<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11608</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Dialogue between Religions and Cultures</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Диалог между религиями и культурами</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>McLean</surname><given-names>George F</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Маклин</surname><given-names>Джордж Ф</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Department of Philosophy</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Кафедра философии</bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">The Catholic University of America</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Католический университет Америки</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2015-04-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO4 (2015)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№4 (2015)</issue-title><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>168</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-12"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2015, McLean G.F.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2015, Маклин Д.Ф.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">McLean G.F.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Маклин Д.Ф.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11608">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11608</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">There can be little doubt that as we enter into newly global times we find the world sinking rapidly into mutual fear and conflict. Some would propose to solve this by a kind of spiritual lobotomy or negative mode of tolerance that leads via relativism to a flaccid indifference. If however, religion is the key to having life and that more fully - as is the very essence of religion - then abandoning faith commitments or employing them against one another is not a reasonable proposal. Rather it becomes the most urgent task of our day to search deeply into how our universal faiths relate to the diversity of the cultures they inspire and hence to their mutual encounters in global times. But were religion and culture to be two alien or even antithetic realities then we might be doomed to failure and hence to conflict. Our task would be simply one of conflict resolution or attenuation by external manipulation. The argument of this paper is the contrary, namely (a) that the history of thought indicates that originally religion and culture were one and not distinguished, but (b) that in the West the emphasis on objectivity from the time of Socrates and Plato directed the mind away from culture and in modern times has made it difficult to appreciate religion as well. In response (c) the important new appreciation of human intentionality and subjectivity opens new paths to understanding both culture and religion as it were from within and as mutually important.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">В статье рассматривается проблема соотношения религии и культуры как двух или даже более антитетических реалий. Сам автор придерживается противоположной позиции. Основными тезисами данной статьи являются следующие положения: а) основываясь на истории философии и науки, показать, что изначально религия и культура были одним и тем же элементом и не отличаются, но б) что на Западе акцент ставился на объективность, данная тенденция наблюдается со времен Сократа и Платона. На основе данной позиции в современном мире появляется новая важная оценка человеческой интенциональности и субъектности, которая открывает новые пути для понимания как культуры, так и религии.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>tolerance</kwd><kwd>faith</kwd><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>reason</kwd><kwd>Socrates</kwd><kwd>Plato</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>толерантность</kwd><kwd>вера</kwd><kwd>религия</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>разум</kwd><kwd>Сократ</kwd><kwd>Платон</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list/></back></article>
