<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11520</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Post-Anthropocentric Antihumanism vs. an Other Humanism as a Humanism of the Other</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Постантропоцентрический антигуманизм против другого гуманизма как гуманизма Другого</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tlostanova</surname><given-names>M V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тлостанова</surname><given-names>Мадина Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Department of Philosophy</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Кафедра философии</bio><email>mydina@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2015-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO1 (2015)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№1 (2015)</issue-title><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-12"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2015, Tlostanova M.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2015, Тлостанова М.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tlostanova M.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Тлостанова М.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11520">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11520</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">The article offers a comparative analysis of largely Western post-anthropocentric antihumanism in its main versions - reactive, technocratically apologetic and critical, and the non-Western humanism as a reiteration of the importance of humanist premises that have never been fulfilled in relation to liminal subjects of modernity deprived of their right to be considered human. The author discusses in detail the intersections and divergences between the Western theories of affect and the decolonial geopolitics and body-politics of knowledge, being, perception, demonstrating that many “discoveries” of the affective turn have been long ago represented in the non-Western theorizing remaining unknown or non-legitimate in the eyes of the mainstream scholarship. This problem has become particularly acute in the context of the discussion of the human, natural and animal, the decentration of the human being as a species and the erasing and destabilizing of the seemingly stable modern boundaries and hierarchies between the human and the natural. The second part of the article focuses on the further problematization of the border between humans and animals in the frame of the so called “autistic regard” which may be expressed both in the form of a scientific experiment and in the form of a performance which is often more efficient.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">В статье представлен сравнительный анализ преимущественно западного постантропоцентрического антигуманизма в его основных проявлениях - реактивном, технократически-апологетическом и критическом - и незападного гуманизма как реитерации важности так и неосуществленных гуманистических принципов в отношении лиминальных субъектов модерности, лишившихся права считаться людьми. Автор подробно останавливается на пересечениях и расхождениях между западными теориями аффекта и деколониальной геополитикой и телесной политикой знания, ощущения и бытия, показывая, что многие «открытия» аффективного поворота уже давно были представлены в незападном теоретизировании, хотя и оставались неизвестными или нелегитимными в глазах мейнстримовской науки. Особую остроту эта проблема обрела в рамках дискуссии о человеческом, природном и животном, децентрации человека как вида и стирания и расшатывания казалось бы незыблемых модерных границ и иерархий между человеческим и природным. Во второй части статьи речь идет о дальнейшей проблематизации границы между человеком и животным в рамках так называемого «аутистского взгляда», который может выражаться как в форме научного эксперимента, так и в форме перформанса, которая зачастую оказывается более результативной.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>post(anti)humanism</kwd><kwd>Rosi Braidotti</kwd><kwd>an other humanism</kwd><kwd>the affective turn</kwd><kwd>body-politics</kwd><kwd>Sylvia Wynter</kwd><kwd>autistic gaze</kwd><kwd>liminality</kwd><kwd>ethno-humanism</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>пост(анти)гуманизм</kwd><kwd>Рози Брайдотти</kwd><kwd>иной гуманизм</kwd><kwd>аффективный поворот</kwd><kwd>телесная политика</kwd><kwd>Сильвия Уинтер</kwd><kwd>аутистский взгляд</kwd><kwd>лиминальность</kwd><kwd>этногуманизм</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Maldonado-Torres N. Introduction. Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise, Volume 1, Dossier 3, Fall 2006. URL: http://www.jhfc.duke.edu/wko/dossiers/1.3/1.3introarchive.php.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Wynter, Sylvia. “Human Being as Noun? or Being Human as Praxis - Towards the Autopoetic Turn/Overturn: A Manifesto,” 2007. URL: http://otl2.wikispaces.com/file/view/The+ Autopoetic+Turn.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Malden: Polity Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Agamben, G. Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Lugones, María. