<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2329</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8986</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">38560</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2329-2024-32-1-25-36</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">PFBHGW</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Developed and developing countries economy</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Экономика развитых и развивающихся стран</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">US trade and industrial policy as a challenge to the modern system of international trade relations</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Торгово-промышленная политика США как вызов современной системе международных торговых отношений</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1315-1874</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Miadzel</surname><given-names>Viktor S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мядзель</surname><given-names>Виктор Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD Student, Department of International Economic Relations, Faculty of Economics</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>аспирант, кафедра международных экономических отношений, экономический факультет</p></bio><email>myadzel.v@ya.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">RUDN University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-03-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">THE WORLD ECONOMY   IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Мировая экономика  в условиях глобальной трансформации</issue-title><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-04-02"><day>02</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Miadzel V.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Мядзель В.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Miadzel V.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Мядзель В.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/38560">https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/38560</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The current stage of development of international trade relations is followed by a growing protectionism. At the same time, the ideas of free trade and fair competition are still declared as key principles for the development of the world economy. One of the authors of these principles, as well as the entire modern system of international trade relations, is the USA. In this context, the possible refusal of the USA to comply with these principles is a serious challenge for the existing system of international trade. The author tries to answer the question if some measures of the US trade and industrial policy correspond to the basic principles of the international trade system. As an empirical basis there were used the works of Russian and foreign economists specializing in trade policy, international economic relations and the US economy. To answer the stated question about the compliance of the US trade and industrial policy with the principles of free trade and fair competition, the author uses methods of analysis and generalization to assess the nature of certain measures and mechanisms implemented in the US trade and industry. The author comes to conclusion about the protectionist nature of several legal acts and mechanisms of the US trade and industrial policy. Considering that not only certain legal acts, but also industrial programs are protectionist in nature, it should be assumed that retreat from the principles of free trade and fair competition is an element of the US position on the development of the national economy as well as international trade. The USA takes advantage of the imperfections of the existing system of international economic relations, demonstrating the use of protectionist measures contrary to the principles of free trade and fair competition.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Современный этап развития международных торговых отношений сопровождается растущим количеством протекционистских мер. В то же время идеи свободной торговли и справедливой конкуренции продолжают декларироваться в качестве ключевых принципов развития мировой экономики. Одними из авторов этих принципов, как и всей современной системы международных торговых отношений, выступали США. В этом контексте возможный отказ США от соблюдения указанных принципов является серьезным испытанием для существующей системы торгово-экономических отношений. В рамках настоящей работы автор предпринимает попытку ответить на вопрос, соответствуют ли отдельные меры торгово-промышленной политики США основным принципам современной системы международной торговли. Действительно ли одни из основателей этой системы отказываются от идей свободной торговли и справедливой конкуренции. В качестве эмпирической базы для написания настоящей работы служат труды российских и зарубежных экономистов, специализирующихся в вопросах торговой политики, международных экономических отношений и экономики США. Для ответа на поставленный вопрос о соответствии торгово-промышленной политики США принципам свободной торговли и справедливой конкуренции в настоящей работе широко используются методы анализа и обобщения, позволяющие оценить характер отдельных мер и механизмов, реализуемых в США в сфере торговли и промышленности. В рамках работы автор приходит к выводам о протекционистском характере ряда нормативных правовых актов и механизмов торгово-промышленной политики США. Учитывая, что протекционистский характер носят не только отдельные нормативные правовые акты, но и государственные программы по поддержке промышленности, следует полагать, что отступление от принципов свободной торговли и справедливой конкуренции является элементом сформированной позиции США по вопросу развития национальной экономики и внешнеторговых связей. США пользуются несовершенством существующей системы международных экономических отношений, демонстрируя применение протекционистских мер в нарушение принципов свободной торговли и справедливой конкуренции.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Trade Defense</kwd><kwd>WTO</kwd><kwd>International Trade</kwd><kwd>USA</kwd><kwd>Industry Support</kwd><kwd>Reshoring</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>торговая защита</kwd><kwd>ВТО</kwd><kwd>международная торговля</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>поддержка промышленности</kwd><kwd>решоринг</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andronova, I., &amp; Sakharov, A. (2019). G20 contribution to the trade-related sdgs implementation. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(4), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.17323/19967845-2019-04-06 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Андронова И.В., Сахаров А.Г. Вклад «Группы двадцати» в реализацию торговых задач в рамках Целей устойчивого развития // Вестник международных организаций. 2019. № 14 (4). С. 112-137. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-04-06</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Biryukova, O., &amp; Daniltsev, A. (2015). Regulation of public procurement in international trade in services. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 7, 31–41. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бирюкова О.В., Данильцев А.В. Регулирование государственных закупок в международной торговле услугами // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. 2015. № 7. С. 31-41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Build America Buy America. Office Acquisition Management. Retrieved October 24, 2023, from  https://www.commerce.gov/oam/build-america-buy-america</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гудкова Т.В., Логинова В.С. Решоринг промышленности США: цифровизация vs глобализация // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2020. № 50 (7). С. 42-60. https://doi.org/10.31857/S268667300010134-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernysheva, N. (2019). Initiation of WTO disputes. Ekonomika I Upravlenie. Problemy, Resheniya, 5(1), 108–111. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Загашвили В.С. Противоречия и конфликты в многосторонней торговой системе // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2023. № 67 (9). С. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-9-5-14</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Conconi, P., Garcia-Santana, M., Puccio, L., &amp; Venturini, R. (2018). From final goods to inputs: The protectionist effect of rules of origin. American Economic Review, 108(8), 2335–2365. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161151</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Захаров А.Н. Перспективы реиндустриализации развитых экономик (США, Канада и Австралия) // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2018. № 1 (58). С. 213-245. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2018-1-58-213-245</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Evenett, S., &amp; Hoekman, B. (2005). Government procurement: Market access, transparency, and multilateral trade rules. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.01.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Опальский А.П., Шишов Ю.В. К вопросу о новой парадигме экономической безопасности в условиях глобализации // Микроэкономика. 2019. № 5 (88). С. 100-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gudkova, T., &amp; Loginova, V. (2020). Reshoring process in the USA industry: Digitalization vs globalization. USA &amp; Canada: Economics. Politics. Culture, 7, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.31857/s268667300010134-7 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сидоров А.А. Особенности современного протекционизма США и ЕС в отношении России // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2022. № 15 (4). С. 81-101. https://doi.org/10.2 4833/2071-8160-2022-4-85-81-101</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Howse, R., &amp; Langille, J. (2023). Continuity and change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism past, present, and future. American Journal of International Law, 117(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.82</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чернышева Н.А. Инициация споров в рамках деятельности ВТО // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2019. Т. 5, № 1. С. 108-111.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luo, Y., &amp; Van, Assche, A. (2023). The rise of techno-geopolitical uncertainty: Implications of the United States Chips and science act. Journal of International Business Studies, 54, 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-023-00620-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Build America Buy America. Office Acquisition Management. URL: https://www.commerce.gov/ oam/build-america-buy-america (accessed: 24.10.2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milgram, M. (2018). Future implications of the Buy American-Hire American executive order and domestic preferences on U.S.government procurement and trade policies. The George Washington University Law School.28 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Conconi P., Garcia-Santana M., Puccio L., Venturini R. From final goods to inputs: The protectionist effect of rules of origin // American Economic Review. 2018. Vol. 108 (8). P. 2335-2365. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161151</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NME Countries List. International Trade Administration. Retrieved October 24, 2023, from  https:// trade.gov/nme-countries-list</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Evenett S.J., Hoekman B.M. Government procurement: Market access, transparency, and multilateral trade rules // European Journal of Political Economy. 2005. Vol. 21 (1). P. 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.01.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nwoke, U. (2020). Imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China: Implications for the WTO and International Trade Law. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 19(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-01-2019-0003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Howse R, Langille J. Continuity and Change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism Past, Present, and Future // American Journal of International Law. 2023. Vol. 117, no. 1. P. 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.82</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Opalskiy, A., &amp; Shishov, Yu. (2019). To the question of a new economic security paradigm in the conditions of globalization, Mikroekonomika, 5(88), 100–108. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luo Y., Van Assche A. The rise of techno-geopolitical uncertainty: Implications of the United States CHIPS and Science Act // J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2023. Vol. 54. P. 1423-1440. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-023-00620-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pan, H., &amp; Zhu, D. (2019). The «Manufacturing Reshoring» strategy in the United States and its implications to China. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2019.07.03.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milgram M. Future Implications of the Buy American-Hire American Executive Order and Domestic Preferences on U.S. Government Procurement and Trade Policies // The George Washington University Law School. 2018. 28 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sidorov, A. (2022). Features of the modern protectionism of the US and the EU towards Russia, MGIMO Review of International Relations, 15(4), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.24833/20718160-2022-4-85-81-101 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nwoke U. Imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China: Implications for the WTO and International Trade Law // Journal of International Trade Law and Policy. 2020. Vol. 19 (2). P. 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-01-2019-0003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sinha, A. (2021). Understanding the «Crisis of the Institution» in the liberal trade order at the WTO. International Affairs, 97(5), 1521–1540. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab109</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pan H., Zhu D. The «Manufacturing Reshoring» strategy in the United States and its implications to China // Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance. 2019. Vol. 7 (3). P. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2019.07.03.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Watson, C. (2022). Domestic steel manufacturing: Overview and prospects. Congressional Research Service. 16 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sinha A. Understanding the «Crisis of the Institution» in the liberal trade order at the WTO // International Affairs. 2021. Vol. 97 (5). P. 1521-1540. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab109</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zagashvili, V. (2023). Contradictions and conflicts in the Multilateral Trading System. World Economy and International Relations, 67(9), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-22272023-67-9-5-14 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Watson C. Domestic steel manufacturing: Overview and prospects. Congressional Research Service, 2022. 16 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Zakharov, A. (2018). Prospects for the re-industrialization of developed economies (USA, Canada and Australia), MGIMO Review of International Relations, 1(58), 213–245. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2018-1-58-213-245 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
