<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Информатизация образования</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2312-8631</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2312-864X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">26276</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2312-8631-2021-18-1-12-26</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIDUCTIC ASPECTS OF EDUCATION INFORMATIZATION</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ ИНФОРМАТИЗАЦИИ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Research on the differences of students’ learning styles and knowledge integration in SPOC learning: a case study of course “Basic Portuguese”</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Исследование различий стилей обучения студентов и интеграции знаний в процессе обучения в среде SPOC на примере курса «Основы португальского языка»</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ху</surname><given-names>Цзин</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Educational Sciences, lecturer, Head of the Department of Portuguese of Nankai University, researcher of the Interdisciplinary Center for Social Sciences (CICS.NOVA).</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат педагогических наук, преподаватель, заведующий кафедрой португальского языка Нанькайского университета, научный сотрудник Междисциплинарного центра социальных наук (CICS.NOVA).</p></bio><email>hujingzinha@hotmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>do Carmo Vieira</surname><given-names>Silva Maria</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>до Кармо Виейра</surname><given-names>Сильва Мария</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>retired assistant professor of the Faculty of Social and Human Sciences of the Nova University of Lisbon, researcher of the Interdisciplinary Center for Social Sciences (CICS.NOVA).</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>отставной доцент факультета социальных и гуманитарных наук Нового университета Лиссабона, научный сотрудник Междисциплинарного центра социальных наук (CICS.NOVA).</p></bio><email>carmo.vs@fcsh.unl.pt</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Nankai University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Нанькайский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">NOVA University Lisbon</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Новый университет Лиссабона</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-04-09" publication-format="electronic"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 18, NO1 (2021)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 18, №1 (2021)</issue-title><fpage>12</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-04-08"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Hu J., do Carmo Vieira S.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Ху Ц., до Кармо Виейра С.М.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Hu J., do Carmo Vieira S.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ху Ц., до Кармо Виейра С.М.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/article/view/26276">https://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/article/view/26276</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">Problem and goal. With the advent of the information age, Internet-based online learning has also become one of the learning methods chosen by many learners. They can use these online learning platforms to complete knowledge construction while learning offline. Methodology. Most studies of learning behaviors focus on the discovery of the best learning model and disregard the possible impact of different learning behaviors on knowledge construction. Therefore, based on the Felder - Silverman learning style model, this article uses the Solomon learning style scale to improve the design of the questionnaire and collect four-dimensional differential learning behaviors data. In order to further understand the influence of learning styles on the effectiveness of online learning, we also use online learning data on the Small Private Online Course platform and general cognitive intelligence knowledge integration theory to clarify the relation between learning modes and individuals’ differences. Results. This study observes and analyzes the learning behavior data of 46 students of Nankai University in the SPOC learning platform, also analyzes the differences in learning styles and knowledge construction of students in the SPOC environment. Compared with the traditional “Basic Portuguese” teaching method, the blended teaching model based on the Chaoxing Learning platform has unparalleled advantages. Interactions inside and outside the classroom, improving student participation and promoting teaching diagnosis. Conclusion. Through a comprehensive analysis of questionnaire data and online data, we found that some learning styles have different effects on the effectiveness of online learning, ignoring the individual differences of learners will still cause problems in knowledge construction.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Проблема и цель. С наступлением информационной эры многие учащиеся все чаще обращаются к онлайн-обучению и используют специализированные платформы для завершения построения знаний, занимаясь в автономном режиме. Методология. Большинство исследований обучающего поведения фокусируются на поиске наилучшей модели обучения и игнорируют возможное влияние различных форм обучения на построение знаний. Поэтому, основываясь на модели стилей обучения Фелдера - Сильвермана, в данной работе для улучшения опросника и сбора данных о поведении учащихся при четырехмерном дифференциальном обучении применялась шкала стилей обучения Соломона. Для лучшего понимания влияния стилей обучения на эффективность онлайн-обучения использовались данные об обучении на платформе небольших частных онлайн-курсов и общая теория интеграции знаний когнитивного интеллекта для выяснения связи между режимами обучения и индивидуальными различиями. Результаты. Проанализированы данные об учебном поведении 46 студентов Нанькайского университета, занимающихся на платформе SPOC, выявлены различия в стилях обучения и построении знаний студентов в среде SPOC. По сравнению с традиционным методом обучения на курсе «Основы португальского языка» смешанная модель обучения с использованием платформы Chaoxing имеет беспрецедентные преимущества. Взаимодействие внутри и вне класса положительно сказывается на вовлеченности студентов и содействует педагогической диагностике. Заключение. Установлено, что некоторые стили обучения по-разному влияют на эффективность онлайн-обучения, а игнорирование индивидуальных различий учащихся негативно отражается на построении знаний.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>SPOC</kwd><kwd>learning style</kwd><kwd>knowledge integration</kwd><kwd>differentiation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>стиль обучения</kwd><kwd>интеграция знаний</kwd><kwd>дифференциация</kwd><kwd>SPOC</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Fox A. From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM. 2013;56(12):38-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Kang SM. On learning style. Shandong Foreign Languages Journal. 2006;(3):24-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang M, Zhu J, Zou Y, Yan H, Hao D, Liu C. Educational evaluation in the PKU SPOC course “Data structures and algorithms”. L@S’15: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. Vancouver: ACM; 2015. p. 237-240.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Wang X, Wen M, Rosé CP. Towards triggering higher-order thinking behaviors in MOOCs. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics &amp; Knowledge. 2016;(4):398-407.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang W, Tao Y L. Research on flipped class of English major based on SPOC. Foreign Language Teaching. 2017;(2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang YY. Discussion on the feasibility of “Online + Offline” blended teaching in college English. Journal of Higher Education. 2018;(7):86-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Liu J, Yang J, Liao XH, Su H, Yang J. Research on the differences of learner knowledge integration in SPOC learning. China Distance Education. 2019;(1):36-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Alesandrini K, Larson L. Teachers bridge to constructivism. The Clearing House: Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 2010;75(3):118-121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Hannon B, Daneman M. A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;93(1):103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao DF, Zhu MM, Yang J. Research on the evolutionary personal knowledge graph construction and cognitive evaluation model. Modern Distance Education Research. 2017;146(2):95-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Keefe JW. School applications of the learning style concept: student learning styles. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals; 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Dembo MH, Howard K. Advice about the use of learning styles: a major myth in education. Journal of College Reading and Learning. 2007;37(2):101-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Coffield F, Moseley D, Hall E, Ecclestone K. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. 2004. Available from: https://nwresearch.wikispaces.com/file/view/Coffield%20learning%20styles.pdf/246502619/Coffield%20learning%20styles.pdf (accessed: 05.09.2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Akbulut Y, Cardak CS. Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: a content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers &amp; Education. 2012;(58):835-842.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Brown PF, Della Pietra VJ, deSouza PV, Lai JC, Mercer RL. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics. 1992;18(4):467-479.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Alshammari M, Anane R, Hendle RJ. An e-learning investigation into learning style adaptivity. The 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-48). 2015;11-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Liegle JO, Janicki TN. The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior. 2006;(22):885-898.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Feldre RM, Silverman LK. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education. 1988;78(7):674-681.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Filippidis SK, Tsoukalas IA. On the use of adaptive instructional images based on the sequential-global dimension of the Felder - Silverman learning style theory. Interactive Learning Environments. 2009;17(2):135-150.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
