<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-0660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-0679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">30683</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-126-141</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEMATIC DOSSIER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЕ ДОСЬЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Eurasian Connectivity: Interests of Regional and Great Powers</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Связанность Евразии: интересы региональных и великих держав</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-4854</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>Shoaib</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хан</surname><given-names>Шоайб</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, President, ALFAAZ Education and Cultural Society, Mumbai; Visiting Faculty, Centre for Central Eurasian Studies, University of Mumbai</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>президент Образовательного и культурного центра ALFAAZ; приглашенный преподаватель Центра исследований Центральной Евразии Мумбайского университета</p></bio><email>shoaibk_92in@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">ALFAAZ Education and Cultural Society</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Образовательный и культурный центр ALFAAZ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of Mumbai</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Мумбайский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-03-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Eurasian Ideology and Eurasian Integration</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Евразийская идеология и евразийская интеграция</issue-title><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>141</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-03-30"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2022, Khan S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2022, Хан Ш.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khan S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хан Ш.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/30683">https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/30683</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">This article analyses the structure of trading networks in Eurasia and raises important questions on the relationship between these networks and the geopolitical contexts they navigate. Obviously, the geopolitical ambitions of multiple nation-states directly affect the lives and activities of the traders. Besides, nation-states also seek to instrumentally use the trading networks and communities that operate across their territories in order to expand their geopolitical reach and influence. The ultimate goal of these efforts is to dismantle trade barriers among regional players and invigorate intra-regional trade and investments in such a spirit that it would serve their interests. This leaves researchers and analysts wondering whether there is a need for connectivity in Eurasia and how it can be achieved. Which countries are participating in these projects, and what strategies have they adopted? In this article, the author answers the above questions with the help of the relevant maps reflecting the geopolitical interests of major powers and trade statistical reports. The author analyses the institutional arrangements and frameworks created by regional and great powers of Eurasia with special focus on the ambitions of Russia, the European Union, China, Central Asian states, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, and India. Neighboring states may take up an interest in developing overland and maritime trade routes. However, to unlock the potential of regional economic cooperation there are conditions to fulfill, such as favorable economic context and political circumstances or the decision by the governments striving to unlock the potential of their economies through cooperation with the neighbors. Naturally, the Eurasian space has room for most players to participate rather than be self-sufficient, with all of them standing to benefit from increased connectivity. Thus, this article offers a broad note on connectivity issues in Eurasia, which denotes physical and non-physical linkages between continental geographies, polities, economies, and populations. Despite the potential benefits of securing a higher level of connectivity in Eurasia, related initiatives have become a competitive factor. Eurasian powers, both great and regional, have made no secret of their goals to reshape regional and continental integration in accordance with their interests.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Анализируется структура торговых сетей Евразии, и поднимаются важные вопросы в отношении взаимосвязи этих сетей и геополитического контекста, в котором они развиваются. Геополитические амбиции национальных государств напрямую воздействуют на международную торговлю. Кроме того, все государства стремятся к тому, чтобы использовать существующие торговые сети, проходящие через их территорию, в целях расширения своих геополитических возможностей и влияния. Конечной целью таких усилий является ликвидация торговых барьеров между странами региона и активизация внутрирегиональной торговли и инвестиционных потоков так, чтобы они соответствовали интересам стран-инициаторов. Исследователи и аналитики задаются вопросом, есть ли реальная необходимость в укреплении связанности Евразии и каким образом эта цель может быть достигнута? Какие страны участвуют в подобных проектах и какие стратегии применяют? В статье предпринимается попытка ответить на эти вопросы, используя картографический материал, отражающий геополитические интересы ключевых держав, а также статистические материалы по региональной торговле. В авторском анализе делается акцент на институциональные структуры, созданные ведущими региональными и великими державами континента при особом внимании к России, Европейскому союзу, Китаю, государствам Центральной Азии, Турции, Ирану, Пакистану и Индии. Соседние государства могут быть заинтересованы в развитии сухопутных и морских торговых путей. Однако для того чтобы раскрыть потенциал подобных инициатив, необходима совокупность условий, в частности благоприятный экономический и политический контекст, приверженность инициаторов раскрытию потенциала сотрудничества с соседями. Очевидно, на евразийском пространстве существует достаточно возможностей для развития сотрудничества всех заинтересованных держав, каждая из которых выиграет от увеличения связанности континента. Представлен широкий обзор проблем связанности Евразии, рассматриваются узлы связей географических, политических, экономических и демографических структур континента. Несмотря на потенциальные выгоды, существующие инициативы, призванные увеличить связанность Евразии, из-за различий в подходах инициаторов среди региональных и великих держав континента стали фактором конкуренции, поскольку державы континента стремятся перестроить в соответствии со своими интересами процессы региональной и континентальной интеграции на евразийском пространстве.