<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Law</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Law</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2337</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-9001</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">5818</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Constitutional-legal value of the guarantees of protection of religious secrets at the complex of constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Конституционно-правовое значение гарантий охраны и защиты религиозной тайны в комплексе гарантий конституционной свободы вероисповедания</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Andreev</surname><given-names>K M</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Андреев</surname><given-names>Константин Михайлович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>andreev.advokat@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow Bar Association «Protection»</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московская коллегия адвокатов «Защита»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-03-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO3 (2014)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№3 (2014)</issue-title><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-07"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2016, Legal Science</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2016, Юридические науки</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Legal Science</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Юридические науки</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/5818">https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/5818</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en">The article investigates the constitutional-legal and other regulatory guarantees of recognition, protection and defense of religious secret. The author considers the consolidation of religious secrets (in particular - the secrecy of confession) at the legislative level in the law of different states. Author is considering different points of view of the legal practitioners on the question of incurring certain legal responsibilities of priests to preserve, confidential information, that has been told to them. It’s given the author ‘s definition of «religious secret» based on the author’s two-pronged concept of interpretation of the term (as the information and also as the regulatory regime) and the classification of types of religious secret.</abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">Статья посвящена исследованию конституционно-правовых и других нормативных гарантий признания, охраны и защиты религиозной тайны. Автором рассматривается природа религиозной тайны и ее место в религиозном порядке религиозной организации. В данной работе оценивается уровень исследованности религиозной тайны в работах как российских ученых, так и зарубежных. Автором рассматривается закрепление религиозной тайны (в частности, тайны исповеди) на законодательном уровне в праве различных государств. Рассматриваются различные точки зрения практикующих юристов по вопросу несения священнослужителями определенных юридических обязанностей по сохранению сообщенной им конфиденциальной информации. Предложено авторское определение понятия «религиозная тайна» исходя из авторского концепта двухаспектной интерпретации этого понятия (как информации и как нормативного режима), дана классификация видов религиозной тайны.</trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>freedom of religion</kwd><kwd>secular state</kwd><kwd>religious secrets (religious mystery)</kwd><kwd>constitutional rights and freedoms</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>свобода вероисповедания</kwd><kwd>светское государство</kwd><kwd>религиозная тайна</kwd><kwd>конституционные права и свободы</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Понкин И.В., Понкина А.И., Рябых Ф. К вопросу гарантий свободы вероисповедания в демократическом государстве // Платон. -- 2013. -- № 1. -- С. 13-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Anglim C.T. Encyclopedia of religion and the law in America. Second Edition. -- Amenia (NY, USA): Grey House Publishing, Inc., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bullis R.K., Mazur C.S. Legal Issues and Religious Counseling. - Louisville (Kentucky, USA): Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Clergy as Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect / U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. URL: https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/ clergymandated.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Liberté Religieuse et Régimes des Cultes en Droit Français: Textes, pratique administrative, jurisprudence. Nouvelle édition. -- Paris: Les éditions du CERF, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook D.O. Pastoral Confidentiality: An Ethical and Legal Responsibility (The pastor’s obligation to maintain confidentiality is not only a moral obligation, but also often a legal one) // Enrichment Journal, 2014. URL: http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/201002/ ejonline_201002_pastor_confid_.cfm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Ponkin I.V., Ryabykh P., Ponkina A. Sur la reconnaissance de la compétence exclusive des groupements religieux afin d’instaurer leur structure intrinsèque et les normes intérieures des relations en tant qu’une des garanties de la liberté de la conscience dans l’État démocratique // Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale. -- 12 novembre 2012. -- № 34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Priest Penitent Privilege Law &amp; Legal Definition / US Legal. URL: http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/priest-penitent-privilege.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Traité de droit français des religions. -- Paris: Litec, Croupe LexisNexis, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
