<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Philosophy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Cерия: Философия</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2302</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8900</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11395</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">To What Extent Contemporary Mathematical Science is Reliable</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>В какой степени современные математические науки являются надежными</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khakhanian</surname><given-names>Valery Kh</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хаханян</surname><given-names>Валерий Христофорович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en">Moscow State University of Railway Communications</bio><bio xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный университет путей сообщения</bio><email>tu@miit.ru &amp;lt;mailto:tu@miit.ru&amp;gt;</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State University of Railway Communications</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный университет путей сообщения</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-03-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO3 (2011)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№3 (2011)</issue-title><fpage>86</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-12"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, Khakhanian V.K.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Хаханян В.Х.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khakhanian V.K.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хаханян В.Х.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11395">https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11395</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">The crisis in foundation of mathematics at the end of 19th beginning of 20th centuries initiated a number of axiomatic set theoretical systems during the first half of the 20th century. These systems were the result of different philosophical approaches (in view of second Godel's Theorem) aimed at overcoming of the above crisis. But the way out of this situation has never been found.
In my article I offer a new approach to solve this problem using a basic axiomatic system of the set theory with intuitionistic logic. I will present a lot of mathematical results having been obtained during the last forty years. We will survey the development of the set theory with the intuitionistic logic underlining the main points and formulating unsolved problems and describe the basic system of the intuitionistic set theory.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">В статье предлагается философский подход к обоснованию математики (теории множеств как математической дисциплины, лежащей в основании математики), базирующийся на полученных к настоящему времени математических результатах в области неклассических аксиоматических формальных систем. Дается краткая историческая картина развития понятия строгости математических доказательств и обоснования математики от древних греков до наших дней. В статье приводится ряд новейших достижений в области формализованных теорий арифметики (теории чисел), теорий действительного числа (математического анализа) и аксиоматических теорий множеств, которые рассматриваются с подлежащей интуиционистской логикой, а также в области классических дескриптивной и аксиоматической теорий множеств.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>arithmetic</kwd><kwd>mathematical analysis</kwd><kwd>axiomatic systems of set theory</kwd><kwd>intuitionism</kwd><kwd>constructivism</kwd><kwd>basic system</kwd><kwd>mathematics</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>арифметика</kwd><kwd>математический анализ</kwd><kwd>аксиоматические системы теории множеств</kwd><kwd>интуиционизм</kwd><kwd>конструктивизм</kwd><kwd>базисная система</kwd><kwd>математика</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Meyer R.K., Mortensen C. Inconsistent models for relevant arithmetic // The Journal of Symbolic Logic. - V. 49. - 1984. P. 917-929</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman H., Meyer R.K. Whether relevant arithmetic // The Journal of Symbolic Logic. - V. 57. -1992. - P. 824-831.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Struik von Dirk J. Abriss der Geschichte der Mathematik. - Berlin, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Hilbert D. Grundlagen der Geometrie. - Leipzig und Berlin (Teubner), 1930.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Heyting A. Mathematische Grundlagenforschung. Intuitionismus, Beweistheorie. (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Hrsg. v. d. Schriftleitung des „Zentralblatt der Mathematik". III, Bd., 4. Heft.) - Berlin, 1934. - XII.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Cantor G. Proceeding on set theory. - M., 1985 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Fraenkel A.A., Bar-Hillel Y. Foundations of set theory. - Amsterdam, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Kleene S.C. Introduction to metamathematics. - New York, Toronto, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Markov A.A. About constructive mathematics. Proceedings of Math. Institute of V.A. Steklov of Acad. of Science of USSR. - Vol. LXVII. - Moscow-Leningrad, 1962 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Kushner B.A. Lectures on constructive mathematical analysis. - Moscow, 1973 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Beeson M. Problematic Principles in Constructive Mathematics. - Preprint № 185. - Department of Mathematics. - University of Utrecht. - February 1981. - Part 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Kanovei V.G. Axiom of choice and axiom of determinateness. - Moscow, 1984 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hilbert D. Uber dieGrundlagender Logik und der Arithmetik // Verhanndlungen des Dritfen Internationalen Mathematiker-Kongresses in Heidelberg vom. 8 bis 13 August 1904. - Leipzig, 1905 (application from VII of [2]).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Godel K. Zur intuitionistishen Arithmetik und Zahlentheorie Ergebnisse eines math. - Koll., 1931-1932.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kolmogorov A.N. Jubilee edition in three books. Book 1.Truth is weal. Biobibliographia. -Phismathlit, 2003 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Kolmogorov A.N. About principle tertium non datur. Mathem // Transections. - 1925. - V. 32. - № 4 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Dragalin A.G. Mathematical Intuitionism. Introduction to the Proof Theory. Trans. of Math. Monographs. - 1988. - Vol. 67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Khakhanian V. Thesis "Models of intuitionistic set theory". - Moscow, 1982 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Khakhanian V. Thesis "Intuitionistic logic and set theory". - Moscow, 2004 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman H. Some applications of Kleene's method for intuitionistic systems // Lecture Notes in Mathematics. - № 337. - 1973.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Myhill J. Constructive set theory // The Journal of Symbolic Logic. - V. 40. - № 3. - 1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Glivenko V.I. Sur la logique de M. Brouwer // Academie Royale de Belgique, Bulletin de la classe des sciences. - Ser 5. - 4 (1928).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Glivenko V.I. Sur quelques points de la logique de M. Brouwer // Academie Royale de Belgique, Bulletin de la classe des sciences. - Ser. 5, 15 (1929).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Jech T. Set theory (english summary). The third millennium edition, revised and expanded Springer Monographs in Mathematics. - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Kanamori A. The higher infinite. Large cardinals in set theory from their beginning. Second edition. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Quine W.V. New foundations for mathematical logic //Amer. Mathem. Monthly. - 44. - 1937.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Shestopal V.E. A theory of elements and sets. Preprint of Institute of theoretical and experimental physics 90-8. - Moscow, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
