<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Law</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Law</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2337</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-9001</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24561</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-3-547-571</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>LEGAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ПРАВОВЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL NATURE OF THE LAW PRINCIPLE: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ФИЛОСОФСКО-ПРАВОВАЯ ПРИРОДА ПРАВОВОГО ПРИНЦИПА: МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Skorobogatov</surname><given-names>Andrey V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Скоробогатов</surname><given-names>Андрей Валерьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law and Public Legal Disciplines</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор исторических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры теории государства и права и публично-правовых дисциплин</p></bio><email>av.skorobogatov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Krasnov</surname><given-names>Alexandr V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Краснов</surname><given-names>Александр Валерьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Legal Sciences, associate professor of the department of theory and history of law and state</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры теории и истории права и государства</p></bio><email>field08@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Kazan Innovation University named after V.G. Timiryasova (IEML)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Казанский инновационный университет им. В.Г. Тимирясова (ИЭУП)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Kazan branch of the Russian State University of Justice</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Казанский филиал Российского государственного университета правосудия</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 24, NO3 (2020)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 24, №3 (2020)</issue-title><fpage>547</fpage><lpage>571</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-09-14"><day>14</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Скоробогатов А.В., Краснов А.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Скоробогатов А.В., Краснов А.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/24561">https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/24561</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article explores the legal nature of law principles from the perspective of philosophical and legal analysis. The purpose of the article is to form scientifically based knowledge on the philosophical and legal nature of the category law principle using postclassical methodological tools. Research Methods: The methodology of the article is based on the postclassical scientific rationality. The authors use an integrative approach to the study of legal reality in combination with a phenomenological and synergetic methodology, thereby using a number of general scientific and special scientific methods in a particular logical system, which makes it possible to study law principles both ontologically, in terms of their role in law in general, and epistemologically as well as axiologically. Moreover, the content, functioning and development of law principles are considered phenomenologically, as well as in the context of law communication. Results: The law principle in the ontological aspect is a fundamental form of law, reflecting the most significant ideas concerning regulation of public relations; the law principle is used as a direct regulator along with the rule of law. The epistemological law principle can be interpreted as a generalizing category, reflecting interpretation and assessment of legal reality from the standpoint of postclassical methodology. From an axiological point of view, the law principle embodies the law and social values and traditions that are dominant within the framework of a given socio-cultural chronotope, and is also used as one of the fundamental tools for constructing legal reality and its development. Conclusions: the law nature of law principles is determined with the account of postclassical methodology onto-logically, epistemologically and axiologically, in terms of their dual role in formation, development and construction of legal reality at all of its levels, in the context of both objective and subjective factors. The findings can be applied in drawing up concepts of legal and judicial reforms in terms of targeted construction of legal reality, as well as in the process of predicting the development of the Russian legal system.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье исследуется правовая природа правовых принципов с позиций философскоправового анализа. Цель статьи - формирование научно обоснованных знаний о философскоправовой природе категории «правовой принцип» с использованием постклассического методологического инструментария. Методология статьи базируется на постклассической научной рациональности. Авторы применяют интегративный подход к исследованию правовой реальности в сочетании с феноменологической и синергетической методологией, тем самым используя ряд общенаучных и частнонаучных методов в определенной логической системе, что дает возможность исследовать правовые принципы как онтологически, в плане их роли в правовом бытии в целом, так и гносеологически, а также аксиологически. При этом вопросы содержания, функционирования и развития правовых принципов рассматриваются феноменологически, а также в контексте правовой коммуникации. Результаты: Правовой принцип в онтологическом аспекте представляет собой фундаментальную форму права, отражающую наиболее существенные идеи и представления по поводу регулирования общественных отношений; при этом правовой принцип используется как прямой регулятор наряду с нормами права. Гносеологически правовой принцип может трактоваться как обобщающая категория, отражающая интерпретацию и оценку правовой реальности с позиций постклассической методологии. С аксиологических позиций правовой принцип воплощает главенствующие в рамках заданного социокультурного хронотопа правовые и социальные ценности и традиции, а также используется как один из основополагающих инструментов конструирования правовой реальности и ее развития. Выводы: определена правовая природа правовых принципов с учетом постклассической методологии онтологически, гносеологически и аксиологически, в плане их дуальной роли в формировании, развитии и конструировании правовой реальности на всех ее уровнях, в контексте как объективных, так и субъективных факторов. Полученные выводы могут быть использованы при составлении концепций правовых и судебных реформ в плане целенаправленного конструирования правовой реальности, а также в процессе прогнозирования путей развития российской правовой системы.