<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11763</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The Hartshornian Way: A Way to Solve Dualism</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Путь Хартшорна:еще один способ преодолеть дуализм</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sriwarakuel Warayuth</surname><given-names>-</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Вайрают Шривакуэль</surname><given-names>-</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Assumption University</bio><email>warayuthsrw@au.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Assumption University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-04-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO4 (2011)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№4 (2011)</issue-title><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-12"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, Sriwarakuel Warayuth -.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Вайрают Шривакуэль -.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sriwarakuel Warayuth -.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Вайрают Шривакуэль -.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11763">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11763</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">The Western way of thinking has been dominated by the Aristotelian law of the excluded middle. Even though Hegel tried to initiate a revolution in the Western thought through his dialectical logic, the Aristotelian logic or the either/or logic still haunts the European philosophy. However, the Hegelian logic is not clear enough in epistemological terms to solve the problem of dualism. It is Charles Hartshorne who could be said to have successfully solved this problem in the West. In the article the author demonstrates what he calls the Hartshornian Way and argues for this way as the only one through which truths of the opposites can be successfully recognized and combined together.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">В западном мышлении превалировал аристотелевский закон исключенного третьего. Хотя Гегель и попытался совершить революцию в западной мысли с помощью своей диалектической логики, аристотелевская эксклюзивистская логика продолжает довлеть над европейской философией. Однако гегелевская логика не достаточно эпистемологически ясна, чтобы решить проблему дуализма. Чарльз Хартшорн - тот философ, которому удалось это успешно сделать на Западе. В статье автор демонстрирует то, что он называет хартшорнианским путем, представляя его в качестве единственного, позволяющего успешно объединять противоположные истинные суждения.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Aristotelian logic</kwd><kwd>Hegelian Dialectic</kwd><kwd>Hartshornian logic</kwd><kwd>dualism</kwd><kwd>law of the excluded middle</kwd><kwd>panentheism (neo-classical theism)</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>аристотелевская логика</kwd><kwd>гегелевская диалектика</kwd><kwd>хартшорнианский путь</kwd><kwd>дуализм</kwd><kwd>закон исключенного третьего</kwd><kwd>панентеизм (нео-классический теизм)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Hartshorne Ch. Reality as Social Process. - N.Y.: Hafner Publishing Company, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Barbour I.G. Religion and Science. Harper SanFrancisco: An Imprint of Harper Collins Publishers, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Taylor M.C. Erring: A Postmodern A/theology in Lawrence E. Cahoone. From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. - Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Aristotle. Metaphysics in Jonathan Barnes, ed. The Complete Works of Aristotle. - Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. - Vol. II. - P. 1597.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Hegel. Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, translated by W. Wallace in Jacob Loewenberg, ed., 1929. Hegel Selections. - N.Yo.: Charles Scribner's Sons.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Brent A. Philosophy and Educational Foundations. - London: George Allen &amp; Unwin, 1983. - P. 174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>The New York Times on Friday. - October 13. - 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Hartshorne Ch. The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God. - New Haven:Yale University Press, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