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Eurasia</kwd><kwd>connectivity</kwd><kwd>Russia</kwd><kwd>Central Asia</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>European Union</kwd><kwd>Turkey</kwd><kwd>Iran</kwd><kwd>South Asia</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Евразия</kwd><kwd>связанность</kwd><kwd>Россия</kwd><kwd>Центральная Азия</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd><kwd>Европейский союз</kwd><kwd>Турция</kwd><kwd>Иран</kwd><kwd>Южная Азия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Arase, D. (2015). China’s two silk roads initiative: What it means for Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, (2015), 25-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Atlı, A. (2018). Turkey as a Eurasian transport hub: Prospects for inter-regional partnership. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 23(2), 117-134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bossuyt, F., &amp; Bolgova, I. (2020). Connecting Eurasia: Is cooperation between Russia, China, and the EU in Central Asia possible? In M. Lagutina (Ed.), Regional integration and future cooperation initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union (pp. 234-250). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1950-9.ch013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Chan, M. H. T. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative - the New Silk Road: A research agenda. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 104-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1580407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Diesen, G. (2021). Europe as the Western Peninsula of Greater Eurasia: Geoeconomic regions in a multipolar world. London: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Diesen, G. (Ed.). (2017). Russia’s geoeconomic strategy for a Greater Eurasia. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212227</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Erixon, F., &amp; Srinivasan, K. (Eds.). (2015). Europe in Emerging Asia: Opportunities and obstacles in political and economic encounters. London: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Erşen, E., &amp; Köstem, S. (Eds.). (2019). Turkey’s pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and foreign policy in a changing world order. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Fawn, R. (2021). ‘Not here for geopolitical interests or games’: The EU’s 2019 strategy and the regional and inter-regional competition for Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2021.1951662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Gvosdev, N. K., &amp; Marsh, C. (2014). Russian foreign policy: Interests, vectors, and sectors. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335391</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Korybko, A., &amp; Morozov, V. M. (2020). Pakistan’s role in Russia’s Greater Eurasian partnership. Polis. Political Studies, (3), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.03.02</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Laruelle, M. (2018). Introduction. China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Quo vadis? In M. Laruelle (Ed.), China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its impact in Central Asia (pp. x-xii). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, M. W., &amp; Wigen, K. (1997). The myth of continents: A critique of metageography. Berkeley: University of California Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Libman, A., &amp; Vinokurov, E. (2021). One Eurasia or many? Regional interconnections and connectivity projects on the Eurasian continent. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Maçães, B. (2018). The dawn of Eurasia: On the trail of the new world order. New Haven: Yale University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Mahmood, T. (1996). Pakistan and Central Asia. Eurasian Studies, 3(4), 79-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Marsden, M. (2021). Inter-Asian corridor of connectivity (1): The Eurasian world - China, Russia, Ukraine and Western Europe. In M. Marsden (Ed.), Beyond the Silk roads (pp. 56-85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974387.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Pomfret, R. (2021). The Eurasian landbridge: Implications of linking East Asia and Europe by rail. Research in Globalization, 3, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Purushothaman, U., &amp; Unnikrishnan, N. (2019). A tale of many roads: India’s approach to connectivity projects in Eurasia. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 75(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418821488</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Sahakyan, M. D., &amp; Gärtner, H. (Eds.). (2021). China and Eurasia: Rethinking cooperation and contradictions in the era of changing world order. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, V. (Ed.). (2018). Turkey: Towards a Eurasian shift? Milan: Ledizioni LediPublishing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Trenin, D. (2009). Russia’s spheres of interest, not influence. The Washington Quarterly, 32(4), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636600903231089</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Vasilyeva, N. A., &amp; Lagutina, M. L. (2016). The Russian project of Eurasian integration: Geopolitical prospects. Lanham: Lexington Books.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Vinokurov, E. (2018). Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92825-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Walcott, S. M., &amp; Johnson, C. (Eds.). (2013). Eurasian corridors of interconnection: From the South China to the Caspian Sea. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796443</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
