<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24092</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-219-252</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Miscellaneous</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Язык, культура и идеология в дискурсивных практиках</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bilá</surname><given-names>Magdaléna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Била</surname><given-names>Магдалена</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. of Philology, Full Professor at the Institute of British and American Studies, Faculty of Arts</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор филологических наук, профессор Института британских и американских исследований гуманитарного факультета</p></bio><email>magdalena.bila@unipo.sk</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ivanova</surname><given-names>Svetlana V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Иванова</surname><given-names>Светлана Викторовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. of Philology, Full Professor, Head of English Philology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор филологических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой английской филологии, член редколлегии журнала Russian Journal of Linguistics</p></bio><email>svet_victoria@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of Prešov</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Прешовский университет в Прешове</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Pushkin Leningrad State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Ленинградский государственный университет имени А.С. Пушкина</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Язык, культура и идеология в дискурсивных практиках</issue-title><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>252</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-06-27"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Bilá M., Ivanova S.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Била М., Иванова С.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2020, Bilá M., Ivanova S.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bilá M., Ivanova S.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Била М., Иванова С.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Bilá M., Ivanova S.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/24092">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/24092</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Discursive practices are looked upon as the core notion of discourse theory and the main instrument linguists can operate with studying language in connection with society and a human being. In this introductory article we will look into how language, culture and ideology are intertwined in diverse discursive practices and how these practices are shaped by people representing various cultures, ideologies and social entities. As part of linguistic discourse theory, we will briefly outline the major objectives and tenets of discourse theory or discourse analysis and track down the reasons why discourse theory turned into a dominant linguistic paradigm in the new millennium. Besides, some light will be thrown on the advancements and debatable questions arising within discourse theory as reflected in its methodology. Then we will give a brief synopsis of each individual paper and highlight theoretical and methodological contributions and innovations proposed by our authors. The results of the discussion as well as a brief outlook on future research will be summed up at the end of the introductory article.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Дискурсивные практики рассматриваются в качестве основополагающего понятия теории дискурса и основного инструмента, при помощи которого лингвисты могут изучать язык в связи с обществом и человеком. Данная вводная статья, как и весь выпуск, посвящены вопросу о том, как язык, культура и идеология переплетаются в различных дискурсивных практиках и как эти практики формируются людьми, представляющими разные культуры, идеологии и социальные образования. Рассматривая дискурсивные практики как часть лингвистической теории дискурса (дискурс-анализа), мы кратко опишем основные цели и принципы теории дискурса и выделим причины, по которым это направление превратилось в доминирующую лингвистическую парадигму нового тысячелетия. Кроме того, мы остановимся на развитии теории дискурса и тех дискуссионных вопросах, которые возникают в ее рамках. Проблемные зоны теории дискурса касаются расширения предметной области дискурс-анализа, избираемых дискурс-аналитиками объектов исследования, стыковых дисциплин, граничащих с теорией дискурса, и методологии анализа. В завершение мы дадим краткий обзор каждой статьи номера и отметим теоретический и методологический вклад, а также новизну каждой публикации. Результаты и перспективы будущих исследований очерчены в заключительной части вводной статьи.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>discursive practices</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>ideology</kwd><kwd>identity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дискурс анализ</kwd><kwd>дискурсивные практики</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>идеология</kwd><kwd>идентичность</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Alba-Juez, Laura &amp; Tatiana V. Larina. 2018. Language and emotion: Discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1). 9-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, Richard &amp; Arran Stibbe. 2014. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences 41. 104-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Beard, Adrian. 