<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-0660</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2313-0679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">16771</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-3-598-611</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>双方关系历史</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">THE PROBLEM OF REVERSION OF OKINAWA IN THE US-JAPAN POSTWAR RELATIONS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ПРОБЛЕМА ВОЗВРАЩЕНИЯ ОКИНАВЫ В ЯПОНО-АМЕРИКАНСКИХ ОТНОШЕНИЯХ ПОСЛЕВОЕННОГО ПЕРИОДА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Streltsov</surname><given-names>D V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стрельцов</surname><given-names>Д В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of History, Professor, Head of the Oriental Studies Department at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA of the Russian Federation</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р ист. наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой востоковедения Московского государственного института международных отношений (Университета) Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации</p></bio><email>dmstrl@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный институт международных отношений (Университет) Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации, Москва, Россия</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">ASEAN and Inter-Regional Cooperation in Asia</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">АСЕАН и трансрегиональное сотрудничество в Азии</issue-title><fpage>598</fpage><lpage>611</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2017-09-13"><day>13</day><month>09</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2017, Streltsov D.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2017, Стрельцов Д.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Streltsov D.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Стрельцов Д.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/16771">https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/16771</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the postwar period the Okinawa problem for many years was a stumbling block in the relations between Japan and the United States, creating the risk of undermining the foundations of the alliance. In fact, Okinawa personified a deep contradiction between the diplomatic and military-strategic interests of the United States in East Asia and the national interests of Japan, for which Okinawa was a primarily domestic political problem. In the mid-1960 's, despite the increasing role of Okinawa in the American global strategy after the start of the Vietnam war, the United States came to the conclusion of the speedy reversion of Okinawa to Japan. The main obstacle for the implementation of this decision was the nuclear weapon stored in Okinawa, which played an important role in the global strategy of Pentagon. The United States managed to find an option of reversion Okinawa to Japan in 1972, under which they retained the right to store nuclear weapons in Okinawa and to transit them through the island in the case of emergency. The transfer administrative right on Okinawa to Japan was a symbolic act, by which the United States demonstrated their willingness for Japan to play a ‘responsible role’ in the alliance as an active actor, not just a junior partner.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В послевоенный период окинавский вопрос на долгие годы стал камнем преткновения в отношениях между США и Японией, рискуя подорвать основы альянса. Фактически Окинава олицетворяла собой глубокие противоречия между дипломатическими и военно-стратегическими интересами США в Восточной Азии и национальными интересами Японии, для которой Окинава представляла собой в первую очередь внутриполитическую проблему. В середине 1960-х гг., несмотря на повышение роли Окинавы в американской глобальной стратегии после начала вьетнамской войны, США пришли к выводу о необходимости скорейшей передачи Окинавы Японии. Главным препятствием на пути реализации этого решения было складированное на острове ядерное оружие, которое играло важную роль в глобальной стратегии Пентагона. США удалось найти такой вариант передачи Окинавы Японии в 1972 г., при котором они сохранили бы за собой право на хранение здесь ядерного оружия и его транзит через остров в случае чрезвычайных обстоятельств. Передача Японии административных прав на Окинаву имела символический характер. Данным шагом США продемонстрировали свое стремление к тому, чтобы Токио играло более ответственную роль в альянсе на правах полноценного члена, а не просто «младшего партнера».</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Japan</kwd><kwd>the reversion of Okinawa</kwd><kwd>‘residual sovereignty’</kwd><kwd>nuclear weapon</kwd><kwd>Vietnam war</kwd><kwd>Security Treaty</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Япония</kwd><kwd>возвращение Окинавы</kwd><kwd>«остаточный суверенитет»</kwd><kwd>ядерное оружие</kwd><kwd>вьетнамская война</kwd><kwd>Договор безопасности</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aldous, C. (2003). Achieving Reversion: Protest and Authority in Okinawa, 1952—70. Modern Asian Studies, 37 (2), 485—508. DOI: 10.1017/S0026749X03002099.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вада Х. «Хэйва кокка»-но тандзё (Рождение «мирного государства»). Токио: Иванами сётэн, 2015. (на яп. языке).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DiFilippo, A. (2006). Japan’s nuclear disarmament Policy and the U.S. security umbrella. N.Y.: Pal¬grave Macmillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коно Я., Симотомаи Н. Японо-советские отношения в условиях холодной войны (1955-1970 гг.) и территориальный вопрос в рамках треугольника СССР - США - Япония // Российско-японские отношения в формате параллельной истории. М.: МГИМО-Уни¬верситет, 2015. С. 591-620.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eldridge, R. (2001). The Origins of the Bilateral Okinawa Problem: Okinawa in Postwar U.S.