<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">22529</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-1014-1038</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Understandings of Impoliteness in the Greek Context</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Понимание невежливости в греческом контексте</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tzanne</surname><given-names>Angeliki</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цанне</surname><given-names>Ангелики</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Professor Emerita at the Department of English Language and Literature, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>почетный профессор факультета английского языка и литературы Афинского национального университета им. Каподистрии</p></bio><email>msifian@enl.uoa.gr</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sifianou</surname><given-names>Maria</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сифиану</surname><given-names>Мария</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Associate Professor in Linguistics at the Department of English Language and Literature, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доцент кафедры лингвистики факультета английского языка и литературы Афинского национального университета им. Каподистрии</p></bio><email>atzanne@enl.uoa.gr</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Афинский национальный университет им. Каподистрии</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Politeness and Impoliteness Research in Global Contexts</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Исследование вежливости и невежливости в глобальном контексте</issue-title><fpage>1014</fpage><lpage>1038</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-12-25"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Tzanne A., Sifianou M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, Цанне А., Сифиану М.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2019, Tzanne A., Sifianou M.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tzanne A., Sifianou M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Цанне А., Сифиану М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Tzanne A., Sifianou M.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/22529">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/22529</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Interest in non-academic ways of understanding of im/politeness has so far been evident primarily in analyses of the sequential development of real-life interactions. However, understandings of im/politeness can be found in other sources such as related articles in on-line newspapers and their ensuing comments. The main aim of this paper is to contribute to this rather neglected area in im/politeness research, thus placing emphasis on the underexplored societal rather than individual level of im/politeness. The data to be investigated comes from two on-line articles and the comments they received. The articles appeared in a popular Greek free press on-line newspaper, LIFO, in 2014 and 2017 and were written by the same journalist. Both articles and ensuing comments express lay understandings of impoliteness and are discussed in the paper in terms of van Dijk’s (1998, 2006a, b) ideological discourse analysis and ‘ideological square’ that revolves around positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation. In exploring understandings of impoliteness in this context, we identified two emerging social identities, those of ‘polite’ and ‘impolite citizen’, dynamically co-constructed as binary opposites by the journalist and posters involved. Despite the fact that on-line newspaper articles and their accompanying comments reflect stereotypical thinking, they also depict pervasive views and are worth exploring because they concern the societal level of im/politeness.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Анализ понимания (не)вежливости на бытовом уровне обычно проводится на основе исследований реального взаимодействия. Однако для данных исследований можно использовать и другие источники, например, соответствующие статьи в онлайн газетах и последующие комментарии. Основная цель данной статьи - внести вклад в эту мало изученную область, сделав акцент на социальном, а не индивидуальном уровне (не)вежливости. Материалом для исследования послужили две онлайн-статьи и комментарии к ним. Статьи были написаны одним и тем же журналистом и опубликованы в популярной греческой онлайн-газете LIFO в 2014 и 2017 годах. Обе статьи и последующие комментарии выражают бытовое понимание невежливости и обсуждаются нами с точки зрения идеологического дискурс-анализа ван Дейка (1998, 2006a, b) и «идеологического квадрата», который вращается вокруг позитивной презентации себя и негативной презентации другого. Изучая понимание невежливости в этом контексте, мы определили две бинарно противоположные социальные идентичности - вежливого и невежливого гражданина, совместно сконструированные журналистом и авторами комментариев. Несмотря на то, что статьи в онлайн-газетах и сопровождающие их комментарии отражают стереотипное мышление, они представляют широко распространенные взгляды и заслуживают изучения, поскольку затрагивают социальный уровень (не)вежливости.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Impoliteness</kwd><kwd>lay conceptualisations</kwd><kwd>ideological discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>identity construction</kwd><kwd>on-line newspaper articles</kwd><kwd>Greek</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>невежливость</kwd><kwd>концептуализация</kwd><kwd>идеологический дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>конструирование идентичности</kwd><kwd>статьи в онлайн-газетах</kwd><kwd>греческий язык</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, Jeffrey C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Archakis, Argiris &amp; Villy Tsakona (2012). The narrative construction of identities in critical education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Archakis, Argiris &amp; Angeliki Tzanne (2009). Constructing in-group identity through story-telling: evidence from conversational narratives of young people in Greece. In Georgakopoulou, A. &amp; V. Lytra (eds.) Language, Discourse and Identities: Snapshots from Greek Contexts. Pragmatics Special Issue, 19 (3), 343-362.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Barnes, Renee (2018). Uncovering online commenting culture: Trolls, fanboys and lurkers. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Benwell, Bethan &amp; Elizabeth Stokoe (2006) Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Uni­versity Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Berg, Janne (2016). The impact of anonymity and issue controversiality on the quality of online discussion. Journal of Information Technology &amp; Politics, 13 (1), 37-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bolander, Brook &amp; Miriam A. Locher (2015). “Peter is a dumb nut”: Status updates and reactions to them as ‘acts of positioning’ in Facebook. Pragmatics, 25 (1), 99-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Bou-Franch, Patricia &amp; Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (2014). Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 73, 19-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Boyd, Richard (2006). The value of civility? Urban Studies, 43 (5/6), 863-878.