<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">43743</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-42282</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">NVOPMB</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Nonverbal communication at the ecolinguistic grassroots</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Эколингвистика невербальной коммуникации</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title/></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-2857</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Frayne</surname><given-names>Craig</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Фрайне</surname><given-names>Крайг</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>technical communication practitioner and he also focuses on civil society engagement. He earned his PhD from TU Freiberg, Germany, where his dissertation, “Language Games and Nature”, examined the linguistic and intercultural dimensions of ecological and infrastructure discourse.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>специалист по технической коммуникации, занимается вопросами взаимодействия с гражданским обществом. Получил степень PhD в Техническом университете Фрайберга, Германия, где в своей диссертации «Языковые игры и природа» исследовал лингвистические и межкультурные аспекты экологического и инфраструктурного дискурса.</p></bio><email>craigfrayne@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution></institution></aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-02" publication-format="electronic"><day>02</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Ecolinguistics: Consolidating a research paradigm</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Эколингвистика: объединяя исследовательские парадигмы</issue-title><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-08"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Frayne C.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Фрайне К.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025, Frayne C.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Frayne C.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Фрайне К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Frayne C.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/43743">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/43743</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the Lebenswelt of everyday communication, meaning emerges from the interplay of verbal and nonverbal semiosis. While textual discourse analysis offers valuable insights, the richness and complexity of human communication come to the fore when considering communication in its entirety, including nonverbal elements. This paper aims to move beyond theoretical analysis and support real-world organizing efforts, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the human-environment relationship and its implications for environmental justice. It argues for integrating nonverbal analysis into ecolinguistic praxis, particularly in engagement with communities and civil society, or the ecolinguistic ‘grassroots.’ However, there is a gap in existing ecolinguistic scholarship regarding frameworks for this integration. To address this, the paper presents a multilevel methodology based on eight hours of audio and video recordings, which capture different perspectives on mining operations and proposed developments. These include interviews, documentaries, and recordings from ‘town hall’ meetings from YouTube recordings uploaded between approximately 2007 and 2018. Analysis of facial expressions and gestures reveals distinct cognitive responses at different thematic levels of discourse (ecological, cultural, socioeconomic). This paper demonstrates how such findings have important implications for practitioners engaging with working-class communities impacted by environmental change. As nonverbal research increasingly focuses on human-computer interaction and artificial intelligence, this study advocates for nonverbal analysis as humanistic inquiry, emphasizing meaning-centered approaches that draw from the embodied nature of human interaction to foster empathic understanding and more effective organizing within communities.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В повседневном общении смысл возникает в результате семиозиса вербального и невербального. Хотя текстовый анализ дискурса дает ценную информацию, богатство и сложность человеческого общения выходят на первый план, только если рассматривать коммуникацию во всей ее полноте, включая невербальные элементы. Цель данной работы - выйти за рамки теоретического анализа и привлечь внимание к практическим мерам, направленным на более полное понимание отношений между человеком и окружающей средой, а также их последствий для экологии. В ней приводятся аргументы в пользу интеграции невербального анализа в эколингвистическую практику, особенно при взаимодействии с населением и гражданским обществом. Однако в современной эколингвистике заметен пробел в отношении подходов к такой интеграции. Для решения этой проблемы в статье использована многоуровневая методология. Материалом послужили аудио- и видеозаписи (8 часов), загруженные на YouTube в период с 2007 по 2018 гг., в которых отражены различные точки зрения на горнодобывающие работы и предлагаемые проекты. Они включают интервью, документальные фильмы и встречи с общественностью. Анализ мимики и жестов позволил выявить различные когнитивные реакции на разных тематических уровнях дискурса (экологическом, культурном, социально-экономическом). В статье показано, как полученные результаты могут помочь специалистам-практикам, работающим с представителями рабочих поселков, подверженных влиянию экологических изменений. В то время как исследования невербальных реакций все больше фокусируются на взаимодействии человека с компьютером и на искусственном интеллекте, данная работа выступает за невербальный анализ как гуманистическое направление, опирающееся на смыслоориентированные подходы и естественную природу человеческого взаимодействия.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"/><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>ecolinguistics</kwd><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>nonverbal communication</kwd><kwd>environmental communication</kwd><kwd>body language</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эколингвистика</kwd><kwd>дискурсивный анализ</kwd><kwd>невербальная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>экологическая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>язык тела</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Abuczki, Ágnes &amp; Esfandiari Baiat Ghazaleh. An overview of multimodal corpora, annotation tools and schemes. Argumentum 9. 2013. 86-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Argyle, Michael 1988. Bodily Communication. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Beattie, Geoffrey. 2016. Rethinking Body Language: How Hand Movements Reveal Hidden Thoughts. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Cienki, Alan. 2024. Self-focused versus dialogic features of gesturing during simultaneous interpreting. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (2). 227-242. https://doi.org/10.22363/ 2687-0088-34572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Crivelli, Carlos &amp; Alan J Fridlund. 2018. Facial displays are tools for social influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22 (5). https://doi/org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenaus. 1970. Ethology: The Biology of Behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Ekman, Paul. 1972. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of Emotions. In J. Cole. Lincoln (ed.), Symposium on motivation, 207-282. NB: University of Nebraska Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Ekman, Paul &amp; Wallace Friesen. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17 (2). 124-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Hall, Edward T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Halliday, Michael. 2001. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In Alwin Fill &amp; Peter Mühlhäusler (eds.) The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment ,175-202. London, UK: Continuum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Hartley, Gregory &amp; Maryann Karinch. 2017. The Art of Body Talk: How to Decode Gestures, Mannerisms, and Other Non-Verbal Messages. Red Wheel/Weiser.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Haugen, Einar. 1972. The Ecology of Language. Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hooks, Bell. 1992. Black Looks: Race and Representation. South End Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Jack, Rachael E., Oliver G. B. Garrod, Hui Yu, Roberto Caldara &amp; Philippe G. Schyns. 2012. Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (19). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200155109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 125. 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Johnston, Hank. 2014. What is protest music? Music as a tool of protest and social movement. Sociology Compass 8 (8). 1049-1061.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Kinsbourne, Marcel. 2006. Gestures as embodied cognition: A neurodevelopmental interpretation. Gesture 6 (2). 205-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Lakin, Jessica L. 2006. Automatic cognitive processes and nonverbal communication. The Sage Handbook of Nonverbal Communication. 59-77. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152.n4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Lakoff, George. 2010. Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication 4 (1). 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Lamendella, John T. 1977. The limbic system in human communication. Studies in Neurolinguistics 3. 157-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-746303-2.50010-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>LeDoux, Joseph E. 1994. Emotion, memory and the brain. Scientific American 270 (6). 50-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Leonteva, Anna V., Alan Cienki &amp; Olga V. Agafonova. 2023. Metaphoric gestures in simultaneous interpreting. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (4). 820-842. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687008836189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, Hedwig. 2012. Body Language: A Guide for Professionals. SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Livingstone, Steven &amp; Caroline Palmer. 2016. Head Movements Encode Emotions During Speech and Song 16. 365-380. https://doi.org/10. 1037/emo0000106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Mai, Xiaoqin, Yue Ge, Lin Tao, Honghong Tang, Chao Liu &amp; Yue-Jia Luo. 2011. Eyes are windows to the Chinese soul: Evidence from the detection of real and fake smiles. PLOS ONE 6 (5). e19903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019903 ISSN: 1932-6203. Available at: PubMed and PMC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Massaro, Douglas W. 1987. Speech Perception by Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, David &amp; Hyisung Hwang. 2013. Facial expressions. In David Matsumoto, Mark G. Frank &amp; Hyisung Hwang (eds.), Nonverbal communication: Science and applications, 2nd ed., chap. 2. Los Angeles: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, David &amp; Hyisung C. Hwang 2012. Culture and nonverbal communication. In Mark L. Knapp &amp; Judith A. Hall (eds.), Nonverbal communication. De Gruyter. Chap. 23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy, Anjanie, Kang Lee, Shoji Itakura &amp; Darwin W. Muir. 2006. Cultural display rules drive eye gaze during thinking. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 37 (6). 717-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106292079</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>McClave, Evelyn Z. 2000. Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (7). 855-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03782166(99)00079X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>McNeill, David, 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Murray, John D. 2013. Multimodal Communication. London, UK: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Navarro, Joe. 2008. What Everybody is Saying: An Ex-FBI Agent’s Guide to Speed-Reading People. New York: HarperCollins.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Özyürek, Asli. 2010. The role of iconic gestures in production and comprehension of language: Evidence from brain and behavior BT gesture in embodied communication and human computer interaction. In Stefan Kopp &amp; Ipke Wachsmuth (eds.), 1-10. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN: 9783642125539.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas M. 2023. More than just a tree: Ecolinguistics and responses to the felling of ‘Hadrian’s tree. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (4). 797-819. https://doi.org/10.22363/ 2687008836732</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology, and the Stories We Live By. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Tooby, John &amp; Leda Cosmides. 2008. The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland Jones &amp; Lisa F. Barrett (eds.), Handbook of eemotions, 114-137. New York: The Guilford Press. URL: https://www.cep. ucsb.edu/papers/emotionIRVLewisCh8.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Wood, Jack Denfeld &amp; Gianpiero Petriglieri. 2005. Transcending polarization: Beyond binary thinking. Transactional Analysis Journal 35 (1). 31-39.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
