<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Metaphysics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Metaphysics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>МЕТАФИЗИКА</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2224-7580</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">29790</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2224-7580-2021-3-36-46</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>UNITY OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS AND METAPHYSICS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЕДИНСТВО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОЙ ФИЗИКИ И МЕТАФИЗИКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PHYSICS NEEDS PHILOSOPHY. PHILOSOPHY NEEDS PHYSICS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ФИЗИКА НУЖДАЕТСЯ В ФИЛОСОФИИ, А ФИЛОСОФИЯ - В ФИЗИКЕ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rovelli</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ровелли</surname><given-names>Карло</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru">профессор Центра теоретической физики</bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rybakova</surname><given-names>I. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рыбакова</surname><given-names>Ирина Андреевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru">сотрудник сектора философии естественных наук</bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Aix-Marseille University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Экс-Марсель</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Института философии Российской академии наук</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO3 (2021)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№3 (2021)</issue-title><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>46</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-12-25"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Metaphysics</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, МЕТАФИЗИКА</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Metaphysics</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">МЕТАФИЗИКА</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/metaphysics/article/view/29790">https://journals.rudn.ru/metaphysics/article/view/29790</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">Contrary to claims about the irrelevance of philosophy for science, I argue that philosophy has had, and still has, far more influence on physics than is commonly assumed. I maintain that the current anti-philosophical ideology has had damaging effects on the fertility of science. I also suggest that recent important empirical results, such as the detection of the Higgs particle and gravitational waves, and the failure to detect supersymmetry where many expected to find it, question the validity of certain philosophical assumptions common among theoretical physicists, inviting us to engage in a clearer philosophical reflection on scientific method.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">Вопреки утверждениям о несоответствии философии науке, я утверждаю, что философия имела и все еще имеет гораздо большее влияние на физику, чем это обычно предполагается. Я утверждаю, что нынешняя антифилософская идеология пагубно сказалась на плодородии науки. Я также полагаю, что недавние важные эмпирические результаты, такие как обнаружение частицы Хиггса и гравитационных волн, а также неспособность обнаружить суперсимметрию там, где многие ожидали ее обнаружить, ставят под сомнение обоснованность некоторых философских предположений, распространенные среди физиковтеоретиков, побуждая нас к более ясному философскому размышлению о научном методе.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Philosophy of physics</kwd><kwd>Aristotle</kwd><kwd>Popper</kwd><kwd>Kuhn</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>философия физики</kwd><kwd>Аристотель</kwd><kwd>Поппер</kwd><kwd>Кун</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Weinberg Steven. Dreams of a Final Theory. Chapter VII. Vintage, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Hawking Stephen. The Grand Design. Bantam, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltbADstPdek (accessed: 17.05.2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Isocrates quoted in Iamblichus, Protrepticus, VI 37.22-39.8 (de Gruyter 1996).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Rovelli C. Aristotle's Physics: A Physicist's look // Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 2015. 1. 23-40, arXiv:1312.4057.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Heisenberg W. Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen // Zeitschrift fur Physik. 1925. No. 1, 33. P. 879-893.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Howard D. A Peek behind the Veil of Maya: Einstein, Schopenhauer, and the Historical Background of the Conception of Space as a Ground for the Individuation of Physical Systems // The Cosmos of Science: Essays of Exploration / John Earmanand, John D. Norton, eds. Pittsburgh-Konstanz Series in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 6. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997; Konstanz: Universitätsverlag, 87-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Howard D. A kind of vessel in which the struggle for eternal truth is played out. Albert Einstein and the Role of Personality in Science // The Natural History of Paradigms: Science and the Process of Intellectual Evolution / John H. Langdon and Mary E. McGann, eds. Indianapolis: University of Indianapolis Press, 1994. P. 111-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Einstein A. Letter to Robert A. Thornton, 7 December 1944. EA 61-574, in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986-present).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Carnap R. Überwindungder Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache // Erkenntnis. 1932. Vol. 2: English translation: The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language / Sarkar, Sahotra, ed. // Logical empiricism at its peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. New York: Garland Pub., 1996. P. 10-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Quine W. V. O. Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Kepler Johannes. Astronomia Nova / translated by William H. Donahue. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Abbott B.P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration &amp; Virgo Collaboration) GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral // Physical Review Letters. 2017. 119 (16).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Abbott B.P. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger // The Astrophysical Journal. 2017. 848 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>The worst episode of this misunderstanding is the confusion between the (strong) commonsense notion of `confirmation’ and the (weak) Bayesian notion of `confirmation’ that has driven the controversy over Richard Dawid's work on non-empirical confirmation [Dawid R. String Theory and the Scientific Method. Cambridge University Press, 2013.] An attempt to study the actual source of (possibly unjustified) confidence in a theory has been re-trumpeted by scientists as a proof of validity.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
