<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11741</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The denial of semantic relation in Indian classical culture</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Отрицание семантической связи в индийской классической культуре</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Desnitskaya</surname><given-names>E A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Десницкая</surname><given-names>Евгения Алексеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Chair of Oriental Philosophy and Culturology Faculty of Philosophy</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Кафедра философии и культурологии Востока Философский факультет</bio><email>hphilosophy@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saint-Petersburg State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Санкт-Петербургский государственный Университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO1 (2014)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№1 (2014)</issue-title><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>93</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-12"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2014, Desnitskaya E.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2014, Десницкая Е.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Desnitskaya E.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Десницкая Е.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11741">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11741</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">The existence of semantic relation was postulated in Katyayana’s Varttika (3 B.C.E.), which served a key-stone for the further development of Indian language philosophy. However in different Sanskrit texts (Tantras, the Nirukta, works on ritual and poetics) the existence of semantic relation had been denied explicitly. This paper considers specific characteristics of extralinguistic kinds of activities that stipulated the genesis of these texts and elicits the reasons why their authors rejected to use ordinary language, for the sake of establishing new semantic relations.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">Существование семантической связи постулируется в варттике Катьяяны (III в. до н.э.), послужившей отправной точкой для дальнейшего развития индийской лингвофилософии. Тем удивительнее встретить отрицание существования семантической связи, эксплицитно выраженное в санскритских текстах различной тематики (тантры, «Нирукта», труды по ритуалу и поэтике). В статье рассматриваются особенности видов внеязыковой деятельности, лежащие в основе подобных текстов, и выявляются причины, побудившие авторов отказаться от использования обыденного языка и устанавливать новые семантические связи.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Indian language philosophy</kwd><kwd>samdha-bhasha</kwd><kwd>Nirukta</kwd><kwd>Tantra</kwd><kwd>Indian poetic</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>индийская философия языка</kwd><kwd>самдхья-бхаша</kwd><kwd>нирукта</kwd><kwd>тантра</kwd><kwd>индийская поэтика</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Patanjali’s Vyakarana-Mahabhashya. Edited by F. Kielhorn. Vol. I. Bombay, 1880.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Iyer K.A.S. Bhartrihari. A study of Vakyapadiya in the Light of the Ancient Commentaries. Poona, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Patanjali’s Vyakarana-Mahabhashya. Paspashahnika. Introduction. Text. Translation and Notes by S.D. Joshi and J.A.F. Roodbergen. Pune, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Devasthali G.V. Mimamsa — the Vakya-shastra of Ancient India. Bombay, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Prajnopayavinishcayasiddhi of Anangavajra // Two Vajrayana Works. Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, NXLIV. Baroda, 1929.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Elder G.R. Problems of Language in Buddhist Tantra // History of Religions. Vol. 15/3, 1976. P. 231—250.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Wayman A. Buddhist Tantra and Lexical Meaning // Current Advances in Semantic Theory. Amsterdam — Philadelphia. 1992. P. 465—478.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Apte V.Sh. The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Delhi, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Houben J.E.M. Bhartrihari’s Samaya / Helaraja’s Samketa. A Contribution to the Reconstruction of the Grammarian’s Discussion with the Vaisheshikas on the Relation between Shabda and Artha // Journal of Indian Philosophy. 20. 1992. P. 219—242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>The Early Upanishads. Annotated Text and Translation by Patrick Olivelle. Oxford, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Семенцов В.С. Проблемы интерпретации брахманической прозы. М., 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Елизаренкова Т.Я., Топоров В.Н. Древнеиндийская поэтика и ее индоевропейские истоки // Литература и культура Древней и Средневековой Индии. М., 1979. С. 36—88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Гринцер П.А. Тайный язык «Ригведы» // Избранные произведения. Том I. Древнеиндийская литература. М., 2008. С. 9—74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Kahrs E. Indian Semantic Analysis: the Nirvacana Tradition. Cambridge. 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Bronkhorst J. Nirukta and Ashtadhyayi: their shared presuppositions // Indo-Iranian Journal. 23. 1981. P. 1—14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Bronkhorst J. Etymology and magic: Yaska’s Nirukta, Plato’s Cratylus, and the riddle of semantic etymologies // Numen, Vol. 48. Leiden, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Raja K.K. Indian theories of meaning. Madras, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Anandavardhana. Dhvanyaloka. http://sanskritdocuments.org/all_pdf/dhvanyaloka1.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Анандавардхана. Дхваньялока («Свет дхвани») / Пер. с санскрита, введение и комментарий Ю.М. Алихановой. М., 1974.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Gnoli R. The Aesthetic Experience According to Abhinavagupta. Varanasi, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Катенина Т.Е., Рудой В.И. Лингвистические знания в Древней Индии // История лингвистических учений. Древний мир. Л., 1980</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