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Brown, Penelope (2015). Politeness and language. International Encyclopedia of the Social &amp; Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), 18, 326-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Bucholtz, Mary &amp; Kira Hall (2003). Language and identity. In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, 368-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Bucholtz, Mary &amp; Kira Hall (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 584-614.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Canakis, Costas (2007). Εισαγωγή στην πραγματολογία: γνωστικές και κοινωνικές όψεις της γλωσσικής χρήσης [Introduction to pragmatics: Cognitive and social aspects of language use]. Athens: Ekdoseis tou Eikostou Protou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Culpeper, Jonathan (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Davies, Bethan L., Andrew J. Merrison &amp; Michael Haugh (2013). Epilogue. In Davies, B.L., M. Haugh, &amp; A.J. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, 270-277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin &amp; Michael Bamberg (eds.) (2006). Discourse and identity. Cam­bridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Dynel, Marta (2015). The landscape of impoliteness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 11 (2), 329-354.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Eelen, Gino (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Eller, Monika (2017). Reader response in the digital age: Letters to the editor vs. below-the-line comments: A synchronic comparison. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/23857/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Fukushima, Saeko &amp; Maria Sifianou (2017) Conceptualizing politeness in Japanese and Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14 (4), 525-555. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0024.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Fyfe, Nicholas, Jon Bannister &amp; Ade Kearns (2006). (In)civility and the city. Urban Studies, 43 (5/6), 853-861.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar (2013). Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness: Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory. Journal of Politeness Research, 9 (1), 1-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar &amp; Maria Sifianou (2017). Im/politeness and identity. In Culpeper, J., M. Haugh &amp; D. Kádár (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 227-256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Georgalou, Mariza (2017). Discourse and identity on Facebook. London: Bloomsbury.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Grainger, Karen &amp; Sara Mills (2016). Directness and indirectness across cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Hall, Stuart &amp; Paul Du Gay (eds.) (1996). Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Hardaker, Claire (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 215-242. doi: 10.1515/JPLR.2010.011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Hardaker, Claire &amp; Mark McGlashan (2016). “Real men don’t hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Haugh, Michael (2007). Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 657-680.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Haugh, Michael (2010). When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evalua­tions of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 6 (1), 7-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Haugh, Michael (2012). Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 8 (1), 111-134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Haugh, Michael &amp; Jonathan Culpeper (2018). Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Ilie, C. &amp; N. Norrick (eds.) Pragmatics and its Interfaces. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 213-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Howard, Judith A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 26, 367-393.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland &amp; Dariusz Galasiński (2004) Metalanguage: Why now? In Jaworski, A., N. Coupland &amp; D. Galasiński (eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Pers­pectives. Berlin &amp; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 3-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Johnstone, Barbara (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Joseph, John E. (2004) Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Kádár, Dániel Z. &amp; Michael Haugh (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Kienpointner, Manfred (1997). Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language, 4 (2), 251-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Kienpointner, Manfred (2018). Impoliteness online: Hate speech in online interactions. Internet Pragmatics, 1 (2), 329-351.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Kristiansen, Tore (2003). The youth and the gatekeepers. Reproduction and change in language norm and variation. In Androutsopoulos, J. &amp; A. Georgakopoulou (eds) The Discursive Construction of Youth Identities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 279-302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Lakoff, Robin (2005). Civility and its discontents: Or getting in your face. In Lakoff, R.T. &amp; S. Ide (eds.) Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 23-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. (2008). Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In Antos, G., E. Ven­tola &amp; T. Weber (eds.) Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Volume 2: Interpersonal Communica­tion. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 509-540. doi: 10.1515/9783110211399.4.509.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. (2013) Situated impoliteness: The interface between relational work and identity construction. In Haugh, M., B.L. Davies &amp; A.J. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Bloomsbury, 187-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. &amp; Brook Bolander, (2017). Facework and identity. In Hoffmann, C.R. &amp; W. Bublitz (eds.) Pragmatics of Social Media. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 407-434. doi: 10.1515/9783110431070-015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. &amp; Brook Bolander. (2019). Ethics in pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 83-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. &amp; Martin Luginbühl (2019). Meta-discussions on Swiss and German politeness in online sources. In Ogiermann, E. &amp; P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.) From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 250-279.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Locher, Miriam A. &amp; Richard J. Watts (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1 (1), 9-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Lodewijkx, Hein F.M. (2008). Reciprocity, norm of. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (2nd ed.), 107-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich &amp; Patricia Bou-Franch (2011). On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), 2578-2593.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Luzón, María-José (2018). Constructing academic identities online: Identity performance in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 24-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Marwick, Alice (2013). Online identity. In Hartley, J., J. Burgess &amp; A. Bruns (eds.) Companion to New Media Dynamics. Malden MA: Blackwell, 355-364.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Mills, Sara (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Mills, Sara (2009). Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1047-1060.