<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Linguistics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Linguistics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2687-0088</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-8024</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">15905</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-2-390-404</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">A Discourse-Based View in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Fictional Text Analysis</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Дискурсивно-ориентированные междисциплинарные подходы к анализу художественных текстов</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sousa</surname><given-names>Alcina</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соуса</surname><given-names>Альсина</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>alcina.sousa@staff.uma.pt</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of Madeira</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Мадейры</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 21, NO2 (2017)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 21, №2 (2017)</issue-title><fpage>390</fpage><lpage>404</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2017-04-26"><day>26</day><month>04</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2017, Sousa A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2017, Соуса А.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2017, Sousa A.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sousa A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Соуса А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Sousa A.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/15905">https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/15905</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">As patterns of communication change in a globalized society, literacy in foreign languages, especially English, becomes an issue of ever growing relevance to all those involved in the educational system, not to mention those who are to learn all their life long. As such, the goal of this article is to discuss how EFLit (English as a Foreign Literature) students can gain in both linguistic competence and critical awareness thereof, should their teachers/lecturers abide to a discourse-based view on (literary) language and approach the selected texts by following a pedagogical stylistics orientation also drawing eclectically on pragmatics and other areas of knowledge within the broader domain of applied linguistics. Here under focus will be a discussion of the topics on which literary and linguistic studies show greatest potential for (theoretical) convergence and, above all, combined applications in lecture setting. Crucially, it will be argued that a pedagogical stylistics approach to EFLit teaching/learning both develops students’ linguistic competence and raises their awareness as to the meaning making potential of language in use in the texts at hand as well as in their larger historical and sociocultural settings. This will be illustrated by highlighting some textual features within a short extract of Fred D’Aguiar’s The Longest Memory (1995) and the linguistic competence that its comprehension would demand from students.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">С изменением моделей коммуникации в ситуации глобализации изучение иностранных языков, особенно английского языка, становится все более важной проблемой для лиц, работающих в системе образования, не говоря о тех, кто должен поддерживать свой академический уровень на протяжении всей жизни. Целью данной статьи является обсуждение возможных способов наращивания языковой компетенции и навыков анализа языка обучающимися по программам EFLit. Соответственно, автор задается вопросом о том, должен ли преподаватель придерживаться основанного на дискурсивном подходе понимания (нормативного) языка и анализировать тексты, следуя принципам педагогической стилистики и учитывая знания прагматики и других областей знания в рамках более широкой области прикладной лингвистики. На первый план обсуждения в статье вынесены те области, которые в наибольшей степени подвержены конвергенции лингвистики и методики обучения языку. В частности, в статье показано, что педагогическая стилистика в обучении EFLit развивает учебные компетенции и повышает осведомленность учащихся о процедурах передачи языкового значения в рамках текста и, более широко, культурного и социального контекста. Анализ отрывка из книги Фреда Д’Агуайра «Насколько я помню» (1995) помогает понять, какие языковые компетенции требуются в процессе чтения для понимания этой книги.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>EFLit</kwd><kwd>pedagogical stylistics</kwd><kwd>reading</kwd><kwd>language and literary awareness</kwd><kwd>discourse-based view</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>педагогическая стилистика</kwd><kwd>чтение</kwd><kwd>языковая грамотность</kwd><kwd>дискурсивный подход</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Aston, G. (1988) Learning Comity. Bologna: Editrice CLUEB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Austin, J. (1976) How to do Things with Words: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bally, C., Sechehaye, A. (eds.) (1966) Ferdinand de Saussure: Course in General Linguistics [1959] (trans. Wade Baskin). New York: McGraw-Hill</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Barthes, R. (1977) Image - Music - Text. New York: Hill and Wang</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Calvo, L. (2009) Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Carter, R. (1997) Investigating English Discourse: Language, literacy and literature. London and New York: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Carter, R. (1994) Teaching Literature: A View for the 90s. Greta, Granada, vol. 2 (2/Dec.), 5-10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Clark, B. (2013) Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Clark, B. (2014) Pragmatics and Inference. In Stockwell, P., &amp; Whiteley, S. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics (300-314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, U., &amp; Zyngier, S. (2003) Towards a Pedagogical Stylistics. Language and Literature, 12, 4, 339-351</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Cockcroft, R., Cockcroft, S., Hamilton, C., &amp; Hidalgo-Downing, L. (2014) Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Cook, G. (1992) The Discourse of Advertising. London and New York: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Crystal, D., Davy, D. (1985) Investigating English Style. New York: Longman</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Culler, J. (1994) Structuralist Poetics - Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature [1975]. London &amp; New York: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>De Man, P. (1979) Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke and Proust. New York: Yale University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Derrida, J. (1978) Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Durant, A. (2001) Comprehension and Problem-Solving in The Literature Classroom. The Nottingham Linguistic Circular 16, The School of English Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 1-18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Emmott, C. (2002) Split Selves in Fiction and in Medical Life Stories. In Semino, E. &amp; Culpeper, J. (eds) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis,153-182)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Fairclough, N. (1992) Language and Power. Essex: Longman</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Frye, N. (1990) Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays [1971]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Gee, J. P. (2001) Discourse and Sociocultural Studies in Reading. Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P., Barr, R. (2001) Methods of Literacy Research: The Methodology Chapters of the Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III., chapter 9 (195-207), New Jersey/London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Giovanelli, M. (2010) Pedagogical Stylistics: A Text World Theory Approach to the Teaching of Poetry. English in Education, 44, 3, 214-231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Giovanelli, M. (2016) Text World Theory as Cognitive Grammatics: A Pedagogical Application in the Secondary Classroom. In: Gavins, J., &amp; Lahey, E. (eds) World Building: Discourse in the Mind</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Grice, P. (1991) Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Hall, H., Curtin, A., Rutherford, V. (2014) Networks of Mind: Learning, Culture, Neuroscience. London &amp; New York: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Halliday, M. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Halliday, M. (1989) Spoken and Written Language [1985]. Oxford: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Hart, C. (2014) Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Humboldt, W. (1999) On Language. In M. Losonsky (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Hutcheon, L. (1995) Irony’s Edge: the Theory and Politics of Irony. London and New York: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Iser, W. (1993) The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Jeffries, L. (2007) Textual Constructions of the Female Body. Basingstoke: Macmillan</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Jeffries, L. (2010) Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P., Barr, R. (2001) Methods of Literacy Research: The Methodology Chapters of the Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III. New Jersey/London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Lambrou, M., &amp; Durant, A. (2014) Media Stylistics. Stockwell, P., &amp; Whiteley, S. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 503-519</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Lankshear, C., &amp; Knobel, M. (2006) New literacies. 2nd ed. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Leech, G. (1969) A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Leu, D. Castek, J., Hartman, D., (2006) Evaluating the development of scientific knowledge and new forms of reading comprehension during online learning. Final Report to North Central Regional Educational Laboratory/Learning Point Associates. Chicago, IL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., and O’Neil. (2007) What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. Rush, J. Eakle, &amp; A. Berger (eds.). Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practices. (37-68). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Available at http://www.newliteracies.uconn.edu/docs/whats%20new%20about%20online%20reading% 20comprehension.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., Henry, L. A. (2013) New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., &amp; Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed.), 1150-1181. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Available at: http://www.reading.org/ Libraries/books/IRA-710-chapter42.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., Timbrell, N. (2015) The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Manuscript accepted for publication in Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1). doi:10.1002/rrq.85</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Leu, D. J., Maykel, C. (2015) Thinking in new ways and in new times about reading. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55 (2)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Lier, L. (1995) Introducing language Awareness. London: Penguin</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>MachMahon, B. (2006) Relevance Theory: stylistic applications. In: Brown, K. (ed) Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics (519-522). Oxford: Elsevier</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy, M., &amp; Carter, R. (2001) Size isn’t everything: spoken English, corpus and the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 2, 337-340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>McRae, J., &amp; Boardman, R. (1984) Reading between the Lines: Integrated Language and Literature Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>McRae, J. (1991) Literature with a Small ‘l’. London: Macmillan</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>McRae, J. (1994) “An Interview with John McRae”. Greta, Granada, vol. 2 (2/Dec.), 35-41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Naciscione, A. (2001) Phraseological units in literary discourse: implications for teaching and learning. Cauce: Revista de Filologia e su Didáctica, 24, 53-67</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Porto, M., &amp; Byram, M. (2015) Developing intercultural citizenship education in the language classroom and beyond. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 2, 9-29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Reisigl, M. (2011) (Critical) Discourse analysis and pragmatics: Commonalities and differences. In Hart, C. (ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition (7-27). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Johns Benjamins Publishing Company</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Rumelhart, D. (1984) Understanding Understanding. James Flood (ed.). Understanding Reading Comprehension. Newark: International Reading Association, 1-20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Searle, J. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Semino, E. (2014) Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism. Language and Literature, 23, 2, 141-158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Sinclair, J. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, L. (1994) The Relation between Metalinguistic Awareness and Reading in the Native and the Foreign Language. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Azores: University of the Azores</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. (1997) Down with 'cribs': developing discourse competence”. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Discourse Analysis, Maria Emília Ribeiro Pedro (ed.), Lisbon, Portugal, May 1997, 103-124</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. (1998) Who cares about stylistics in an EFL classroom? Greta, 7 (1), 85-96</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. (1999) Who Cares About Stylistics in an EFL Classroom? In Greta, Adelina Espinosa and Bryan Robinson (eds.), Granada, Spain, vol. 7 (1), 85-96</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. (2000) Breaking the Ice with Literary Extracts: Old/New Voices in Ever Developing EFL Reading Contexts”. ANPLI Proceedings - 8th and 9th Meetings, English - Diversity and Challenge, Braga, Portugal, 124-141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. (2000) The clashing I’s in literary and pedagogical discourse: André Brink’s A Dry White Season in an EFL/Portuguese setting. PALA 19 Conference Papers, Discourses of War and Conflict, Annette Combrink and Ina Biermann (eds.), Potchefstroom, South Africa, 201-217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. (2002) Is text analysis in EFL contexts reader-oriented/“real” student-oriented? - The Validity of Questionnaires in Pedagogical Stylistics? PALA Proceedings 21, Textual Secrets, The Message of the Medium. In Judith Mólnar and Szilvia Csábi (eds.), Budapest, Hungary, 2002, 513-524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A., &amp; Cíbiková, I. (2016) A Stylistics Approach to Canon Breaking Texts. Trnave: University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A &amp; Costa, D. (2001) Broadening horizons in stylistics: The multimedia lab as a challenging tool for text analysis in EFL contexts. CAUCE, Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages, John McRae (ed.), Seville, Spain, 2001, vol. 12/1, 175-184. Available at: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/ servlet/oaiart?codigo=625278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Swales, J. (1991) Genre Analysis, English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Traugott, E., &amp; Pratt, M. (1980) Linguistics for Students of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Urquhart, A., &amp; Weir, C. (1998) Reading in a Second Language: process, product and Practice. London and New York: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Waugh, L, Monville-Burston, M. (eds.) (1998) On Language: Roman Jakobson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Verdonk, P. (ed.) (1993). Twentieth Century Poetry: From Text to Context. London &amp; New York: Routledge</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
