<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-0660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-0679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">46265</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-3-469-484</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">WNKTNS</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>APPLIED ANALYSYS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРИКЛАДНОЙ АНАЛИЗ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>应用分析</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">ICT Security in U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Latin America: The Case of the Biden Administration’s Discourse</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ИКТ-безопасность во внешней политике США в отношении Латинской Америки: кейс дискурса администрации Дж. Байдена</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title/></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-1022</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">6958-8932</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sokolshchik</surname><given-names>Lev M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сокольщик</surname><given-names>Лев Маркович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD (History), Leading Researcher, Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Центр комплексных европейских и международных исследований</p></bio><email>lsokolshchik@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-5301</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5148-7454</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Yanikeeva</surname><given-names>Inna O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Яникеева</surname><given-names>Инна Олеговна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD (Political Science), Researcher, Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат политических наук, научный сотрудник, Центр комплексных европейских и международных исследований</p></bio><email>iyanikeeva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-1202</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1524-2434</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Toropchin</surname><given-names>Gleb V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Торопчин</surname><given-names>Глеб Вячеславович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD (History), Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Faculty of Humanities, Novosibirsk State Technical University; Senior Research Fellow, Center for Eurasian Studies, National Research Tomsk State University</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат исторических наук, заместитель декана по научной работе, факультет гуманитарного образования, Новосибирский государственный технический университет; старший научный сотрудник, Центр евразийских исследований, Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет</p></bio><email>glebtoropchin@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National Research University Higher School of Economics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Novosibirsk State Technical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Новосибирский государственный технический университет</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National Research Tomsk State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-10-02" publication-format="electronic"><day>02</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the Bandung Conference: The Evolving Role of Asian and African Countries in World Politics</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Отмечая 70-летие Бандунгской конференции: эволюция роли стран Азии и Африки в мировой политике</issue-title><fpage>469</fpage><lpage>484</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-10-03"><day>03</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Sokolshchik L.M., Yanikeeva I.O., Toropchin G.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Сокольщик Л.М., Яникеева И.О., Торопчин Г.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025, Sokolshchik L., Yanikeeva I., Toropchin G.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sokolshchik L.M., Yanikeeva I.O., Toropchin G.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Сокольщик Л.М., Яникеева И.О., Торопчин Г.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Sokolshchik L., Yanikeeva I., Toropchin G.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/46265">https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/46265</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The issue of information and communication technology (ICT) security is becoming increasingly important in the context of international relations and foreign policy. In the present study, the authors analyze the discourse of the Joseph Biden administration in the field of international ICT security in the Latin American dimension, with the aim of identifying the underlying ideology that supports and justifies the U.S. power relations with the region. The scientific novelty of the present study lies in the integrated application of the critical discourse analysis (CDA) method, which allows examining how language practices shape ICT security perceptions and political reality. In addition, the study employs quantitative content analysis, which provides insights into attributed threats, primarily among state actors. The authors conduct the CDA at the contextual and discursive levels. The study’s extensive source base includes materials from U.S. government agencies, encompassing the period from January 2021 to November 2024. The authors critically examine the image of the United States as an agent constructing international ICT security in the Latin American dimension from the perspective of its hegemonic aspirations. The image of Latin America as a region vulnerable in the ICT space and in need of paternalism from Washington is a significant element of the U.S. discourse. At the same time, the images of China and Russia are presented as the main sources of threat to the region to justify the dominant role of the United States. In the background of American discourse, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) are presented as limited but growing threats to ICT security. These discursive practices serve as a tool to legitimize American influence and promote its strategic interests in the region.