RUDN Journal of LawRUDN Journal of LawВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки2313-23372408-9001Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)5799ArticlesСтатьиResearch ArticleInternational Responsibility of States and the Questions of CountermeasuresМеждународно-правовая ответственность государств и меры противодействияMohsen Matour-Мохсен Матур-The Department of International LawКафедра международного праваmohsenmatour@yahoo.comPeoples’ Friendship University of RussiaРоссийский университет дружбы народов150420134NO4 (2013)№4 (2013)25726707092016Copyright ©; 2016, Legal ScienceCopyright ©; 2016, Юридические науки2016Legal ScienceЮридические наукиhttps://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/5799The Analyze of the following key questions dealing with International responsibility of states and the status of countermeasures in this article is the main connotation, such as: exceptions to the citation of countermeasure and termination of treaty, plurality of damaged government, plurality of responsive government, citation by non-damaged governments, responsibility resulted from violation of ergaomnes, appealing UN Mechanisms, countermeasures and execution guarantee in international law system, commitments resulted from international treaties, status of coordination and relationship between countermeasure and termination of treaty as a result of principal violation of the treaty, citation right of countermeasure and termination of treaty for misfeasor government, governments with citation rights of countermeasure and termination of treaty as a result of principal violation, time realm of countermeasure and termination of treaty as a result of principal violation, status of suitability principle in the citation of countermeasure and termination of treaty, citing international responsibility of government.В рамках анализа данной проблемы рассматриваются такие проблемы международно-правовой ответственности государств и применимых контрмер, как: прекращение действия международного договора, ответственность за нарушение обязательств ergaomnes , механизмы, существующие в рамках ООН, контрмеры, существующие в рамках международного права и их исполнение, обязательства, происходящие из международных договоров, соотношение контрамер и прекращения договора вследствие существенного нарушения договора, право на применение контрмер по отношению к государству-нарушителю, временные рамки применения контрмер и прекращения договора при существенном его нарушении, соответствие применяемых мер при применении контрмер и прекращении договора, международно-правовая ответственность государств.international lawinternational responsibility of statesinternational law commissioncountermeasuresмеждународное правомеждународно-правровая ответственность государствконтрмеры[Ago W. Eight Report on State Responsibility. Vol.II, — ILC Yearbook, 1979.][Askari P. Individual and States Responsibility Regarding to Control Regulation // International Law Journal. — 2010. — Vol. 26. — No. 40.][Bull H. The Anarchical Society. Macmillan Publication. —London, 1995.][Cassese A. International Law. — Oxford University Press, Second Edition, 2005.][Crawford J. The International Law Commission’s Articles on State responsibility. — Cambridge Uni.Press. — U.K, 2002.][Crawford J. Counter Measures as Interim Measures // EJIL. — 1994. — Vol. 5. — No.1.][Crawford J. Olleson S. The Exception of Non-Performance: Links between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility // AJIL. — 2000. — Vol. 21. — No2.][Dean K. Negovin D.P Pelle A. Public International Law.Vol.I, Etellaat Publication. — Tehran, 2003.][Donald A.K. International Law Cases and Materials. — Oxford University Press. —U.K, 2005.][Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, adopted by the Commission at its fifty-third session. — 2001.][Erasmus G. Third States and Sanctions in Public International Law- the Positions of South Africa // AVR. — 1992. — Vol. XXXII. — No 30.][Haddadi M. Citation to States Responsibility raised out of Breaching the ErgaOmnes // International Law Journal. — 2011. —Vol. XXVII. — No 42.][Haddadi M. The Recent Development in The Implementation of International Responsibility of States. Dadgostar Publication. — Tehran, 2012.][Institut De DroitInternetional. Resolution: Obligations Ergaomnes in International law. Commission LIII. — 2005.][Kawasaki K. The Content and Implementation of the International Responsibility of States: Some Remarks on the Draft Articles on State Responsibility 2000 // Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics. — 2001. — Vol. XXIX. — No 3.][Mostagimi B. Taromsary M. International State Responsibility according to Iraq attack to Iran. Tehran University Publication. — Tehran, 1999.][Naseri L.N. Interaction between Treaty Law and Law of International Responsibility Regarding to Breaching The International Treaties // International Law Journal. — 2001. —Vol. XXVII. — No 42.][Ruiz A. Countermeasures and Amiable Dispute Settlement Means in the Implementation of State Responsibility: Acrucial Issue before the International Law Commission // EJIL. —1994. —Vol. V. — No 5.][Sicilianos L.A. The Relationship between Reprisals and Denunciation or Suspension of Treaty// EJIL. —1993. —Vol. IV. — No 4.][Tomuschat C. Obligation Arising for States Without or Against Their Will // RDC. — 1993. —Vol. II. — No 1.][United Nations. Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts // Yearbook of the International Law Commission. — 2001. — Vol. II. — No 2.][Watts A. The International Law Commission 1949–1998. Vol. II. — Oxford University Press. —U.K,1999.][World Trade Organization. United States Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp products // WTO Doc. —WT/DSB/731 — 1997.]