (In Russian). (Losev AF. The Dialectic of Artistic Form. Transl., annot. and introd. by OV Bychkov; ed. by DL Tate. München, Berlin, Washington: Verl. Otto Sagner; 2013).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
