<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">43742</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-42820</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">NSJAXU</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Imagining a post-crisis society through generative conversation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Посткризисное общество в генеративном дискурсе</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title/></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-2152</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Laparle</surname><given-names>Schuyler</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лапарле</surname><given-names>Шуйлер</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Lecturer in Communication and Cognition at Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands Her research focuses on cognitive linguistics, the role of hand gestures in maintaining cooperative face-to-face discourse, as well as the use of metaphor in public discourses on immigration and climate change.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>преподаватель кафедры коммуникации и когниции в Тилбургском университете, Тилбург, Нидерланды. Ее исследовательские интересы включают когнитивную лингвистику, роль жестов в межличностном диалоге, использование метафор в публичных дискуссиях об иммиграции и изменении климата.</p></bio><email>s.m.laparle@tilburguniversity.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Tilburg University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Тилбургский университет</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-02" publication-format="electronic"><day>02</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Ecolinguistics: Consolidating a research paradigm</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Эколингвистика: объединяя исследовательские парадигмы</issue-title><fpage>148</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-08"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Laparle S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Лапарле Ш.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025, Laparle S.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Laparle S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лапарле Ш.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Laparle S.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/43742">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/43742</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Realizing a sustainable and equitable world requires a shared vision of what that world should look like. Given the scale and complexity of the climate crisis, conceptualizing necessary societal transformations can be challenging for individuals, resulting in fatalism and disempowerment. In this work, I look at the ways in which generative conversations that center embodiment may help individuals move through this challenge to reclaim hope and agency around the climate crisis. The goal of this study is to better understand what conceptual and communicative strategies individuals use to imagine transformational change. Using Mental Spaces Theory and conceptual blending, I analyze 11 interviews with climate-concerned adults tasked with imagining a “post-crisis world”. Post-crisis world descriptions were assessed for detail and the degree to which their structure diverged from the input space(s). I show that imagined worlds that incorporate diverse embodied experiences are more generative according to these metrics. This work adds a new theoretical approach to our Positive Discourse Analysis toolkit by demonstrating the utility of mental spaces and conceptual blending to critical analysis and the creation of new beneficial narratives.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Для построения устойчивого и справедливого мира необходимо иметь общее видение того, как этот мир должен выглядеть. Учитывая масштаб и сложность климатического кризиса, концептуализация необходимых общественных преобразований может быть сложной задачей для человека и приводить к фатализму и бессилию. В данной работе рассматривается, как генеративный дискурс может помочь преодолеть этот вызов и вернуть надежду и уверенность в борьбе с климатическим кризисом. Цель исследования - определить концептуальные и коммуникативные стратегии, используемые для генерации трансформационных изменений. На основе теории ментальных пространств и концептуального смешения в работе проанализировано 11 интервью с экологическими активистами, которым было предложено представить себе «посткризисный мир». Описания посткризисного мира оценивались на предмет детализации и степени расхождения с исходным пространством. Результаты показали, что в соответствии с этими критериями воображаемый мир, включающий разнообразный опыт, является более генеративным. Данная работа вносит теоретический вклад в существующий инструментарий позитивного дискурс-анализа, демонстрируя полезность ментальных пространств и концептуального смешения для критического анализа и создания новых позитивных нарративов.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"/><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>climate crisis</kwd><kwd>generative discourse</kwd><kwd>Positive Discourse Analysis</kwd><kwd>Mental Spaces</kwd><kwd>cognitive linguistics</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>климатический кризис</kwd><kwd>генеративный дискурс</kwd><kwd>позитивный дискурс- анализ</kwd><kwd>ментальные пространства</kwd><kwd>когнитивная лингвистика</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Ágoston, Csilla, Róbert Urbán, Bence Nagy, Benedek Csaba, Zoltán Kőváry, Kristóf Kovács, Attila Varga, Andrea Dúll, Ferenc Mónus, Carrie A. Shaw &amp; Zsolt Demetrovics. 2022. The psychological consequences of the ecological crisis: Three new questionnaires to assess eco-anxiety, eco-guilt, and ecological grief. Climate Risk Management 37. 100441.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, Ben. 2010. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34 (6). 777-798.