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Проблема безопасности в сфере информационно-коммуникационных технологий (ИКТ) приобретает все возрастающее значение в контексте международных отношений и внешней политики. Исследование посвящено анализу дискурса администрации Дж. Байдена в области международной ИКТ-безопасности на латиноамериканском направлении. Цель - выявление скрытой в дискурсе идеологии, поддерживающей и оправдывающей властные отношения США со странами Латинской Америки. Научная новизна работы состоит в комплексном применении метода критического дискурс-анализа (КДА), позволяющего рассмотреть, как языковые практики формируют восприятие ИКТ-безопасности и политической реальности, а также количественного контент-анализа, дающего представление об атрибутируемых угрозах, в первую очередь среди государственных акторов, что ранее не получило должного внимания в научной литературе. КДА проводится на контекстуальном и дискурсивном уровнях. Исследование опирается на широкую источниковую базу, включающую материалы государственных органов США за период с января 2021 по ноябрь 2024 г. Авторы критически осмысляют образ США как агента, конструирующего международную ИКТ-безопасность на латиноамериканском направлении, в ракурсе своих гегемонистских устремлений. Выявлено, что значимым элементом американского дискурса является образ Латинской Америки как региона, уязвимого в ИКТ-пространстве и нуждающегося в патернализме со стороны Вашингтона. Образы Китая и России представляются как основные источники угроз в регионе для оправдания доминирующей роли США. На втором плане американского дискурса присутствуют образы Корейской Народно-Демократической Республики (КНДР) и Исламской Республики Иран (ИРИ), которые позиционируются как ограниченные, но растущие угрозы в ИКТ-пространстве. Авторы приходят к выводу, что подобные дискурсивные практики служат инструментом легитимации влияния США и продвижения ими своих стратегических интересов в регионе.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"/><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>information security</kwd><kwd>cybersecurity</kwd><kwd>critical discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>content analysis</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>Russia</kwd><kwd>Iran</kwd><kwd>the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea</kwd><kwd>the DPRK</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>информационная безопасность</kwd><kwd>кибербезопасность</kwd><kwd>критический дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>контент-анализ</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd><kwd>Россия</kwd><kwd>Иран</kwd><kwd>Корейская Народно-Демократическая Республика</kwd><kwd>КНДР</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 22-78-10014, https:// rscf.ru/project/22-78-10014</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">The research was supported by RSF (project No. 22-78-10014, https://rscf.ru/project/ 22-78-10014/).</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta><fn-group/></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bolgov, R. (2020). The UN and cybersecurity policy of Latin American countries. 2020 7th International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG 2020 (pp. 259-263). Buenos Aires: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096798; EDN: CFHGPI</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зиновьева Е., Игнатов А. БРИКС в глобальном режиме ИКТ-безопасности // Международные процессы. 2023. Т. 21, № 4. С. 104–132. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.4.75.2; EDN: AVLWZW</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buzan, B., Weaver, O., &amp; de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for Analysis. London: Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/39047709/Buzan_Waever_and_De_Wilde_ 1998_Security_A_New_Framework_For_Analysis</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крутских А. В. Международная информационная безопасность: в поисках консолидированных подходов : интервью с Андреем Владимировичем Крутских, Специальным представителем Президента Российской Федерации по вопросам международного сотрудничества в области информационной безопасности / интервью провел Д. А. Пискунов // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. 2022. Т. 22, № 2. С. 342–351. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-342-351; EDN: DVBISA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Campbell, D. (1993). Politics without principle: Sovereignty, ethics, and the narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856090</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пахалюк К. А. Истоки дискурсивного подхода в политических исследованиях // Вестник Московского  университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2018. Т. 24, № 1. С. 71–97. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-71-97; EDN: YUPBIH</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fomin, I. V. (2014a). Representations of state formations in political discourse analysis (the case of Kosovo). Polis. Political Studies, (2), 124-137. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.02.09; EDN: RXHOPN</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Понька Т. И., Рамич М. С., У Ю. Информационная политика и информационная безопасность КНР: развитие, подходы и реализация // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. 2020. Т. 20, № 2. С. 382–394. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-382-394; EDN: UANODL</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fomin, I. V. (2014b). The category of image as a means of studying the political reality (the example of the image of South Ossetia in the Russian foreign policy discourse). In Symbolic politics: Collection of articles (Issue 2: Debates on the Past as Designing the Future, pp. 40-65). Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN publ. (In Russian). EDN: ULCLXR</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Свирчевский Д. А., Фомин И. В. Образы Европы в дискурсе левых и правых популистов Германии: между Европой солидарности и Европой-крепостью // Полис. Политические исследования. 2023. № 2.  С. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.03; EDN: YGNOEA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Henshaw, A. (2024). Capacity building and cyber insecurity in Latin America: Geopolitics, Surveillance, and Disinformation. In A. Mhajne &amp; A. Henshaw (Eds.), Critical perspectives on cybersecurity: Feminist and postcolonial interventions (pp. 173-193). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197695883.003.0008</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сокольщик Л. М., Сакаев В. Т., Галимуллин Э. З. Нелегальная иммиграция из Латинской Америки в контексте президентской кампании в США 2024 г.: эффекты поляризации // Международная аналитика. 2023. Т. 14, № 3. С. 106–126. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-3-106-126; EDN: FTAYME</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hurel, L. M. (2022). Interrogating the cybersecurity development agenda: A critical reflection. The International Spectator, 57(3), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2022.2095824; EDN: SPVBPZ</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сокольщик Л. М., Сокольщик Ю. С., Теремецкий К. С. Дискурсивные стратегии легитимации санкционной политики США в отношении России (2021–2023) // Полис. Политические исследования. 2024. № 3.  С. 109–125. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.08; EDN: NTYWXM</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kheifets, V. L., &amp; Khadorich, L. V. (2015). Latin America between OAS and CELAC. World Eсonomy and International Relations, (4), 90-100. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-4-90-100; EDN: TRNTVZ1`</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стадник И. Т. Как изучать политику безопасности в области ИКТ: возможности и ограничения критического дискурс-анализа // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения. 2024. Т. 17, № 2. С. 183–200. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.205; EDN: NKMILI</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krebs, R. R. (2015). How dominant narratives rise and fall: Military conflict, politics, and the Cold War consensus. International Organization, 69(4), 809-845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000181</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фомин И. В. Возможности анализа репрезентаций государственных образований в политических  дискурсах (на примере образа Косова) // Полис. Политические исследования. 2014a. № 2. С. 124–137. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.02.09; EDN: RXHOPN</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krutskikh, A. V. (2022). International information security: In search of consolidated approaches : Interview with Andrey V. Krutskikh, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation for International Cooperation in the Field of Information Security. Interviewed by D. A. Piskunov. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-342-351; EDN: DVBISA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фомин И. В. Категория образа как средство изучения политической действительности (на примере образа Южной Осетии в российском внешнеполитическом дискурсе) // Символическая политика : сборник статей. Вып. 2.: Споры о прошлом как проектирование будущего. Москва : Институт научной  информации по общественным наукам РАН, 2014b. С. 40–65. EDN: ULCLXR</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miao, W., Xu, J., &amp; Zhu, H. (2019). From technological issue to military-diplomatic affairs: Analysis of China’s official cybersecurity discourse (1994-2016). In J. Hunsinger, M. Allen &amp; L. Klastrup (Eds.), Second international handbook of internet research (pp. 1-13). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_61-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хейфец В. Л., Хадорич Л. В. Латинская Америка между ОАГ и СЕЛАК // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2015. № 4. С. 90–100. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-4-90-100; EDN: TRNTVZ</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pakhalyuk, K. A. (2018). Intellectual origins of discursive analysis in political studies. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 24(1), 71-97. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-71-97; EDN: YUPBIH</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bolgov R. The UN and Cybersecurity Policy of Latin American Countries // 2020 7th International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG 2020. Buenos Aires : Institute of Electrical and Electronics  Engineers Inc., 2020. P. 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096798; EDN: CFHGPI</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ponka, T. I., Ramich, M. S. &amp; Wu, Y. (2020). Information policy and information security of PRC: Development, approaches and implementation. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 20(2), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-382-394; EDN: UANODL</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buzan B., Wæver O., de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London : Boulder, Lynne Rienner  Publishers, 1998. URL: https://www.academia.edu/39047709/Buzan_Waever_and_De_Wilde_1998_Security_ A_New_Framework_For_Analysis (accessed: 14.01.2025)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reisigl, M., &amp; Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak &amp; M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis: 2nd revised edition (pp. 87-121). London: SAGE. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251636976_The_Discourse-Historical_Approach_DHA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campbell D. Politics Without Principle : Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder, USA : Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856090</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siudak, R. (2022). Cybersecurity discourses and their policy implications. Journal of Cyber Policy, 7(3), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2023.2167607; EDN: MLSWMA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Henshaw A. Capacity Building and Cyber Insecurity in Latin America: Geopolitics, Surveillance, and  Disinformation // Critical Perspectives on Cybersecurity : Feminist and Postcolonial Interventions /  ed. by A. Mhajne, A. Henshaw. New York : Oxford University Press, 2024. P. 