<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">43738</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-42428</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">MXLYOW</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Big oil and climate change: An ecolinguistic perspective</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Большая нефть и изменение климата: эколингвистический аспект</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title/></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2324-7294</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>Richard John</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Александер</surname><given-names>Ричард Джон</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Professor Emeritus of English for Business and Economics at the Vienna University of Economics. A graduate of Jesus College, Cambridge, he has taught and researched English as a foreign language, business English, linguistics and language and ecology for over forty-six years at several European universities. He is the author of Framing Discourse on the Environment. A Critical Discourse Approach (2009, New York, Routledge).</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>почетный профессор Венского экономического университета. Выпускник Колледжа Иисуса в Кембридже. Более 46 лет преподавал и исследовал английский язык как иностранный, деловой английский, лингвистику, язык и экологию в нескольких европейских университетах. Автор книги Framing Discourse on the Environment. A Critical Discourse Approach (2009, Routledge).</p></bio><email>richard.alexander@aon.at</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9968-1162</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ponton</surname><given-names>Douglas Mark</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Понтон</surname><given-names>Дуглас Марк</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Associate Professor of English Language and Translation at the Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Catania, where he is president of the Masters’ Degree Course “Internationalisation of Business Relations”. His research interests include ecolinguistics, positive discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, Critical discourse studies, pragmatics and applied linguistics. Most recent publication: Exploring Ecolinguistics: Ecological Principles and Narrative Practices (Bloomsbury, 2024).</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доцент кафедры английского языка и перевода факультета политических и социальных наук Университета Катании. Руководит магистерской программой «Интернационализация деловых отношений». Сфера его научных интересов включает эколингвистику, позитивный дискурс анализ, корпусную лингвистику, критический дискурс, прагматику и прикладную лингвистику. Последняя публикация - Exploring Ecolinguistics: Ecological Principles and Narrative Practices (Bloomsbury, 2024).</p></bio><email>dponton@unict.it</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of Economics and Business</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Венский университет экономики и бизнеса</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of Catania</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Катании</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-02" publication-format="electronic"><day>02</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Ecolinguistics: Consolidating a research paradigm</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Эколингвистика: объединяя исследовательские парадигмы</issue-title><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-08"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Alexander R.J., Ponton D.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Александер Р.Д., Понтон Д.М.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025, Alexander R., Ponton D.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Alexander R.J., Ponton D.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Александер Р.Д., Понтон Д.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Alexander R., Ponton D.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/43738">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/43738</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the context of the ever-worsening climate crisis, the global debate around fossil fuels is keener than ever. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Press Release of 20 March 2023 stated: “In 2018, IPCC highlighted the unprecedented scale of the challenge required to keep warming to 1.5°C. Five years later, that challenge has become even greater due to a continued increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The pace and scale of what has been done so far, and current plans, are insufficient to tackle climate change.” Against this background, this paper investigates the discourse of oil giant TotalEnergies in its report “More Energy, Less Emissions: Sustainability &amp; Climate 2024 Progress Report”. The paper throws an ecolinguistic light on one of the main drivers of climate change, and explores the extent to which such a report may represent an instance of greenwashing. The aim of the study is to reveal linguistic strategies that enable such companies - who have played, and continue to play the most significant role in producing global warming - to present themselves as agents for environmental good. From the critical, discourse-historical perspective, the paper highlights the circulation in government, environmental, corporate and public contexts of both positive and destructive discourses. The findings appear to support the greenwashing hypothesis; the paper thus contributes to the growing tradition of ecolinguistic studies that expose the role of (corporate) language in perpetuating situations of environmental harm.