Vestnik RUDN. International RelationsVestnik RUDN. International RelationsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения2313-06602313-0679федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)3306710.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-771-787INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONSМЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ国际经济关系Research ArticleGlobal Dissipation of Neoliberal Models and the Sovereign State DoctrineГлобальный трансфер неолиберальных моделей и доктрина суверенного государстваhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-7449SumkoskiGoranШумкоскиГоран

Independent Researcher

Независимый исследователь

goran.sumkoski@mail.ru30122022224Postcolonialism and Anti-colonial StruggleПостколониализм и антиколониальная борьба77178730122022Copyright ©; 2022, Sumkoski G.Copyright ©; 2022, Шумкоски Г.2022Sumkoski G.Шумкоски Г.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/33067

The article examines the mechanisms of quasi-voluntary and coercive dissemination of neoliberal models of development at the global level through the targeted activities and agendas of international organizations. At present, the legitimacy of both the process of promoting global neoliberalism itself and its results appear contradictory and widely challenged. This process has been accompanied by a decades-long erosion of state sovereignty, mandates and powers of nation-states. The result has been a “vacuum” in their ability to fully implement the sovereign state doctrine. However, today, with a multipolar world order transit states are again claiming the need to implement sovereign approaches to their own development, actively forming strategies and operational development plans alternative to neoliberalism. The author extensively analyzes neoliberal models of intervention, as well as those spheres in which there has been the greatest weakening of state powers. The article puts forward the thesis of the necessity for states to formulate national independent models of development alternative to the neoliberal programs globally imposed. This involves providing a broad ideological and philosophical framework and understanding of sovereign development for restoring the nation-sates ability to formulate sovereign state doctrine, vision, and strategy. In order to design and implement operational plans to revitalize the functional capacities of nation-states, it is important to restore relevant knowledge and practical skills, platforms and tools. It seems that this is what will allow nation-states to formulate their own development strategies in the context of dynamically emerging multipolarity. The article puts special emphasis on the doctrine of a sovereign state in the sphere of the economy. However, a similar approach can and should be applied in related spheres of social and political development.

Рассматриваются механизмы квазидобровольного и принудительного распространения неолиберальных моделей развития на глобальном уровне через целенаправленную деятельность и повестку международных организаций. В настоящее время легитимность как самого процесса продвижения глобального неолиберализма, так и его результатов выглядит противоречивой и широко оспаривается. Данный процесс сопровождался продолжительной эрозией государственного суверенитета, мандатов и полномочий национальных государств. Как результат - «вакуум» в их способности полноценно реализовывать доктрину суверенного государства. Однако сегодня в условиях перехода к многополярному миропорядку государства вновь заявляют о необходимости реализации суверенных подходов к собственному развитию, активно формируя альтернативные неолиберализму стратегии и оперативные планы развития. Проанализированы неолиберальные модели вмешательства в дела государств, а также те сферы, где произошло наибольшее ослабление государственных полномочий. Выдвигается тезис о необходимости формулирования государствами независимых национальных моделей развития, альтернативных насаждаемым неолиберальным программам. Это предполагает обеспечение широких идеологических и философских основ и понимания сути суверенного развития. Для разработки и реализации оперативных планов по возрождению функциональных возможностей национальных государств важно восстановить соответствующие знания и практические навыки, платформы и средства. Представляется, что именно это позволит национальным государствам сформулировать собственные стратегии развития в условиях динамично формирующейся многополярности. Сделан особый акцент на доктрину суверенного государства в сфере экономики. Однако подобный подход может и должен применяться в смежных сферах социального и политического развития.