2000. The Language of Politics. NY: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: a text-driven approach. Text and Talk 26 (6). 635-660.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bell, Allan &amp; Peter Garett. 1998. Approaches of media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bacchi, Carol &amp; Jennifer Bonham. 2014. Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies 17. 173-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Bousfield, Derek &amp; Miriam A. Locher (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Inter-play with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Cap, Piotr &amp; Urszula Okulska. 2013. Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. John Benjamins Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Chernyavskaya, Valeria E. 2017. Metodologitscheskie vosmoznosti diskursivnogo analiza v korpusnoi lingvistike [Towards methodological application of discourse analysis in corpus-driven linguistics]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology 50. 135-148. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/50/9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Chernyavskaya, Valeria E. 2018. Diskursivnyy analiz i korpusnyye metody: neobkhodimoye dokazatel'noye zveno? Ob"yasnitel'nyye vozmozhnosti kachestvennogo i kolichestvennogo podkhodov [Discourse analysis and corpus approaches: a missing evidence-based link? Towards qualitative and quantitative approaches]. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki 2. 31-37. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-2-31-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. NY: Routledge. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press. Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis. A Functional Perspective. London, New York: Continuum</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Cook, Guy. 1992. The Discourse of Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Corbett, James. 2009. Genre and Genre Analysis. In Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevir Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Crystal, David. 2010. Internet Linguistics. London, New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh &amp; Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2017. Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Dementyev, Vadim. 2016. Speech genres and discourse: Genres study in discourse analysis paradigm. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 103-121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Dobrosklonskaya, Tatiana G. 2014. Massmedijnyj diskurs kak ob"ekt nauchnogo opisaniya [Mass media discourse as an object of scientific description]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki 13 (184). 22. 181-187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Dolník, Ján. 2015. Človek - jazyk - kultúra. Kaligram.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Dubrovskaya, Tatiana. 2017. Metapragmatics of Аdministering Justice in Russian and English Judicial Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 73-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Dubrovskaya, Tatiana &amp; Evgeniy Kozhemyakin. 2016. Media construction of Russia’s international relations: specifics of representations. Critical Discourse Studies 14 (1). 90-107. DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2016.1196228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome. Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press. Fairclough, Norman. 2001. The dialectics of discourse. Textus 2 (14). 231-242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Fairclough, Norman. 2014. Language and Power. 3rd edn. Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Fernández-Amaya, Lucía. 2019. Disagreement and (im)politeness in a Spanish family members’ WhatsApp group. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 1065-1087. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-4-1065-1087.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Foucault, Michel. 1981. The Order of Discourse. In Robert Young (eds.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, 51-78. Boston, London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Foucault, Michel. 1994. The Order of Things. An Archeology of the Human Sciences: A translation of Les Mots et les choses. New York: Vintage Books, a Division of Random House Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. London &amp; New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina &amp; Gloria Álvarez-Benito. 2016. A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse: The Andalusian Parliament. John Benjamins.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Fullagar, Simone. 2002. Governing the healthy body: Discourses of leisure and lifestyle within Australian health policy. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 6 (1). 69-84</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2. 46-94</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar &amp; Maria Sifianou. 2019. Im/politeness and discursive pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 145. 91-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Gee, James Paul. 2007. Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York and London: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Goddard, Cliff &amp; Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Good, Byron J. &amp; Mary-Jo Del Vecchio Good. 1981. The Semantics of Medical Discourse. In Everett Mendelsohn &amp; Yehuda Elkana (eds.), Sciences and Cultures. Sociology of the Sciences a Yearbook. 5. Springer, Dordrecht</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal Discourse. London: Macmillan Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Gorter, Durk. 2006. Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism 3 (1). 