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В условиях постоянно обостряющегося климатического кризиса глобальные дебаты вокруг ископаемого топлива становятся как никогда острыми. В пресс-релизе Межправительственной группы экспертов по изменению климата (МГЭИК) от 20.03 2023 г. говорится: «В 2018 г. МГЭИК сформулировала беспрецедентную по масштабу задачу, которую необходимо решить, чтобы удержать потепление на уровне 1,5°C. Пять лет спустя эта задача стала еще более серьезной из-за продолжающегося роста выбросов парниковых газов. Темпы и масштабы того, что было сделано до сих пор, а также текущие планы недостаточны для решения проблемы изменения климата». В свете данной дискуссии в статье анализируется дискурс нефтяного гиганта TotalEnergies. Материалом исследования послужил отчет компании за 2024 г. «Больше энергии, меньше выбросов: работа в области устойчивого развития и изменения климата». С позиций эколингвистики рассматривается одна из главных причин изменения климата и исследуется, в какой степени данный отчет может представлять собой пример «зеленого пиара». Цель исследования - выявить лингвистические стратегии, позволяющие компаниям, играющим существенную роль в процессе глобального потепления, позиционировать себя в качестве представителей рациональной экологии. С точки зрения критического и дискурсивно-исторического подходов рассматриваются как позитивные, так и деструктивные дискурсы, циркулирующие в правительственных, экологических, корпоративных и общественных контекстах. Полученные результаты подтверждают гипотезу о «зеленом пиаре». Таким образом, работа вносит вклад в развитие эколингвистических исследований, раскрывающих роль корпоративного дискурса в сохранении пагубного влияния компаний на окружающую среду.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"/><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>corpus linguistic methods</kwd><kwd>critical discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>climate change</kwd><kwd>greenhouse gas emissions</kwd><kwd>greenwashing</kwd><kwd>ecolinguistics</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>корпусные лингвистические методы</kwd><kwd>критический дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>изменение климата</kwd><kwd>выбросы парниковых газов</kwd><kwd>зеленый пиар</kwd><kwd>эколингвистика</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, Richard John. 2017. Investigating texts about environmental degradation using critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistic techniques. In Alwin F. Fill &amp; Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, 196-210. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, Richard John. 2024. Is Cargill Inc. Really the Answer to World Hunger? UK: Grosvenor House Publishing Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Augé, Anaïs 2023. Metaphor and Argumentation in Climate Crisis Discourse. New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baker, Paul. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bowen, Frances &amp; J. Alberto Aragon-Correa. 2014. Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization &amp; Environment 27 (2). 107-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Chau, Meng Huat, Chenghao Zhu, George M. Jacobs, Nimrod Lawson Delante, Alfian Asmi, Serena Ng, Sharon Santhia John, Qingli Guo &amp; Krishnavanie Shunmugam. 2022. Ecolinguistics for and beyond the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of World Languages 8 (2). 323-345.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Ciplet, David &amp; J. Timmons Roberts. 2017. Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 46. 148-156.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Döring, Martin &amp; Beate Ratter. 2018. The regional framing of climate change: Towards a place-based perspective on regional climate change perception in north Frisia. Journal of Coastal Conservation (22). 131-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Döring, Martin. 2017. Media reports about natural disasters: An ecolinguistic perspective. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 293-308.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Dowson, Nick. 2022. Beyond big oil. New Internationalist May-June. 15-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Fill, Alwin &amp; Hermine Penz (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Fløttum, Kjersti. 2016. Narratives of climate change from the perspective of international negotiations. Journal of Language and Politics 15 (5). 623-646. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Gabrys, Jennifer. 2020. Climate change and the politics of ecolinguistics. Environmental Communication 14 (2). 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1694336.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Grasso, Marco. 2022. From Big Oil to Big Green: Holding the Oil Industry to Account for the Climate Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Gutstein, Donald. 2018. The Big Stall: How Big Oil and Think Tanks are Blocking Action on Climate Change in Canada. Toronto: Lorimer.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, Anders &amp; David Machin. 2019. Media and Communication Research Methods. London: Red Globe Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Howarth, Robert W., Renee Santoro &amp; Anthony Ingraffea. 2011. Methane and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 106. 679-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Hunston, Susan. 2007. Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (2). 249-268.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Jaworska, Sylvia. 2018. Change but no climate change: Discourses of climate change in corporate social responsibility reporting in the oil industry. International Journal of Business Communication 55 (2). 194-219.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Martin, James R. &amp; Peter R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Messaris, Paul. 1996. Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Thousand Oaks, Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Mignone, Bryan K., Leon Clarke, James A. Edmonds, Angelo Gurgel, Howard J. Herzog, Johnson Jeremiah X., Dharik S. Mallapragada, Haewon McJeon, Jennifer Morris, Patrick R. O’Rourke, Sergey Paltsev, Steven K. Rose, Daniel C. Steinberg &amp; Aranya Venkatesh,. 2024. Drivers and implications of alternative routes to fuels decarbonization in net-zero energy systems. Nature Communications (15). 3938.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Miller, Toby. 2017. Greenwashing Culture. London and New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Norgaard, Kari. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MIT Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Norgaard, Kari. 2019. Climate change denial and ecolinguistics: An integrated approach to communication and action. Language Sciences (74). 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Penz, Hermine &amp; Alwin Fill. 2022. Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages 8 (2). 232-253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Poole, Robert. 2022. Corpus-Assisted Ecolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas M. 2023. More than just a tree: Ecolinguistics and responses to the felling of ‘Hadrian’s tree’. Russian Journal of Linguistic 27 (4). 