-Japan Relations, 1945—1952. N.Y.: Garland Pub.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пустовойт Е.В. Законодательные меры по возвращению Окинавы в состав Японии и включе¬ние ее в интеграционные процессы в АТР // Россия и АТР. 2014. № 4 (86). С. 142-153.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hara, K. (2007). Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided Territories in the San Francisco System. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стрельцов Д.В. Внешнеполитические приоритеты Японии в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе. М.: Восточная литература, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hook G.D. (2015). The American eagle in Okinawa: the politics of contested memory and the unfi¬nished war. Japan Forum, 27 (3), p. 299—320. DOI: 10.1080/09555803.2015.1042011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aldous C. Achieving Reversion: Protest and Authority in Okinawa, 1952-70 // Modern Asian Studies. 2003. Vol. 37. N 2. P. 485-508. DOI: 10.1017/S0026749X03002099.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hook G.D., Gilson J., Hughes C.W. &amp; Hugo D. (2005). Japan’s international relations. Politics, eco¬nomics and security. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DiFilippo A. Japan’s nuclear disarmament Policy and the U.S. security umbrella. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iokibe, M. (Eds.). (2011). The Diplomatic History of Postwar Japan. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eldridge R.D. The Origins of the Bilateral Okinawa Problem: Okinawa in Postwar U.S.-Japan Rela¬tions, 1945-1952. New York: Garland Pub., 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ito, G. (2003). Alliance in anxiety: détente and the Sino-American-Japanese triangle. New York: Rout¬ledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hara K. Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided Territories in the San Francisco System. London: Routledge, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kono, Y. &amp; Simotomai, N. (2015). Japan-Soviet Relations in the Cold War Period (1955—1970) and the Territorial Issue in the Triangle the USSR — The USA — Japan. In: Russo- Japanese Relations in the Format of Parallel History. Moscow: MGIMO-University Pb., p. 591—620. (in Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hook G.D. The American eagle in Okinawa: the politics of contested memory and the unfinished war // Japan Forum. 2015. Vol. 27. Iss. 3. P. 299-320. DOI: 10.1080/09555803.2015.1042011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lie, J. (2001). Multiethnic Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hook G.D., Gilson J., Hughes C.W., Hugo D. Japan’s international relations. Politics, economics and security. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mendel, D. H. (1975). Okinawan Reversion in Retrospect. Pacific Affairs, 48 (3), 398—412.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ito G. Alliance in anxiety: détente and the Sino-American-Japanese triangle. New York: Routledge, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mitchell J. (2015). Battle scars: Okinawa and the Vietnam War. URL: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/ news/2015/03/07/national/history/forgotten-history-okinawa-vietnam-war/#.WNI2fvmLSUl (accessed 22.03.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lie J. Multiethnic Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murthy, P.A.N. (1970). Reversion of Okinawa and Japan's Future Defence Posture. China Report, 6 (1), 17—22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mendel D.H. Okinawan Reversion in Retrospect // Pacific Affairs. 1975. Vol. 48. N 3. P. 398-412.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pustovoit, E.V. (2014). The Legal Measures for the Reversion of Okinawa and its Inclusion in the In¬tegration Processes of the Asia Pacific. Rossiya i ATR, 4 (86), 142—153. (in Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mitchell J. Battle scars: Okinawa and the Vietnam War. 2015. URL: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/ news/2015/03/07/national/history/forgotten-history-okinawa-vietnam-war/#.WNI2fvmLSUl (accessed 22.03.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Strel’tsov, D.V. (2015). The Diplomatic Priorities of Japan in the Asia Pacific Region. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura. (in Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murthy P.A.N. Reversion of Okinawa and Japan’s Future Defence Posture // China Report. 1970. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. P. 17-22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Togo, K. (2005). Japan’s Foreign Policy, 1945—2003. The Quest for a Proactive Policy. Leiden, Bos¬ton: Brill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Diplomatic History of Postwar Japan / Ed. by Makoto Iokibe. London: Routledge, 2011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Varma, L. (1980). Okinawa Before and Since Reversion. International Studies, 19 (1), 43—57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002088178001900103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Togo K. Japan’s Foreign Policy, 1945-2003. The Quest for a Proactive Policy. Leiden: Brill, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wada, H. (2015). The birth of a ‘peaceful state’. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. (in Japanese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Varma L. Okinawa Before and Since Reversion // International Studies. 1980. Vol. 19. Iss. 1. P. 43-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002088178001900103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wakaizumi, K. (2002). The Best Course Available: A Personal Account of the Secret U.S.-Japan Okinawa Reversion Negotiations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wakaizumi K. The Best Course Available: A Personal Account of the Secret US-Japan Okinawa Reversion Negotiations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
