<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-0660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-0679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">36158</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-3-562-574</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">CUCPRP</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL SECURITY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>国际安全</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Great Powers Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific Region and Its Impact on Vietnam’s Strategy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Соперничество великих держав в Индо-Тихоокеанском регионе и его влияние на стратегию Вьетнама</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3665-3113</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>Son T.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Нгуен</surname><given-names>Сон Тхань</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Research Fellow, Institute of Political Economy, Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics; Faculty Member, FPT University</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>научный сотрудник, Институт политической экономии, Национальная политическая академия им. Хо Ши Мина; преподаватель, Университет FPT</p></bio><email>nguyenthanhson.ktct@hcma.edu.vn</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Political Economy, Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт политической экономии, Национальная политическая академия им. Хо Ши Мина</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">FPT University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет FPT</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-09-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Peacekeeping and the Global South</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Миротворчество и Глобальный Юг</issue-title><fpage>562</fpage><lpage>574</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-09-29"><day>29</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Nguyen S.T.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Нгуен С.Т.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Nguyen S.T.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Нгуен С.Т.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/36158">https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/36158</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">At the end of the 20th century, many researchers had envisioned a world where countries shift from political and military competition towards economic competition. However, the prospect of a world without conflict was short-lived, as the concerns about political tensions were revived in the early 21st century. Great powers such as the United States, China and Russia, have all shifted their focus to Asia, in particular the Indo-Pacific region. As a developing country in this region, Vietnam has its reasons to pay close attention to the competition among these great powers. Based on the theory of defensive realism, the author examines the reorientation of the US, Chinese and Russian foreign policy towards the Indo-Pacific region from Vietnam’s perspective. It shows that the US pivot to the region is set to challenge the rise of China and to maintain the US position as the leader of the world, China’s expanding influence is to reclaim its historical position in the region and Russia seeks to diversify its political and economic relations. In this context, Vietnam should maintain its multi-vector foreign policy, balancing the interests of several countries. In addition, Vietnam needs to strengthen its position in the global economy through participation in new-generation free trade agreements, expand the scope and forms of its diplomacy, and play a more active role in the global community. All these, in the author’s opinion, will enable Vietnam to strengthen its position in the global economy and boost its diplomatic activities.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">В конце XX в., после окончания холодной войны, многие исследователи пришли к выводу, что государства постепенно переходят от политического и военного соперничества к противостоянию преимущественно в экономической сфере. Однако перспектива мира без конфликтов оказалась недолгой, и в начале XXI в. начался рост политической напряженности. Одним из ее центров стал Индо-Тихоокеанский регион, где столкнулись интересы различных великих держав, таких как США, Китай и Россия. Региональные державы, например Вьетнам, оказались в эпицентре этого соперничества. Опираясь на теорию оборонительного реализма, автор рассматривает переориентацию внешней политики США, Китая и России на Индо-Тихоокеанский регион с точки зрения Вьетнама. Показано, что «поворот» США к Индо-Тихоокеанскому региону направлен на сдерживание Китая и сохранение позиции США как мирового лидера, в то время как Китай стремится восстановить свое историческое положение в регионе, а Россия - диверсифицировать свои политические и экономические отношения. Автор приходит к выводу, что Вьетнаму необходимо сохранять свой многовекторный внешнеполитический курс, балансируя между интересами нескольких стран. Кроме того, Вьетнаму следует стремиться к укреплению своих позиций в мировой экономике посредством участия в соглашениях о свободной торговле нового поколения, расширения масштабов и форм дипломатии, а также поддержания статуса активного актора в мировом сообществе. Все это, по мнению автора, позволит Вьетнаму укрепить свои позиции в мировой экономике и стимулировать дипломатическую активность.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>great powers competition</kwd><kwd>Indo-Pacific</kwd><kwd>Vietnam</kwd><kwd>the U.S</kwd><kwd>Russia</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>geopolitics</kwd><kwd>geoeconomics</kwd><kwd>geostrategy</kwd><kwd>pivot to Asia</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>соперничество великих держав</kwd><kwd>Индо-Тихоокеанский регион</kwd><kwd>Вьетнам</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>Россия</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd><kwd>геополитика</kwd><kwd>геоэкономика</kwd><kwd>геостратегия</kwd><kwd>поворот к Азии</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blackwill, R. D., &amp; Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blackwill R. D., Harris J. M. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen, S. B. (2015). Geopolitics: The geography of international relations. London: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen S. B. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. London : Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooper, Z., &amp; Shearer, A. (2017). Thinking clearly about China’s layered Indo-Pacific strategy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73(5), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1364005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooper Z., Shearer A. Thinking Clearly about China’s Layered Indo-Pacific Strategy // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2017. Vol. 73, no. 5. P. 305—311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1364005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davidson, J. (2014). The U.S. “Pivot to Asia”. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 21(SI), 77-82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davidson J. The U.S. “Pivot to Asia” // American Journal of Chinese Studies. 2014. Vol. 21, SI. P. 77—82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friend, J. M., &amp; Thayer, B. A. (2018). How China sees the world: Han-centrism and the balance of power in international politics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, Potomac Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv80cchq</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Friend J. M., Thayer B. A. How China Sees the World: Han-Centrism and the Balance of Power in International Politics. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press, Potomac Books, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv80cchq</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gabuev, A., &amp; Zuenko, I. (2018). The “Belt and Road” in Russia: Evolution of expert discourse. Russia in Global Affairs, 16(4), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2018-16-4-142-163</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gabuev A., Zuenko I. The “Belt and Road” in Russia: Evolution of Expert Discourse // Russia in Global Affairs. 2018. Vol. 16, no. 4. P. 142—163. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2018-16-4-142-163</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harrell, P., Rosenberg, E., &amp; Saravalle, E. (2018). China’s use of coercive economic measures. Center for a New American Security, 1-62. Retrieved from http://files.cnas.org.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/China_Use_FINAL-1.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harrell P., Rosenberg E., Saravalle E. China’s Use of Coercive Economic Measures // Center for a New American Security. 2018. P. 1—62. URL: http://files.cnas.org.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/China_Use_FINAL-1.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hillman, J. E. (2020). China and Russia: Economic unequals. CSIS Report, (July), 1-11. Retrieved from https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/200715_ChinaandRussia.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hillman J. E. China and Russia: Economic Unequals // CSIS Report. 2020. July. P. 1—11. URL: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/200715_ChinaandRussia.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hu, Weixing, &amp; Meng, Weizhan. (2020). The US Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s response. China Review, 20(3), 143-176.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hu Weixing, Meng Weizhan. The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response // China Review. 2020. Vol. 20, no. 3. P. 143—176.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hurley, J., Morris, S., &amp; Portelance, G. (2019). Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 3(1), 139-175. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hurley J., Morris S., Portelance G. Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective // Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2019. Vol. 3, no. 1. P. 139—175. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jung, Sung Chul, Lee, Jaehyon, &amp; Lee, Ji-Yong. (2021). The Indo-Pacific strategy and US alliance network expandability: Asian middle powers’ positions on Sino-US geostrategic competition in Indo-Pacific region. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(127), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1766909</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jung Sung Chul, Lee Jaehyon, Lee Ji-Yong. The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US Geostrategic Competition in Indo-Pacific Region // Journal of Contemporary China. 2021. Vol. 30, no. 127. P. 53—68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1766909</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karaganov, S. (2016). A turn to Asia: The history of the political idea. Russia in Global Affairs. Retrieved from https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/a-turn-to-asia-the-history-of-the-political-idea/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karaganov S. A Turn to Asia: The History of the Political Idea // Russia in Global Affairs. 2016. URL: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/a-turn-to-asia-the-history-of-the-political-idea/ (accessed: 08.08.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koga, K. (2019). Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” strategy: Tokyo’s tactical hedging and the implications for ASEAN. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 286-313. https://dx.doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2l</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koga K. Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” Strategy: Tokyo’s Tactical Hedging and the Implications for ASEAN // Contemporary Southeast Asia. 2019. Vol. 41, no. 2. P. 286—313. https://dx.doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2l</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korolev, A. (2016). Russia’s reorientation to Asia: Causes and strategic implications. Pacific Affairs, 89(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.5509/201689153</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Korolev A. Russia’s Reorientation to Asia: Causes and Strategic Implications // Pacific Affairs. 2016. Vol. 89, no. 1. P. 53—73. https://doi.org/10.5509/201689153</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lei, Yu, &amp; Sui, S. (2022). China’s strategy of free trade area and economic regionalism. Journal of International Development, 34(8), 1633-1648. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3658</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lei Yu, Sui S. China’s Strategy of Free Trade Area and Economic Regionalism // Journal of International Development. 