sovereign state doctrineneoliberalismglobalismsovereign economic developmentinternational organizationsсуверенная государственная доктринанеолиберализмглобализмсуверенное экономическое развитиемеждународные организацииAbelson, D. E. (2002). Do think tanks matter? Assessing the impact of public policy institutes. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Дегтерев Д. А. Содействие международному развитию. Эволюция международно-правовых режимов и эффективность внешней помощи. Москва : Ленанд, 2013.Barrientos, A., & Powell, M. (2004). The route map of the Third Way. In S. Hale, W. Leggett & L. Martell (Eds.), The Third Way and beyond: Criticisms, futures, alternatives (pp. 9-27). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Дементьев В. Е., Устюжанина Е. В. Проблема власти с точки зрения институционального подхода // Журнал институциональных исследований. 2016. Т. 8, № 3. С. 91—101. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.3.091-101Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K., & Richard, J.-F. (2003). Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. European Economic Review, 47(1), 165-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00196-9Маньшин Р. В., Гафари А. Л. Инвестиционное сотрудничество России и Индии // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика. 2021. Т. 29, № 3. С. 490—501. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2021-29-3-490-501Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2000). Globalization, four paths of internationalization and domestic policy change: The case of ecoforestry in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 3(1), 67-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900000044Abelson D. E. Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Montreal : McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002.Blagescu, M., & Young, J. (2006). Capacity development for policy advocacy: Current thinking and approaches among agencies supporting civil society organisations. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper, (260), 1-50. Retrieved from https://www.gichd.org/fileadmin/GICHD-resources/rec-documents/Capacity-Development-for-Policy-Advocacy.pdfBarrientos A., Powell M. The Route Map of the Third Way // The Third Way and Beyond: Criticisms, Fu-tures, Alternatives / ed. by S. Hale, W. Leggett, L. Martell. Manchester : Manchester University Press, 2004. P. 9—27.Boas, M., & McNeill, D. (Eds.). (2004). Global institutions and development: Framing the world? London: Routledge.Berkowitz D., Pistor K., Richard J.-F. Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect // Europe-an Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 47, no. 1. P. 165—195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00196-9Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2008). Institutional stickiness and the New Development Economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(2), 331-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00573.xBernstein S., Cashore B. Globalization, Four Paths of Internationalization and Domestic Policy Change: The Case of Ecoforestry in British Columbia, Canada // Canadian Journal of Political Science. 2000. Vol. 3, no. 1. P. 67—99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900000044Buchanan, A., & Keohane, O. R. (2005). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.xBlagescu M., Young J. Capacity Development for Policy Advocacy: Current Thinking and Approaches Among Agencies Supporting Civil Society Organisations // Overseas Development Institute Working Paper. 2006. No. 260. P. 1—50. URL: https://www.gichd.org/fileadmin/GICHD-resources/rec-documents/Capacity-Development-for-Policy-Advocacy.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2022).Busch, P. O., & Jörgens, H. (2004). The international sources of policy convergence: Explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 860-884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161514Boettke P. J., Coyne C. J., Leeson P. T. Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2008. Vol. 67, no. 2. P. 331—358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00573.xCisse, O. (2008). Mineral policy in developing countries: Copy and paste? CEPMLP Annual Review, (12), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.dundee.ac.uk/download/17271/mediaBuchanan A., Keohane O. R. The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions // Ethics & International Affairs. 2005. Vol. 20, no. 4. P. 405—437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.xClark, I. (2003). Legitimacy in a global order. Review of International Studies, 29(S1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503005904Busch P. O., Jörgens H. The International Sources of Policy Convergence: Explaining the Spread of Envi-ronmental Policy Innovations // Journal of European Public Policy. 2004. Vol. 12, no. 5. P. 860—884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161514Court, J., Hovland, I., & Young, J. (2005). Bridging research and policy: Evidence and the change process. Rugby: ITDG Publishing.Cisse O. Mineral Policy in Developing Countries: Copy and Paste? // CEPMLP Annual Review. 