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Mills, Sara (2017). English politeness and class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Mills, Sara &amp; Dániel Z. Kádár (2011). Culture and politeness. In Kádár, D.Z. and S. Mills (eds.) Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Moser, Gabriel &amp; Denis Corroyer (2001). Politeness in the urban environment: Is city life still synonymous with civility? Environment and Behavior, 33 (5), 611-625.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Mouffe, Chantal (2005). For an agonistic public sphere. In Tønder, L. &amp; L. Thomassen (eds.) Radical Democracy: Politics between Abundance and Lack. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 123-132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Mutz, Diana C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Mutz, Diana C. &amp; Byron Reeves (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99 (1), 1-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela (2011). Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. Journal of Politeness Research, 7, 187-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Niedzielski, Nancy A. &amp; Dennis R. Preston (2003). Folk linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>O’Driscoll, Jim (2013). Situational transformations: The offensive-izing of an email message and the public-ization of offensiveness. Pragmatics and Society, 4 (3), 369-387.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Ogiermann, Eva &amp; Vasiliki Saloustrou (2019). Conceptualising im/politeness in Greece and Great Britain. Paper presented at the 12th international conference on (im)politeness. Cambridge, 17-19 July 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Ohashi, Jun &amp; Chang, Wei-Lin, Melody (2017). (Im)politeness and relationality. In Culpeper, J., M. Haugh &amp; D. Kádár (eds.) Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. Basingstoke. Palgrave MacMillan, 257-281.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Oz, Mustafa, Pei Zheng &amp; Gina Masullo Chen (2017). Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media &amp; Society, 20 (9), 3400-3419.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Papacharissi, Zizi (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media &amp; Society, 6 (2), 259-283. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1461444804041444.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula (2014). Constructing collectivity with ‘we’: An introduction. In Pav­lidou, Th.-S. (ed.) Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Perugini, Marco &amp; Marcello Gallucci (2001). Individual differences and social norms: The distinction between reciprocators and prosocials. European Journal of Personality, 15, 19-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Pinto, Derrin (2011). Are Americans insincere? Interactional style and politeness in everyday America. Journal of Politeness Research, 7 (2), 215-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Preston, Dennis (2005). What is folk linguistics? Why should you care? Lingua Posnaniensis, 47, 143-162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Reader, Bill (2012). Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of “civility” in regard to anonymous online comments. Journalism &amp; Mass Communication Quarterly, 89 (3), 495-513.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Rowe, Ian (2015) Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication &amp; Society, 18 (2), 121-138. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Santana, Arthur D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8 (1), 18-33. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17512786.2013.813194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Scott, Craig R. (2004). Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations. Free Speech Yearbook, 41 (1), 127-141. doi: 10.1080/08997225.2004.10556309.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Sellers, Mortimer (2003). Ideals of public discourse. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1144719. (Last accessed, 16 September 2018).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Sifianou, Maria (2019). Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship? Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 49-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Sifianou, Maria &amp; Angeliki Tzanne (2010). Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7 (4), 661-687.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Smith, Philip, Timothy L. Phillips &amp; Ryan D. King (2010) Incivility: The rude stranger in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2002). Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (5), 529-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Stryker, Robin, Bethany Anne Conway &amp; Taylor J. Danielson (2016). What is political incivility? Communication Monographs, 83 (40), 535-556. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Temmerman, Martina (2014). “Nail polish - We’ve chosen the nicest shades for you!”: Editorial voice and ‘we’ in a Flemish women’s magazine. In Pavlidou, Th.-S. (ed.) Constructing Collectivity. ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 247-263.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Terkourafi, Marina (2011). From politeness1 to politeness2: Tracking norms of im/politeness across time and space. Journal of Politeness Research, 7 (2), 159-185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Terkourafi, Marina, Lydia Catedral, Iftikhar Haider, Farzad Karimzad, Jeriel Melgares, Cristina Mostacero-Pinilla, Julie Nelson &amp; Benjamin Weissman (2018). Uncivil Twitter: A socioprag­matic analysis. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6 (1), 26-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Thurlow, Crispin, Lara Lengel &amp; Alice Tomic (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Tzanne, Angeliki (2019). Politeness, praising, and identity construction in a Greek food blog. Ogiermann, E. &amp; P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.) From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 48-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Upadhyay, Shiv R. (2010). Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 105-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. (2006a). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11 (2), 115-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, Teun A. (2006b). Politics, ideology and discourse. In Wodak, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Volume on Politics and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 728-740.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Verschueren, Jef (2012). Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Watson, Tony J. (2008). Managing identity: Identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances. Organization, 15 (1), 121-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>Watts, Richard J. (1989). Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua, 8, 131-166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>Watts, Richard J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><mixed-citation>Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide &amp; Konrad Ehlich (1992). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><mixed-citation>Wieland, Stacey M.B. (2010). Ideal selves as resources for the situated practice of identity management. Communication Quarterly, 24 (4), 503-528.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><mixed-citation>Zappavigna, Michele (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Continuum International.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