1-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Gotti, Maurizio &amp; Christopher Williams. 2003. Legal Discourse across Languages and Cultures. Peter Lang</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Hagege, Claude. 1985. L'Homme de paroles. Paris: Fayard. Harris, Zellig. S. 1952. Discourse Analysis. Language 28. 1-30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>He, Agnes Weiyun. 2003. Discourse Analysis. In Mark Aronoff &amp; Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. Continuum</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Issers, Oxana S. 2011. Diskursivnaya praktika kak nablyudayemaya real’nost’ [Discursive practice as an observable reality]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta 4. 227-232</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Ivanova, Svetlana V. 2017. Commencement Speech as a Hybrid Polydiscursive Practice. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 141-160</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Ivanova, Svetlana V. 2019. Stylistics and rhetoric of lifestyle discourse. Professional Discourse &amp; Communication 1 (2). 8-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-2-8-21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Jaworski, Adam &amp; Crispin Thurlow. 2010. Tourism Discourse. Language and Global Mobility. Palgrave Macmillan UK</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Johnstone, Barbara. 2018. Discourse Analysis. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Jørgensen, Marianne &amp; Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, Ltd</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Kalyango Jr., Yusuf &amp; Monika Kopytowska (eds.). 2014. Why discourse matters: Negotiating identity in the mediatized world. Peter Lang: New York</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Karasik, Vladimir. 2002. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost', koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Kibrik, Andrei. A. 2009. Modus, zanr i parametry klassifikacii diskursov [Modus, genre and other parameters of discourse classification]. Voprosy Yazykoznanyja 2. 3-21. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://iling-ran.ru/kibrik/Discourse_classification@VJa_2009.pdf (Accessed 01 March 2019)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Koshkarova, Natalya N. 2019. Linguistic, Pragmatic, and Stylistic Peculiarities of 2018 FIFA World Cup Representation in British Media-Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (3). 802-819. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-802-819</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Langlotz, Andreas &amp; Miriam A. Locher. 2017. (Im)politeness and emotion. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh &amp; Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 287-322. London: Palgrave</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Larina, Tatiana V., Vladimir I. Ozyumenko &amp; Svetlana Kurteš. 2017. I-identity vs we-identity in language and discourse: Anglo-Slavonic perspectives. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (1). 195-215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Larina, Tatiana, Vladimir Ozyumenko &amp; Douglas Mark Ponton. 2019. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz papers in Pragmatics 15 (1) 3-22. DOI: https://doi .org/10.1515/lpp-2019-0002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Larina, Tatiana &amp; Douglas M. Ponton (forthcoming). Tact or frankness: Intercultural pragmatics in the blind peer review genre. Intercultural Pragmatics</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Leontovich, Olga A. 2019. New forms of urban discourse as a reflection of social change. Communication Studies (Russia) 6 (3). 645-654. DOI: 10.25513/2413-6182.2019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. 2017. Reflective Writing in Medical Practice: A Linguistic Perspective. Bristol: MultilingualMatters</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. &amp; Tatiana V. Larina. 2019. Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 873-903. DOI: 10.22363/2312-91822019-23-4-873-903</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Macdonald, Myra. 2003. Exploring Media Discourse (Understanding Media Series). London: Arnold.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Mackenzie, J. Lachlan &amp; Laura Alba-Juez (eds.). 2019. Emotion in Discourse. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 302. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Matheson, Donald. 2005. Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Open University Press. Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Molodychenko, Evgeni. 2016. Cennosti i ocenka v diskurse konsyumerizma: lingvopragmaticheskij i kriticheskij analiz [Values and evaluation in discourse of consumerism: a pragmalinguistic analysis]. Filologiya. 122-130. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564. 2016.3.122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Molodychenko, Evgeni. 2020. Metasemiotic projects and lifestyle media: Formulating commodities as resources for identity enactment. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (1). 117-136. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-117-136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Montgomery, Martin. 2007. Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Naydenova, Natalia S. 2018. Modern linguistics through post-secular perspective. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (4). 988-1000. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-4 988-1000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Nefedov, Sergei T. &amp; Valeria E. Сhernyavskaya. 2020. Context in linguistics: pragmatic and discourse analytical dimension. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology 63. 83-97. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/63/5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Nunan David. 1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: Penguin English</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Olyanich, Andrey V. 2003. Gastronomicheskiy diskurs v sisteme massovoy kommunikatsii: semantiko-semioticheskiye kharakteristiki [Gastronomic discourse in the system of mass communication: semantic-semiotic specifications]. Massovaya kul'tura na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov: chelovek i ego diskurs, 167-201. Moscow</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Ozyumenko, Vladimir. 2017. Media discourse in an atmosphere of information warfare: From manipulation to aggression. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21(1). 203-220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas. 2016. Movement and meaning: Towards an integrated approach to political discourse analysis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 122 -139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas &amp; Tatiana V. Larina. 2016. Discourse analysis in the 21st century: Theory and practice (I). Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 7-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Ponton, Douglas &amp; Tatiana V. Larina. 2017. Discourse analysis in the 21st century: Theory and practice (II). Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 7-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, Mary. 2007. Media Discourse: Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. (eds.). 1985. Discourse and Communication. New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Series: Research in Text Theory 10. De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, Routledge, 11 (2). 115-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. (eds.). 2011. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Resta, Simonetta. 1998. Words and social change. The impact of power and ideology on the language of Economics and Law, Asp 19-22. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/asp/2760. (Accessed 14 March 2020). DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2760</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Saville-Troike, Muriel. 1994. Communicative Competence. In Ronald E. Asher (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2. 538. Oxford, New York, Seoul, Tokyo: Pergamon Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Schiffrin, Deborah. 1995. Approaches to Discourse. Blackwell</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Shahovsky, Victor I. 2015. Golos emotsiy v yazykovom kruge homo sentiens [Voice of emotion in the linguistic circle of homo sentiens]. 3rd edn. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM» Publ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Shakhovsky, Victor I. 2018. The Cognitive Matrix of Emotional-Communicative Personality. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1). 54-79. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-54-79</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Sheigal, Elena. 2004. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Political discourse semiotics]. Moscow: Gnozis</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Sériot, Patrick. 1999. Kak chitayut teksty vo Francii [How they read texts in France].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Kvadratura smysla. Frantsuskaya škola analiza diskursa, 12-53. M.: Progress.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Sériot, Patrick. 2012. Structure and the Whole. East, West and Non-Darwinian Biology in the Origins of Structural Linguistics / Translated from French by Amy Jacobs-Colas. Mouton De Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Skålén, Per, Martin Fougère &amp; Markus Fellesson. 2008. Marketing Discourse: A Critical Perspective. London &amp; New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Solopova, Olga &amp; Anatoly Chudinov. 2018. Diachronic Analysis of Political Metaphors in the British Corpus: from Victory Bells to Russia’s V-Day. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (2). 313-337. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-2-313-337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>Titscher, Stefan, Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak &amp; Eva Vetter. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. 1st edn. SAGE Publications Ltd</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>Unger, Johann W. 2016. The interdiciplinarity of critical discourse studies research. Palgrave communications.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><mixed-citation>Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge. Cambridge University press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><mixed-citation>Williams, Glyn. 1999. French Discourse Analysis. The method of post-structuralism. London and New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><mixed-citation>Yule, George. 1999. The Study of Language. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B99"><label>99.</label><mixed-citation>Бобырева Е.В. Религиозный дискурс: ценности, жанры, стратегии: (на материале православного вероучения). Волгоград: Перемена, 2007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B100"><label>100.</label><mixed-citation>Дементьев В.В. Жанры речи и дискурс: место жанроведческих исследований в парадигме дискурс-анализа // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2016. Т. 20. № 4. С. 103-121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B101"><label>101.</label><mixed-citation>Добросклонская Т.Г. Массмедийный дискурс как объект научного описания // Научные ведомости. Серия Гуманитарные науки. 