<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-0660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-0679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">26779</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-2-304-324</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>国际经济关系</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The U.S. and China in India’s Foreign Economic Policy: In Quest of Balance for Maintaining Strategic Autonomy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>США и Китай во внешнеэкономической политике Индии: в поисках баланса для сохранения стратегической автономии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-6625</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Galistcheva</surname><given-names>Natalia Valerievna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Галищева</surname><given-names>Наталья Валерьевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Dr. of Sc. (Economics), Head, Department of International Relations, School of International Relations</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор экономических наук, заведующая кафедрой мировой экономики</p></bio><email>galistcheva@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0738-4660</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nebolsina</surname><given-names>Elena Vakhtangovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Небольсина</surname><given-names>Елена Вахтанговна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department No. 2 of the English Language, School of International Economic Relations</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, доцент кафедры английского языка № 2</p></bio><email>e.nebolsina@inno.mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный институт международных отношений МИД России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-06-22" publication-format="electronic"><day>22</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Intensifying U.S. — Сhina Strategic Rivalry and the Transformation of the Global Order</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Нарастающее стратегическое соперничество между США и КНР  и трансформация глобального миропорядка</issue-title><fpage>304</fpage><lpage>324</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-06-22"><day>22</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Galistcheva N.V., Nebolsina E.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Галищева Н.В., Небольсина Е.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Galistcheva N.V., Nebolsina E.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Галищева Н.В., Небольсина Е.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/26779">https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/26779</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The paper investigates trade and investment relations between India and its two major trading partners, viz. the U.S. and China in the 2000-2010s. On the basis of mixed method research with equal use of quantitative and qualitative, as well as historical and statistical methods, the authors estimate the possibilities for expanding interstate interactions and the difficulties the countries might face. By comparing the scale and particulars of the product structure of Indo-American and Indo-Chinese trade, the authors reveal that intra-industry trade between India and the United States is at a fairly high level, which, in turn, is not typical for the trade between India and China, which is mostly inter-industry due to the sluggish cooperation of Indian and Chinese entrepreneurs. The authors assess the intensity of the Indo-American and Indo-Chinese bilateral trade between 2000-2018 by means of indices of intensity of India’s exports and imports to / from the USA and China, as well as indices of intensity of exports and imports of its partners to / from India. The obtained results outline the upward trend of the share of Indian exports to the U.S. relative to other countries, which indicates that India is successfully conquering the U.S. market, and Indian goods are becoming increasingly competitive. Meanwhile, the volume of Indian-Chinese trade remains on a much lower level than it could be expected with the current share of India in the world trade. In the meantime, neither for the United States nor for China, India is a dominant partner. The article also investigates major obstacles hindering the development of both Indo-American and Indo-Chinese bilateral relations. The obtained results enable the authors to predict that in the short- and mid-term economic cooperation between India and its leading partners is likely to strengthen, with India keeping striving for standing neuter while building the two most crucial vectors of its foreign economic policy.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Анализируются основные аспекты экономического сотрудничества Индии со своими ведущими партнерами - США и Китаем в 2000-2010-е гг. Исследование проведено с помощью смешанного метода научного познания, интегрирующего количественные и качественные методы. На основе исторического и статистического методов проведена оценка возможностей расширения их взаимодействия и трудностей, с которыми страны могут столкнуться. Авторы сравнили масштабы и особенности товарной структуры индо-американской и индо-китайской торговли, что позволило прийти к следующим выводам. Внутриотраслевая торговля между Индией и США находится на довольно высоком уровне. В свою очередь, это нетипично для взаимодействия между Индией и Китаем, которое носит межотраслевой характер, являющийся следствием слабой кооперации индийских и китайских предпринимателей. Дана оценка интенсивности индо-американской и индо-китайской взаимной торговли в период 2000-2018 гг. Результаты, полученные на основе расчетов индексов интенсивности экспорта и импорта Индии в / из США и КНР, а также индексов интенсивности экспорта и импорта ее партнеров в / из Индии, свидетельствуют о том, что в настоящее время Индия успешно завоевывает американский рынок, и конкурентоспособность ее товаров на нем неуклонно возрастает. Вместе с тем объем индо-китайского товарооборота остается гораздо ниже возможного при нынешнем участии Индии в мировой торговле. Между тем ни для США, ни для Китая Индия не является ведущим партнером. Также проводится анализ основных проблем как индо-американских, так и индо-китайских двусторонних отношений. В заключение подчеркивается, что в кратко- и среднесрочной перспективе экономическое сотрудничество между Индией и ее ведущими партнерами, вероятнее всего, будет лишь углубляться, а найденный ею разумный баланс при выстраивании двух важнейших векторов ее внешнеэкономической политики сохранится.