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>law principle</kwd><kwd>legal reality</kwd><kwd>post-classical methodology</kwd><kwd>integrative law understanding</kwd><kwd>philosophical and legal category</kwd><kwd>form of law</kwd><kwd>interpretation of law</kwd><kwd>legal regulation</kwd><kwd>legal value</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>правовой принцип</kwd><kwd>правовая реальность</kwd><kwd>постклассическая методология</kwd><kwd>интегративное правопонимание</kwd><kwd>философско-правовая категория</kwd><kwd>форма права</kwd><kwd>толкование права</kwd><kwd>правовое регулирование</kwd><kwd>правовая ценность</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Albonetti, C.A. (1991) An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion. Social Problems. 38(2). 247–266.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Albonetti, C.A. (1991) An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion. Social Problems. 38(2). 247-266</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Albov, A.P. (1997) Russkaya filosofiya prava: filosofiya very i nravstvennosti: Antologiya [Russian Philosophy of Law: Philosophy of Faith and Morality: Anthology]. St. Petersburg. Aleteya Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Русская философия права: философия веры и нравственности: Антология / сост.: Альбов А.П. и др. СПб.: Алетейя, 1997. 398 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alexandrov, N.G. (1957) Sotsialisticheskie printsipy sovetskogo prava [Socialist principles of Soviet law]. Soviet state and law. (6). 16–29. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Александров Н.Г. Социалистические принципы советского права // Советское государство и право. 1957. № 6. С. 16-29</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, T.W. (1969) Law as Symbolism. Sociology of Law. Selected readings. Ed. by Vilhelm Aubert. Baltimore: Penguin Books Publ.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bell, J., Boyron, S., Whittaker, S. (2008) Principles of French law. Second Edition, Oxford University Press: N.-Y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T. (1991) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin Books: N.Y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bix, B.H. (2017) Introduction. In: Frank J. Law and Modern Mind. Routvelege: London, N.-Y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cankorel, T. (2008) Cognitive Classification of legal Principles: a new Approach to international legal Training. Ankara Law Review. 5 (2). 153–200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cankorel, T. (2008) Cognitive Classification of legal Principles: a new Approach to international legal Training. Ankara Law Review. 5 (2). 153-200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Daci, J. (2010) Legal Principles, Legal Values and Legal Norms: are they the same or different? Academicus International Scientific Journal. (2). 109–115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Daci, J. (2010) Legal Principles, Legal Values and Legal Norms: are they the same or different? Academicus International Scientific Journal. (2). 109-115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davydova, M.L. (2016) The principles of positive law in the theoretical and legal discourse. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies. 3 (33). 36–45. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Давыдова М.Л. Принципы позитивного права в теоретико-правовом дискурсе // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Сер. 7. Философия. Социология и социальные технологии. 2016. № 3 (33). С. 36-45. Dworkin, R. (1988) Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press: Cambridge</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman, L.M. (2019) A History of American Law. 4th ed., Cambridge: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Friedman, L.M. (2019) A History of American Law. 4th ed., Cambridge: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gerasimova, N.P. (2019). Theoretical understanding of the nature values of law and legal principles of science. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Law. 19 (2). 52–58. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Герасимова Н.П. Теоретическое осмысление природы ценности права и правовых принципов в науке // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Сер. Право. 2019. Т. 19. № 2. С. 52-58</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gessner, V. (1994) Global Legal Interaction and Legal Cultures. Ratio Juris. An International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. 7(2). 132–145.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gessner, V. (1994) Global Legal Interaction and Legal Cultures. Ratio Juris. An International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. 7(2). 132-145.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Gurvitch, G. (2001) Sociology of law. With a new introduction by Alan Hunt; with a preface by Roscoe Pound. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Habermas, Jü. (1973) Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus, Suhrkamp Verlag: Frankfurt am Main. (in Germany).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Habermas, Jü. (1996) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie, Suhrkamp Verlag: Frankfurt am Main. (in Germany).