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Azevedo, José &amp; Margarida Marques. 2017. Climate literacy: A systematic review and model integration. International Journal of Global Warming 12 (3-4). 414-430.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Beddoe, Rachel, Robert Costanza, Joshua Farley, Eric Garza, Jennifer Kent, Ida Kubiszewski, Luz Martinez, Tracy McCowen, Kathleen Murphy, Norman Myers, Zach Ogden, Kevin Stapleton &amp; John Woodward. 2009. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (8). 2483- 2489.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Brandt, Line &amp; Per A. Brandt. 2005. Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3 (1). 216-249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Springer.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Cianconi, Paulo, Sophia Betrò &amp; Luigi Janiri. 2020. The impact of climate change on mental health: A systematic descriptive review. Frontiers in Psychiatry 11. 74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Couto, Hildo H. d. 2014. Ecological approaches in linguistics: A historical overview. Language Sciences 41. 122-128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Crist, Eileen. 2007. Beyond the climate crisis: A critique of climate change discourse. Telos 141 (Winter). 29-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Cutrer, L. Michelle. 1994. Time and Tense in Narrative and in Everyday Language. University of California, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Dancygier, Barbara. 2016. Figurativeness, conceptual metaphor, and blending. In Elena Semino &amp; Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 46-59. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Fauconnier, Gilles &amp; George Lakoff. 2009. On metaphor and blending. Cognitive Semiotics 5 (1-2). 393-399.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Fauconnier, Gilles &amp; Mark Turner. 2008. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Fauconnier, Gilles, &amp; Mark Turner. 1994. Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces (tech. rep. No. 9401). University of California, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech 280 (1). 20-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Freire, Paulo. 1970a. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Continuum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Freire, Paulo. 1970b. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Gallie, Walter B. 1955. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56. 167-198.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Garton, Sue &amp; Fiona Copland. 2010. ‘I like this interview; I get cakes and cats!’: The effect of prior relationships on interview talk. Qualitative Research 10 (5). 533-551.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Gilligan, Jonathan M. &amp; Michael P. Vandenbergh. 2020. Beyond wickedness: Managing complex systems and climate change. Vanderbilt Law Review 73 (6). 1777-1810.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Giroux, Henry A. 1997. Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Gladwin, Derek &amp; Naoko Ellis. 2024. Systems beings: Educating for a complex world. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Hanson-Easey, Scott, Susan Williams, Alana Hansen, Kathryn Fogarty, &amp; Peng Bi. 2015. Speaking of climate change: A discursive analysis of lay understandings. Science Communication 37 (2). 217-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Hart, Christopher J. 2007. Critical discourse analysis and conceptualisation: Mental spaces, blended spaces and discourse spaces. In Christopher Hart &amp; Dominik Lukeš (eds.), Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory, 106-130. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Hossain, Rokeya S. 1905. Sultana’s dream. Indian Ladies’ Magazine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>IPCC. 2023. Summary for policymakers. In Houesung Lee &amp; José Romero (eds.), Climate change 2023: Synthesis report, 1-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Jasanoff, Sheila. 2010. A new climate for society. Theory, Culture &amp; Society 27 (2-3). 233- 253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Jeffrey, Craig &amp; Jane Dyson. 2021. Geographies of the future: Prefigurative politics. Progress in Human Geography 45 (4). 641-658.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Kahn, Richard. 2008. From education for sustainable development to ecopedagogy: Sustaining capitalism or sustaining life. Green Theory &amp; Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy 4 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Keller, Ellis, John E. Marsh, Beth H. Richardson &amp; Linden J. Ball. 2022. A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct. Journal of Environmental Psychology 81. 101822.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Lawrance, Emma L., Rhiannon Thompson, Jessica Newberry, Lisa Page &amp; Neil Jennings. 2022. The impact of climate change on mental health and emotional wellbeing: A narrative review of current evidence, and its implications. International Review of Psychiatry 34 (5). 443-498.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Lazarus, Richard J. 2008. Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review 94. 1153-1234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Léger-Goodes, Terra, Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise, Trinity Mastine, Mélissa Généreux, Olivier Paradis &amp; Chantal Camden. 2022. Eco-anxiety in children: A scoping review of the mental health impacts of the awareness of climate change. Frontiers in Psychology 13. 872544.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Levin, Kelly, Benjamin Cashore, Steven Bernstein &amp; Graeme Auld. 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences 45 (2). 123-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2011. Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies 10 (01). 1-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Maiella, Roberta, Pasquale La Malva, Daniela Marchetti, Elena Pomarico, Adolfo Di Crosta, Rocco Palumbo, Luca Cetara, Alberto Di Domenico &amp; Maria Cristina Verrocchio. 