<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">44884</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-41632</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">KFXUSM</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Gendered use of hedges in the discussion and conclusion sections of research articles</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Влияние гендера на хеджирование в разделах «обсуждение» и «заключение» научных статей</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title/></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4895-5770</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alhuqbani</surname><given-names>Lamya</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Альхукбани</surname><given-names>Ламия</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>lecturer at King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Her research interests include translation, interpretation and discourse analysis</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>преподаватель Университета короля Сауда, Эр-Рияд, Саудовская Аравия. Ее исследовательские интересы связаны с переводом и анализом дискурса</p></bio><email>lalhuqbani@cfy.ksu.edu.sa</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5649-821X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alhuqbani</surname><given-names>Mohammed</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Альхукбани</surname><given-names>Мохаммед</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Professor of Applied Linguistics in the Department of English, the College of Languages and Translation at Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. His research interests include, but are not limited to, English for Specific Purposes, discourse analysis, forensic linguistics, and bilingualism</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор кафедры английского языка Колледжа языков и перевода Исламского университета имени имама Мухаммада ибн Сауда, Эр-Рияд, Саудовская Аравия. В сферу его научных интересов входят английский язык для специальных целей, анализ дискурса, судебная лингвистика и билингвизм.</p></bio><email>alhuqbani@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">King Saud University (KSU)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет короля Сауда</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Исламский университет имени имама Мухаммада ибн Сауда</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-06-28" publication-format="electronic"><day>28</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>320</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-07-08"><day>08</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Alhuqbani L., Alhuqbani M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Альхукбани Л., Альхукбани М.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025, Alhuqbani L., Alhuqbani M.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Alhuqbani L., Alhuqbani M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Альхукбани Л., Альхукбани М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Alhuqbani L., Alhuqbani M.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/44884">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/44884</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Following Lakoff’s (1975) claim that women hedge in speech more often than men, a large number of studies have investigated the role of gender in academic discourse and produced limited evidence, indicating the need for more research to highlight the role of gender in academic writing. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally examine how gender may affect the use of hedges in the discussion and conclusion sections of research articles. For this purpose, the study adopted Salager-Meyer’s (1997) taxonomy of hedges to qualitatively and quantitatively examine the types, frequency and gendered use of hedges in a small-scale corpus of research articles produced by 20 Saudi male and female researchers. The overall results showed that both genders employed Salager-Meyer’s taxonomy of hedges and used more hedges in the discussion than in the conclusion . Males hedged more than females, but the difference was not statistically significant except in certain cases, such as the use of two modal lexical verbs ( indicate and seem ) and the modal auxiliary verb ( must ). Moreover, the results revealed a marginal significant difference in the use of adjectival , adverbial and nominal phrases. Females tended to employ more of these hedges than their male counterparts. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between gender and hedging in academic discourse, and may guide postgraduate students towards the appropriate use of hedging devices in their research development. They also emphasize the need for further research on the role of gender across disciplines, languages and cultures.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Утверждение Робин Лакофф (1975) о том, что женщины прибегают к хеджированию в речи чаще, чем мужчины, способствовало появлению большого количества исследований, посвященных изучению роли гендера в академическом дискурсе. Однако было приведено ограниченное количество доказательств, что указывает на необходимость проведения дальнейших исследований для выявления роли гендера в академическом письме. Данное кросс-культурное исследование нацелено на выявление того, как гендер может влиять на использование хеджирования в разделах «обсуждение» и «заключение» научных статей. Материалом послужил корпус научных статей, написанных 20 саудовскими исследователями - мужчинами и женщинами. Качественное и количественное изучение типов, частоты и гендерного использования хеджей проводилось на основе таксономии хеджей Салагера-Мейера (1997). Общие результаты показали, что представители обоих полов употребляют различные типы хеджей и в большей степени они встречаются в «обсуждении», чем в «заключении». При этом мужчины прибегали к хеджированию чаще, чем женщины, хотя разница статистически несущественная, за исключением использования глаголов indicate и seem , а также модального глагола must . Кроме того, результаты выявили незначительную разницу в использовании прилагательных, наречий и именных словосочетаний, которые использовались женщинами чаще, чем мужчинами. Полученные результаты способствуют лучшему пониманию взаимосвязи между гендером и хеджированием в академическом дискурсе и могут быть полезны при написании научных работ. Они также свидетельствуют о необходимости дальнейших исследований в области гендера в разных дисциплинах, языках и культурах.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"/><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>academic discourse</kwd><kwd>hedges</kwd><kwd>gender</kwd><kwd>research articles</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>академический дискурс</kwd><kwd>хеджирование</kwd><kwd>гендер</kwd><kwd>научные статьи</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Ajmal, Muhammad, Saba Sadia &amp; Uzma Sadiq. 2023. A comparative study of hedges used by male and female native English writers: A corpus-based analysis. Propel Journal of Academic Research 3 (1). 305-325. https://doi.org/10.55464/pjar.v3i1.73</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Ansarin, Ali &amp; Mahnaz Bathaie. 