2022. Vol. 34, no. 8. P. 1633—1648. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3658</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morgunova, O. A., &amp; Moraru, N.-F. (2022). Discourses of “Europeanness” in asylum practices in the postcolonial context. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(4), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-741-754</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morgunova O. A., Moraru N.-F. Discourses of “Europeanness” in Asylum Practices in the Postcolonial Context // Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2022. Vol. 22, no. 4. P. 741—754. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-741-754</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oh, Yoon Ah. (2020). Chinese development aid to Asia: Size and motives. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(3), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119836521</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oh Yoon Ah. Chinese Development Aid to Asia: Size and Motives // Asian Journal of Comparative Politics. 2020. Vol. 5, no. 3. P. 223—234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119836521</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pham, T. T. B., &amp; Vu, T. P. D. (2020). Chiến lược của các nước lớn đối với khu vực châu Á - Thái Bình Dương và vai trò, vị thế của Việt Nam. Thông tin Khoa học xã hội [Strategies by great powers for the Asia-Pacific region and the position of Vietnam. Vietnamese Journal of Social Science Information], (1), 11-20. (In Vietnamese). Retrieved from https://vjol.info.vn/index.php/ssir/article/download/55801/46439/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pham T. T. B., Vu T. P. D. Chiến lược của các nước lớn đối với khu vực châu Á — Thái Bình Dương và vai trò, vị thế của Việt Nam // Thông tin Khoa học xã hội [Стратегии великих держав в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе и позиция Вьетнама // Вьетнамский журнал информации социальных наук]. 2020. No. 1. P. 11—20. (На вьетнамском языке). URL: https://vjol.info.vn/index.php/ssir/article/download/55801/46439/ (accessed: 08.08.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rajagopalan, R. (2020). Evasive balancing: India’s unviable Indo-Pacific strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz224</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajagopalan R. Evasive Balancing: India’s Unviable Indo-Pacific Strategy // International Affairs. 2020. Vol. 96, no. 1. P. 75—93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz224</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ruta, M., Dappe, M. H., Lall, S., Zhang, C., et al. (2019). Belt and Road economics: Opportunities and risks of transport corridors. World Bank, 1-159. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/publication/belt-and-road-economics-opportunities-and-risks-of-transport-corridors</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ruta M., Dappe M. H., Lall S., Zhang C., Constantinescu C., et al. Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors // World Bank. 2019. P. 1—159. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/publication/belt-and-road-economics-opportunities-and-risks-of-transport-corridors (accessed: 08.08.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scott, D. (2018). The Indo-Pacific in US strategy: Responding to power shifts. Rising Powers Quarterly, 3(2), 19-43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scott D. The Indo-Pacific in US Strategy: Responding to Power Shifts // Rising Powers Quarterly. 2018. Vol. 3, no. 2. P. 19—43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tellis, A. J. (2020a). The return of U.S. - China strategic competition. In A. J. Tellis, A. Szalwinski &amp; M. Wills (Eds.), Strategic Asia 2020: U.S. - China competition for global influence (pp. 40-59). Seattle, Washington, D.C.: The National Bureau of Asian Research. Retrieved from https://www.nbr.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/publications/sa20_overview_tellis_dec2019advance.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tellis A. J. The Return of U.S. — China Strategic Competition // Strategic Asia 2020: U.S. — China Competition for Global Influence / ed. by A. J. Tellis, A. Szalwinski, M. Wills. Seattle, Washington, D.C. : The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2020a. P. 40—59. URL: https://www.nbr.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/publications/sa20_overview_tellis_dec2019advance.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tellis, A. J. (2020b). Waylaid by contradictions: Evaluating Trump’s Indo-Pacific strategy. The Washington Quarterly, 43(4), 123-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2020.1849992</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tellis A. J. Waylaid by Contradictions: Evaluating Trump’s Indo-Pacific Strategy // The Washington Quarterly. 2020b. Vol. 43, no. 4. P. 123—154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2020.1849992</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vihma, A. (2018). Geoeconomic Analysis and the limits of critical geopolitics: A new engagement with Edward Luttwak. Geopolitics, 23(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1302928</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vihma A. Geoeconomic Analysis and the Limits of Critical Geopolitics: A New Engagement with Edward Luttwak // Geopolitics. 2018. Vol. 23, no. 1. P. 1—21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1302928</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waltz K. N. Theory of International Politics. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1979.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wigell, M., &amp; Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: The case of Russia’s geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12600</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wigell M., Vihma A. Geopolitics versus Geoeconomics: The Case of Russia’s Geostrategy and Its Effects on the EU // International Affairs. 2016. Vol. 92, no. 3. P. 605—627. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12600</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yahuda, M. (2019). The international politics of the Asia Pacific. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543291</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yahuda M. The International Politics of the Asia Pacific. London : Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543291</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