2020. The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 568899.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Pelling, Mark, David Manuel-Navarrete &amp; Michael Redclift. 2012. Climate Change and the Crisis of Capitalism. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Maslin, Mark. 2014. Climate Change: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>McDonald, Rachel I., Hui Yi Chai &amp; Ben R. Newell. 2015. Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 44. 109-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Nouri, Ali &amp; Seyed Mehdi Sajjadi. 2014. Emancipatory pedagogy in practice: Aims, principles and curriculum orientation. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy 5 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>O’Brien, Karen &amp; Linda Sygna. 2013. Responding to climate change: The three spheres of transformation. Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate 16. 16-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Ogunbode, Charles Adedayo, Ståle Pallesen, Gisela Böhm, Rouven Doran, Navjot Bhullar, Sibele Aquino, Tiago Marot, Julie Aitken Schermer, Anna Wlodarczyk, Su Lu, Feng Jiang, Katariina Salmela-Aro, Daniel Hanss, Daniela Acquadro Maran, Rahkman Ardi, Razieh Chegeni, Hajra Tahir, Elahe Ghanbarian, Joonha Park, Takashi Tsubakita, Chee-Seng Tan, Karlijn van den Broek, JohnBosco Chika Chukwuorji, Ojewumi Kehinde, Marc Eric Santos Reyes, Samuel Lins, Violeta Enea, Tatiana Volkodav, Tomáš Sollár, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Jorge Torres-Marín, Winfred Mbungu, Charles Onyutha &amp; Michael Lomas. 2021. Negative emotions about climate change are related to insomnia symptoms and mental health: Cross- sectional evidence from 25 countries. Current Psychology. 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Ojala, Maria, Ashlee Cunsolo, Charles A. Ogunbode &amp; Jacqueline Middleton. 2021. Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 46 (1). 35-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>O’Neill, Daniel W., Andrew L. Fanning, William F. Lamb &amp; Julia K. Steinberger. 2018. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability 1 (2). 88-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Paglia, Eric. 2018. The socio-scientific construction of global climate crisis. Geopolitics 23 (1). 96-123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Penz, Hermine &amp; Alwin Fill. 2022. Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages 8 (2). 232-253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Pepermans, Yves &amp; Pieter Maeseele. 2016. The politicization of climate change: Problem or solution? Climate Change 7 (4). 478-485.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Pihkala, Panu. 2020. Anxiety and the ecological crisis: An analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability 12 (19). 7836.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas M. 2022. Ecolinguistics and positive discourse analysis: Convergent pathways. MediAzioni 34. A36-A54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Richardson, Katherine, Will Steffen, Wolfgang Lucht, Jørgen Bendtsen, Sarah E. Cornell, Jonathan F. Donges, Markus Drüke, Ingo Fetzer, Balasubramanian Govindasamy, Werner Von Bloh, Georg Feulner, Stephanie Fiedler, Dieter Gerten, Tom Gleeson, Matthias Hofmann, Willem Huiskamp, Matti Kummu, Chinchu Mohan, David Nogués-Bravo, Stefan Petri, Miina Porkka, Stefan Rahmstorf, Sibyll Schaphoff, Kirsten Thonicke, Arne Tobian, Vili Virkki, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Lisa Weber &amp; Johan Rockström. 2023. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science advances 9 (37). eadh2458.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Shor, Ira. 2012. Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Shudak, Nicholas J. &amp; Mejai BM Avoseh. 2015. Freirean-based critical pedagogy: The challenges of limit-situations and critical transitivity. Creative Education 6 (4). 463-471.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Spence, Alexa, Wouter Poortinga &amp;Nick Pidgeon. 2012. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 32 (6). 957-972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Steffensen, Sune Vork &amp; Alwin Fill. 2014. Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language sciences 41. 6-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Stibbe, Arran. 2017. Positive discourse analysis: Rethinking human ecological relationships. In Alwin F. Fill &amp; Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 165-178. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Sweetser, Eve. 2006. Negative spaces: Levels of negation and kinds of spaces. In Stéphanie Bonnefille &amp; Sébastien Salbayre (eds.), La négation: Forms, figures, conceptualisation, 313-332. Presses universitaires François-Rabelais.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Szerszynski, Bronislaw &amp; John Urry. 2010. Changing climates: Introduction. Theory, Culture &amp; Society 27 (2-3). 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Urry, John. 2011. Climate and Society. London: Polity.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Van Lange, Paul A. &amp; Anna L. Huckelba. 2021. Psychological distance: How to make climate change less abstract and closer to the self. Current Opinion in Psychology 42. 49-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Wright, Christopher, Daniel Nyberg, Christian De Cock &amp; Gail Whiteman. 2013. Future imaginings: Organizing in response to climate change. Organization, 20 (5). 647-658.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Yusoff, Kathryn &amp; Jennifer Gabrys. 2011. Climate change and the imagination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2 (4). 516-534.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, Wenjuan. 2022. Ecolinguistics: A half-century overview. Journal of World Languages 7 (3). 461-486.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
