RUDN Journal of EconomicsRUDN Journal of EconomicsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика2313-23292408-8986Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)3309210.22363/2313-2329-2022-30-4-602-616INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION MARKETSЭКОНОМИКА ОТРАСЛЕВЫХ РЫНКОВResearch ArticleResearch of the environmental sustainability of enterprises in the oil and gas sector of the Russian economyИсследование экологической устойчивости предприятий нефтегазового сектора российской экономикиhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-9435BaranovaNina M.БарановаНина Михайловна

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor in Economics and National Economy Management, Associate Professor of the Economic and Mathematical Modeling Department, Faculty of Economics

кандидат педагогических наук, доцент по специальности «Экономика и управление народным хозяйством», доцент кафедры экономико-математического моделирования, экономический факультет

baranova_nm@pfur.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-1566LoginovaDaria S.ЛогиноваДарья Сергеевна

Marketing Research analyst, Marketing and Analytics Department

аналитик маркетинговых исследований департамента маркетинга и аналитики

dloginova@eve.restPeoples’ Friendship University of RussiaРоссийский университет дружбы народовSales-House EVERESTТД «Эверест»30122022304NEW TRENDS, STRATEGIES AND STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN THE WORLD ECONOMYНОВЫЕ ТРЕНДЫ, СТРАТЕГИИ И СТРУКТУРНЫЕ ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ В МИРОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИКЕ60261630122022Copyright ©; 2022, Baranova N.M., Loginova D.S.Copyright ©; 2022, Баранова Н.М., Логинова Д.С.2022Baranova N.M., Loginova D.S.Баранова Н.М., Логинова Д.С.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/33092

In 2015, the UN Member States took 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Innovative development and environmental protection played a significant role in them. The solution to this problem directly depends on the environmental programs adopted at the state level, competent management, development of environmental innovations and their introduction. This article considers how sustainable development programs at the oil and gas enterprises are implemented to preserve the environment on the example of PJSC Gazprom. PJSC Gazprom, following the principles of sustainable development, combines economic growth and environment preservation. In 1995, PJSC Gazprom adopted an ecological program and gradually solves the environmental problems of the corporation, country and the world. Therefore, the study of some indicators of oil and gas enterprises affecting Russian environmental ecology, on the example of Gazprom Corporation, is relevant. The proceedings of Russian and foreign scientists were analyzed; UNDP’s annual and environmental reports for 2018-2022 were studied; leading Russian oil and gas companies for 2009-2021 and their environmental activities were analyzed to conduct the study. The calculations were carried out using Rosstat (2009-2021), World Bank (2009-2021), PJSC Gazprom (2009-2021). The regression analysis and econometric modeling were carried out through MS Excel and Eviews 12. The linear and exponential models of the innovative component in the environmental protection system were built and studied. It was proved the linear model can be used to build short-term forecasts, while the exponential model turned out to be untenable. PJSC Gazprom invested 658,284 billion rubles in environmental protection and rational use of natural resources, 139,1 billion rubles in R&D from 2009 to 2021. In 2021, PJSC Gazprom fulfilled all of its innovative and environmental objectives and approved Environmental Program until 2024 with an outlook for 2030. The company’s contribution to the implementation of the UN sustainable development goals and objectives amounted to 89,9 %.

В 2015 г. государствами - членами ООН были приняты 17 Целей устойчивого развития. Значительная роль в них отводилась инновационному развитию и защите окружающей среды. Решение данной проблемы напрямую зависит от экологических программ, принятых на государственном уровне, грамотного менеджмента, развития экологических инноваций и их внедрения. Рассмотрено, как реализуются программы устойчивого развития на предприятиях нефтегазового сектора в области сохранения окружающей среды на примере PJSC Gazprom. PJSC Gazprom, следуя принципам устойчивого развития, в своей деятельности стремится к экономическому росту наряду с сохранением окружающей среды. В 1995 г. PJSC Gazprom принял экологическую программу и постепенно решает экологические проблемы корпорации, страны и мира в целом. Поэтому исследование некоторых показателей предприятий нефтегазового сектора, влияющих на экологию России, на примере корпорации Газпром актуально. Для проведения исследования были проанализированы труды российских и иностранных ученых, изучены годовые и экологические отчеты UNDP за 2018-2022 гг., ведущих российских нефтегазовых компаний за 2009-2021 гг., проанализирована их экологическая деятельность. Расчеты проводились по данным Rosstat (2009-2021), WorldBank (2009-2021), PJSC Gazprom (2009-2021). Регрессионный анализ и эконометрическое моделирование проведено с помощью пакетов прикладных программ MS Excel и Eviews-12. Были построены и исследованы линейная и экспоненциальная модели инновационной составляющей в системе охраны окружающей среды. Доказано, что линейную модель можно использовать для построения краткосрочных прогнозов, экспоненциальная же модель оказалась несостоятельной. За период с 2009 по 2021 г. ПАО «Газпром» инвестировало в охрану окружающей среды и рациональное использование природных ресурсов 658 284 млрд р., в НИОКР - 139,1 млрд р. В 2021 г. ПАО «Газпром» выполнило все свои инновационные и экологические задачи и утвердило экологическую программу развития до 2024 г. с перспективой на 2030 г. Вклад компании в реализацию целей и задач устойчивого развития ООН составил 89,9 %.