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hramcova, N.G. (2010) Teoriya pravovogo diskursa: bazovye idei, problemy, zakonomernosti: monografiya [Theory of legal discourse: basic ideas, problems, patterns]. Kurgan: Publishing house of the Kurgan state university Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Храмцова Н. Г. Теория правового дискурса: базовые идеи, проблемы, закономерности: монография. Курган: Изд-во Курганского гос. ун-та, 2010. 179 с. Hart, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: University Press: N.-Y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson, D.R., Post, D. (1996) Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review. 48 (5). 1367–1402.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson, D.R., Post, D. (1996) Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review. 48 (5). 1367-1402.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ershov, V.V. (2018) The essence of the principles of law. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences. 11(12). 2089–2103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ershov, V.V. (2018) The essence of the principles of law. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences. 11(12). 2089-2103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ershov, V.V. (2018) Pravovoe i individual'noe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii: Monografiya [Legal and individual regulation of public relations]. Moscow. RGUP Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ершов В.В. Правовое и индивидуальное регулирование общественных отношений: Монография. М.: РГУП, 2018. 628 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerimov, D.A. (2000) Metodologiya prava: predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava [Methodology of law: subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law]. Moscow. Avanta+ Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Керимов, Д.А. Методология права: предмет, функции, проблемы философии права. М.: Аванта+, 2000. 560 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koskenniemi, M. (ed.) (2000) Sources of International Law. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koskenniemi, M. (ed.) (2000) Sources of International Law. London: Routledge</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasnov, A.V. (2019) Legitimacy of the Law: Axiological Aspect. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology. (1). 87–90. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Краснов А.В. Легитимность права: аксиологический аспект // Вестник экономики, права и социологии. 2019. № 1. С. 87-90</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasnov, A.V., Skorobogatov, A.V. (2016) Sources and Legal Forms in the Context of Legal Reality. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 5. 2(15). 221–227. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Краснов А.В., Скоробогатов, А.В. Источники и формы права в контексте правовой реальности // Балтийский гуманитарный журнал. 2016. Т. 5. № 2(15). С. 221-227</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krawietz, W. (2008) Juridische Kommunikation im modernen Rechtssystem in rechtstheoretischer Perspektive. In: Brugger, W., Neumann, U., Kirste, S. (eds.) Rechtsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt-am-Main. 181–206. (in Germany).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krawietz, W. (2008) Juridische Kommunikation im modernen Rechtssystem in rechtstheoretischer Perspektive. In: Brugger, W., Neumann, U., Kirste, S. (eds.) Rechtsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt-am-Main. 181-206. (in Germany)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kulikov, E.A. (2017). Philosophical categories in legal science and legal categories: problems of theory and methodology. Legal Studies. (10). 59–77. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куликов Е.А. Философские категории в правовой науке и правовые категории: проблемы теории и методологии // Юридические исследования. 2017. № 10. С. 59-77</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Llewellyn, K. (1989) The Case Law System in America. Ed. by P. Gewirts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Llewellyn, K. (1989) The Case Law System in America. Ed. by P. Gewirts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lukasheva, E.A. (1970) The principles of socialist law. Soviet State and Law. (6). 21–29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лукашева Е.А. Принципы социалистического права // Советское государство и право. 1970. № 6. С. 21-29</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyons, D. (1977) Principles, positivism, and legal theory. The Yale Law Journal. 87 (2). 415–435.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lyons, D. (1977) Principles, positivism, and legal theory. The Yale Law Journal. 87 (2). 415-435</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miller, D. (1999) Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miller, D. (1999) Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Montesquieu, Ch. (1989) Montesquieu: The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montesquieu, Ch. (1989) Montesquieu: The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muromzev, S.A. (2004) Definition and main division of law. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Муромцев С.А. Определение и основное разделение права / Вступ. ст. и коммент.: Гревцов Ю.И. 2-е изд., доп. СПб.: Издат. Дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2004. 224 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nersesyanz, V.S. (2004) Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Norma Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нерсесянц В.С. Философия права: учебник для вузов. М.: Норма, 2004. 656 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Niezen, R. (2010) Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. N.-Y.: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Niezen, R. (2010) Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. N.-Y.: Cambridge University Press</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Osipov, M.Yu. (2006) The principles of legal regulation and their socio-legal conditionality. Law and State: Theory and Practice. (12). 