2014. № 13 (184). Вып. 22. С. 181-187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B102"><label>102.</label><mixed-citation>Дубровская Т.В. Метапрагматика осуществления правосудия в дискурсе российских и английских судей // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 73-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B103"><label>103.</label><mixed-citation>Иванова С.В. Актовая речь как гибридная полидискурсивная практика // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 141-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B104"><label>104.</label><mixed-citation>Иванова С.В. Стилистика и риторика лайфстайл-дискурса // Дискурс профессиональной коммуникации. 2019. № 1 (2). С. 8-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B105"><label>105.</label><mixed-citation>Иссерс О.С. Дискурсивная практика как наблюдаемая реальность // Вестник Омского университета. 2011. № 4. С. 227-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B106"><label>106.</label><mixed-citation>Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B107"><label>107.</label><mixed-citation>Кибрик А.А. Модус, жанр и другие параметры классификации дискурсов. Вопросы языкознания. 2009. № 2. С. 3-21. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://iling-ran.ru/kibrik/ Discourse_classification@VJa_2009.pdf (дата обращения: 01.03.2020)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B108"><label>108.</label><mixed-citation>Кошкарова Н.Н. Лингвопрагматические и жанрово-стилистические особенности репрезентации чемпионата мира по футболу 2018 г. в британском медиадискурсе // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2019. Т. 23. № 3. С. 802-819. DOI: 10.22363/2312 9182-2019-23-3-802-819</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B109"><label>109.</label><mixed-citation>Леонтович О.А. Новые формы урбанистического дискурса и их социальные истоки // Коммуникативные исследования. 2019. Т. 6. № 3. С. 645-654. DOI: 10.25513/2413 6182.2019.6(3).645-654</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B110"><label>110.</label><mixed-citation>Молодыченко Е.Н. Ценности и оценка в дискурсе консюмеризма: лингво-прагматический и критический анализ // Филология. 2016. С. 122-130. DOI: 10.17238/issn22276564.2016.3.122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B111"><label>111.</label><mixed-citation>Молодыченко Е.Н. Метасемиотические проекты и лайфстайл-медиа: дискурсивные механизмы превращения предметов потребления в ресурсы выражения идентичности // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2020. Т. 24. № 1. С. 117-136. DOI: 10.22363/26870088-2020-24-1-117-136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B112"><label>112.</label><mixed-citation>Найденова Н.С. Современная лингвистика в постсекулярной перспективе // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Т. 22. № 4. С. 988-1000. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018 22-4-988-1000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B113"><label>113.</label><mixed-citation>Нефедов С.Т., Чернявская В.Е. Контекст в лингвистическом анализе: прагматическая и дискурсивно-аналитическая перспектива // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2020. № 63. 83-97. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/63/5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B114"><label>114.</label><mixed-citation>Олянич А.В. Гастрономический дискурс в системе массовой коммуникации: семантикосемиотические характеристики // Московская культура на рубеже XX-XXI веков: человек и его дискурс. М.: Институт языкознания РАН, 2003. С.167-201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B115"><label>115.</label><mixed-citation>Озюменко В.И. Медийный дискурс в ситуации информационной войны: от манипуляции - к агрессии // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 203-220</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B116"><label>116.</label><mixed-citation>Серио П. Как читают тексты во Франции // Квадратура смысла: Французская школа анализа дискурса. М.: Прогресс, 1999. С.12-53</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B117"><label>117.</label><mixed-citation>Солопова О.А., Чудинов А.П. Диахронический анализ метафор в британском корпусе текстов: колокола победы и Russia’s V-Day // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Т. 22. № 2. С. 313-337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B118"><label>118.</label><mixed-citation>Чернявская В.Е. Методологические возможности дискурсивного анализа в корпусной лингвистике // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2017. 50. 135-148. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/50/9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B119"><label>119.</label><mixed-citation>Чернявская В.Е. Дискурсивный анализ и корпусные методы: необходимое доказательное звено? Объяснительные возможности качественного и количественного подходов // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2018. № 2. С. 31-37. DOI: 10.20916/1812-32282018-2-31-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B120"><label>120.</label><mixed-citation>Шаховский В.И. Голос эмоций в языковом круге homo sentiens. Изд. 3-е, стер. М.: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ», 2015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B121"><label>121.</label><mixed-citation>Шаховский В.И. Когнитивная матрица эмоционально-коммуникативной личности // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Т. 22. № 1. С. 54-79. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182 2018-22-1-54-79</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B122"><label>122.</label><mixed-citation>Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса. М.: Гнозис, 2004</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
