RUDN Journal of EconomicsRUDN Journal of EconomicsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика2313-23292408-8986Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)3130510.22363/2313-2329-2022-30-2-242-252REGIONAL ECONOMYРЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКАResearch ArticleRatings as a way of assessing the effectiveness of smart city policiesРейтинги как способ оценки эффективности политики развития умных городовhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3424-7856TislenkoMaria I.ТисленкоМария Игоревна

аспирант кафедры региональной экономики и географии экономического факультета

tislenko-mi@rudn.ruPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Российский университет дружбы народов26062022302CHALLENGES OF EFFECTIVE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE IN THE POST-COVID ERAПРОБЛЕМЫ ЭФФЕКТИВНОГО ГЛОБАЛЬНОГО УПРАВЛЕНИЯ В ПОСТКОВИДНУЮ ЭПОХУ24225226062022Copyright ©; 2022, Tislenko M.I.Copyright ©; 2022, Тисленко М.И.2022Tislenko M.I.Тисленко М.И.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/31305

The paper provides a comparative analysis of smart city rankings as a tool to assess the effectiveness of measures implemented by the city authorities to digitalize the urban economy. The genesis of the issue of ranking smart cities in the academic literature has been considered, and three international rankings have been selected for comparative analysis. Their comparison shows that those rankings, which are based on a wide selection of cities and statistical indicators, as well as assessments of experts and citizens, are the most effective in assessing the course towards smartization. It has been proven that, at the moment, the most representative is the rating IESE “Cities in Motion”, which, however, does not take into account the qualitative methods of assessing cities. This experience can be used by city and national authorities to implement policies to promote smart cities, including in Russia, where its “IQ index of cities” has been created.

В статье приведен сравнительный анализ рейтингов умных городов как инструмента оценки эффективности реализуемых мер цифровизации городской экономики. Рассмотрен генезис вопроса ранжирования умных городов в академической литературе, для компаративного анализа отобраны три международных рейтинга. Их сравнение показало, что наиболее эффективно позволяют оценить курс на смартизацию те рейтинги, которые опираются на широкую выборку населенных пунктов и статистических показателей, а также оценки экспертов и горожан. Было доказано, что на текущий момент наиболее репрезентативным является рейтинг «Города в движении» испанской бизнес-школы IESE, который, тем не менее, не учитывает качественные методы оценки городов. Данный опыт может быть использован городскими и национальными властями для реализации политики продвижения умных городов, в том числе и в России, где создан свой «индекс IQ городов».

smart citiessmartizationratingsstrategic managementумные городасмартизациярейтингистратегический менеджментAkande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009Дрожжинов В. И. Умные города: модели, инструменты, рэнкинги и стандарты // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2017. Т. 5, № 3. С. 19-48.Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of urban technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092Akande A. et al. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019. Vol. 44. P. 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009Bakici, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. Journal of the knowledge economy, 4(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9Albino V., Berardi U., Dangelico R. M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives // Journal of urban technology. 2015. Vol. 22, no. 1. P. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092Ballman, K. V. (1991). Cost-effectiveness of smart traffic signals (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 285.Bakici T., Almirall E., Wareham J. A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona // Journal of the knowledge economy. 2013. Vol. 4, no. 2. P. 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-0120084-9Batten, J., & Edwards, C. (2016). Sustainable Cities Index — 2015. Balancing the economic, social and environmental needs of the world’s leading cities. 21.Ballman K. V. Cost-effectiveness of smart traffic signals: Diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1991. P. 285.Blanco, H. (2018). Livable Cities: From Concept to Global Experience. In Livable Cities From a Global Perspective (pp. 1–13). Routledge.Batten J., Edwards C. Sustainable Cities Index - 2015. Balancing the economic, social and environmental needs of the world’s leading cities. 2016. P. 21.Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., Ariccio, S., Cancellieri, U. G., & Rahimi, L. (2015). Perceived residential environment quality indicators (PREQIs) relevance for UN-HABITAT city prosperity index (CPI). Habitat International, 45, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.015 Drozhzhinov, V. I., Kupriyanovskij, V. P., Namiot, D. E., Sinyagov, S. A., & Haritonov, A. A. (2017). Smart Cities: models, instruments, rankings and standards. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 5(3), 19–48. (In Russ.)Blanco H. Livable Cities: From Concept to Global Experience // Livable Cities From a Global Perspective. Routledge, 2018. P. 1-13.Gibson, D. V., Kozmetsky, G., & Smilor, R. W. (1992). The technopolis phenomenon: Smart cities, fast systems, global networks. Rowman & Littlefield. 216.Bonaiuto M. et al. Perceived residential environment quality indicators (PREQIs) relevance for UN-HABITAT city prosperity index (CPI) // Habitat International. 2015. Vol. 45. P. 53-63. https://10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.015Goddard, N. D. R., Kemp, R. M. J., & Lane, R. (1997). An overview of smart technology. Packaging Technology and Science: An International Journal, 10(3), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(19970501/30)10:3<129::AID-PTS393>3.0.CO;2-CGibson D. V., Kozmetsky G., Smilor R. W. The technopolis phenomenon: Smart cities, fast systems, global networks. Rowman & Littlefield, 1992. P. 216.Gupta, A. D., Pandey, P., Feijóo, A., Yaseen, Z. M., & Bokde, N. D. (2020). Smart water technology for efficient water resource management: A review. Energies, 13(23), 62–68. https:// doi.org/10.3390/en13236268Goddard N. D. R., Kemp R. M. J., & Lane R. An overview of smart technology // Packaging Technology and Science: An International Journal. 1997. Vol. 10, no. 3. P. 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(19970501/30)10:3<129::AID-PTS393>3.0.CO;2-CHall, R. E., Bowerman, B., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., & Von Wimmersperg, U. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (US), 1–7.Gupta A. D. Smart water technology for efficient water resource management: A review // Energies. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 23. P. 62-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236268Ichikawa, H., Yamato, N., & Dustan, P. (2017). Competitiveness of global cities from the perspective of the global power city index. Procedia engineering, 198, 736–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.125Hall R. E. The Vision of a Smart City // Proc. of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop. Paris, France, 2000. P. 1-7.Khalil, H. A. E. E. (2012). Enhancing quality of life through strategic urban planning. Sustainable cities and society, 5, 77–86.Ichikawa H., Yamato N., & Dustan P. Competitiveness of global cities from the perspective of the global power city index // Procedia engineering. 2017. Vol. 198. P. 736-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.125Luterek, M. (2019). Smart Cities and Citizen Orientation: The Growing Importance of “Smart People” in Developing Modern Cities. EMCIS, 381, 209–222.Khalil H. A. E. E. Enhancing quality of life through strategic urban planning // Sustainable cities and society. 2012. Vol. 5. P. 77-86.Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2020). A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions. Geoforum, 117, 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008Luterek M. Smart Cities and Citizen Orientation: The Growing Importance of ”Smart People” in Developing Modern Cities // EMCIS. 2019. Vol. 381. P. 209-222.Reshetnikova, M. S., Vasilieva, G. А., & Tretyakova, S. S. (2021). China’s place in the global smart city market. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.11.4.113971Paul A., Sen J. A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions // Geoforum. 2020. Vol. 117. P. 90-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008Skeledzija, N. (2014). Smart home automation system for energy efficient housing. 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE, 540–544.Решетникова М. С., Васильева Г. А., Третьякова С. С. Место Китая на мировом рынке «умных городов» // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2021. T. 11, № 4. С. 1997- 2018. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.11.4.113971Skeledzija N. et al. Smart home automation system for energy efficient housing // 2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE. 2014. P. 166-171.