2011. Hedging as an index of gender realization in research articles in applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of Applied Language 3 (2). 85-108. https://doi.org/10.22111 /ijals.2011.1010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Argina, Ade &amp; Nur Ijabah. 2022. Hedging strategies in research articles: A comparative analysis of Indonesian male and female English students. Acitya: Journal of Teaching &amp; Education 4 (1). 285-296. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v4i1.3215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Basturkmen, Helen. 2012. A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11. 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Behnam, Biook, Amin Naeimi &amp; Ali Darvishzade. 2012. A comparative genre analysis of hedging expressions in research articles: Is fuzziness forever wicked? English Language and Literature Studies 2 (2). 20-38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n2p20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bonyadi, Alireza, Javad Gholami &amp; Sina Nasiri. 2012. A contrastive study of hedging in environmental sciences research articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3 (6). 1186-1193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Coates, Jennifer. 2004. Women, Men, and Language. London: Pearson Longman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Daryaee Motlagh, Ebrahim. 2021. The use and frequency of hedges in applied linguistics papers written by male and female scholars: A gender-based comparison. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies 7 (1). 16-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Dousti, Masoumeh &amp; Abbass Rasekh. 2016. ELT students’ gender differences in the use of hedges in interpersonal interactions: A mixed method approach applied. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 3 (1). 217-231.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Farahani, Mohammad &amp; Motahareh Hassani. 2014. A discourse analysis of gender differences in the use of hedging devices in applied linguistics research articles. English Language Teaching 1 (1). 59-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In Gunther Kaltenböck &amp; Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 15-34. Bingley, UK: Emerald.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gul, Sanam, Rosy Ilyas, Shoukat Lohar &amp; Mansoor Ahmed. 2020. Exploring gender differences in the use of hedges in Pakistani engineering research. Education and Linguistics Research 6 (1). 101-116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hashemi, Mohammad &amp; Danial Shirzadi. 2016. The use of hedging in discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles with varied research methods. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) 35 (1). 31-56. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2016.3729</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Hidayati, Farida, Syihabuddin Syihabuddin &amp; Dadang Sudana. 2017. A pragmatic analysis of hedges in articles on chemistry, linguistics and economics. In The Tenth Conference on Applied Linguistics and The Second English Language Teaching and Technology Conference in collaboration with The First International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education - CONAPLIN and ICOLLITE. 418-422. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007168404180422</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken. 1994. Hedging in academic textbooks and EAP. English for Specific Purposes 13 (3). 239-256. Retrieved Jan 20, 2013 from http://.caes. hku.hk/kenhyland/files/2012/08/Hedging-in-academic-writing-and EAPtextbooks.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken. 1995. The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching 18. 33-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken. 1996. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research 63 articles. Applied Linguistics 17 (4). 433-456.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Retrieved Jan 20, 2013 from http://books.google.com/books.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken &amp; Polly Tse. 2008. Robot kung-fu: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1232-1248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken &amp; Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25 (2). 156-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Martin-Martin, Pedro. 2008. The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies 8. 133-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Myers, Greg. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10. l-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Navrátilová, Michaela. 2013. Hedges in biomedical research articles. Unpublished diploma thesis, Masaryk University, Brno.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Pellby, Ellen. 2013. Hedging in political discourse: An analysis of hedging in an American city council. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Gävle University, Gävle.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13 (2). 149-170. Retrieved Jan 20, 2013from ttp://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/123456789/27713/1/hedges.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1997. I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In Tom Miller (ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications, 105-118. Washington, D.C.: English Language Programs-United States Information Agency, Retrieved Jan 20, 2013 from http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-331736-541472.html.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Serholt, Sofia. 2012. Hedges and boosters in academic writing. A study of gender differences in essays written by Swedish advanced learners of English. Unpublished Thesis, Gotensborgs Universität, Retrieved from http://gyoea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/29626/1.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Tran, Thao Q. &amp; Tham Duong M. 2013. Hedging: A comparative study of research article results and discussion section in applied linguistics and chemical engineering. English for Specific Purposes World 14 (41). 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Varttala, Teppo. 2001. Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Electronic dissertation. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis. Retrieved July 20, 2013 from http://acta.uta.fi</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Winardi, Wijaya. 2009. The use of hedging devices by American and Chinese writers in the field of applied linguistics. Sastra Inggris Journal 8 (3). 228-237.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Yeganeh, Maryam &amp; Seyedeh Ghoreyshi. 2015. Exploring gender differences in the use of discourse markers in Iranian academic research articles. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 192. 684-689.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Quan &amp; Renbai Wen. 2022. A corpus-based quantitative study on the interpersonal functions of hedges in Chinese and German academic discourse. Heliyon 8 (9). 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10698</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
