<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Law</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Law</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2337</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-9001</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">34057</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2337-2023-27-1-54-75</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CONSTITUTIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КОНСТИТУЦИОННОЕ И МУНИЦИПАЛЬНОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Russian Constitutional Court jurisprudence of tax fairness</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Принцип налоговой справедливости в решениях Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-9630</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ryabova</surname><given-names>Elena V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рябова</surname><given-names>Елена Валерьевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at Department of State and Municipal Finance</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат юридических наук, доцент, кафедра государственных и муниципальных финансов, Высшая школа государственного аудита (факультет)</p></bio><email>lentaf@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-26" publication-format="electronic"><day>26</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 27, NO1 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 27, №1 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>54</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-03-26"><day>26</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Ryabova E.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Рябова Е.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Ryabova E.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Рябова Е.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/34057">https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/34057</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">Public finance is subject to the principle of fairness, which has a vague character and rarely finds an appropriate reflection in law. Supreme Courts and Constitutional Courts of different countries may refer to this principle and disclose the content of fairness in public finance processes. The scope of the article includes legal establishment and realization of the principle of fairness in contemporary Russian tax law. The author investigates this issue mainly considering the Constitutional Court’s legal positions. The Russian Constitutional Court actively refers to the principle of fairness to resolve disputes in taxation. The analysis of Constitutional Court judgements shows that the content of the principle of fairness for tax purposes depends upon a type of public fee. In some cases, the Court uses the principle of fairness in a broader legal meaning and does not interpret fairness for tax purposes using the vaguest terms and words for arguments. In other cases, the Court may use a more specific and narrow meaning of the principle of fairness in cases on imposition of tax and/or tax liability (tax fairness).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Система публичных финансов подчинена принципу справедливости, который имеет расплывчатое содержание и редко находит надлежащее отражение в законодательстве. Высшие суды различных стран могут ссылаться на этот принцип и раскрывать содержание справедливости в публичных финансах. Проведен анализ правового закрепления и реализации принципа справедливости в современном российском налоговом праве. Автор исследует данный вопрос преимущественно с учетом правовых позиций Конституционного Суда РФ, активно ссылающегося на принцип справедливости при разрешении споров в сфере налогообложения. Анализ постановлений Конституционного Суда РФ показал, что содержание принципа справедливости для целей налогообложения может зависеть от вида обязательного платежа. В некоторых случаях Суд использует принцип справедливости в широком юридическом смысле и не толкует справедливость для целей налогообложения, используя для аргументации самые расплывчатые термины и слова. В иных случаях Суд может использовать более конкретный и узкий смысл принципа справедливости при разрешении дел о возложении налога (налоговая справедливость).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Constitution</kwd><kwd>fairness</kwd><kwd>taxation</kwd><kwd>tax law</kwd><kwd>tax fairness</kwd><kwd>case law</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Конституция</kwd><kwd>справедливость</kwd><kwd>налогообложение</kwd><kwd>налоговое право</kwd><kwd>налоговая справедливость</kwd><kwd>прецедентное право</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Alesina, A. &amp; Angeletos, G-M. (2005) Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review. 95 (4), 960-980. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, H.W. (1951) Taxation and the American economy: an economic, legal, and administrative analysis. New York, Prentice-Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Braithwaite, J.B. (2002) Rules and principles: A theory of legal certainty. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy. (27), 47-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Christians, A. (2009) Fair Taxation as a basic human right. International Review of Constitutionalism. 9 (1), 211-230.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Diver, C.S. (1989) Regulatory precision. In: Hawkins, K. &amp; Thomas, J. (eds.). Making Regulatory Policy. Pittsburg, University of Pittsburg Press, pp. 199-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Dodge, J.M. (2005) Theories of tax justice: ruminations on the benefit, partnership, and ability-to-pay principles. Tax Law Review. 58 (4), 399-462.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Duff, D.G. (2008) Tax fairness and the tax mix. Oxford, University of Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Englisch, J. (2014) Ability to pay in European tax law. In: Brokelind, C. (ed.). Principles of Law: Function, Status and Impact in EU Tax Law. Amsterdam, IBFD, pp. 439-464.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eremenko, E.A. (2018) The concept of fairness in taxation and its impact on the improvement of the national tax system. Dis. ... cand. economy. sciences. Moscow, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Еременко Е.А. Концепция справедливости в налогообложении и ее влияние на совершенствование национальной налоговой системы: дис. ... канд. эконом. наук. М.: Финансовый ун-т при Правительстве РФ, 2018. 162 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Fried, B.H. (2003) Proportionate taxation as a fair division of the social surplus: the strange career of an idea. Economics &amp; Philosophy. 19 (2), 211-239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267103001135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Galle, B. (2008) Tax Fairness. Wash. &amp; Lee L. Rev. (65), 1323-1379.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Hemels, S.J.C. (2013) Fairness: a legal principle of EU tax law? In: Brokelind, C. Principles of Law: Function, Status and Impact in EU Tax Law, IBFD Amsterdam 2014. pp. 413-437.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Infanti, A.C. (2008) Tax Equity. Buffalo Law Review. (55), 1191-1260.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lopatnikova, E. (2011) Implementation of the principles of tax law. Dis. ... cand. jurid. sciences. Moscow, All-Russian State Tax Academy of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лопатникова Е.В. Реализация принципов налогового права: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М.: Всерос. гос. налоговая акад. М-ва финансов РФ, 2011. 210 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Miklos, A. (2013) Institutions in Global Distributive Justice. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Miller, F.D. (1997) Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford, Clarendon Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, L. &amp; Nagel, Th. (2002) The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Musgrave, R.A. (2008) Public finance and three branch models. Journal of Economics and Finance. 32 (4), 334-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-008-9044-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Myburov, I.A. (ed.). (2010) Tax policy. Theory and practice. Moscow, Juniti-Dana Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Налоговая политика. Теория и практика / под ред. И.А. Майбурова. М.: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА, 2010. 519 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>O’Kelley, Ch.R. (1981) Rawls, Justice, and the Income Tax. Georgia Law Rev. 16 (1), 1-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Perelman, Ch. (1963) The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London, Routledge Kegan Paul.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Rawls, J. (1999) The Theory of Justice. Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Roach, B. (2010) Taxes in the United States: history, fairness, and current political issues. Medford, Tufts University Global Development and Environment Institute.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Seto, Th.P. (2013) Four Principles of Optimal Tax System Design. Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2008-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1303717</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Sugin, L. (2004) Theories of distributive justice and limitations on taxation: What Rawls demands from tax systems. Fordham Law Review. 72 (5), 1991-2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Urubkova, I. (2011) The principle of justice in tax law: on the example of personal income tax. Dis. ... cand. jurid. sciences. Moscow, Moscow state Institute of International relations. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Урубкова И.А. Принцип справедливости в налоговом праве: на примере налога на доходы физических лиц: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М.: Моск. гос. ин-т междунар. отношений, 2011. 182 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Wood, R.J. (2006) Supreme Court Jurisprudence of Tax Fairness. Seton Hall Law Review. (36), 421-479.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
