RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and JournalismRUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism2312-92202312-9247Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)2764010.22363/2312-9220-2021-26-3-375-391Research ArticleThe Polyphony of the Silent: The Specifics of Dostoevsky’s Philosophical DiscourseKrinitsynAlexandr B.<p>Doctor of Philology, Reader at the Department of the History of Russian Literature</p>derselbe@list.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-5058Moscow State University M.V. Lomonosov0810202126337539108102021Copyright © 2021, Krinitsyn A.B.2021<p style="text-align: justify;">The article describes the phenomenon of silence in Dostoevskys later prose. Philosophical, plot-forming and psychological aspects of silence are looked at. A confessional type of monologue is defined as a discursive genre, with specific roles of the speaker and his silent listeners, whose predominance in Dostoevskys prose lets the author of the article adjust the notion of polyphony and dialogue within the context of Dostoevskys poetics. The conventionality of the other in the confessional type of monologue is proved by the absence of the completing functions in listeners. In most cases Dostoevskys later works retain some rudimental forms of frantic dialogue while the role of specific monologue discourse, caused and conditioned by silence, is increasing. By semantics and function types of silence in Dostoevsky fall into three groups: 1) the underground silence as expression of human disunity in the epoch of universal solitude; 2) role silence of listeners in the discursive genre of confessional monologue; 3) sacred silence of Christ indicating transition to a new higher level of communication</p>Dostoevsky’s novelssilencediscoursedialoguemonologue of confessional typethe speakerthe listenerthe confidentроманы Ф.М. Достоевскогомолчаниедискурсдиалогмонолог исповедального типаговорящийслушательконфидент[Bachtin, M.M. (1972). The problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Moscow: Khudozh. Literaturа Publ. (In Russ.)][Bachtin, M.M. (1975). Esthetics of verbal fiction. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)][Shmid, V. (1994). Story-telling and the story being told in “Brothers Karamazov”. In V. Shmid. Prose as poetry: articles on narration in Russian literatre (pp. 142–150). Saint-Petersburg. (In Russ.)][Epshtejn, M.N. (2006). Word and silence: Metaphysics of Russian literature: textbook for high schools. Moscow. (In Russ.)][Dostoevskij, F.M. (1976). Complete works. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)][Krinicyn, A.B. (2016). The theory of plots in Dostoevsky’s novels. Moscow. (In Russ.)][Zveig, Stefan. (1992). Three masters. Moscow. (In Russ.)][Sartr, J.-P. (1988). Primary attitude to the other: love, language, masochism. In The problem of man in Western philosophy (pp. 227–228). Moscow. (In Russ.)][Vitgenstein, L. (2005). Tractatus logico-philosoficus. In L. Vitgenstein Selected works (pp. 14–221). Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom «Territoriia budushchego» Publ. (In Russ.)][Chirkov, N.M. (1967). On Dostievsky’s style: Problems. Ideas. Images. Moscow. (In Russ.)]