24–30. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Осипов М.Ю. Принципы правового регулирования и их социально-юридическая обусловленность // Право и государство: теория и практика. 2006. № 12. С. 24-30</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Panchenko, V.Yu., Vlasenko, V.N. (2020) Principles and norms of law as abstract and specific legal regulators. Russian justice. (1). 14–21. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Панченко В.Ю., Власенко В.Н. Принципы и нормы права как абстрактные и конкретные правовые регуляторы // Российское правосудие. 2020. № 1. С. 14-21</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Postema, G.J. (2003) Law’s Melody: Time and the Normativity of Law. A Realist Approach to the Objectivity of Norms and Law. Associations. Journal for Legal and Social Theory. 7 (1). 227–239.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Postema, G.J. (2003) Law’s Melody: Time and the Normativity of Law. A Realist Approach to the Objectivity of Norms and Law. Associations. Journal for Legal and Social Theory. 7 (1). 227-239</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Puchta, G.F. (1965) Das Gewohnheitsrecht. 2 vols. Reprint. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (in Germany).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Puchta, G.F. (1965) Das Gewohnheitsrecht. 2 vols. Reprint. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (in Germany)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raz, J. (1972) Legal Principles and the Limits of Law. The Yale Law Journal. (81). 823–854.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raz, J. (1972) Legal Principles and the Limits of Law. The Yale Law Journal. (81). 823-854.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Raz, J. (2005) The Rule of Law and its Virtue. In: Bellamy, R. (ed.). The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Rüthers, B., Fischer, Ch. (2010) Rechtstheorie: Begriff, Geltung und Anwendung des Rechts. 5. Auflage. München: Verlag C. H. Beck. (in Germany).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Selznick, P. (1961) Sociology and natural law. Natural Law Forum. (61). 84–108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Selznick, P. (1961) Sociology and natural law. Natural Law Forum. (61). 84-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shershenevich, G.F. (1995) Textbook of Russian Civil Law. Moscow: Spark Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шершеневич Г.Ф. Учебник русского гражданского права. М.: Спарк, 1995. 556 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skorobogatov, A.V, Bulnina, I.S., Krasnov, A.V., Tyabina, D.V. (2015) Legal reality as a jural category. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6 (3). 664–668.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skorobogatov, A.V, Bulnina, I.S., Krasnov, A.V., Tyabina, D.V. (2015) Legal reality as a jural category. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6 (3). 664-668</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skorobogatov, A.V., Ali Abbood Malik (2019) Legitimation of law in juridical discourse. Topical Issues of Economics and Law. 13 (3). 1370–1378 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скоробогатов А.В., Али Аббуд Малик. Легитимация закона в юридическом дискурсе // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2019. Т. 13, № 3. С. 1370-1378</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skurko, E.V. (2008) Printsipy prava: monografiya [Principles of Law: Monograph]. Moscow: Os89 Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скурко Е.В. Принципы права: монография. М.: Ось-89, 2008. 192 c</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Syrykh, V.M., Vlasenko, V.N. (eds.) (2017) Principles of law: problems of theory and practice: Materials of the XI international scientific-practical conference. In 2 hours. Moscow: Russian State Unitary Enterprise Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Принципы права: проблемы теории и практики: Материалы XI международной научно-практической конференции / под ред. В.М. Сырых, В.Н. Власенко. В 2-х ч. М.: РГУП, 2017. Ч. 1-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tolstik, V.A. (2000) Obshchepriznannye printsipy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoi sisteme Rossii [Generally recognized principles and norms of international law in the legal system of Russia]. Journal of Russian Law. (8). 67–71. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Толстик В.А. Общепризнанные принципы и нормы международного права в правовой системе России // Журнал российского права. 2000. № 8. С. 66-71</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Eikema Hommes, H.J. (1974) The Functions of Law and the Role of Legal Principles. Philosophia Reformata. 39 (1/2). 77–81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Eikema Hommes, H.J. (1974) The Functions of Law and the Role of Legal Principles. Philosophia Reformata. 39 (1/2). 77-81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Van Hoecke, M. (2002) Law as Communication. Oxford: Hart Publishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wiethölter, R. (2011) Proceduralization of The Category of Law. German Law Journal. 12(1). 465–473.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wiethölter, R. (2011) Proceduralization of The Category of Law. German Law Journal. 12(1). 465-473.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wright, R.G. (2017) Objective and Subjective Tests in the Law. The UNH Law Review. 16(1). 121–146.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wright, R.G. (2017) Objective and Subjective Tests in the Law. The UNH Law Review. 16(1). 121-146.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yavich, L.S. (1978) Pravo razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva. Sushchnost' i printsipy [The law of a developed socialist society. The essence and principles]. Moscow: Legal literature Publ. (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Явич Л.С. Право развитого социалистического общества. Сущность и принципы. М.: Юридическая литература, 1978. 224 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