797-819. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-36732</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas M. 2024. Exploring Ecolinguistics. Ecological Principles and Narrative Practices. London, Bloomsbury.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Raslavičius, Laurencas, Artūras Keršys, Saulius Mockus, Neringa Keršienė &amp; Martynas Starevičius. 2014. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as a medium-term option in the transition to sustainable fuels and transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (32). 513-525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Seele, Peter &amp; Lucia Gatti. 2017. Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (2). 239-252.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. London, Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Stibbe, Arran. 2023. Econarrative: Ethics, Ecology, and the Search for New Narratives to Live By. London, Bloomsbury Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Synák, František, Kristián Čulík, Vladimír Rievaj &amp; Ján Gaňa. 2019. Liquefied petroleum gas as an alternative fuel. Transportation Research Procedia 40. 527-534.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Vasta, Nicoletta. 2005. Profits and principles: Is there a choice? The multimodal construction of Shell’s commitment to social responsibility and the environment in and across advertising texts. In Giuseppina Cortese &amp; Anna Duszak (eds), Identity, community, discourse: English in intercultural settings, 429-452. Berne: Peter Lang.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Westervelt, Amy. 2021. How to spot five of the fossil fuel industry’s biggest disinformation tactics. The Guardian Thu 9 Sep 2021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Weiss, Gilbert &amp; Ruth Wodak. 2007. Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In Gilbert Weiss &amp; Ruth Wodak (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. London, Basingstoke &amp; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 1-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Wiesenthal, Christine, Brad Bucknell &amp; William J.T. Mitchell. 2000. Essays into the Imagetext: An interview with William J. T. Mitchell. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 33 (2). 1-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In Ruth Wodak &amp; Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. 63-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Bukold, Steffen for Greenpeace 2023 “The dirty dozen: the climate greenwashing of 12 European oil companies”. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://greenpeace.at/ uploads/2023/08/greenpeace-cee_aug-23_media-briefing_dirty-dozen-report.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Carbon Brief 2019 “Factcheck: How electric vehicles help to tackle climate change”. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-how-electric-vehicles-help-to-tackle-climate-change/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Cook, J., Supran, G., Lewandowsky, S., Oreskes, N., &amp; Maibach, E., 2019 “America Misled: How the fossil fuel industry deliberately misled Americans about climate change”. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/ america-misled/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>IPCC 2022 The Sixth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. 2.10.2024. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ ar6/wg3/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Lakhani, Nina. 2024. Corporations invested in carbon offsets that were ‘likely junk’” the Guardian Thu 30 May 2024 12.00 CEST. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/30/corporate-carbon-offsets-credits, retrieved 27.10.2024.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Lamb, William F., Mattioli, Giulio, Levi, Sebastian, Roberts, J. Timmons, Capstick, Stuart, Minx, Jan C., Müller-Hansen, Finn, Culhane, Trevor &amp; Steinberger, Julia K. 2020. Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-sustainability/article/discourses-of-climate-delay/7B11B722E3E3454BB6212378E32985A7, retrieved 27.10.2024.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Miliband, Ed 2024 Great British Energy is becoming a reality - bringing with it cheap, clean and secure energy. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.pressreader.com/ australia/the-guardian-australia/20240726/282514368785682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Milman, Oliver 2024 Global methane emissions rising at fastest rate in decades, scientists warn. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/ 240910121039.htm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Niranjan, Ajit 2024a France urged to step in to spur TotalEnergies’ transition from oil, the Guardian Wed 19 Jun 2024. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jun/19/france-urged-to-step-in-to-spur-totalenergies-transition-from-oil.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Niranjan, Ajit 2024b “Climate hero or villain? Fossil fuel frenzy challenges Norway’s green image”, the Guardian Fri 26 Jul 2024 12.00 CEST. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-guardian-usa/20240727/281479281671981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Noor, Dharna 2024 “News and tech media mostly quiet after UN chief calls for ban on ads for oil and gas”, the Guardian Fri 7 Jun 2024. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/major-oil-companies-lagging-behind-their-climate-targets-according-to-ngo/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Ritchie, Hannah and Rosado, Pablo 2020 “Energy Mix” Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://ourworldindata.org/ energy-mix.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Steffensen, Sune Vork &amp; Stephen J. Cowley. 2021. Thinking on behalf of the world: Radical embodied ecolinguistics. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 723-736.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Toledano, Perrine, Martin Dietrich Brauch &amp; Jiarui Chen. 2022. How Much Have the Oil Supermajors Contributed to Climate Change? New York, Columbia University. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4085011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>TotalEnergies 2024 Sustainability &amp; Climate Progress Report. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.csreurope.org/newsbundle-articles/totalenergies-publishes-its-sustainability-climate-2024-progress-report.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