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197695883.003.0008</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolshchik, L. M., Sakaev, V. T., &amp; Galimullin, E. Z. (2023). Illegal immigration from Latin America amid the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign: Polarization effects. Journal of International Analytics, 14(3), 106-126. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-3-106-126; EDN: FTAYME</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hurel L. M. Interrogating the Cybersecurity Development Agenda: A Critical Reflection // The International  Spectator. 2022. Vol. 57, iss. 3. P. 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2022.2095824; EDN: SPVBPZ</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolshchik, L. M., Sokolshchik, Yu. S., &amp; Teremetskiy, K. S. (2024). Discursive strategies for legitimizing U.S. sanctions policy towards Russia (2021-2023). Polis. Political Studies, (3), 109-125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.08; EDN: NTYWXM</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krebs R. R. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus // International Organization. 2015. Vol. 69, iss. 4. P. 809–845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000181</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolshchik, L. M. (2024). Year one of the Biden administration: U.S. foreign policy Towards Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 15(1), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231170639; EDN: AMHXNS</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miao W., Xu J., Zhu H. From Technological Issue to Military-Diplomatic Affairs: Analysis of China’s Official  Cybersecurity Discourse (1994–2016) // Second International Handbook of Internet Research / ed. by  J. Hunsinger, M. Allen, L. Klastrup. Dordrecht : Springer, 2019. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_61-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolshchik, L., &amp; Sokolshchik, Y. (2023). Why U.S. - Russia relations failed: an analysis of competing national security narratives. Russian Politics, 8(4), 468-492. https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00803009; EDN: YFYVMB</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reisigl M., Wodak R. The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) // Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis :  2nd revised edition / ed. by R. Wodak, M. Meyer. London: SAGE, 2009. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/251636976_The_Discourse-Historical_Approach_DHA (accessed: 14.01.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stadnik, I. T. (2024). How to study ICT-security policy: Opportunities and challenges for critical discourse-analysis. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 17(2), 183-200. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.205; EDN: NKMILI</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siudak R. Cybersecurity Discourses and Their Policy Implications // Journal of Cyber Policy. 2022. Vol. 7, iss. 3.  P. 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2023.2167607; EDN: MLSWMA</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svirchevskii, D. A., &amp; Fomin, I. V. (2023). Images of Europe in the discourse of German left- and right-wing populists: Between solidarity Europe and fortress Europe. Polis. Political Studies, (2), 27-40. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.03; EDN: YGNOEA</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sokolshchik L. M. Year One of the Biden Administration: U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Russia // Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2024. Vol. 15, iss. 1. P. 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231170639; EDN: AMHXNS</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tikk, E., &amp; Kerttunen, M. (2020). Introduction. In E. Tikk &amp; M. Kerttunen (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international cybersecurity (pp. 1-8). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351038904</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sokolshchik L., Sokolshchik Y. Why U.S. — Russia Relations Failed: An Analysis of Competing National Security Narratives // Russian Politics. 2023. Vol. 8, no. 4. P. 468–492. https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00803009; EDN: YFYVMB</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Urbanovics, A. (2022). Cybersecurity policy-related developments in Latin America. AARMS - Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, 21(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.32565/aarms.2022.1.6; EDN: JOBKFG</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tikk E., Kerttunen M. Introduction // Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity / ed. by E. Tikk,  M. Kerttunen. New York : Routledge, 2020. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351038904</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Urbanovics A. Cybersecurity Policy-Related Developments in Latin America // AARMS — Academic  and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science. 2022. Vol. 21, no. 1. P. 79–94. https://doi.org/10.32565/aarms.2022.1.6; EDN: JOBKFG</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Dijk T. A. Discourse, Context and Cognition // Discourse Studies. 2006. Vol. 8, iss. 1. P. 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zinovieva, E., &amp; Ignatov, A. (2023). The role of BRICS in the international ICT security regime. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy, 21(4), 104-132. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.4.75.2; EDN: AVLWZW</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