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism,” Hypatia. Special Issue: Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures, Vol. 25, Issue 4 (2010): 742-759.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Nishitani, Osamu. “Anthropos and Humanitas: Two Western Concepts of Human Being.” In Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Difference. Edited by Naoki Sakai and John Solomon. 259-273. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Mignolo, Walter. “Geopolitics of Sensing and Knowing. On (De)Coloniality, Border Thinking, and Epistemic Disobedience,” EIPCP, 09.2011. URL: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0112/ mignolo/en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. “On the Coloniality of Being,” Cultural Studies Vol. 21, No. 2-3 (2007): 240-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Wynter, Sylvia. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human After Man, Its Overrepresentation - An Argument,” The New Centennial Review, 3:3 (2003): 257-337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Ferry, Luc, Alain Renault and Franklin Philip. From the Rights of Man to the Republican Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Tlostanova, Madina and Walter Mignolo. Learning to Unlearn: Decolonial Reflections from Eurasia and the Americas. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Shinkle, Eugenie. “Uneasy Bodies: Affect, Embodied Perception and Contemporary Fashion Photography,” In Carnal Aesthetics. Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics. Edited by Bettina Papenburg and Martha Zarzycka, 73-88. London, N.Y.: I.B. Tauris 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Wynter, Sylvia. ‘Towards the Sociogenic Principle: Fanon, The Puzzle of Conscious Experience, of “Identity” and What it’s Like to be “Black”’ In National Identity and Socio-Political Change: Latin America Between Marginalisation and Integration. Edited by Mercedes Duran-Cogan and Antonio Gomez-Moriana, 30-66. New York: Garland, 2000. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, Lewis. “Problematic People and Epistemic Decolonization: Toward the Postcolonial in Africana Political Thought,” In Postcolonialism and Political Theory. Edited by Nalini Persram, 121-142. N.Y.: Lexington Books, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Fanon, Franz. Black Skin, White Masks. N.Y.: Grove Press, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Du Bois, William B. The Souls of Black Folk. A.C. McClurg &amp; Co., Chicago, 1903.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Henry, Padget. Caliban’s Reason. Introducing Afro-Caribbean Philosophy. N.Y.: Routledge, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Moraga, Cherrry and Gloria Anzaldua, eds. This Bridge Called my Back. Writings by Radical Women of Color N.Y.: Kitchen Table. Women of Color Press, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/ La Frontera. The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, Lewis. “What does it mean to be a problem”, In Existentia Africana. Understanding Africana Existential Thought, 62-95. N.Y.&amp; Lodon: Routledge, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Albán Achinte, Adolfo. “Artistas Indígenas y Afrocolombianos: Entre las Memorias y las Cosmovisiones. Estéticas de la Re-Existencia”. In Arte y Estética en la Encrucijada Descolonial, 83-112. Buenos Aires: Del Siglo, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Mignolo, Walter. ”I am where I Think: Remapping the Order of Knowing”, In The Creolization of Theory. Edited by Francoise Lionnet and Shu-mei Shih, 159-192, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Dussel, Enrique. The Underside of Modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor, and the Philosophy of Liberation. Atlantic Highlands: Humanity Books, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Koivunen, Anu. “Force of affects, weight of histories in Love is a Treasure”, In Carnal Aesthetics. Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics. Edited by Bettina Papenburg and Martha Zarzycka, 89-101. London, N.Y.: I.B. Tauris, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Masumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Gallese, Vittorio. “The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism.” Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358-431, 29 March (2003): 517-528.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Karkov, Nikolay. “From Humanism to Post-humanism and Back: Notes on the Geopolitics of Knowledge”, Личность. Культура. Общество. Т. 15, Вып. 3-4 (2013): 52-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Shiva, Vandana. Earth Democracy. Justice, Sustainability and Peace. N.Y., Boston: South End Press, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Manning, Erin. “Another regard”, In Carnal Aesthetics. Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics. edited by Bettina Papenburg, Martha Zarzycka, 55-72. London, N.Y.: I.B. Tauris, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Mignolo, Walter. The Darker Side of the Renaissance. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Lugones, Maria. “Playfulness, “World”-traveling and Loving Perception”, In: Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes. Theorizing Coalition against Multiple Oppression. 77-100. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