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>India</kwd><kwd>U.S</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>Indo-Pacific Region</kwd><kwd>trade and economic cooperation</kwd><kwd>investment</kwd><kwd>D. Trump</kwd><kwd>N. Modi</kwd><kwd>trade intensity index</kwd><kwd>Grubel-Lloyd index</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Индия</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd><kwd>Индо-Тихоокеанский регион (ИТР)</kwd><kwd>торгово-экономическое сотрудничество</kwd><kwd>инвестиции</kwd><kwd>Д. Трамп</kwd><kwd>Н. Моди</kwd><kwd>индекс интенсивности торговли</kwd><kwd>индекс Грубеля-Ллойда</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arapova, E.Ya. (2018). China: trends of international interaction amid contemporary challenges. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 62(6), 77—85. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-6-77-85</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Арапова Е.Я. Китай: международное взаимодействие в условиях внутренних вызовов // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2018. Т. 62. № 6. С. 77-85. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-6-77-85</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baral, J.K. (2012). Conflict and cooperation in India — China relations. Journal of Defence Studies, 6(2), 78—93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Васильев В.С. Экономический подъем США в 2017-2019 гг.: фактор Д. Трампа // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. 2019. № 4. С. 1-1. DOI: 10.18254/S207054760008140-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown, A.J. (1947). Applied economics: Aspects of the world economy in war and peace. London: G. Allen &amp; Unwin.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Галищева Н.В. Индия в мировом хозяйстве на рубеже веков: внешнеэкономические связи и внешнеэкономическая политика. М.: Буки Веди, 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chellaney, B. (2009). Coming water wars. The International Economy, Fall, 1—2. Retrieved from http://www.international-economy.com/TIE_F09_Chellaney.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гарусова Л.Н. Индия и США: формирования Индо-Тихоокеанского геополитического пространства // Труды Института истории, археологии и этнографии ДВО РАН. 2018. Т. 18. С. 65-84.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chellaney, B. (2013). Rising powers, rising tensions: The troubled China — India relations. SAIS Review, 32(2), 99—108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Корнеев А.В. Устойчивое развитие и проблемы выхода США из Парижского соглашения по климату // Экономика США в XXI веке: вызовы и тенденции развития / под ред. В.Б. Супяна. М.: Институт США и Канады РАН, «Весь Мир», 2018. С. 363-384.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galistcheva, N.V. (2013). India in the world economy at the turn of the century: International economic ties and external economic policy. Moscow: BukiVedi publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лебедева Л.Ф. Внешнеторговая политика Д. Трампа: риски и вызовы на уровне штатов // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2020. T. 64. № 7. C. 43-48. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-43-48</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garusova, L.N. (2018). India and the United States: The formation of the Indo-Pacific geopolitical area. Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology FEB RAS, 18, 65—84. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пак Е.В. Международная внутриотраслевая торговля как фактор углубления интеграции в ЕАЭС // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. 2018. № 2. С. 95-104.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garver, J.W. (2001). Protracted contest: Sino-Indian rivalry in the Twentieth century. University of Washington Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Супян В.Б. Экономическая политика Д. Трампа: новые подходы или повторение пройденного? // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2018. № 5. С. 5-19. DOI: 10.7868/S0321206818050015</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grubel, H.G., &amp; Lloyd, P.J. (1975). Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. London: MacMillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Супян В.Б. Экономическая модель Д. Трампа: итоги и перспективы // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2020. Т. 64. № 7. С. 34-42. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-34-42</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herbert, J., McCrisken, T., &amp; Wroe, A. (2019). The ordinary presidency of Donald J. Trump. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04943-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хромова Н.Г. Алмазно-бриллиантовый комплекс Индии на мировом алмазном рынке // Азия и Африка сегодня. 2019. № 11. С. 16-21. DOI: 10.31857/S032150750007017-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson, R.B., &amp; Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14—26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чжао Чжэнь А. Перспективы Индийско-американских экономических отношений // Торговая политика. 2019. № 2. С. 61-71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khromova, N.G. (2019). The diamond complex of India in the global diamond market. Asia and Africa Today, (11), 16—21. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750007017-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baral J.K. Conflict and cooperation in India - China relations // Journal of Defence Studies. 2012. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 78-93.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kojima, K. (1964). The pattern of international trade among advanced countries. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 5(1), 16—36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown A.J. Applied economics: Aspects of the world economy in war and peace. London: G. Allen &amp; Unwin, 1947.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korneev, A.V. (2018). Sustainable development and the problems of the US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. In V.B. Supyan (Eds.), US economy in the 21st century: Challenges and development trends (pp. 363—384). Moscow: Institut SShA i Kanady RAN publ., “Ves’ Mir” publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chellaney B. Coming water wars // The International Economy. 2009. Fall. P. 1-2. URL: http://www.international-economy.com/TIE_F09_Chellaney.pdf (accessed: 12.09.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman, P.R. (1986). Strategic trade policy and new international economics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chellaney B. Rising powers, rising tensions: The troubled China - India relations // SAIS Review. 2013. Vol. 32. No. 2. P. 99-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lebedeva, L.F. (2020). Foreign trade policy under D. Trump: Risks and challenges at the state level. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 64(7), 43—48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-43-48</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garver J.W. Protracted contest: Sino-Indian rivalry in the Twentieth century. Washington: University of Washington Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li, W. &amp; Skop, E. (2010). Diaspora in the United States: Chinese and Indians compared. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 6(2), 286—310. https://doi.org/10.1163/179325410X526131</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grubel H.G., Lloyd P.J. Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. London: MacMillan, 1975.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Melitz, M.J., &amp; Ottaviano, G.I.P. (2008). Market size, trade and productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 295—316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herbert J., McCrisken T., Wroe A. The ordinary presidency of Donald J. Trump. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04943-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pak, E.V. (2018). The role of international intra-industry trade in deepening integration in the Eurasian Economic Union. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, (2), 95—104. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come // Educational Researcher. 2004. Vol. 33. No. 7. P. 14-26. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033007014</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pant, H.V., &amp; Joshi, Y. (2016). The US pivot and Indian foreign policy: Asia’s evolving balance of power. London: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-55772-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kojima K. The pattern of international trade among advanced countries // Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics. 1964. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 16-36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singh, A., Pande, A., Smith, J.M., Saran, S., Joshi, S., &amp; Lohman, W. (2018). The new India — US partnership in the Indo-Pacific: Peace, prosperity and security. Observer Research Foundation, Hudson Institute. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ORF-Heritage-Hudson.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krugman P.R. Strategic trade policy and new international economics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1986.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith, J.M. (2014). Cold peace: China — India rivalry in the Twenty-First century. Lexington Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li W., Skop E. Diaspora in the United States: Chinese and Indians compared // Journal of Chinese Overseas. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 286-310. DOI: 10.1163/179325410X526131</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Supyan, V.B. (2018). Economic policy of President Trump: New approaches or just reiteration of the past? USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, (5), 5—19. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0321206818050015</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Melitz M.J., Ottaviano G.I.P. Market size, trade and productivity // Review of Economic Studies. 2008. No. 75. P. 295-316. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Supyan, V.B. (2020). D. Trump’s economic model: Results and prospects. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 64(7), 34—42. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-34-42</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pant H.V., Joshi, Y. The US pivot and Indian foreign policy: Asia’s evolving balance of power. London: Palgrave Pivot, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-55772-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thirlwall, A.P., &amp; Pacheco-Lopez, P. (2017). Economics of development. Theory and evidence: 10th edition. Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singh A., Pande A., Smith J.M., Saran S., Joshi S., Lohman W. The new India - US partnership in the Indo-Pacific: Peace, prosperity and security. Observer Research Foundation, Hudson Institute, 2018. URL: https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ORF-Heritage-Hudson.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Todaro, M.P., &amp; Smith, S.C. (2015). Economic development: 12th edition. Harlow: Pearson.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith J.M. Cold peace: China - India rivalry in the Twenty-First century. Lexington Books, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Valli, V. (2018). The American Economy from Roosevelt to Trump. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96953-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thirlwall A.P., Pacheco-Lopez P. Economics of development. Theory and evidence: 10th edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasiliev, V.S. (2019). US economic recovery in 2017—2019: D. Trump’s factor. Russia and America in the 21th Century, (4), 1—1. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207054760008140-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Todaro M.P., Smith S.C. Economic development: 12th edition. Harlow: Pearson, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vidya, C.T., &amp; Prabheesh, K. (2019). Intra-industry trade between India and Indonesia. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 21, 511—530. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v0i0.978</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valli V. The American economy from Roosevelt to Trump. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96953-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang, H.-B., Dai, H.-Ch., Lai, H.-X., &amp; Wang, W.T. (2017). U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Reasons, impacts, and China’s response. Advances in Climate Change Research, 8(4), 220—225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.09.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vidya C.T., Prabheesh K. Intra-industry trade between India and Indonesia // Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking. 2019. Vol. 21. P. 511-530. DOI: 10.21098/bemp.v0i0.978</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhaozhen, A. (2019). Perspectives of Indian-American economic relation. Trade Policy, (2), 61—71. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang H.-B., Dai H.-Ch., Lai H.-X., Wang W.T. U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Reasons, impacts, and China’s response // Advances in Climate Change Research. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 220-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.accre.2017.09.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
