<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="book-review" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24103</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-493-505</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>BOOK REVIEW</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>РЕЦЕНЗИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>最新动态</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Review of Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-37507-0</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Рецензия на книгу Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-37507-0</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Etsuko</surname><given-names>Oishi</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Эцуко</surname><given-names>Оиси</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>professor of linguistics</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор лингвистики</p></bio><email>oishi@rs.tus.ac.jp</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Tokyo University of Science</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Токийский университет науки</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Язык, культура и идеология в дискурсивных практиках</issue-title><fpage>493</fpage><lpage>505</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-06-27"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Etsuko O.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Эцуко О.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2020, Etsuko O.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Etsuko O.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эцуко О.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Etsuko O.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/24103">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/24103</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>-</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>-</p></trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Ädel, Annelie. 2010. How to use corpus linguistics in the study of political discourse. In Michael McCarthy &amp; Anne O’Keeffe (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 591-604. London: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Archer, Dawn. 2011. Cross-examining lawyers, facework and the adversarial courtroom. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 3216-3230</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2). 193- 216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Austin, John. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Boxer, Diana &amp; Florencia Cortés-Conde.1997. From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics 27. 275-294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Brown, Penelope. 1980. How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker &amp; Nelly Furman (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society, 111-136. New York: Praeger.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Brown, Roger &amp; Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18. 159-212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Brown, Penelope &amp; Stephen Levinson. 1978/1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Bunrnley, David. 2003. The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature. In Irma Taavitsainen &amp; Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 27-45. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Changing politeness strategies in English requests: A diachronic investigation. In Jacek Fisiak (eds.), Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A festschrift for Akio Oizumi, 17-35. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 349-367</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1). 35-72</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Foolen, Ad, Ulrike M. Lüdtke, Timothy P. Racine &amp; Jordan Zlatev (eds.). 2012. Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. Face, identity, and (im)politeness: Looking backwards, moving forward-from Goffman to Practice Theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1). 1-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Graham, Sage L. 2007. ‘Do unto others’: Gendered identity construction in an online religious community. In Allyson Jule (eds.), Language and Religious Identity: Women in Discourse, 73-1103. Basingstoke: Palgrave</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole &amp; Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts, 3. 41-58. New York: Academic Press. (reprinted Grice 1989).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies of the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Haugh, Michael. 2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3. 295-317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Haugh, Michael &amp; Wei-Lin M. Chang. 2019. Indexical and sequential properties of criticisms in initial interactions: Implications for examining (im)politeness across cultures. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 909-929.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Homes, Janet. 1988. Paying compliments: A sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 3. 445-465</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Homes, Janet. 1993. New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 20 (2). 91-116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Homes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Janney, Richard &amp; Horst Arndt. 1992. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide &amp; Ehlich Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, 21-41. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Kádár, Dániel Z. 2011. Postscript. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (LPRG) (eds.), Discursive Approaches to Politeness, 245-262. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness? In Andreas H. Jucker &amp; Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27-44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Lakoff, Robin T. 1973. The logic of politeness; or minding your P’s and Q’s. In Claudia Corum, Thomas C. Smith-Stark &amp; Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 1. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Mills, Sara. 2011. Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (LPRG) (eds.), Discursive Approaches to Politeness, 19-56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Peirce, Charles S. 1901. Index (in exact logic). In James M. Baldwin (eds.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, 1. 531-532. London: Macmillan and Co.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Rockwell, Patricia A. 2006. Sarcasm and Other Mexed Messages: The Ambiguos Ways People Use Language. Queenston: Edwin Mellon Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Scollon, Ronald &amp; Suzanne W. Scollon. 2001. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Short, Mick. 1996. Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London: Longman. Spencer-Oatey, Helen (eds.). 2001. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. 1st edn. London/New York: Continuum</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Spencer-Oatey, Helen (eds.). 2008. Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. 2nd edn. London/New York: Continuum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Strawson, Peter F. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73 (4). 439-460.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Terkourafi, Marina. 2007. Toward a universal notion of face for a universal notion of cooperation. In Istvan Kecskés &amp; Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, 307-338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Terkourafi, Marina. 2014. The importance of being indirect: A new nomenclature for indirect speech. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 45-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Terkourafi, Marina. 2019. Indirectness in the age of globalization: A social network analysis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 930-949.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Tracy, Karen. 2008. Reasonable hostility: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research 4. 169-191</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Tzanne, Angeliki &amp; Maria Sifianou. 2019. Understandings of impoliteness in the Greek context. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 1014-1038.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Van der Bom, Isabelle &amp; Sara Mills. 2015. A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2). 179-206.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide &amp; Ehlich Konrad (eds.). 1992. Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Wolfson, Nessa. 1988. The bulge: A theory of speech behaviour and social distance. In Jonathan Fine (eds.), Second Language Discourse: A Textbook of Current Research, 21- 38. Norwood: Ablex</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