2008. No. 12. P. 1—15. URL: https://www.dundee.ac.uk/download/17271/media (accessed: 15.09.2022).D’Aspremont, E., & de Brabandere, A. (2011). The complementary faces of legitimacy in international law: The legitimacy of origin and the legitimacy of exercise. Fordham International Law Journal, 34(2), 190-235.Clark I. Legitimacy in a Global Order // Review of International Studies. 2003. Vol. 29, no. S1. P. 75—95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503005904Deacon, B. (2007). Global social policy & governance. London: Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446212219Court J., Hovland I., Young J. Bridging Research and Policy: Evidence and the Change Process. Rugby : ITDG Publishing, 2005.Degterev, D. A. (2011). International development assistance: Evolution of international legal regimes and effectiveness of foreign aid. Moscow: Lenand publ. (In Russian).D’Aspremont E., De Brabandere A. The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Le-gitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise // Fordham International Law Journal. 2011. Vol. 34, no. 2. P. 190—235.Degterev, D., & Kurylev, K. (Eds.). (2019). Foreign policies of the CIS states: A comprehensive reference. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626378087Deacon B. Global Social Policy & Governance. London : Sage, 2007. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446212219Dementiev, V. E., & Ustyuzhanina, E. V. (2016). The problem of power: Institutional approach. Journal of Institutional Studies, 8(3), 91-101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.3.091-101Dolowitz D., Marsh D. Who Learns What From Whom? A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature // Politi-cal Studies. 1996. Vol. 44, no. 2. P. 343—357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.xDolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.xDomjahn T. What (if Anything) Can Developing Countries Learn from South Korea? // Asian Culture and History. 2013. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 16—24. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v5n2p16Domjahn, T. (2013). What (if anything) can developing countries learn from South Korea? Asian Culture and History, 5(2), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v5n2p16Drezner D. W. Globalization and Policy Convergence // International Studies Review. 2001. Vol. 3, no. 1. P. 53—78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00225Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review, 3(1), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00225Duan Y., Nie W., Coakes E. Identifying Key Factors Affecting Transnational Knowledge Transfer // Infor-mation & Management. 2010. Vol. 47, no. 7—8. P. 356—363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.08.003Duan, Y., Nie, W., & Coakes, E. (2010). Identifying key factors affecting transnational knowledge transfer. Information & Management, 47(7-8), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.08.003Dunning T., Pop-Eleches G. From Transplants to Hybrids: Exploring Institutional Pathways to Growth // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2004. Vol. 38, no. 4. P. 3—29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686326Dunning, T., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2004). From transplants to hybrids: Exploring institutional pathways to growth. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686326Evans P. Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls of Monocropping and Potentials of Deliberation // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2004. Vol. 38, no. 4. P. 30—53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686327Evans, P. (2004). Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 30-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686327Foreign Policies of the CIS States: A Comprehensive Reference / ed. by D. Degterev, K. Kurylev. Boulder : Lynne Rienner, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626378087Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019). The politics of policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1245-1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12326Gilardi F., Wasserfallen F. The Politics of Policy Diffusion // European Journal of Political Research. 2019. Vol. 58, no. 4. P. 1245—1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12326Goderis, B., & Versteeg, M. (2013). Transnational constitutionalism: A conceptual framework. In D. J. Galligan & M. Versteeg (Eds.), Social and political foundations of constitutions (pp. 103-133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507509.007Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World? / ed. by M. Boas, D. McNeill. London : Routledge, 2004.Hausmann, R., Pritchett, L., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Growth accelerations. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(4), 303-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-005-4712-0Goderis B., Versteeg M. Transnational Constitutionalism: A Conceptual Framework // Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions / ed. by D. J. Galligan, M. Versteeg. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 103—133. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507509.007Hennink, M., & Stephenson, R. (2005). Using research to inform health policy: Barriers and strategies in developing countries. Journal of Health Communication, 10(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590915128Hausmann R., Pritchett L., Rodrik D. Growth Accelerations // Journal of Economic Growth. 