oil and gas sectorPJSC GAZPROMinnovativeenvironmentalsustainable developmenteconometric modelingPJSC GAZPROMнефтегазовый секторинновационноеэкологическоеустойчивое развитиеэконометрическое моделированиеThe publication was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant No. 20–010-00169a.Публикация выполнена при поддержке РФФИ, грант № 20-010-00169а.Ackerberg, D.A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2015). Identifi properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83, 2411-2451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13408Antonioli, D., Gilli, M., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2018). Backing environmental innovations through information technology adoption. Empirical analyses of innovation-related complementarity in fi Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1124151Bambi, M., Di Girolami, C., Federico, S., et al. (2017). Generically distributed investments on fl projects and endogenous growth. Econ Theory. 63, 521-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-015-0946-zBamgbade, J.A., Kamaruddeen, A.M., Nawi, M.N.M., Adeleke, A.Q., Salimon, M.G., & Ajibike, W.A. (2019). Analysis of some factors driving ecological sustainability in construction fi J. Cleaner Production, 208, 1537-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.10.229Baranova, N.M., & Loginova, D.S. (2020). Innovative development of enterprises in Russian energy sector to increase country’s competitiveness. In International Scientifi Conference «Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development». EpSBS, 2020; Samara, https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.03.87Baranova, N.M., & Loginova, D.S. (2021). Modeling the innovative component of sustainable development of oil and gas enterprises. The case of PJSC ROSNEFT. In Sustainable Development of Regions 2020. XVI ISPC «State. Politics. Society». Ekaterinburg, Russia, 2020. SHS Web of Conferences, 94, 01020 https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219401020Baranova, N.M., & Sorokin, L.V. (2017). The Role of Research and Development in Sustainable Economic Development. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 13(11), 2035-2048. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.11.2035Cainelli, G., De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2015). Does the development of environmental innovation require diff resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing fi J. Cleaner Production, 94, 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.008Chang, K.H., & Gotcher, D.F. (2020). How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures. International Business Review, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101731Choi, H., & Yi, D. (2018). Environmental innovation inertia: Analyzing the business circumstances for environmental process and product innovations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1623-1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2228Dai, J., Cantor, D., & Montabon, F. (2015). How Environmental Management Competitive Pressure Affects a Focal Firm’s Environmental Innovation Activities: A Green Supply Chain Perspective. J. Business Logistics, 36(3), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12094Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2018). World Happiness Report 2018. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0308-5Heidenreich, S., Spieth, P., & Petschnig, M. (2017). Ready, Steady, Green: Examining the Eff of External Policies to Enhance the Adoption of Eco-Friendly Innovations. J. Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12364Jain, N.K., Panda, A., & Choudhary, P. (2020). Institutional pressures and circular economy performance: The role of environmental management system and organizational fl in oil and gas sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3509-3525. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2593Liao, Z. (2018). Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a fi s environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 849-857. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2036Matyushok, V.M., Balashova, S.A., & Lazanyuk, I.V. (2020). Basics of econometric modeling using Eviews. Moscow: RUDNMityakov, S.N., Mityakova, O.I., Mityakov, E.S., & Alenkova, I.V. (2018). Innovative development of Russian regions: ecological innovations. Innovation, 3(233), 72-78. (In Russ.)Orazalin, N., & Mahmood, M. (2018). Economic, environmental, and social performance indicators of sustainability reporting: Evidence from the Russian oil and gas industry. Energy Policy, 121(6), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.015Rexhäuser, S., & Rammer, C. (2014). Environmental Innovations and Firm Profi Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(1), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9671-xShvarts, E.A., Pakhalov, A.M., & Knizhnikov, A.Y. (2016). Assessment of environmental responsibility of oil and gas companies in Russia: the rating method. J. Cleaner Production, 127, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.021Skordoulis, M., Ntanos, S., Kyriakopoulos, G.L., Arabatzis, G., Galatsidas, S., & Chalikias, M. (2020). Environmental innovation, open innovation dynamics and competitive advantage of medium and large-sized fi J. Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040195Souto, J.E., & Rodriguez, A. (2015). The problems of environmentally involved fi innovation obstacles and essential issues in the achievement of environmental innovation. J. Cleaner Production, 101, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.017Thurner, T., & Proskuryakova, L.N. (2014). Out of the cold - the rising importance of environmental management in the corporate governance of Russian oil and gas producers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(5), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1787Vlasova, V.V., Gokhberg, L.M., Gracheva, G.A. et al. (2022). Indicators of innovation activity 2022: Statistical Compilation. Moscow: HSE NRU (In Russ.)Wooldridge, J.M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, MasonYu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017). Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005