2005. Vol. 10, no. 4. P. 303—329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-005-4712-0Holzinger, K., Knill, C., & Sommerer, T. (2008). Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization, 62(4), 553-587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830808020XHennink M., Stephenson R. Using Research to Inform Health Policy: Barriers and Strategies in Developing Countries // Journal of Health Communication. 2005. Vol. 10, no. 2. P. 163—180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590915128Jacoby, W. (2008). Minority traditions and post-communist politics: How do IGOs matter? In M. A. Orenstein, S. Bloom & N. Lindstrom (Eds.), Transnational actors in Central and East European transitions (pp. 56-76). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zwb44Holzinger K., Knill C., Sommerer T. Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Har-monization, Transnational Communication, and Regulatory Competition // International Organization. 2008. Vol. 62, no. 4. P. 553—587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830808020XJones, N., & Young, J. (2007). Setting the scene: Situating DFID’s research funding policy and practice in an international comparative perspective. London: Overseas Development Institute.Jacoby W. Minority Traditions and Post-Communist Politics: How Do IGOs Matter? // Transnational Actors in Central and East European Transitions / ed. by M. A. Orenstein, S. Bloom, N. Lindstrom. Pitts-burgh : University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008. P. 56—76. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zwb44Jones, N., Jones, H., Steer, L., & Datta, A. (2008). Improving impact evaluation production and use. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper, (300), 1-78. Retrieved from https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/4158.pdfJones N., Jones H., Steer L., Datta A. Improving Impact Evaluation Production and Use // Overseas Devel-opment Institute Working Paper. 2008. No. 300. P. 1—78. URL: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/4158.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2022).Jörgens, H. (2004). Governance by diffusion: Implementing global norms through cross-national imitation and learning. In W. M. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function (pp. 246-283). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421700.00017Jones N., Young J. Setting the Scene: Situating DFID’s Research Funding Policy and Practice in an Interna-tional Comparative Perspective. London : Overseas Development Institute, 2007.Kahler, M. (2009). Global governance redefined. In A. Sobel (Ed.), Challenges of globalization: Immigration, social welfare, global governance (pp. 174-198). London: Routledge.Jörgens H. Governance by Diffusion: Implementing Global Norms through Cross-National Imitation and Learning // Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function / ed. by W. M. Lafferty. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2004. P. 246—283. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421700.00017Kelley, J. (2004). Ethnic politics in Europe: The power of norms and incentives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Kahler M. Global Governance Redefined // Challenges of Globalization: Immigration, Social Welfare, Global Governance / ed. by A. Sobel. London : Routledge, 2009. P. 174—198.Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161332Kelley J. Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2004.Kramer, A., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2014). The global policy network behind integrated water resources management: Is it an effective norm diffusor? Ecology and Society Research, 19(4), 11.Knill C. Introduction: Cross-National Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors // Journal of European Public Policy. 2005. Vol. 12, no. 5. P. 764—774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161332Kurylev, K., Degterev, D., Smolik, N., & Stanis, D. (2018). A quantitative analysis of geopolitical pluralism in the post-Soviet space. International Organisations Research Journal, 13(1), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-01-08Kramer A., Pahl-Wostl C. The Global Policy Network Behind Integrated Water Resources Management: Is It an Effective Norm Diffusor? // Ecology and Society Research. 2014. Vol. 19, no. 4. P. 1—12.Lazer, D. (2001). Regulatory interdependence and international governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 474-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056077Kurylev K., Degterev D., Smolik N., Stanis D. A Quantitative Analysis of Geopolitical Pluralism in the Post-Soviet Space // International Organisations Research Journal. 2018. Vol. 13, no. 1. P. 134—156. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-01-08Leimgruber, M. (2012). The historical roots of a diffusion process: The three-pillar doctrine and European pension debates (1972-1994). Global Social Policy, 12(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018111431668Lazer D. Regulatory Interdependence and International Governance // Journal of European Public Policy. 2001. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 474—492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056077Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338797Leimgruber M. The Historical Roots of a Diffusion Process: The Three-Pillar Doctrine and European Pension Debates (1972—1994) // Global Social Policy. 2012. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 24—44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018111431668Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development policy. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Levi M., Sacks A., Tyler T. Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs // American Behav-ioral Scientist. 2009. Vol. 53, no. 3. P. 354—375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338797Maggetti, M. (2009). The role of independent regulatory agencies in policy-making: A comparative analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802662854Lin J. Y. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development Policy. Washington, D.C. : World Bank, 2012.Maggetti, M. (2010). Legitimacy and accountability of independent regulatory agencies: A critical review. Living Reviews in Democracy, 2, 1-10.Maggetti M. Legitimacy and Accountability of Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Critical Review // Living Reviews in Democracy. 2010. Vol. 2. P. 1—10.Manshin, R. V., & Ghafari, A. L. (2021). Investment cooperation between Russia and India. RUDN Journal of Economics, 29(3), 490-501. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2021-29-3-490-501Maggetti M. The Role of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Policy-Making: A Comparative Analysis // Journal of European Public Policy. 2009. Vol. 16, no. 3. P. 450—470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802662854Margulis, M. E. (2021). Intervention by international organizations in regime complexes. The Review of International Organizations, 16(4), 871-902 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09403-zMargulis M. E. Intervention by International Organizations in Regime Complexes // The Review of Interna-tional Organizations. 2021. Vol. 16, no. 4. P. 871—902 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09403-zMerrien, F. X. (2001). The World Bank’s new social policies: Pensions. International Social Science Journal, 53(170), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00343Merrien F. X. The World Bank’s New Social Policies: Pensions // International Social Science Journal. 2001. Vol. 53, no. 170. P. 537—550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00343Minogue, M. (2002). Governance-based analysis of regulation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(4), 649-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00209Minogue M. Governance-based Analysis of Regulation // Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2002. Vol. 73, no. 4. P. 649—666. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00209Moran, T. H. (2011). Foreign direct investment and development: Launching a second generation of policy research: Avoiding the mistakes of the first, re-evaluating policies for developed and developing countries. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Moran T. H. Foreign Direct Investment and Development: Launching a Second Generation of Policy Re-search: Avoiding the Mistakes of the First, Re-Evaluating Policies for Developed and Developing Coun-tries. Washington, D.C. : Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2011.Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.xPotoski M., Prakash A. Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms’ Regulatory Compli-ance // American Journal of Political Science. 2005. Vol. 49, no. 2. P. 235—248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.xReinicke, W. H., Deng, F., Witte, J. M., et al. (2000). Critical choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Reinicke W. H., Deng F., Witte J. M., Benner T. et al. Critical Choices: The United Nations, Networks, and the Future of Global Governance. Ottawa : International Development Research Centre, 2000.Risse, T. (2006). Transnational governance and legitimacy. In A. Benz & Y. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Governance and democracy: Comparing national, European and international experiences (pp. 179-199). London: Routledge.Risse T. Transnational Governance and Legitimacy // Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, Eu-ropean and International Experiences / ed. by A. Benz, Y. Papadopoulos. London : Routledge, 2006. P. 179—199.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5th edition. New York: Free Press.Rogers E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition. New York : Free Press, 2003.Rosenau, J. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13-43.Rosenau J. Governance in the Twenty-first Century // Global Governance. 1995. Vol. 1, no. 1. P. 13—43.Scott, C. (2010). Regulatory governance and the challenge of constitutionalism. In D. Oliver, T. Prosser & R. Rawlings (Eds.), The regulatory state: Constitutional implications (pp. 15-33). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593170.003.0002Scott C. Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism // The Regulatory State: Constitu-tional Implications / ed. by D. Oliver, T. Prosser, R. Rawlings. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010. P. 15—33. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593170.003.0002Stallings, B. (2007). The globalization of capital flows: Who benefits? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206297918Stallings B. The Globalization of Capital Flows: Who Benefits? // The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2007. Vol. 610, no. 1. P. 201—216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206297918Stiglitz, J. (2001). Redefining the role of the state: Joseph Stiglitz on building a “post-Washington consensus”. An Interview with introduction by Brian Snowdon. World Economics, 2(3), 45-86.Stiglitz J. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York : Norton & Company, 2002.Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton & Company.Stiglitz J. Redefining the Role of the State: Joseph Stiglitz on Building a “post-Washington Consensus”. An Interview with introduction by Brian Snowdon // World Economics. 2001. Vol. 2, no. 3. P. 45—86.Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760410001694291Stone D. Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the ‘Transnationalization’ of Policy // Journal of European Public Policy. 2004. Vol. 11, no. 3. P. 545—566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760410001694291Sumkoski, G. (2016). Towards socio-economic theory and practice of regulation. Evidence from OECD countries and Bangladesh. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1254840Sumkoski G. Building Reform Capacity // Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance / ed. by A. Farazmand. Cham : Springer, 2017. P. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3306-2Sumkoski, G. (2017). Building reform capacity. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1-6). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3306-2Sumkoski G. Towards Socio-Economic Theory and Practice of Regulation. Evidence from OECD Countries and Bangladesh // Cogent Social Sciences. 2016. Vol. 2, no. 1. P. 1—22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1254840Sutinen, J. G., & Kuperan, L. (1999). A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(1/2/3), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229569Sutinen J. G., Kuperan L. A Socio-Economic Theory of Regulatory Compliance // International Journal of Social Economics. 1999. Vol. 26, no. 1/2/3. P. 174—193. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229569Trein, P. (2015). Literature report: A review of policy learning in five strands of political science research. INSPIRES Working Paper Series, (26), 1-22. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2707344Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action / ed. by R. Weaver. London : Sage, 2000.True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00181Trein P. Literature Report: A Review of Policy Learning in Five Strands of Political Science Research // IN-SPIRES Working Paper Series. 2015. No. 26. P. 1—22. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2707344 (accessed: 15.09.2022).Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.True J., Mintrom M. Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming // International Studies Quarterly. 2001. Vol. 45, no. 1. P. 27—57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00181Uhlin, A. (2010). Democratic legitimacy of transnational actors: Mapping out the conceptual terrain. In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (Eds.), Legitimacy beyond the state? (pp. 16-37). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283251_2Tyler T. R. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1990.Vachudova, M. A. (2005). Europe undivided: Democracy, leverage, & integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199241198.001.0001Uhlin A. Democratic Legitimacy Of Transnational Actors: Mapping Out the Conceptual Terrain // Legitima-cy Beyond the State? / ed. by E. Erman, A. Uhlin. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. P. 16—37. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283251_2Verger, A., Novelli, M., & Kosar Altinyelken, H. (2012). Global education policy and international development: An introductory framework. In A. Verger, M. Novelli & H. Kosar Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp. 3-32). London: Bloomsbury.Vachudova M. A. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, & Integration after Communism. Oxford : Ox-ford University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199241198.001.0001Weaver, R. (Ed.). (2000). Think tanks and civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action. London: Sage.Verger A., Novelli M., Kosar Altinyelken H. Global Education Policy and International Development: An In-troductory Framework // Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies / ed. by A. Verger, M. Novelli, H. Kosar Altinyelken. London : Bloomsbury, 2012. P. 3—32.Weyland, K. (2005). Theories of policy diffusion lessons from Latin American pension reform. World Politics, 57(2), 262-295. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0019Weyland K. Theories of Policy Diffusion Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform // World Politics. 2005. Vol. 57, no. 2. P. 262—295. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0019Young, O. R. (1979). Compliance and public authority. New York: RFF Press.Young O. R. Compliance and Public Authority. New York : RFF Press, 1979.